Long-dormant town square cafe may finally open

11:30am Monday 18th March 2013 in News By David Trayner

Councillor Andrew Moring outside the kiosk Councillor Andrew Moring outside the kiosk

A CAFE that lay empty for most of the two years since it was built may finally be open in time for summer.

Southend Council is considering offers from several people who want to take over Warrior Square Gardens Kiosk, which has been open for just five of the 22 months since its completion.

The kiosk opened as a cafe and takeaway selling sandwiches and hot drinks between May and October last year, but problems with the roof and ventilation system have prevented it ever opening permanently.

Andrew Moring, Tory councillor responsible for property, said: “We were disappointed about the shaky start with the first tenant.

“We are delighted that so many people have shown interest and look forward to working with them to select the best tenant for the town.

“It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of tourists, workers on lunch breaks and shoppers taking a break picnicking in the sun.”

The council refused to reveal how many people are in the running as it carries out pre-contract negotiations, but it received “a number” of expressions of interest before the deadline at the end of February.

Comments (29)

11:47am Mon 18 Mar 13

Saxonpride says...

I'll believe it when I see it.
I'll believe it when I see it. Saxonpride

11:53am Mon 18 Mar 13

perini says...

“It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of tourists, workers on lunch breaks and shoppers taking a break picnicking in the sun.”

Summer on it's way - really! Only if you count scraping half an inch of ice from the windscreen typical summer weather I suppose!
“It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of tourists, workers on lunch breaks and shoppers taking a break picnicking in the sun.” Summer on it's way - really! Only if you count scraping half an inch of ice from the windscreen typical summer weather I suppose! perini

12:00pm Mon 18 Mar 13

jayman says...

I thought this 'thing' was supposed to win design awards, take this kiosk as an example and apply it to ever future council proposal and capital spending scheme and consider how the council is burning 'your' money on their (or their friends) unworkable and unrealistic ideas...
I thought this 'thing' was supposed to win design awards, take this kiosk as an example and apply it to ever future council proposal and capital spending scheme and consider how the council is burning 'your' money on their (or their friends) unworkable and unrealistic ideas... jayman

12:06pm Mon 18 Mar 13

jayman says...

It looks like irregular slabs of glass that have been stuck together with black gaffer tape. how many MILLIONS where wasted on this project...
It looks like irregular slabs of glass that have been stuck together with black gaffer tape. how many MILLIONS where wasted on this project... jayman

12:15pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Soouthchurch59 says...

'TO LET'

Who stole the 'I'.... !?
'TO LET' Who stole the 'I'.... !? Soouthchurch59

12:29pm Mon 18 Mar 13

westcliffboy says...

Err, this is the cafe that cost a fortune - OUR MONEY btw, not the Council's. The opening petal roof doesn't and never will work, and the original tenant was a Chinese takeaway, who stored boxes in there as the place was unusable.

So, Cllr Moring. Have you: sought to reclaim costs from the original architect and manufacturer? Have you investigated the officers who passed this as fit for purpose? We should be told!
Err, this is the cafe that cost a fortune - OUR MONEY btw, not the Council's. The opening petal roof doesn't and never will work, and the original tenant was a Chinese takeaway, who stored boxes in there as the place was unusable. So, Cllr Moring. Have you: sought to reclaim costs from the original architect and manufacturer? Have you investigated the officers who passed this as fit for purpose? We should be told! westcliffboy

12:37pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Cosmo Spring says...

another coffee shop?
another coffee shop? Cosmo Spring

1:05pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Not A Native says...

"The council refused to reveal how many people are in the running as it carries out pre-contract negotiations, but it received “a number” of expressions of interest before the deadline at the end of February."

A number? Why can't they say how many? Zero is a number, and not an unlikely one in this case.
"The council refused to reveal how many people are in the running as it carries out pre-contract negotiations, but it received “a number” of expressions of interest before the deadline at the end of February." A number? Why can't they say how many? Zero is a number, and not an unlikely one in this case. Not A Native

1:23pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd says...

Wonder how many affordable homes couldve been constructed instead of this embarassment of a botched greenhouse.

It's completely not fit for purpose (that goes for the Council aswell!)

Another day, another Southend Council FAIL!

Wonder what tomorrows epic fail from the council will be?

Can anyone remember anything in recent history that the council was involved in that wasnt a failure?
Wonder how many affordable homes couldve been constructed instead of this embarassment of a botched greenhouse. It's completely not fit for purpose (that goes for the Council aswell!) Another day, another Southend Council FAIL! Wonder what tomorrows epic fail from the council will be? Can anyone remember anything in recent history that the council was involved in that wasnt a failure? Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd

1:31pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Nebs says...

It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of drunks, drug dealers peddling their wares, and Londons homeless who need somewhere to sleep.

Convert it into an enormous grit bin, in readiness for next winter.
It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of drunks, drug dealers peddling their wares, and Londons homeless who need somewhere to sleep. Convert it into an enormous grit bin, in readiness for next winter. Nebs

1:40pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Derek_Christmas says...

jayman wrote:
It looks like irregular slabs of glass that have been stuck together with black gaffer tape. how many MILLIONS where wasted on this project...
I heard it cost £400 thousand!
[quote][p][bold]jayman[/bold] wrote: It looks like irregular slabs of glass that have been stuck together with black gaffer tape. how many MILLIONS where wasted on this project...[/p][/quote]I heard it cost £400 thousand! Derek_Christmas

1:48pm Mon 18 Mar 13

mys842 says...

by the looks of the picture it's envelopped in fog! not very summery looking to me. I also doubt it will be full of tourists - they come for adventure island and the seafront, not Warrior Square. Play on the benefits of the area - i.e. it's an ideal place for town workers to eat their lunch. A sandwich shop / ice cream parlour would make good sense.
by the looks of the picture it's envelopped in fog! not very summery looking to me. I also doubt it will be full of tourists - they come for adventure island and the seafront, not Warrior Square. Play on the benefits of the area - i.e. it's an ideal place for town workers to eat their lunch. A sandwich shop / ice cream parlour would make good sense. mys842

1:48pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Saxonpride says...

Nebs wrote:
It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of drunks, drug dealers peddling their wares, and Londons homeless who need somewhere to sleep.

Convert it into an enormous grit bin, in readiness for next winter.
I've long thought they needed a permanent police patrol in the area to finally stamp out the hideous trend of sexual assaults that seem to take place in and around Warrior Square.

There it is, a lovely green area, a place where families should be picnicking and dogs should be chasing frisbees and whatnot, and yet people still know it as 'Rape Square'.

I had hoped that the revamp would improve the situation, but lo and behold, upon walking home from work last year, it was taped off, there were cops everywhere and another foul perversion had been committed.

To be frank, the situation is intolerable.
It is a nice area in the heart of our commercial district. We cannot allow either drug dealers or the homeless or sexual predators to sully it.
[quote][p][bold]Nebs[/bold] wrote: It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of drunks, drug dealers peddling their wares, and Londons homeless who need somewhere to sleep. Convert it into an enormous grit bin, in readiness for next winter.[/p][/quote]I've long thought they needed a permanent police patrol in the area to finally stamp out the hideous trend of sexual assaults that seem to take place in and around Warrior Square. There it is, a lovely green area, a place where families should be picnicking and dogs should be chasing frisbees and whatnot, and yet people still know it as 'Rape Square'. I had hoped that the revamp would improve the situation, but lo and behold, upon walking home from work last year, it was taped off, there were cops everywhere and another foul perversion had been committed. To be frank, the situation is intolerable. It is a nice area in the heart of our commercial district. We cannot allow either drug dealers or the homeless or sexual predators to sully it. Saxonpride

3:20pm Mon 18 Mar 13

emcee says...

Quote Cllr Moring: “It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of tourists, workers on lunch breaks and shoppers taking a break picnicking in the sun.”
-
...and the award for sickening optomism goes to...
Before the council start to rub their hands with glee they need to hang their heads in shame. Firstly to allow so much money to be spent on this building in the first place, money that will take forever to recoup from rents. Secondly to allow the architect, constructors and council officers who passed the finished building as complete and fit for use, to get away with providing a facility that is NOT what was paid for. Why have these people not been held to account and, in the case of constuctors/architec
ts, not been fined and refunds obtained for shoddy design/workmanship?
Quote Cllr Moring: “It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of tourists, workers on lunch breaks and shoppers taking a break picnicking in the sun.” - ...and the award for sickening optomism goes to... Before the council start to rub their hands with glee they need to hang their heads in shame. Firstly to allow so much money to be spent on this building in the first place, money that will take forever to recoup from rents. Secondly to allow the architect, constructors and council officers who passed the finished building as complete and fit for use, to get away with providing a facility that is NOT what was paid for. Why have these people not been held to account and, in the case of constuctors/architec ts, not been fined and refunds obtained for shoddy design/workmanship? emcee

3:46pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd says...

Do you know, if my euro millions numbers come up tomorrow, i'd make the council an offer they couldnt refuse and then bulldoze it and provide a classy brick built pavillion overlooking the square for the boroughs residents (Cabinet members excluded) to use and be proud of.

Whats the betting this would come in at under half what the council spent on that ridiculous wonky greenhouse.
Do you know, if my euro millions numbers come up tomorrow, i'd make the council an offer they couldnt refuse and then bulldoze it and provide a classy brick built pavillion overlooking the square for the boroughs residents (Cabinet members excluded) to use and be proud of. Whats the betting this would come in at under half what the council spent on that ridiculous wonky greenhouse. Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd

5:20pm Mon 18 Mar 13

jaguarxxv says...

Warrior Square is yet another missed opportunity, it could have been turned into a proper town square, instead of the deserted patch of grass that it is.
Warrior Square is yet another missed opportunity, it could have been turned into a proper town square, instead of the deserted patch of grass that it is. jaguarxxv

7:06pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Joe Wildman-Clark says...

It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme.

Why don't people check thie facts first before posting?

Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so?

http://www.southendt
imeline.com/warriors
quaregardens.htm
It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme. Why don't people check thie facts first before posting? Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so? http://www.southendt imeline.com/warriors quaregardens.htm Joe Wildman-Clark

9:49pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Broadwaywatch says...

emcee wrote:
Quote Cllr Moring: “It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of tourists, workers on lunch breaks and shoppers taking a break picnicking in the sun.”
-
...and the award for sickening optomism goes to...
Before the council start to rub their hands with glee they need to hang their heads in shame. Firstly to allow so much money to be spent on this building in the first place, money that will take forever to recoup from rents. Secondly to allow the architect, constructors and council officers who passed the finished building as complete and fit for use, to get away with providing a facility that is NOT what was paid for. Why have these people not been held to account and, in the case of constuctors/architec

ts, not been fined and refunds obtained for shoddy design/workmanship?
Cllr Moring .........where did he pop up from. Never heard of him before this. Yet another one with his head it the clouds it would seem.
[quote][p][bold]emcee[/bold] wrote: Quote Cllr Moring: “It’s fortuitous that summer seems to finally be on its way and we can see Warrior Square being full of tourists, workers on lunch breaks and shoppers taking a break picnicking in the sun.” - ...and the award for sickening optomism goes to... Before the council start to rub their hands with glee they need to hang their heads in shame. Firstly to allow so much money to be spent on this building in the first place, money that will take forever to recoup from rents. Secondly to allow the architect, constructors and council officers who passed the finished building as complete and fit for use, to get away with providing a facility that is NOT what was paid for. Why have these people not been held to account and, in the case of constuctors/architec ts, not been fined and refunds obtained for shoddy design/workmanship?[/p][/quote]Cllr Moring .........where did he pop up from. Never heard of him before this. Yet another one with his head it the clouds it would seem. Broadwaywatch

10:07pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Broadwaywatch says...

Joe Wildman-Clark wrote:
It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme.

Why don't people check thie facts first before posting?

Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so?

http://www.southendt

imeline.com/warriors

quaregardens.htm
Indeed it was but also was'nt it Clllr Lamb or some such councillor on the Renaissance Southend board or were Renaissance Southend just allowed to do as they pleased as and when they pleased. Who in fact chose them to design and tell us what was best for the town and what was required by and for the people of this town?
[quote][p][bold]Joe Wildman-Clark[/bold] wrote: It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme. Why don't people check thie facts first before posting? Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so? http://www.southendt imeline.com/warriors quaregardens.htm[/p][/quote]Indeed it was but also was'nt it Clllr Lamb or some such councillor on the Renaissance Southend board or were Renaissance Southend just allowed to do as they pleased as and when they pleased. Who in fact chose them to design and tell us what was best for the town and what was required by and for the people of this town? Broadwaywatch

11:00pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Joe Wildman-Clark says...

Broadwaywatch wrote:
Joe Wildman-Clark wrote:
It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme.

Why don't people check thie facts first before posting?

Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so?

http://www.southendt


imeline.com/warriors


quaregardens.htm
Indeed it was but also was'nt it Clllr Lamb or some such councillor on the Renaissance Southend board or were Renaissance Southend just allowed to do as they pleased as and when they pleased. Who in fact chose them to design and tell us what was best for the town and what was required by and for the people of this town?
All planning applications had to go through the planning channels just like any other planning application.

I can't understand why people will not check facts before posting their comments, they make themselves look stupid and foolish.

Oh a word of advice don’t try roller blading for the first time when you’re the wrong side of 40, never knew I could do the splits like that, I’ll be walking funny for the rest of the week!
[quote][p][bold]Broadwaywatch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Joe Wildman-Clark[/bold] wrote: It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme. Why don't people check thie facts first before posting? Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so? http://www.southendt imeline.com/warriors quaregardens.htm[/p][/quote]Indeed it was but also was'nt it Clllr Lamb or some such councillor on the Renaissance Southend board or were Renaissance Southend just allowed to do as they pleased as and when they pleased. Who in fact chose them to design and tell us what was best for the town and what was required by and for the people of this town?[/p][/quote]All planning applications had to go through the planning channels just like any other planning application. I can't understand why people will not check facts before posting their comments, they make themselves look stupid and foolish. Oh a word of advice don’t try roller blading for the first time when you’re the wrong side of 40, never knew I could do the splits like that, I’ll be walking funny for the rest of the week! Joe Wildman-Clark

11:19pm Mon 18 Mar 13

gangsta_len says...

Derek_Christmas wrote:
jayman wrote:
It looks like irregular slabs of glass that have been stuck together with black gaffer tape. how many MILLIONS where wasted on this project...
I heard it cost £400 thousand!
Council of the year, apparently.
[quote][p][bold]Derek_Christmas[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jayman[/bold] wrote: It looks like irregular slabs of glass that have been stuck together with black gaffer tape. how many MILLIONS where wasted on this project...[/p][/quote]I heard it cost £400 thousand![/p][/quote]Council of the year, apparently. gangsta_len

8:50am Tue 19 Mar 13

Broadwaywatch says...

Joe Wildman-Clark wrote:
Broadwaywatch wrote:
Joe Wildman-Clark wrote:
It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme.

Why don't people check thie facts first before posting?

Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so?

http://www.southendt



imeline.com/warriors



quaregardens.htm
Indeed it was but also was'nt it Clllr Lamb or some such councillor on the Renaissance Southend board or were Renaissance Southend just allowed to do as they pleased as and when they pleased. Who in fact chose them to design and tell us what was best for the town and what was required by and for the people of this town?
All planning applications had to go through the planning channels just like any other planning application.

I can't understand why people will not check facts before posting their comments, they make themselves look stupid and foolish.

Oh a word of advice don’t try roller blading for the first time when you’re the wrong side of 40, never knew I could do the splits like that, I’ll be walking funny for the rest of the week!
Then it would seem there was a lot of money spent on an unelected quango. Sorry to hear of your mishap with the roller blades. It would seem that stupidity is not only to be found on postings. Sometimes we can make giddy fools of ourselves the wrong side of 40 on a pair of roller blades....... and more painfully.
[quote][p][bold]Joe Wildman-Clark[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Broadwaywatch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Joe Wildman-Clark[/bold] wrote: It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme. Why don't people check thie facts first before posting? Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so? http://www.southendt imeline.com/warriors quaregardens.htm[/p][/quote]Indeed it was but also was'nt it Clllr Lamb or some such councillor on the Renaissance Southend board or were Renaissance Southend just allowed to do as they pleased as and when they pleased. Who in fact chose them to design and tell us what was best for the town and what was required by and for the people of this town?[/p][/quote]All planning applications had to go through the planning channels just like any other planning application. I can't understand why people will not check facts before posting their comments, they make themselves look stupid and foolish. Oh a word of advice don’t try roller blading for the first time when you’re the wrong side of 40, never knew I could do the splits like that, I’ll be walking funny for the rest of the week![/p][/quote]Then it would seem there was a lot of money spent on an unelected quango. Sorry to hear of your mishap with the roller blades. It would seem that stupidity is not only to be found on postings. Sometimes we can make giddy fools of ourselves the wrong side of 40 on a pair of roller blades....... and more painfully. Broadwaywatch

10:31am Tue 19 Mar 13

heartbeat says...

Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd wrote:
Wonder how many affordable homes couldve been constructed instead of this embarassment of a botched greenhouse.

It's completely not fit for purpose (that goes for the Council aswell!)

Another day, another Southend Council FAIL!

Wonder what tomorrows epic fail from the council will be?

Can anyone remember anything in recent history that the council was involved in that wasnt a failure?
Disgraceful and makes Southend a laughing-stock yet again!

Let's not also forget the "marvels of modern construction" that have been costing council tax payers a fortune that are the arches under Pier Hill, also built defectively with structural problems.

Complete and utter and EXPENSIVE inefficiency is what we get from Southend Council. Why on EARTH do taxpayers have to keep footing the bill for the inefficient way our money is spent? Do they not get building works checked properly before they are "signed off"? If they do, then why doesn't insurance cover these defects? All the time these places stand empty it is money lost which could be going towards Council-run services.

If Council members had a bit more intelligence and business-sense they would be able to afford to keep care homes open for the elderly and other services for residents.

Anyone been stuck in the lift down from Pier HIll recently (faulty workmanship there too, allegedly...)
[quote][p][bold]Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd[/bold] wrote: Wonder how many affordable homes couldve been constructed instead of this embarassment of a botched greenhouse. It's completely not fit for purpose (that goes for the Council aswell!) Another day, another Southend Council FAIL! Wonder what tomorrows epic fail from the council will be? Can anyone remember anything in recent history that the council was involved in that wasnt a failure?[/p][/quote]Disgraceful and makes Southend a laughing-stock yet again! Let's not also forget the "marvels of modern construction" that have been costing council tax payers a fortune that are the arches under Pier Hill, also built defectively with structural problems. Complete and utter and EXPENSIVE inefficiency is what we get from Southend Council. Why on EARTH do taxpayers have to keep footing the bill for the inefficient way our money is spent? Do they not get building works checked properly before they are "signed off"? If they do, then why doesn't insurance cover these defects? All the time these places stand empty it is money lost which could be going towards Council-run services. If Council members had a bit more intelligence and business-sense they would be able to afford to keep care homes open for the elderly and other services for residents. Anyone been stuck in the lift down from Pier HIll recently (faulty workmanship there too, allegedly...) heartbeat

5:45pm Tue 19 Mar 13

Audioman says...

What a dump pull it DOWN.
What a dump pull it DOWN. Audioman

6:43pm Tue 19 Mar 13

Joe Wildman-Clark says...

Broadwaywatch wrote:
Joe Wildman-Clark wrote:
Broadwaywatch wrote:
Joe Wildman-Clark wrote:
It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme.

Why don't people check thie facts first before posting?

Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so?

http://www.southendt




imeline.com/warriors




quaregardens.htm
Indeed it was but also was'nt it Clllr Lamb or some such councillor on the Renaissance Southend board or were Renaissance Southend just allowed to do as they pleased as and when they pleased. Who in fact chose them to design and tell us what was best for the town and what was required by and for the people of this town?
All planning applications had to go through the planning channels just like any other planning application.

I can't understand why people will not check facts before posting their comments, they make themselves look stupid and foolish.

Oh a word of advice don’t try roller blading for the first time when you’re the wrong side of 40, never knew I could do the splits like that, I’ll be walking funny for the rest of the week!
Then it would seem there was a lot of money spent on an unelected quango. Sorry to hear of your mishap with the roller blades. It would seem that stupidity is not only to be found on postings. Sometimes we can make giddy fools of ourselves the wrong side of 40 on a pair of roller blades....... and more painfully.
It was a sponsored thing for the son of one of the guys on my team, plan was to skate between three sites but as the legs went East-West as soon as I stood up it was knocked on the head and I ended up in the stocks! with cold wet sponges lobbed at me, the cheeky g!ts called round the other sites and they all came to chuck sponges! ended up with a dozen buckets of water over my head.

it was worth it as we rised £1800 and manflu!
[quote][p][bold]Broadwaywatch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Joe Wildman-Clark[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Broadwaywatch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Joe Wildman-Clark[/bold] wrote: It was paid for by The Homes & Communities Agency, NOT Southend Council and it was a Renaissance Southend scheme. Why don't people check thie facts first before posting? Is it because you are you too thick, too lazy and just do not care about facts to do so? http://www.southendt imeline.com/warriors quaregardens.htm[/p][/quote]Indeed it was but also was'nt it Clllr Lamb or some such councillor on the Renaissance Southend board or were Renaissance Southend just allowed to do as they pleased as and when they pleased. Who in fact chose them to design and tell us what was best for the town and what was required by and for the people of this town?[/p][/quote]All planning applications had to go through the planning channels just like any other planning application. I can't understand why people will not check facts before posting their comments, they make themselves look stupid and foolish. Oh a word of advice don’t try roller blading for the first time when you’re the wrong side of 40, never knew I could do the splits like that, I’ll be walking funny for the rest of the week![/p][/quote]Then it would seem there was a lot of money spent on an unelected quango. Sorry to hear of your mishap with the roller blades. It would seem that stupidity is not only to be found on postings. Sometimes we can make giddy fools of ourselves the wrong side of 40 on a pair of roller blades....... and more painfully.[/p][/quote]It was a sponsored thing for the son of one of the guys on my team, plan was to skate between three sites but as the legs went East-West as soon as I stood up it was knocked on the head and I ended up in the stocks! with cold wet sponges lobbed at me, the cheeky g!ts called round the other sites and they all came to chuck sponges! ended up with a dozen buckets of water over my head. it was worth it as we rised £1800 and manflu! Joe Wildman-Clark

6:51pm Tue 19 Mar 13

Joe Wildman-Clark says...

heartbeat wrote:
Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd wrote:
Wonder how many affordable homes couldve been constructed instead of this embarassment of a botched greenhouse.

It's completely not fit for purpose (that goes for the Council aswell!)

Another day, another Southend Council FAIL!

Wonder what tomorrows epic fail from the council will be?

Can anyone remember anything in recent history that the council was involved in that wasnt a failure?
Disgraceful and makes Southend a laughing-stock yet again!

Let's not also forget the "marvels of modern construction" that have been costing council tax payers a fortune that are the arches under Pier Hill, also built defectively with structural problems.

Complete and utter and EXPENSIVE inefficiency is what we get from Southend Council. Why on EARTH do taxpayers have to keep footing the bill for the inefficient way our money is spent? Do they not get building works checked properly before they are "signed off"? If they do, then why doesn't insurance cover these defects? All the time these places stand empty it is money lost which could be going towards Council-run services.

If Council members had a bit more intelligence and business-sense they would be able to afford to keep care homes open for the elderly and other services for residents.

Anyone been stuck in the lift down from Pier HIll recently (faulty workmanship there too, allegedly...)
Would that be the works paid for by The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and The European Union Objective 2 scheme/


http://www.southendt
imeline.com/pierhill
.htm

Always helps to check the full facts before posting, make you look less of a fool, when the facts are easy and quick to find.
[quote][p][bold]heartbeat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd[/bold] wrote: Wonder how many affordable homes couldve been constructed instead of this embarassment of a botched greenhouse. It's completely not fit for purpose (that goes for the Council aswell!) Another day, another Southend Council FAIL! Wonder what tomorrows epic fail from the council will be? Can anyone remember anything in recent history that the council was involved in that wasnt a failure?[/p][/quote]Disgraceful and makes Southend a laughing-stock yet again! Let's not also forget the "marvels of modern construction" that have been costing council tax payers a fortune that are the arches under Pier Hill, also built defectively with structural problems. Complete and utter and EXPENSIVE inefficiency is what we get from Southend Council. Why on EARTH do taxpayers have to keep footing the bill for the inefficient way our money is spent? Do they not get building works checked properly before they are "signed off"? If they do, then why doesn't insurance cover these defects? All the time these places stand empty it is money lost which could be going towards Council-run services. If Council members had a bit more intelligence and business-sense they would be able to afford to keep care homes open for the elderly and other services for residents. Anyone been stuck in the lift down from Pier HIll recently (faulty workmanship there too, allegedly...)[/p][/quote]Would that be the works paid for by The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and The European Union Objective 2 scheme/ http://www.southendt imeline.com/pierhill .htm Always helps to check the full facts before posting, make you look less of a fool, when the facts are easy and quick to find. Joe Wildman-Clark

8:37pm Tue 19 Mar 13

southend brummie says...

Warrior Square was always a long odds bet by the council. I don't object to the council trying, but this I'm afraid is a fiasco of the first order. They can't even get the thing waterproof.
Warrior Square was always a long odds bet by the council. I don't object to the council trying, but this I'm afraid is a fiasco of the first order. They can't even get the thing waterproof. southend brummie

10:38pm Wed 20 Mar 13

echoforum says...

southend brummie wrote:
Warrior Square was always a long odds bet by the council. I don't object to the council trying, but this I'm afraid is a fiasco of the first order. They can't even get the thing waterproof.
Main problem no customers not the roof.
Cafe faces away from high street thus is it open or not?
Plus coffee shops are aplenty,but with this cafe ..no seats so you wander around druggie sq holding on your latte watching out for the unhinged.
Seriously poor planning/execution/d
esign and did anyone ask the public?
[quote][p][bold]southend brummie[/bold] wrote: Warrior Square was always a long odds bet by the council. I don't object to the council trying, but this I'm afraid is a fiasco of the first order. They can't even get the thing waterproof.[/p][/quote]Main problem no customers not the roof. Cafe faces away from high street thus is it open or not? Plus coffee shops are aplenty,but with this cafe ..no seats so you wander around druggie sq holding on your latte watching out for the unhinged. Seriously poor planning/execution/d esign and did anyone ask the public? echoforum

2:17am Thu 21 Mar 13

Andycal 172D says...

Joe Wildman-Clark wrote:
heartbeat wrote:
Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd wrote:
Wonder how many affordable homes couldve been constructed instead of this embarassment of a botched greenhouse.

It's completely not fit for purpose (that goes for the Council aswell!)

Another day, another Southend Council FAIL!

Wonder what tomorrows epic fail from the council will be?

Can anyone remember anything in recent history that the council was involved in that wasnt a failure?
Disgraceful and makes Southend a laughing-stock yet again!

Let's not also forget the "marvels of modern construction" that have been costing council tax payers a fortune that are the arches under Pier Hill, also built defectively with structural problems.

Complete and utter and EXPENSIVE inefficiency is what we get from Southend Council. Why on EARTH do taxpayers have to keep footing the bill for the inefficient way our money is spent? Do they not get building works checked properly before they are "signed off"? If they do, then why doesn't insurance cover these defects? All the time these places stand empty it is money lost which could be going towards Council-run services.

If Council members had a bit more intelligence and business-sense they would be able to afford to keep care homes open for the elderly and other services for residents.

Anyone been stuck in the lift down from Pier HIll recently (faulty workmanship there too, allegedly...)
Would that be the works paid for by The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and The European Union Objective 2 scheme/


http://www.southendt

imeline.com/pierhill

.htm

Always helps to check the full facts before posting, make you look less of a fool, when the facts are easy and quick to find.
Convenient of you to miss out the matched funding part of the price. So you'll probably be pleased to know we only paid for half of it...
[quote][p][bold]Joe Wildman-Clark[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]heartbeat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sir Peter Pantsless the 3rd[/bold] wrote: Wonder how many affordable homes couldve been constructed instead of this embarassment of a botched greenhouse. It's completely not fit for purpose (that goes for the Council aswell!) Another day, another Southend Council FAIL! Wonder what tomorrows epic fail from the council will be? Can anyone remember anything in recent history that the council was involved in that wasnt a failure?[/p][/quote]Disgraceful and makes Southend a laughing-stock yet again! Let's not also forget the "marvels of modern construction" that have been costing council tax payers a fortune that are the arches under Pier Hill, also built defectively with structural problems. Complete and utter and EXPENSIVE inefficiency is what we get from Southend Council. Why on EARTH do taxpayers have to keep footing the bill for the inefficient way our money is spent? Do they not get building works checked properly before they are "signed off"? If they do, then why doesn't insurance cover these defects? All the time these places stand empty it is money lost which could be going towards Council-run services. If Council members had a bit more intelligence and business-sense they would be able to afford to keep care homes open for the elderly and other services for residents. Anyone been stuck in the lift down from Pier HIll recently (faulty workmanship there too, allegedly...)[/p][/quote]Would that be the works paid for by The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and The European Union Objective 2 scheme/ http://www.southendt imeline.com/pierhill .htm Always helps to check the full facts before posting, make you look less of a fool, when the facts are easy and quick to find.[/p][/quote]Convenient of you to miss out the matched funding part of the price. So you'll probably be pleased to know we only paid for half of it... Andycal 172D

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree