MPs don’t think they should be handed a £6,000 pay increase

MPs don’t think they should be handed a £6,000 pay increase

MPs don’t think they should be handed a £6,000 pay increase

First published in News

TWO of South Essex’s MPs said they should not have a recommended £6,000 salary increase.

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority has recommended MPs salaries should go up to £74,000.

But South Basildon and East Thurrock MP Stephen Metcalfe said: “I do not think MPs’ pay should be going up while public sector pay is being constrained.

“We shouldnot see the cost of politics or Westminster going up. We should see it go down instead.”

Castle Point MP Rebecca Harris added: “I supported decisions on MPs pay being handed to the Independent Standards Authority, because it wasn’t right that MPs had a say over their own pay.

“But it’s incomprehensible they are consulting on a pay rise when most working people are not seeing real terms increases.”

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, which is overseen by chairman Sir Ian Kennedy, was set up in 2009 following the expenses scandal.

It will now consult with MPs over its recommendations.

While it has recommended a nine per cent wage increase, it wants to cut perks, such as meal allowances and taxis, and downgrade MPs’ pensions.

It also plans to end “golden goodbyes” forMPs who retire or are dismissed.

Basildon and Billericay MP John Baron said expenses should be cancelled and a proportion of this saving could be added to MPs salary instead, perhaps tailored to reflect travel distances to London.

He said: “I believe these proposals would represent a cost saving to the taxpayer, simplify expenses, and once and for all increase public confidence in the system.”

When pressed on whether he would take a rise, he said: “There is no point commenting on hypothetical situations until they are no longer hypothetical.

“A third party has made the recommendations, but people are still complaining.”

Rayleigh and Wickford MP Mark Francois said: “My instinct is there will be little public support for this suggestion – for reasons which I fully understand.

“I suspect, after the consultation, this proposal will either be watered down or abandoned.”

Rochford and Southend East MP James Duddridge was not available for comment.

Comments (32)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:47pm Fri 12 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

Can we take it by that, they wont accept the rise if it is given to them?
Can we take it by that, they wont accept the rise if it is given to them? Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -8

3:54pm Fri 12 Jul 13

runwellian says...

As Britain is managed by France we should get rid of all MP's they are useless and most certainly don't represent my views!
As Britain is managed by France we should get rid of all MP's they are useless and most certainly don't represent my views! runwellian
  • Score: -1

5:07pm Fri 12 Jul 13

firedog says...

Did Amis say anything. Or did he run
into a shop when asked?
Did Amis say anything. Or did he run into a shop when asked? firedog
  • Score: 1

8:29pm Fri 12 Jul 13

rude boy says...

If they get that so shud all of us
If they get that so shud all of us rude boy
  • Score: 1

11:31am Sat 13 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

Lastlaugh... wrote:
Can we take it by that, they wont accept the rise if it is given to them?
It would be a good idea since the rest of us have to tighten our belts, we are supposed to be in it together
[quote][p][bold]Lastlaugh...[/bold] wrote: Can we take it by that, they wont accept the rise if it is given to them?[/p][/quote]It would be a good idea since the rest of us have to tighten our belts, we are supposed to be in it together Dr Martin
  • Score: 5

3:06pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

They will accept it, fighting all the way not to!
They will accept it, fighting all the way not to! Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -10

4:15pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

I have to agree that it would be a pity in a middle of the biggest debt crisis the M.P's of all parties took their noses out of the trough and show we are all in it together
I have to agree that it would be a pity in a middle of the biggest debt crisis the M.P's of all parties took their noses out of the trough and show we are all in it together Dr Martin
  • Score: 11

4:49pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

Dr Martin wrote:
I have to agree that it would be a pity in a middle of the biggest debt crisis the M.P's of all parties took their noses out of the trough and show we are all in it together
'all in it together' is nothing but a buzz word...to con people into thinking all are effected...in reality it an "us and them"...how many politicians will be giving up their large second homes to move into smaller properties?

Plenty of pensioners are being financially penalised while 'we are all in this together'
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: I have to agree that it would be a pity in a middle of the biggest debt crisis the M.P's of all parties took their noses out of the trough and show we are all in it together[/p][/quote]'all in it together' is nothing but a buzz word...to con people into thinking all are effected...in reality it an "us and them"...how many politicians will be giving up their large second homes to move into smaller properties? Plenty of pensioners are being financially penalised while 'we are all in this together' Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -12

5:03pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

Lastlaugh... wrote:
Dr Martin wrote:
I have to agree that it would be a pity in a middle of the biggest debt crisis the M.P's of all parties took their noses out of the trough and show we are all in it together
'all in it together' is nothing but a buzz word...to con people into thinking all are effected...in reality it an "us and them"...how many politicians will be giving up their large second homes to move into smaller properties?

Plenty of pensioners are being financially penalised while 'we are all in this together'
Everyone is being penalised i am, you are but when M.P's/government want us to believe that we are all in it together then it doesn't help when they are hoping for a pay rise
[quote][p][bold]Lastlaugh...[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: I have to agree that it would be a pity in a middle of the biggest debt crisis the M.P's of all parties took their noses out of the trough and show we are all in it together[/p][/quote]'all in it together' is nothing but a buzz word...to con people into thinking all are effected...in reality it an "us and them"...how many politicians will be giving up their large second homes to move into smaller properties? Plenty of pensioners are being financially penalised while 'we are all in this together'[/p][/quote]Everyone is being penalised i am, you are but when M.P's/government want us to believe that we are all in it together then it doesn't help when they are hoping for a pay rise Dr Martin
  • Score: 12

6:12pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

Dr Martin wrote:
Lastlaugh... wrote:
Dr Martin wrote:
I have to agree that it would be a pity in a middle of the biggest debt crisis the M.P's of all parties took their noses out of the trough and show we are all in it together
'all in it together' is nothing but a buzz word...to con people into thinking all are effected...in reality it an "us and them"...how many politicians will be giving up their large second homes to move into smaller properties?

Plenty of pensioners are being financially penalised while 'we are all in this together'
Everyone is being penalised i am, you are but when M.P's/government want us to believe that we are all in it together then it doesn't help when they are hoping for a pay rise
Go tell it on the mountain..
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lastlaugh...[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: I have to agree that it would be a pity in a middle of the biggest debt crisis the M.P's of all parties took their noses out of the trough and show we are all in it together[/p][/quote]'all in it together' is nothing but a buzz word...to con people into thinking all are effected...in reality it an "us and them"...how many politicians will be giving up their large second homes to move into smaller properties? Plenty of pensioners are being financially penalised while 'we are all in this together'[/p][/quote]Everyone is being penalised i am, you are but when M.P's/government want us to believe that we are all in it together then it doesn't help when they are hoping for a pay rise[/p][/quote]Go tell it on the mountain.. Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -12

8:12pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

Which mountain and who will hear me?
Which mountain and who will hear me? Dr Martin
  • Score: 11

8:52pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

Dr Martin wrote:
Which mountain and who will hear me?
Do you mean to be spoonfed?

I had to sort out your user name and now you want me to give you directions!
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: Which mountain and who will hear me?[/p][/quote]Do you mean to be spoonfed? I had to sort out your user name and now you want me to give you directions! Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -12

10:13pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

No you cried to the admin like a baby remember , cowardly act from a coward
No you cried to the admin like a baby remember , cowardly act from a coward Dr Martin
  • Score: 11

10:31pm Sat 13 Jul 13

jayman says...

An MP.

Part time 'volunteer' for a constituent forum and legislative organisation. An MP's main priority in life is self advancement. having spent several years studding for a 'politics economics and philosophy' degree (and having the necessary connections) they are free to (without any life experiences whatsoever) begin deleting emails and shredding mail sent to them by the aforementioned constituents. They then spend vast amounts of time forming policies and draft legislation based on what big business lobbyist tell them. They then have to reverse engineer democratic decision making to maintain the pretence while the right individuals are winked at across the floor of parliament, some lords may need to be 'pacified' so that it gets back intact from the second chamber prior to it becoming a full blown act.

And this is our democracy... lol
An MP. Part time 'volunteer' for a constituent forum and legislative organisation. An MP's main priority in life is self advancement. having spent several years studding for a 'politics economics and philosophy' degree (and having the necessary connections) they are free to (without any life experiences whatsoever) begin deleting emails and shredding mail sent to them by the aforementioned constituents. They then spend vast amounts of time forming policies and draft legislation based on what big business lobbyist tell them. They then have to reverse engineer democratic decision making to maintain the pretence while the right individuals are winked at across the floor of parliament, some lords may need to be 'pacified' so that it gets back intact from the second chamber prior to it becoming a full blown act. And this is our democracy... lol jayman
  • Score: 0

10:31pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

Dr Martin wrote:
No you cried to the admin like a baby remember , cowardly act from a coward
Yeah yeah yeah...

Are you still on about your stupid name that none but a rather dim person would pick to use?

"why cant i have a racially abusive name"
Whaaaaaaaa Whaaaaaa, "I want a racially abusive name"

I did no crying..I asked admin to consider the name they did and banned it..and of course you with it..lol..
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: No you cried to the admin like a baby remember , cowardly act from a coward[/p][/quote]Yeah yeah yeah... Are you still on about your stupid name that none but a rather dim person would pick to use? "why cant i have a racially abusive name" Whaaaaaaaa Whaaaaaa, "I want a racially abusive name" I did no crying..I asked admin to consider the name they did and banned it..and of course you with it..lol.. Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -11

10:37pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

They award themselves 15% rise while awarding the most needy in the country 1%

Yet they and some dim sycophants would try to justify that!
They award themselves 15% rise while awarding the most needy in the country 1% Yet they and some dim sycophants would try to justify that! Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -10

10:39pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

Lastlaugh... wrote:
Dr Martin wrote:
No you cried to the admin like a baby remember , cowardly act from a coward
Yeah yeah yeah...

Are you still on about your stupid name that none but a rather dim person would pick to use?

"why cant i have a racially abusive name"
Whaaaaaaaa Whaaaaaa, "I want a racially abusive name"

I did no crying..I asked admin to consider the name they did and banned it..and of course you with it..lol..
Don't worry I'll stick around
You are someone who gets someone else to fight your battles for you
[quote][p][bold]Lastlaugh...[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: No you cried to the admin like a baby remember , cowardly act from a coward[/p][/quote]Yeah yeah yeah... Are you still on about your stupid name that none but a rather dim person would pick to use? "why cant i have a racially abusive name" Whaaaaaaaa Whaaaaaa, "I want a racially abusive name" I did no crying..I asked admin to consider the name they did and banned it..and of course you with it..lol..[/p][/quote]Don't worry I'll stick around You are someone who gets someone else to fight your battles for you Dr Martin
  • Score: 11

10:59pm Sat 13 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

Dr Martin wrote:
Lastlaugh... wrote:
Dr Martin wrote:
No you cried to the admin like a baby remember , cowardly act from a coward
Yeah yeah yeah...

Are you still on about your stupid name that none but a rather dim person would pick to use?

"why cant i have a racially abusive name"
Whaaaaaaaa Whaaaaaa, "I want a racially abusive name"

I did no crying..I asked admin to consider the name they did and banned it..and of course you with it..lol..
Don't worry I'll stick around
You are someone who gets someone else to fight your battles for you
What a prat you are..only admin can take admin action...if I could of removed the name myself I would of, I couldn't and so went to the baker to bake the bread...see hw the real world works.

Now if you have anything to engage me on in regards to the thread topic please say so.. other wise stop trolling...you are boring beyond belief.
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lastlaugh...[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: No you cried to the admin like a baby remember , cowardly act from a coward[/p][/quote]Yeah yeah yeah... Are you still on about your stupid name that none but a rather dim person would pick to use? "why cant i have a racially abusive name" Whaaaaaaaa Whaaaaaa, "I want a racially abusive name" I did no crying..I asked admin to consider the name they did and banned it..and of course you with it..lol..[/p][/quote]Don't worry I'll stick around You are someone who gets someone else to fight your battles for you[/p][/quote]What a prat you are..only admin can take admin action...if I could of removed the name myself I would of, I couldn't and so went to the baker to bake the bread...see hw the real world works. Now if you have anything to engage me on in regards to the thread topic please say so.. other wise stop trolling...you are boring beyond belief. Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -12

11:05am Sun 14 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

I think you have some sort of memory deficiency I have said if you had asked me not to post using my old username thus giving me a choice then I wouldn’t have complained if I had ignored your warning/request. What you did was run to the admin then posted your comment that you had done so and it was a conversation I was having with ORACUS and not you which I consider in chat room etiquette slightly rude but I suppose for you manners and respect are something you are still learning about.

B.T.W... How has an ‘o’ in it
I think you have some sort of memory deficiency I have said if you had asked me not to post using my old username thus giving me a choice then I wouldn’t have complained if I had ignored your warning/request. What you did was run to the admin then posted your comment that you had done so and it was a conversation I was having with ORACUS and not you which I consider in chat room etiquette slightly rude but I suppose for you manners and respect are something you are still learning about. B.T.W... How has an ‘o’ in it Dr Martin
  • Score: 11

12:30pm Sun 14 Jul 13

Lastlaugh... says...

Dr Martin wrote:
I think you have some sort of memory deficiency I have said if you had asked me not to post using my old username thus giving me a choice then I wouldn’t have complained if I had ignored your warning/request. What you did was run to the admin then posted your comment that you had done so and it was a conversation I was having with ORACUS and not you which I consider in chat room etiquette slightly rude but I suppose for you manners and respect are something you are still learning about.

B.T.W... How has an ‘o’ in it
Err, no the post stated, that your racially abusive user name that you has not known was just that, would be reported..as in hadn't yet!..

The twee claim that you being a reasonable chap would of taken the name down doesn't bear scrutiny...for one, you have shown your character by your racial slurs on another thread and two the fact that you are still harping about a name thats has been consigned to the dustbin a while ago..since then you have trolled threads im on disrupting the topic and debate.

You also dont seem to understand the issue sometimes with phones and predictive text...it happens..get over it..

You are boring the boards to a standstill with your crybaby antics..

Debate me on the issues of a thread or get off the thread and let it flow...at the moment your like a blockage..
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: I think you have some sort of memory deficiency I have said if you had asked me not to post using my old username thus giving me a choice then I wouldn’t have complained if I had ignored your warning/request. What you did was run to the admin then posted your comment that you had done so and it was a conversation I was having with ORACUS and not you which I consider in chat room etiquette slightly rude but I suppose for you manners and respect are something you are still learning about. B.T.W... How has an ‘o’ in it[/p][/quote]Err, no the post stated, that your racially abusive user name that you has not known was just that, would be reported..as in hadn't yet!.. The twee claim that you being a reasonable chap would of taken the name down doesn't bear scrutiny...for one, you have shown your character by your racial slurs on another thread and two the fact that you are still harping about a name thats has been consigned to the dustbin a while ago..since then you have trolled threads im on disrupting the topic and debate. You also dont seem to understand the issue sometimes with phones and predictive text...it happens..get over it.. You are boring the boards to a standstill with your crybaby antics.. Debate me on the issues of a thread or get off the thread and let it flow...at the moment your like a blockage.. Lastlaugh...
  • Score: -16

11:09pm Fri 19 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

Let me quote “you” again from our original encounter “You have been reported” implies you had already done the sneaky deed then you posted your reply

I am not blocking anything people can make their comments as usual
Let me quote “you” again from our original encounter “You have been reported” implies you had already done the sneaky deed then you posted your reply I am not blocking anything people can make their comments as usual Dr Martin
  • Score: 13

11:52pm Tue 30 Jul 13

LastLaugh, says...

Dr Martin wrote:
Let me quote “you” again from our original encounter “You have been reported” implies you had already done the sneaky deed then you posted your reply

I am not blocking anything people can make their comments as usual
Do you think admin react Immediately? I know they don't usually, although they have once or twice..so when I posted I THEN reported. Why?

Not for any idea of gallantry, but because I know admin sometimes locks the thread and I wanted my post about your name on the thread in case it was locked right away..
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: Let me quote “you” again from our original encounter “You have been reported” implies you had already done the sneaky deed then you posted your reply I am not blocking anything people can make their comments as usual[/p][/quote]Do you think admin react Immediately? I know they don't usually, although they have once or twice..so when I posted I THEN reported. Why? Not for any idea of gallantry, but because I know admin sometimes locks the thread and I wanted my post about your name on the thread in case it was locked right away.. LastLaugh,
  • Score: -15

11:52pm Tue 30 Jul 13

LastLaugh, says...

Dr Martin wrote:
Let me quote “you” again from our original encounter “You have been reported” implies you had already done the sneaky deed then you posted your reply

I am not blocking anything people can make their comments as usual
Do you think admin react Immediately? I know they don't usually, although they have once or twice..so when I posted I THEN reported. Why?

Not for any idea of gallantry, but because I know admin sometimes locks the thread and I wanted my post about your name on the thread in case it was locked right away..
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: Let me quote “you” again from our original encounter “You have been reported” implies you had already done the sneaky deed then you posted your reply I am not blocking anything people can make their comments as usual[/p][/quote]Do you think admin react Immediately? I know they don't usually, although they have once or twice..so when I posted I THEN reported. Why? Not for any idea of gallantry, but because I know admin sometimes locks the thread and I wanted my post about your name on the thread in case it was locked right away.. LastLaugh,
  • Score: -15

9:48am Wed 31 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

I quote you again "You have been reported" which is different than your version on the post above, make your mind up, but I will take your first reply as it's probably closest to the truth.
I quote you again "You have been reported" which is different than your version on the post above, make your mind up, but I will take your first reply as it's probably closest to the truth. Dr Martin
  • Score: 14

11:10am Wed 31 Jul 13

LastLaugh, says...

Dr Martin wrote:
I quote you again "You have been reported" which is different than your version on the post above, make your mind up, but I will take your first reply as it's probably closest to the truth.
No need to make my mind up...regardless how when it was done... it was done and another incitement, to the rather dim, to commit acts of criminality was discontinued.
Look at it that way, you played a part in discouraging racism!

Perhaps against your will but all the same you did.

Im surprised you don't spend as much time on the many other sites, where your racially offensive user name is cheered every time it appears...like to tell me what sites they are? LOL.
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: I quote you again "You have been reported" which is different than your version on the post above, make your mind up, but I will take your first reply as it's probably closest to the truth.[/p][/quote]No need to make my mind up...regardless how when it was done... it was done and another incitement, to the rather dim, to commit acts of criminality was discontinued. Look at it that way, you played a part in discouraging racism! Perhaps against your will but all the same you did. Im surprised you don't spend as much time on the many other sites, where your racially offensive user name is cheered every time it appears...like to tell me what sites they are? LOL. LastLaugh,
  • Score: -16

7:30pm Wed 31 Jul 13

Dr Martin says...

So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend)

So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself
So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend) So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself Dr Martin
  • Score: 9

1:47am Wed 7 Aug 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Dr Martin wrote:
So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend)

So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself
Your user name being banned was the part of discouraging, you have in your ridiculous way tried to undo the good work since then.

How can i possibly be able to glean the information of what forum you post on...and why should i care!

But if I did know you know your hilarious (unexplained self-directed humour) user name would be removed rapido!
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend) So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself[/p][/quote]Your user name being banned was the part of discouraging, you have in your ridiculous way tried to undo the good work since then. How can i possibly be able to glean the information of what forum you post on...and why should i care! But if I did know you know your hilarious (unexplained self-directed humour) user name would be removed rapido! lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -9

10:53am Wed 7 Aug 13

Dr Martin says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Dr Martin wrote:
So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend)

So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself
Your user name being banned was the part of discouraging, you have in your ridiculous way tried to undo the good work since then.

How can i possibly be able to glean the information of what forum you post on...and why should i care!

But if I did know you know your hilarious (unexplained self-directed humour) user name would be removed rapido!
Lastlaugh you are showing yourself up there, I can easily find out what websites you have commented on, you should be able to do the same for me.

I am glad you find my old username hilarious, pity you didn't think that a month ago, would have saved you a lot of aggravation
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend) So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself[/p][/quote]Your user name being banned was the part of discouraging, you have in your ridiculous way tried to undo the good work since then. How can i possibly be able to glean the information of what forum you post on...and why should i care! But if I did know you know your hilarious (unexplained self-directed humour) user name would be removed rapido![/p][/quote]Lastlaugh you are showing yourself up there, I can easily find out what websites you have commented on, you should be able to do the same for me. I am glad you find my old username hilarious, pity you didn't think that a month ago, would have saved you a lot of aggravation Dr Martin
  • Score: 11

7:45pm Wed 7 Aug 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Dr Martin wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Dr Martin wrote:
So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend)

So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself
Your user name being banned was the part of discouraging, you have in your ridiculous way tried to undo the good work since then.

How can i possibly be able to glean the information of what forum you post on...and why should i care!

But if I did know you know your hilarious (unexplained self-directed humour) user name would be removed rapido!
Lastlaugh you are showing yourself up there, I can easily find out what websites you have commented on, you should be able to do the same for me.

I am glad you find my old username hilarious, pity you didn't think that a month ago, would have saved you a lot of aggravation
* Note to self... sarcasm not to be used, waste of time*

I wouldn't spend a moment of life looking for the forums you frequent!

There was no aggro...i merely asked them to consider your user name and act accordingly..they did and boom..banned

Now no more on your late depart and much grieved and loved stupid name!
[quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend) So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself[/p][/quote]Your user name being banned was the part of discouraging, you have in your ridiculous way tried to undo the good work since then. How can i possibly be able to glean the information of what forum you post on...and why should i care! But if I did know you know your hilarious (unexplained self-directed humour) user name would be removed rapido![/p][/quote]Lastlaugh you are showing yourself up there, I can easily find out what websites you have commented on, you should be able to do the same for me. I am glad you find my old username hilarious, pity you didn't think that a month ago, would have saved you a lot of aggravation[/p][/quote]* Note to self... sarcasm not to be used, waste of time* I wouldn't spend a moment of life looking for the forums you frequent! There was no aggro...i merely asked them to consider your user name and act accordingly..they did and boom..banned Now no more on your late depart and much grieved and loved stupid name! lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -13

10:18pm Wed 7 Aug 13

Dr Martin says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Dr Martin wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Dr Martin wrote:
So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend)

So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself
Your user name being banned was the part of discouraging, you have in your ridiculous way tried to undo the good work since then.

How can i possibly be able to glean the information of what forum you post on...and why should i care!

But if I did know you know your hilarious (unexplained self-directed humour) user name would be removed rapido!
Lastlaugh you are showing yourself up there, I can easily find out what websites you have commented on, you should be able to do the same for me.

I am glad you find my old username hilarious, pity you didn't think that a month ago, would have saved you a lot of aggravation
* Note to self... sarcasm not to be used, waste of time*

I wouldn't spend a moment of life looking for the forums you frequent!

There was no aggro...i merely asked them to consider your user name and act accordingly..they did and boom..banned

Now no more on your late depart and much grieved and loved stupid name!
Well the forums (in Essex) I frequent are the ones that you have commented on
From another story that has now closed, what were you referring to when you are harking back to the 1930's, you might remember those days but I am not "that" old, what point were you trying to make?
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dr Martin[/bold] wrote: So if I played a part in discouraging racism , then my posts I have made since against your caravan chums were okay (not wanting to offend) So again you are asking to supply you with information that you should be able to get yourself, that’s really lazy Lastlaugh, pull your finger out and find out for yourself[/p][/quote]Your user name being banned was the part of discouraging, you have in your ridiculous way tried to undo the good work since then. How can i possibly be able to glean the information of what forum you post on...and why should i care! But if I did know you know your hilarious (unexplained self-directed humour) user name would be removed rapido![/p][/quote]Lastlaugh you are showing yourself up there, I can easily find out what websites you have commented on, you should be able to do the same for me. I am glad you find my old username hilarious, pity you didn't think that a month ago, would have saved you a lot of aggravation[/p][/quote]* Note to self... sarcasm not to be used, waste of time* I wouldn't spend a moment of life looking for the forums you frequent! There was no aggro...i merely asked them to consider your user name and act accordingly..they did and boom..banned Now no more on your late depart and much grieved and loved stupid name![/p][/quote]Well the forums (in Essex) I frequent are the ones that you have commented on From another story that has now closed, what were you referring to when you are harking back to the 1930's, you might remember those days but I am not "that" old, what point were you trying to make? Dr Martin
  • Score: 0

11:17pm Wed 7 Aug 13

Dr Martin says...

I see you keep trying to score my post down and your posts up, but your posts almost always end up negative mine positive.

Despite your best efforts!
I see you keep trying to score my post down and your posts up, but your posts almost always end up negative mine positive. Despite your best efforts! Dr Martin
  • Score: 0

6:39pm Sat 10 Aug 13

Dr Martin says...

It’s been a month since you stuck your nose in, during this time I have found you to be a rather dogged but limited opponent (stating the population incorrectly, Wikipedia being “BS” and defending people/actions that shouldn’t really be defended)
I saw how well you fared in the story about travellers http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/news/10594672
.Traveller_site_plan
s_rejected_by_counci
l/
I felt Kim Gandy and Smithy22 beat you quite decisively, before the story was closed to comments I observed your tactics, which generally were.
1 Play the race card
2 Try to justify illegality from travellers as being acceptable
3 Play the race card (repeat this tactic often)
4 When own arguments do not win the debate, try to plead to his opponents (revolving door)
5 When all attempts to win the debate have failed make up an excuse for not replying (used against me) or cry to the admin to get the comments section shut down

I have been determined to have the last say on any story I have replied to your comments, and bar one story I have been successful on at least 10 others (mainly closed to new comments) I knew I would wear you down in the end……
It’s been a month since you stuck your nose in, during this time I have found you to be a rather dogged but limited opponent (stating the population incorrectly, Wikipedia being “BS” and defending people/actions that shouldn’t really be defended) I saw how well you fared in the story about travellers http://www.echo-news .co.uk/news/10594672 .Traveller_site_plan s_rejected_by_counci l/ I felt Kim Gandy and Smithy22 beat you quite decisively, before the story was closed to comments I observed your tactics, which generally were. 1 Play the race card 2 Try to justify illegality from travellers as being acceptable 3 Play the race card (repeat this tactic often) 4 When own arguments do not win the debate, try to plead to his opponents (revolving door) 5 When all attempts to win the debate have failed make up an excuse for not replying (used against me) or cry to the admin to get the comments section shut down I have been determined to have the last say on any story I have replied to your comments, and bar one story I have been successful on at least 10 others (mainly closed to new comments) I knew I would wear you down in the end…… Dr Martin
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree