Can you identify these men?

Echo: Can you identify these men? Can you identify these men?

DO you recognise these men?

Police are seeking to identify three men who were involved in a brawl in Southend High Street last month.

Officers were notified by CCTV operators of a group of men fighting in the road shortly before 2:15pm on Saturday January 18.

The attended and arrested three men aged 17, 20 and 24 on suspicion of affray. They were interviewed at Southend Police Station and then released on police bail pending further enquiries to report back on Tuesday March 18.

Now, officers are trying to identify three other men who are still being sought in connection with the incident.

Anyone who recognises the men in the images is asked to call Pc Ben Freeman at Southend Police Station on 101 or ring Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555111.

Comments (13)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:30pm Sun 23 Feb 14

Howard Cháse says...

No.
No. Howard Cháse
  • Score: 3

1:30pm Sun 23 Feb 14

tezzason1 says...

These images are as useless as tits on a bull when pulled from CCTV cameras and published in the media. We have the technology and its not expensive or rocket science, to have the police release clear and sharp images that have been enhanced with computer software.
These images are as useless as tits on a bull when pulled from CCTV cameras and published in the media. We have the technology and its not expensive or rocket science, to have the police release clear and sharp images that have been enhanced with computer software. tezzason1
  • Score: 15

2:16pm Sun 23 Feb 14

Kim Gandy says...

Send them to the front line in Afghanistan where they can pit their very limited wits against REAL men.
Send them to the front line in Afghanistan where they can pit their very limited wits against REAL men. Kim Gandy
  • Score: -8

2:17pm Sun 23 Feb 14

Kim Gandy says...

tezzason1 wrote:
These images are as useless as tits on a bull when pulled from CCTV cameras and published in the media. We have the technology and its not expensive or rocket science, to have the police release clear and sharp images that have been enhanced with computer software.
Why should the police waste valuable time on that when they'd much rather investigate bogus claims about public figures on directions from the House of Lords?
[quote][p][bold]tezzason1[/bold] wrote: These images are as useless as tits on a bull when pulled from CCTV cameras and published in the media. We have the technology and its not expensive or rocket science, to have the police release clear and sharp images that have been enhanced with computer software.[/p][/quote]Why should the police waste valuable time on that when they'd much rather investigate bogus claims about public figures on directions from the House of Lords? Kim Gandy
  • Score: -10

6:35pm Sun 23 Feb 14

Minceir. says...

Kim Gandy wrote:
tezzason1 wrote:
These images are as useless as tits on a bull when pulled from CCTV cameras and published in the media. We have the technology and its not expensive or rocket science, to have the police release clear and sharp images that have been enhanced with computer software.
Why should the police waste valuable time on that when they'd much rather investigate bogus claims about public figures on directions from the House of Lords?
You're only jealous that you're not being investigated. Of course you hardly fit the profile, do you Kim? Figure of fun, yes. Public, no.
[quote][p][bold]Kim Gandy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]tezzason1[/bold] wrote: These images are as useless as tits on a bull when pulled from CCTV cameras and published in the media. We have the technology and its not expensive or rocket science, to have the police release clear and sharp images that have been enhanced with computer software.[/p][/quote]Why should the police waste valuable time on that when they'd much rather investigate bogus claims about public figures on directions from the House of Lords?[/p][/quote]You're only jealous that you're not being investigated. Of course you hardly fit the profile, do you Kim? Figure of fun, yes. Public, no. Minceir.
  • Score: 3

6:55pm Sun 23 Feb 14

jayman says...

Three minecraft figures.... I blame computer games
Three minecraft figures.... I blame computer games jayman
  • Score: 4

8:35am Mon 24 Feb 14

JohnMatrix666 says...

Kim Gandy wrote:
Send them to the front line in Afghanistan where they can pit their very limited wits against REAL men.
so the taliban are "real men" are they?
[quote][p][bold]Kim Gandy[/bold] wrote: Send them to the front line in Afghanistan where they can pit their very limited wits against REAL men.[/p][/quote]so the taliban are "real men" are they? JohnMatrix666
  • Score: 4

12:58pm Mon 24 Feb 14

Southend's Finest says...

You can get a James Bond style camera pen for £9.99 that has higher resolution images than the camera used to snap these toe-rags! Question....is the CCTV there as a deterrent or to actually identify people once they have broken the law? What a waste of time, they are clearly no help in both cases! How about more police on the streets, thats more of a deterrent than a mounted camera, forty feet in the air, zooming in at 1200 percent just to see if someone is wearing a red or blue jacket!
You can get a James Bond style camera pen for £9.99 that has higher resolution images than the camera used to snap these toe-rags! Question....is the CCTV there as a deterrent or to actually identify people once they have broken the law? What a waste of time, they are clearly no help in both cases! How about more police on the streets, thats more of a deterrent than a mounted camera, forty feet in the air, zooming in at 1200 percent just to see if someone is wearing a red or blue jacket! Southend's Finest
  • Score: 3

1:48pm Mon 24 Feb 14

tophat27dt says...

If one actually knew these men (neighbour, friend, relative) the poor quality CCTV would probably be adequate, but those of us who don't know them, then there is a big dead end.
If one actually knew these men (neighbour, friend, relative) the poor quality CCTV would probably be adequate, but those of us who don't know them, then there is a big dead end. tophat27dt
  • Score: 0

4:47pm Mon 24 Feb 14

TheaWells says...

Jeeze I don't even think their own Mothers would recognise them!
Jeeze I don't even think their own Mothers would recognise them! TheaWells
  • Score: 4

4:51pm Mon 24 Feb 14

TheaWells says...

Kim Gandy wrote:
Send them to the front line in Afghanistan where they can pit their very limited wits against REAL men.
So because the three above were in a brawl you assume they are guilty of a crime horrendous enough to force them to put their lives on the line in armed combat....?
Then you refer to the Taliban as "REAL men"..?
Lets assume you are right and they have done something horrendous and not just a scuffle.. would you want them on your side in a war zone?

You say some daft things 90% of the time Kim but this was stupid even for you. You need to get out more.
[quote][p][bold]Kim Gandy[/bold] wrote: Send them to the front line in Afghanistan where they can pit their very limited wits against REAL men.[/p][/quote]So because the three above were in a brawl you assume they are guilty of a crime horrendous enough to force them to put their lives on the line in armed combat....? Then you refer to the Taliban as "REAL men"..? Lets assume you are right and they have done something horrendous and not just a scuffle.. would you want them on your side in a war zone? You say some daft things 90% of the time Kim but this was stupid even for you. You need to get out more. TheaWells
  • Score: 3

1:29pm Tue 25 Feb 14

297595 says...

tezzason1 wrote:
These images are as useless as tits on a bull when pulled from CCTV cameras and published in the media. We have the technology and its not expensive or rocket science, to have the police release clear and sharp images that have been enhanced with computer software.
It is expensive. To record clear image, or HD, would require a LOT more storage space. You can't simply 'enhance' an image with software if the original image wasn't a high quality, it doesn't work like that.
[quote][p][bold]tezzason1[/bold] wrote: These images are as useless as tits on a bull when pulled from CCTV cameras and published in the media. We have the technology and its not expensive or rocket science, to have the police release clear and sharp images that have been enhanced with computer software.[/p][/quote]It is expensive. To record clear image, or HD, would require a LOT more storage space. You can't simply 'enhance' an image with software if the original image wasn't a high quality, it doesn't work like that. 297595
  • Score: 0

2:02pm Tue 25 Feb 14

tophat27dt says...

if one cant enhance the images, then stop asking the public to ID the suspects from blurred pictures.
if one cant enhance the images, then stop asking the public to ID the suspects from blurred pictures. tophat27dt
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree