News RSS Feed


Council is facing traveller payout

1:32pm Friday 25th April 2008

comment Comments (13)   Have your say »

By Jon Austin »

FURIOUS council bosses could be left thousands of pounds out of pocket after being told to compensate travellers for publishing their personal details online.

Watchdog, the Local Government Ombudsman, says Basildon Council should pay at least £300 to each person who made an official complaint.

Travellers are now set to make even more complaints following the ruling.

But the council is adamant it won't pay out.

Council leader Malcolm Buckley, said: "We are not obliged to adhere to ombudsman recommendations and will not be paying. The travellers asked for £3,000 each.

"The details were published in good faith.

"Travellers wanted councillors to weigh their individual circumstances against green belt policy.

"This meant members needed that information."

Mr Buckley said the procedure had since been changed, with personal details now only disclosed in private.

He added: "This has attracted complaints from some travellers, who are now unable to watch proceedings, so we are in a difficult position.

"We will write to the travellers to apologise and explain our stance.

"The ombudsman is likely to publish a public notice critical of the council."

The council published personal details of almost 100 travellers - including children's names, health problems, addresses and benefits payments - in a development control committee agenda.

It was done ahead of eviction votes for the Hovefields site, Wickford, and Dale Farm, Crays Hill, in the summer 2005.

The public document, which was also posted on its website, led to the Echo's exclusive Dole Farm story, which revealed most people at the sites were on handouts. Five families from Hovefields complained to the ombudsman, aided by the Childrens' Legal Service.

The council's appointments appeals and general purposes committee has considered the ruling and voted against paying up.

Grattan Puxon, who launched the complaint, said court action may follow if the council refuses to pay.

He said: "These were test cases. There were about 100 people affected across both sites, and they are now all likely to make complaints.

"I would have expected more than £300 each, which individually would not be a lot.

"But if all the complaints are successful it would add up to quite a lot."

RATE THIS:

  • the percentage to the left is the actual score
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Your Say YourEcho

Your sayYourEcho

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Your Say YourEcho

Harry, Basildon says...
1:39pm Fri 25 Apr 08

I cannot express how angry I am at this!! Will these travellers stop at nothing to avoid being evicted. They are always right and the council is always wrong. Get tough Basildon Council, they are only here because you are soft!!

Vernon, Basildon says...
1:47pm Fri 25 Apr 08

The information is on the council planning public access website! So whats the problem?If however the council have unfairly compromised the privacy of the residents, then of course they should pay up.At best the council looks churlish, at worst they look vindictive.

Seen it, says...
2:17pm Fri 25 Apr 08

Here we go again with Buckley...

"We are not obliged to adhere to ombudsman recommendations..."

and then:

"Mr Buckley said the procedure had since been changed, with personal details now only disclosed in private"

So, why change it Malcolm?


Sue, says...
6:16pm Fri 25 Apr 08

Does anyone know when the judicial review findings will be released?

I think I read somewhere "after Easter"
it well after that now


mike b, Billericay says...
6:27pm Fri 25 Apr 08

Sue wrote:
Does anyone know when the judicial review findings will be released? I think I read somewhere "after Easter" it well after that now
Yes,the Judge did say after Easter,which was a bit vague ; my guess it will now be after the local council elections.

evilc, essex says...
7:04am Sat 26 Apr 08

How Terrible!!

Perhaps their photgraphs should also be displayed then the elderly would be able to recognise them as the doorstep conmen!!

Biffo123, Wickford says...
7:53am Sat 26 Apr 08

Why bother writing to them? They can't read.

Andrew, Shoeburyness says...
4:03pm Sat 26 Apr 08

Well they do need the money, being cash rich, slave owning millionaires isn't all its cracked up to be. A million these days doesn't go half as far as it used to.

See the poor dears pouring their hearts out here: http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=3JAyI-oB5
dc

Kim Gandy, Rayleigh says...
7:37am Sun 27 Apr 08

Sue wrote:
Does anyone know when the judicial review findings will be released? I think I read somewhere "after Easter" it well after that now
Don't hold your breath.
And the likelihood of them ever being moved is about as much a possibility as finding the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.

Kim Gandy, Rayleigh says...
9:05am Sun 27 Apr 08

Biffo123 wrote:
Why bother writing to them? They can't read.
They can read when it suits....

and where it isn't penetrating, they simply get one of the do gooders to interpret it for them.

They know their "human rights" back to front, courtesy of the aforementioned do gooders, who reiterate it to them very often.

I think the only way to solve this is to get rid of the do gooders first. They are a safety net and once removed, the law can then be seen to be done.

Forget the travellers. The Bleeding Hearts are by far the worst scourge on this country because it is they who are always ramming the rights of minorities down our throats.

Trouble is, the really deserving minorities are the ones who are ignored, e.g. pensioners.

do shut up for crying out loud, says...
8:37am Mon 28 Apr 08

Do gooders
Do gooders
Do gooders
Do gooders
Do gooders
Do gooders
Do gooders


Kim you are soooooooo boring

The only person RAMMING things down peoples throats is YOU

manmythlegend, Pitsea says...
5:38pm Mon 28 Apr 08

Hey previous poster, don't like Kim's comments, don't read then then you ****! I do not agree with all comments but unless you have a discussion to make back, don't bother telling people to shut up

ANL, north of watford says...
8:25pm Sun 4 May 08

This is the second time that a Council has identified that it will go against a Local Government Ombudsman decision recently.

There is considerable judicial authority that a LGO decision is binding. The other case is Trafford involving a disabled girl..

Roma, disabled.. sounds sort of familar... all that is needed are a few yellow stars.. and basildon will be there..

Your sayYourEcho

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Hot Jobs

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Sponsored Adverts