Hospice supports Dry Street building plans

ST LUKE’S Hospice could be forced to close its Nethermayne site if controversial plans to build 725 homes at Dry Street do not get the go ahead.

Proposals to build a village across the wildlife haven plus neighbouring South Essex College site are facing mounting public opposition.

However, it has now been finalised that the hospice, which will also border the development including shops and a primary school, will benefit from a donation of two-acres of land if approved.

Eileen Marshall, chief executive of the hospice explained why the land, which it is currently allowed to use as a parking area, was vital to its future.

She said: “The Hospice is in negotiations to secure our position at Nethermayne. Our existing accommodation is very cramped and is now severely hindering service delivery and expansion.

Without an opportunity to expand to support our services, our position would become untenable.

We therefore see these discussions as essential to safeguarding our position in Basildon.”

If the deal goes through the hospice would be expanded and it could potentially provide additional beds with revamped therapy facilities, some of which are currently housed in temporary buildings.

The expansion would also secure the hospice its own additional, permanent car parking area and access will be improved.

The plans involve the college, Basildon Council, and the Homes and Communities Agency.

The development will fund a new £35million college campus on the site of Basildon Market, so the existing college site can be developed.

There is opposition as Dry Street itself is an Essex wildlife site and home to rare plans and animals plus the Longwood Equestrian Centre will also have to be relocated.

Mike Goulding from the agency said: “We've been working closely with staff at St. Luke’s to ensure that the provision of this hugely valuable service to residents of Basildon and Thurrock is protected and enhanced in line with the Hospice’s needs and aspirations.

We hope that the additional land will enable them to meet their expansion objectives and safeguard the facility’s future on this site.”

Basildon Lib Dem group leader said: “Basildon Lib Dem group leader Geoff Williams opposes the development of Dry Street.
 

He said: “This seems as they they are trying to put their case together before the decision next month. However, the bottom line is it would be possible for the two acres of land to be handed over to St Luke’s even if the whole development does not go ahead.”
 

Separately the hospice also applied for planning permission last week for two-storey day therapy annexe and has also applied for Government funding to do the work. The Dry Street planning application will be considered by councillors next month.

Comments (13)

3:17pm Fri 18 Jan 13

GrumpyofLeigh says...

Call me an old cynic but has the hospice been brought into this by the developers to add a bit of emotional leverage to their case?
Call me an old cynic but has the hospice been brought into this by the developers to add a bit of emotional leverage to their case? GrumpyofLeigh

3:30pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Eric Whim says...

GrumpyofLeigh wrote:
Call me an old cynic but has the hospice been brought into this by the developers to add a bit of emotional leverage to their case?
nothing like a bit of emotional blackmail eh?
[quote][p][bold]GrumpyofLeigh[/bold] wrote: Call me an old cynic but has the hospice been brought into this by the developers to add a bit of emotional leverage to their case?[/p][/quote]nothing like a bit of emotional blackmail eh? Eric Whim

3:42pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Discouraged says...

How freaking manipulative "Let us build houses or the dying will suffer" UNREAL
How freaking manipulative "Let us build houses or the dying will suffer" UNREAL Discouraged

3:45pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Eric Whim says...

Discouraged wrote:
How freaking manipulative "Let us build houses or the dying will suffer" UNREAL
let them build the houses near the town centre rather than uproot the college and relocate it there....
[quote][p][bold]Discouraged[/bold] wrote: How freaking manipulative "Let us build houses or the dying will suffer" UNREAL[/p][/quote]let them build the houses near the town centre rather than uproot the college and relocate it there.... Eric Whim

4:26pm Fri 18 Jan 13

QuiteBored says...

Manipulative and greedy. They can build in the center of town, not on greenbelt fields.

St Lukes image is now of a selfish perhaps bribed "charity" sticking its nose in where it does not involve them.

I suggest the council cancels all plans of building on that protected area.
Manipulative and greedy. They can build in the center of town, not on greenbelt fields. St Lukes image is now of a selfish perhaps bribed "charity" sticking its nose in where it does not involve them. I suggest the council cancels all plans of building on that protected area. QuiteBored

4:39pm Fri 18 Jan 13

leslog says...

what a con bringing the hospice into the argument what sort of people are they to restrict any further land for hospice use if they do not get there way ,with development in dry street ,its wrong and leaves a very bad taste ,say no to building plans for dry street say yes for hospice expansion
what a con bringing the hospice into the argument what sort of people are they to restrict any further land for hospice use if they do not get there way ,with development in dry street ,its wrong and leaves a very bad taste ,say no to building plans for dry street say yes for hospice expansion leslog

4:53pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Eric Whim says...

lets not forget all this when it comes time to vote in council elections
lets not forget all this when it comes time to vote in council elections Eric Whim

6:20pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Devils Advocate says...

The Council receive a bonus for every house built. Basildon is the area they choose to earn those bonuses, but are the bonuses then invested only in the areas adversely affected by the building? Of course not!
The area councillors agree to the building of a possibly dangerous waste disposal unit in the town. will the outlying towns suffer if there is a Bhopal type accident? I certainly hope so!
The Council receive a bonus for every house built. Basildon is the area they choose to earn those bonuses, but are the bonuses then invested only in the areas adversely affected by the building? Of course not! The area councillors agree to the building of a possibly dangerous waste disposal unit in the town. will the outlying towns suffer if there is a Bhopal type accident? I certainly hope so! Devils Advocate

1:39pm Sat 19 Jan 13

A.N.Other says...

There is more emotional blackmail to do with hospices to come.

Near Langdon Hills Golf club near Horndon on the Hill they want to build a hospice on green belt land next to a golf club but the donation to build the hospice will only come if the landowner can build a development of luxury homes!

The various hospices in this are are using emotional black mail more and more to try and force councils to agree to developing green belt land.
There is more emotional blackmail to do with hospices to come. Near Langdon Hills Golf club near Horndon on the Hill they want to build a hospice on green belt land next to a golf club but the donation to build the hospice will only come if the landowner can build a development of luxury homes! The various hospices in this are are using emotional black mail more and more to try and force councils to agree to developing green belt land. A.N.Other

2:35pm Sat 19 Jan 13

leslog says...

with more people developing cancer hospices are needed,we know homes are needed also, but not on greenbelt land every blade of grass Basildon council seem to be building on ,locals object but are ignored ,people moved here from London because of the green spaces around the homes which was an escape from concrete London,now more and more this is being taken over ,hospices as a charity require expansion ,to accommodate the ill and dying, but that does not require homes to be built on what is left of the green spaces and green belt land
with more people developing cancer hospices are needed,we know homes are needed also, but not on greenbelt land every blade of grass Basildon council seem to be building on ,locals object but are ignored ,people moved here from London because of the green spaces around the homes which was an escape from concrete London,now more and more this is being taken over ,hospices as a charity require expansion ,to accommodate the ill and dying, but that does not require homes to be built on what is left of the green spaces and green belt land leslog

5:56pm Sat 19 Jan 13

Devils Advocate says...

leslog wrote:
with more people developing cancer hospices are needed,we know homes are needed also, but not on greenbelt land every blade of grass Basildon council seem to be building on ,locals object but are ignored ,people moved here from London because of the green spaces around the homes which was an escape from concrete London,now more and more this is being taken over ,hospices as a charity require expansion ,to accommodate the ill and dying, but that does not require homes to be built on what is left of the green spaces and green belt land
Totally agree with this, and the fact that Our MP's choose to ignore us if we ask why. Thought that representing us was their job. Something about democracy?
[quote][p][bold]leslog[/bold] wrote: with more people developing cancer hospices are needed,we know homes are needed also, but not on greenbelt land every blade of grass Basildon council seem to be building on ,locals object but are ignored ,people moved here from London because of the green spaces around the homes which was an escape from concrete London,now more and more this is being taken over ,hospices as a charity require expansion ,to accommodate the ill and dying, but that does not require homes to be built on what is left of the green spaces and green belt land[/p][/quote]Totally agree with this, and the fact that Our MP's choose to ignore us if we ask why. Thought that representing us was their job. Something about democracy? Devils Advocate

8:29pm Sat 19 Jan 13

Trainman says...

LEAVE DRY STREET AS IT IS, AND AN AREA OF OUTSTANDING BEAUTY.

They should have used the land where Laindon High Road School once stood first.
LEAVE DRY STREET AS IT IS, AND AN AREA OF OUTSTANDING BEAUTY. They should have used the land where Laindon High Road School once stood first. Trainman

10:37am Sun 20 Jan 13

Eric Whim says...

Trainman wrote:
LEAVE DRY STREET AS IT IS, AND AN AREA OF OUTSTANDING BEAUTY.

They should have used the land where Laindon High Road School once stood first.
they already have used that area (and expanded beyond the footprint of the school grounds too) , it's covered with new housing.

Please keep up to date
[quote][p][bold]Trainman[/bold] wrote: LEAVE DRY STREET AS IT IS, AND AN AREA OF OUTSTANDING BEAUTY. They should have used the land where Laindon High Road School once stood first.[/p][/quote]they already have used that area (and expanded beyond the footprint of the school grounds too) , it's covered with new housing. Please keep up to date Eric Whim

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree