Woman with learning difficulties was alone when told she was dying

Echo: Family – Louise Szulk with her mum, Dawn Candy Family – Louise Szulk with her mum, Dawn Candy

A GRIEVING daughter told how her late mum, who had learning difficulties, was told she was dying of cancer without a responsible adult present.

Louise Szluk is furious her late mother, Dawn Candy, 54, was told the news while alone in her Basildon Hospital bed and is now considering legal action.

Echo:

She said Mrs Candy, who needed to be reminded to do simple tasks, including taking her medication and switching her oven off, was put through an unnecessary trauma.

Basildon Hospital investigated after Mrs Szluk made a complaint.

Mrs Szluk, and other family members, had expressly said Mrs Candy might struggle to grasp information about her condition and had ordered the hospital to only tell Mrs Candy about her health, if they were present.

But the hospital’s investigation concluded Mrs Candy had the capacity to understand and it was her right to ask information about her welfare.

Mrs Szluk, 30, who now lives in Gillingham, in Kent, is considering taking legal action against the hospital. She will meet with doctors on Monday.

She said: “The hospital is disgusting – the treatment is horrible. She was not able to deal with it by herself.

“She would have just blocked it out and been really frightened.

Someone without learning difficulties wouldn’t be able to handle that, let alone someone with learning difficulties.”

Mrs Candy was living in a care home in Stanford-le-Hope when she was admitted to Basildon Hospital on May 5 last year.

She had suffered breast cancer in the past and was told her cancer could have spread on May 9.

Doctors found it had returned to her breast and moved to her bones, lung and liver.

It was explained on May 23 by a consultant doctor and a disability specialist nurse.

She was not well enough for chemotherapy and she was transferred to a hospice on May 29. She died on January 1.

In the investigation document, hospital chief executive Clare Panniker said: “While I fully appreciate the concerns raised regarding the distress caused to Mrs Candy receiving such sensitive information whilst alone, as she requested information on her condition, she had the right to be informed. I can only apologise for the upset this has caused.”

The investigation also claimed that Mrs Candy didn’t want her relatives told about her condition.

But Mrs Szluk added: “None of it makes any sense.

“If she had a runny nose she would call me to complain about it. It wasn’t my mum.

“I can’t see us getting anywhere with the meeting on Monday. I have enough proof that my mum did have learning difficulties and I am now considering legal action.”

A spokesman for Basildon Hospital said: “We would like to offer our condolences to the family of Dawn Candy.

“We are sorry that Mrs Szluk still has concerns about how her mother was kept informed about her condition and treatment. We have fully investigated the issues raised by Mrs Szluk and have responded in writing. We have also offered to meet with Mrs Candy’s family to discuss any ongoing concerns, and this meeting is taking place next week.”

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:11am Wed 2 Oct 13

supermadmax says...

Good on you take action. The corporate or institution guilty rarely admit it, in fact virtually always launch an aggressive defence, but once legal action commence's they tend to band over backward to settle out of court.
Good on you take action. The corporate or institution guilty rarely admit it, in fact virtually always launch an aggressive defence, but once legal action commence's they tend to band over backward to settle out of court. supermadmax
  • Score: -5

7:32am Wed 2 Oct 13

Ineverknewthat says...

What like the lady who sought legal action over bullying, she's got a fifty grand legal bill....
What like the lady who sought legal action over bullying, she's got a fifty grand legal bill.... Ineverknewthat
  • Score: -2

7:58am Wed 2 Oct 13

supermadmax says...

No that was entirely different as she had been told at the tribunal preliminary hearing that she had virtually no chance of success, she would have also been made aware that if she insisted on proceeding she would be liable for court costs.
No that was entirely different as she had been told at the tribunal preliminary hearing that she had virtually no chance of success, she would have also been made aware that if she insisted on proceeding she would be liable for court costs. supermadmax
  • Score: 4

8:28am Wed 2 Oct 13

Bigmama1 says...

Sorry but this story doesn't sound true. It seems that this lady possibly was suffering from early dementia. The fact that she was at one time, able to take her medication, cook etc then couldn't . proves she WAS deteriorating. Doesn't sound like learning difficulties to me. She didn't want family to be told of her condition. That's not somebody suffering with learning difficulties. I'm afraid the family seem to be on the compensation route.
Sorry but this story doesn't sound true. It seems that this lady possibly was suffering from early dementia. The fact that she was at one time, able to take her medication, cook etc then couldn't . proves she WAS deteriorating. Doesn't sound like learning difficulties to me. She didn't want family to be told of her condition. That's not somebody suffering with learning difficulties. I'm afraid the family seem to be on the compensation route. Bigmama1
  • Score: 17

10:49am Wed 2 Oct 13

bumper says...

people just do not give a .f...k as long as its not them sue there @ss
people just do not give a .f...k as long as its not them sue there @ss bumper
  • Score: 1

11:19am Wed 2 Oct 13

maddriver says...

Bigmama1 wrote:
Sorry but this story doesn't sound true. It seems that this lady possibly was suffering from early dementia. The fact that she was at one time, able to take her medication, cook etc then couldn't . proves she WAS deteriorating. Doesn't sound like learning difficulties to me. She didn't want family to be told of her condition. That's not somebody suffering with learning difficulties. I'm afraid the family seem to be on the compensation route.
Why does this story not sound true? I bow to your superior medical knowledge and accept your ability to make a diagnosis based on a news story, but the fact remains that this lady was suffering some form of problem and the hospital should have recognised this before causing her distress.
Compensation is the only form of redress in these type of cases and the only way that may possibly lead to changes.
[quote][p][bold]Bigmama1[/bold] wrote: Sorry but this story doesn't sound true. It seems that this lady possibly was suffering from early dementia. The fact that she was at one time, able to take her medication, cook etc then couldn't . proves she WAS deteriorating. Doesn't sound like learning difficulties to me. She didn't want family to be told of her condition. That's not somebody suffering with learning difficulties. I'm afraid the family seem to be on the compensation route.[/p][/quote]Why does this story not sound true? I bow to your superior medical knowledge and accept your ability to make a diagnosis based on a news story, but the fact remains that this lady was suffering some form of problem and the hospital should have recognised this before causing her distress. Compensation is the only form of redress in these type of cases and the only way that may possibly lead to changes. maddriver
  • Score: -5

11:59am Wed 2 Oct 13

abd123 says...

You cannot decide yourself that another person cannot be told of her diagnosis without you present. First it must be checked if the patient has enough capacity to make decisions. If they have that capacity they can decide for themselves. It is extremely unlikely any legal action will take place as nobody would fund it.
You cannot decide yourself that another person cannot be told of her diagnosis without you present. First it must be checked if the patient has enough capacity to make decisions. If they have that capacity they can decide for themselves. It is extremely unlikely any legal action will take place as nobody would fund it. abd123
  • Score: 5

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree