Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us »
10:20am Thursday 7th October 2010 in Health By James Calnan
A GREENSTEAD man who is slowly dying from asbestos poisoning is fighting for money to fund treatment which might help him live longer.
David Mahoney, 50, says his life has been “destroyed” since he began to feel the effects of the mesothelioma he contracted as a roofer on a Colchester building site in 1976.
The father-of-five has been suffering from the rare form of cancer for four years and believes he now has only months to live.
A High Court judge has ordered the company handling claims against his employer’s insurer to make an interim £50,000 payment, but the company has refused, pending a series of court hearings which could take 18 months or even two years.
The company insists it is not liable because his mesothelioma only became apparent after his employer’s original insurance company folded.
Mr Mahoney, who has 11 grandchildren, says he used to love boxing, weightlifting and playing football.
He added: “I’m destroyed. It’s a horrible disease and once you’ve got it, there’s no turning back.
“The hardest part is missing the grandchildren growing up.
“Until I got this, I didn’t even have a doctor’s record. I used to be able to run ten miles without even thinking about it. Now I have no control over my life any more.”
Mr Mahoney and wife, Angela, were forced to move into a council flat in Scarfe Way, after their own three-bedroom house in nearby Stevens Walk was repossessed when he became too ill to work.
He has worked occasional days for communications firm, CCL UK, on the Whitehall Industrial Estate, in Colchester, and says boss Steve Wakefield has helped him through some tough times.
Mr Mahoney would like the chance to prolong his life by travelling to a hospital in Frankfurt for a course of injections which are not available on the NHS.
They would cost at least £30,000, which he cannot afford without the interim payment.
Mr Mahoney urged other people affected by asbestos to stand up to insurers which refused to pay out. He added: “I want to make other people aware of it.
“Through no fault of my own, I got this, just by going to work.
“All I’m doing now is fighting to get as much money as I can for my wife and kids and get other people to stand their ground.”
A COURT of Appeal decision on Friday might give asbestos victim David Mahoney the money he desperately needs to pay for his treatment.
But his lawyer, John Green, of Manchester-based WE Solicitors, fears even if the court finds in his favour, a further appeal to the Supreme Court could prevent him getting the money in time.
Mr Mahoney started as a roofer when he left Stanway School, in 1976, working for a now-defunct builder called Myton on the British Home Stores building in Colchester town centre.
At one point in the 18 months he worked there, he is thought to have inhaled tiny asbestos particles, though it wasn’t until 2006 he showed any symptoms. After weeks of pain, he collapsed at work.
A series of tests and operations followed, before he was diagnosed with mesothelioma on October 15 last year.
Although outwardly healthy, the cancer on his left lung means he tires very quickly. He said: “If I walk to the car park, that’s me finished.”
Myton’s insurer, Builders Accident Insurance, should have been liable, but it folded in the Nineties.
A company called BAI Claims Services was set up to handle claims against Builders Accident Insurance.
Mr Mahoney’s lawyer said BAI did not accept his claim because his mesothelioma developed after the Builders Accident Insurance policy had expired.
A High Court judge has already ruled this was not a valid excuse and ordered the company to hand over £50,000 by August 20. BAI immediately appealed against this ruling, refusing to pay until judges rule again this Friday.
However, even if Mr Mahoney wins this week, an appeal to the Supreme Court could further delay a payout.
Mr Green described Mr Mahoney’s plight as “awful”.
He said: “The client is left with nothing and we have no legal redress, but to wait until this ‘trigger’ issue is finally resolved.
“We’re looking at 18 months to two years after Friday’s decision.”
John Goodwin of BAI, declined to comment on the case, ahead of Friday’s hearing. He added: “We are, of course, concerned cases like Mr Mahoney’s are still not resolved, and are anxious for them to be resolved as soon as possible.”
Comments(20)
Ex-Colcestrian
says...
8:33pm Thu 7 Oct 10
Anna Key
says...
9:26pm Thu 7 Oct 10
Shadow Demon
says...
9:30am Fri 8 Oct 10
Anna Key wrote:Yes because you Anna as you have told us on many occasions as a low paid blue collar worker probably know more about the insurance industry than someone with 25 years experience.
Red Tape's spot-on, ex-Colcestrian is just trying to blind us with myth. Talk of 'shareholders' always tries to perpetuate the myth of the Thatcherite share-holding democracy. The fact is the massive majority of shares are owned by other financial institutions. There only interest is profit, profit for a very small elite that owns and controls the world. And it was of course this pursuit of profit over people that saw the use of asbestos long after its dangers were well known. These are the crimes for which no capitalist has ever been brought to justice.
Poacher
says...
1:43pm Fri 8 Oct 10
Boris
says...
2:26pm Fri 8 Oct 10
Sdapeze
says...
4:22pm Fri 8 Oct 10
Red Tape
says...
5:25pm Fri 8 Oct 10
Anna Key
says...
11:42am Sat 9 Oct 10
Boris wrote:One solution - Revolution!
Anna, normally i agree with you on everything, but you are being too simplistic here. Just as you wouldn't expect a greengrocer to give you a kilo of apples if he didn't believe you had paid for them, you can't expect an insurer to pay out on a policy which it believes has expired.
Mr Mahoney is one of a number of patients involved in a test case, it is in the national news. The argument is over whether the claims should date from when the patients were exposed to asbestos fibres, or from when the symptoms appeared, many years later.
It is reasonable that these things are sorted out in court at the highest level, but what is not reasonable is that patients like Mr Mahoney are unlikely to be alive by the time matters are resolved.
Regardless of how the cuts affect other areas of public life, the government should pay up now for patients like Mr Mahoney, and then collect from the insurers if the judgement goes against them.
Anna Key
says...
11:43am Sat 9 Oct 10
Boris
says...
12:35am Mon 11 Oct 10
Anna Key
says...
7:03pm Mon 11 Oct 10
South colchester resident
says...
10:45pm Mon 11 Oct 10
Boris
says...
2:05am Tue 12 Oct 10
TheTruthMan
says...
10:15am Tue 12 Oct 10
Anna Key
says...
6:10pm Tue 12 Oct 10
Boris
says...
9:21pm Tue 12 Oct 10
South colchester resident
says...
10:30pm Tue 12 Oct 10
Boris wrote:Fair comment. All I will say on this one is that I find on reading this site that whatever the subject (in this case a man who deserves respect and sympathy) Anna Key and his/her followers usually find a way to turn the subject round to some sort of anti-establishment political rant which bores me. Rant over!
Anna does occasionally bang on a bit but I would say she is the best thing that has happened to this web site for a long time. She has raised the level of debate considerably. Thanks Anna, you are a star. And South Colchester Resident, you don't have to read Anna's stuff if you don't want to. I don't like soap operas on TV, but I don't complain about them, for I know that a lot of people like them. So if you see stuff that you don't like, either have a go at it, or ignore it.
TheTruthMan
says...
2:19pm Wed 13 Oct 10
Shadow-hill
says...
2:50pm Wed 13 Oct 10
Search for hundreds of jobs in Essex and beyond
Search Now »
Bring love into your life! Find a date in Essex
Search Now »
Homes for sale, and to let, in Essex
Search Now »
New and used cars in Essex and across the UK
Search Now »
Red Tape says...
2:30pm Thu 7 Oct 10