CCTV: Distraction thefts in Rayleigh and Hockley

Echo: Police want to identify these women Police want to identify these women

TWO women went on a 30-minute crime spree.

Police have released a CCTV image of the pair, who are both Asian and in their 20s, in a bid to track them down.

They are thought to have carried out three distraction thefts from business in Rayleigh and Hockley between 10am and 11am on Friday, May 30.

They first entered The Art Shop, on Rayleigh High Street, where one woman distracted a staff member while the other stole a charity box containing £70.

The pair then moved to Hockley, where they targeted Lily Janes nail and beauty salon, in Spa Road.

One of the women asked to use the customer toilet, but instead entered the staff room and stole £10 from a purse.

The thieves later entered a nearby opticians, a few doors down on Spa Road.

One woman distracted a staff member, while the other leaned over a counter and stole a mobile phone.

They left the optician together and drove off in a green Peugeot 206.

One of the women was wearing a noticeable diamond engagement ring.

Anyone who can identify the pair is urged to contact the Neighbourhood Crime Team at Rayleigh police station on 101.

Comments (25)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:54pm Sun 29 Jun 14

LinfordsLunchbox says...

Asian or romanian?
Asian or romanian? LinfordsLunchbox
  • Score: 36

4:39pm Sun 29 Jun 14

sesibollox says...

Romanian gypsies probably got the thieves express from London, to do a little shopping...
Romanian gypsies probably got the thieves express from London, to do a little shopping... sesibollox
  • Score: 40

5:56pm Sun 29 Jun 14

Robin Reliant says...

LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
yes they are barking up the wrong tree with the Asian angle(not usual for Pakistani/Indian/Mal
ay/indo female goes round robbing people), Romanian is higher on the list, shop staff should have a sixth sense when customers come in who just don't look and feel right especially when they start asking odd things, in retail it helps to have that extra sense.
[quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]yes they are barking up the wrong tree with the Asian angle(not usual for Pakistani/Indian/Mal ay/indo female goes round robbing people), Romanian is higher on the list, shop staff should have a sixth sense when customers come in who just don't look and feel right especially when they start asking odd things, in retail it helps to have that extra sense. Robin Reliant
  • Score: 29

6:03pm Sun 29 Jun 14

CarnMountification says...

Robin Reliant wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
yes they are barking up the wrong tree with the Asian angle(not usual for Pakistani/Indian/Mal

ay/indo female goes round robbing people), Romanian is higher on the list, shop staff should have a sixth sense when customers come in who just don't look and feel right especially when they start asking odd things, in retail it helps to have that extra sense.
Shame your extra senses aren't switched on
[quote][p][bold]Robin Reliant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]yes they are barking up the wrong tree with the Asian angle(not usual for Pakistani/Indian/Mal ay/indo female goes round robbing people), Romanian is higher on the list, shop staff should have a sixth sense when customers come in who just don't look and feel right especially when they start asking odd things, in retail it helps to have that extra sense.[/p][/quote]Shame your extra senses aren't switched on CarnMountification
  • Score: -19

8:05pm Sun 29 Jun 14

streete says...

Ilford comes to mind.
Ilford comes to mind. streete
  • Score: 16

1:01am Mon 30 Jun 14

ThisYear says...

LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
[quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question. ThisYear
  • Score: -16

1:04am Mon 30 Jun 14

ThisYear says...

sesibollox wrote:
Romanian gypsies probably got the thieves express from London, to do a little shopping...
It did say " who are both Asian"

But I suppose the police and witnesses could be lying.

Maybe they are in league with them...sharing the swag.
[quote][p][bold]sesibollox[/bold] wrote: Romanian gypsies probably got the thieves express from London, to do a little shopping...[/p][/quote]It did say " who are both Asian" But I suppose the police and witnesses could be lying. Maybe they are in league with them...sharing the swag. ThisYear
  • Score: -14

9:08am Mon 30 Jun 14

SLord90 says...

what are they doing to this country? SEND THEM HOME!
what are they doing to this country? SEND THEM HOME! SLord90
  • Score: 12

9:34am Mon 30 Jun 14

DAGASMAN says...

ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
[quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians DAGASMAN
  • Score: 14

10:12am Mon 30 Jun 14

MilesBond says...

This pair have been working the local area for a couple of years. They are East European. Probably Romanian.
This pair have been working the local area for a couple of years. They are East European. Probably Romanian. MilesBond
  • Score: 17

11:02am Mon 30 Jun 14

pembury53 says...

MilesBond wrote:
This pair have been working the local area for a couple of years. They are East European. Probably Romanian.
Oh yes, bucharest finest.....
[quote][p][bold]MilesBond[/bold] wrote: This pair have been working the local area for a couple of years. They are East European. Probably Romanian.[/p][/quote]Oh yes, bucharest finest..... pembury53
  • Score: 14

12:52am Tue 1 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

SLord90 wrote:
what are they doing to this country? SEND THEM HOME!
You feel Asian people cant live in this country?

What about Asian people who were born here?

Would you allow them to remain? Or do they have to go to?
[quote][p][bold]SLord90[/bold] wrote: what are they doing to this country? SEND THEM HOME![/p][/quote]You feel Asian people cant live in this country? What about Asian people who were born here? Would you allow them to remain? Or do they have to go to? ThisYear
  • Score: -8

12:56am Tue 1 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry.

The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian!

PILLOCK!
[quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians[/p][/quote]What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry. The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian! PILLOCK! ThisYear
  • Score: -15

12:57am Tue 1 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

MilesBond wrote:
This pair have been working the local area for a couple of years. They are East European. Probably Romanian.
So everyone who came in contact with them were wrong when they reported them as Asian?
[quote][p][bold]MilesBond[/bold] wrote: This pair have been working the local area for a couple of years. They are East European. Probably Romanian.[/p][/quote]So everyone who came in contact with them were wrong when they reported them as Asian? ThisYear
  • Score: -9

9:37am Tue 1 Jul 14

DAGASMAN says...

ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry.

The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian!

PILLOCK!
Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.
[quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians[/p][/quote]What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry. The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian! PILLOCK![/p][/quote]Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock. DAGASMAN
  • Score: 13

1:53am Fri 4 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry.

The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian!

PILLOCK!
Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.
You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak?

Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak?

Never mind via a picture

I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't.

Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian..

Who should be credited with the most reliable identification?

A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women

Or

B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women?

Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B.

Divvy!
[quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians[/p][/quote]What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry. The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian! PILLOCK![/p][/quote]Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.[/p][/quote]You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak? Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak? Never mind via a picture I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't. Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian.. Who should be credited with the most reliable identification? A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women Or B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women? Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B. Divvy! ThisYear
  • Score: -9

10:47am Fri 4 Jul 14

DAGASMAN says...

ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry.

The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian!

PILLOCK!
Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.
You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak?

Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak?

Never mind via a picture

I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't.

Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian..

Who should be credited with the most reliable identification?

A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women

Or

B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women?

Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B.

Divvy!
Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.
[quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians[/p][/quote]What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry. The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian! PILLOCK![/p][/quote]Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.[/p][/quote]You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak? Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak? Never mind via a picture I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't. Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian.. Who should be credited with the most reliable identification? A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women Or B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women? Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B. Divvy![/p][/quote]Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock. DAGASMAN
  • Score: 10

11:49am Fri 4 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry.

The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian!

PILLOCK!
Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.
You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak?

Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak?

Never mind via a picture

I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't.

Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian..

Who should be credited with the most reliable identification?

A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women

Or

B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women?

Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B.

Divvy!
Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.
The point of the comparison has seemingly eluded you as it flew over your pointy head...but never the less Ill continue.

So you agree you you wouldn't be able tell a white Australian from A white English person..if they spoke you could I would surmise (although with your level of intelligence I may be giving you too much credit)

The shop assistant had the opportunity to hear the perpetrators speak!

Therefore she is in the best position to report who she deemed them to be..She stated they were Asian.

The police are therefore looking for a couple of Asian women in connection to this crime.

Your 'Romanian' suggestion would seem to be full of holes...bit like your draughty head.
[quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians[/p][/quote]What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry. The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian! PILLOCK![/p][/quote]Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.[/p][/quote]You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak? Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak? Never mind via a picture I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't. Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian.. Who should be credited with the most reliable identification? A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women Or B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women? Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B. Divvy![/p][/quote]Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.[/p][/quote]The point of the comparison has seemingly eluded you as it flew over your pointy head...but never the less Ill continue. So you agree you you wouldn't be able tell a white Australian from A white English person..if they spoke you could I would surmise (although with your level of intelligence I may be giving you too much credit) The shop assistant had the opportunity to hear the perpetrators speak! Therefore she is in the best position to report who she deemed them to be..She stated they were Asian. The police are therefore looking for a couple of Asian women in connection to this crime. Your 'Romanian' suggestion would seem to be full of holes...bit like your draughty head. ThisYear
  • Score: -8

11:52am Fri 4 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry.

The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian!

PILLOCK!
Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.
You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak?

Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak?

Never mind via a picture

I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't.

Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian..

Who should be credited with the most reliable identification?

A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women

Or

B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women?

Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B.

Divvy!
Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.
Oh and just out of curiosity, before you flee the thread, where does it say the assistant described the women as 'indian" ?

Do you think, in your stupidity, that all Asians are Indian?
[quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians[/p][/quote]What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry. The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian! PILLOCK![/p][/quote]Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.[/p][/quote]You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak? Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak? Never mind via a picture I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't. Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian.. Who should be credited with the most reliable identification? A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women Or B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women? Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B. Divvy![/p][/quote]Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.[/p][/quote]Oh and just out of curiosity, before you flee the thread, where does it say the assistant described the women as 'indian" ? Do you think, in your stupidity, that all Asians are Indian? ThisYear
  • Score: -10

1:31pm Fri 4 Jul 14

Mattster says...

ThisYear wrote:
sesibollox wrote:
Romanian gypsies probably got the thieves express from London, to do a little shopping...
It did say " who are both Asian"

But I suppose the police and witnesses could be lying.

Maybe they are in league with them...sharing the swag.
They do look more Romanian than Asian though it has to be said.
[quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sesibollox[/bold] wrote: Romanian gypsies probably got the thieves express from London, to do a little shopping...[/p][/quote]It did say " who are both Asian" But I suppose the police and witnesses could be lying. Maybe they are in league with them...sharing the swag.[/p][/quote]They do look more Romanian than Asian though it has to be said. Mattster
  • Score: 7

2:15am Sat 5 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

Mattster wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
sesibollox wrote:
Romanian gypsies probably got the thieves express from London, to do a little shopping...
It did say " who are both Asian"

But I suppose the police and witnesses could be lying.

Maybe they are in league with them...sharing the swag.
They do look more Romanian than Asian though it has to be said.
Which of course doesn't make them so...as the plonker insists.
[quote][p][bold]Mattster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sesibollox[/bold] wrote: Romanian gypsies probably got the thieves express from London, to do a little shopping...[/p][/quote]It did say " who are both Asian" But I suppose the police and witnesses could be lying. Maybe they are in league with them...sharing the swag.[/p][/quote]They do look more Romanian than Asian though it has to be said.[/p][/quote]Which of course doesn't make them so...as the plonker insists. ThisYear
  • Score: -6

9:55am Sat 5 Jul 14

Eric the Red says...

ThisYear wrote:
SLord90 wrote:
what are they doing to this country? SEND THEM HOME!
You feel Asian people cant live in this country?

What about Asian people who were born here?

Would you allow them to remain? Or do they have to go to?
Only if they take you with them................
.we could pull the chain for one big flush.
[quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SLord90[/bold] wrote: what are they doing to this country? SEND THEM HOME![/p][/quote]You feel Asian people cant live in this country? What about Asian people who were born here? Would you allow them to remain? Or do they have to go to?[/p][/quote]Only if they take you with them................ .we could pull the chain for one big flush. Eric the Red
  • Score: 6

10:12am Sat 5 Jul 14

DAGASMAN says...

ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry.

The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian!

PILLOCK!
Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.
You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak?

Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak?

Never mind via a picture

I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't.

Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian..

Who should be credited with the most reliable identification?

A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women

Or

B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women?

Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B.

Divvy!
Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.
Oh and just out of curiosity, before you flee the thread, where does it say the assistant described the women as 'indian" ?

Do you think, in your stupidity, that all Asians are Indian?
Its irrelevant as they are clearly romanian you wally.
[quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians[/p][/quote]What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry. The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian! PILLOCK![/p][/quote]Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.[/p][/quote]You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak? Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak? Never mind via a picture I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't. Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian.. Who should be credited with the most reliable identification? A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women Or B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women? Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B. Divvy![/p][/quote]Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.[/p][/quote]Oh and just out of curiosity, before you flee the thread, where does it say the assistant described the women as 'indian" ? Do you think, in your stupidity, that all Asians are Indian?[/p][/quote]Its irrelevant as they are clearly romanian you wally. DAGASMAN
  • Score: 6

10:10pm Mon 7 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

Eric the Red wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
SLord90 wrote:
what are they doing to this country? SEND THEM HOME!
You feel Asian people cant live in this country?

What about Asian people who were born here?

Would you allow them to remain? Or do they have to go to?
Only if they take you with them................

.we could pull the chain for one big flush.
Do you often feel inclined to answer questions for others?

Or is it only questions where you can show your moronic prejudice?

It your sort of prejudice that belongs in the sewer..but them you already know that dont you.
[quote][p][bold]Eric the Red[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SLord90[/bold] wrote: what are they doing to this country? SEND THEM HOME![/p][/quote]You feel Asian people cant live in this country? What about Asian people who were born here? Would you allow them to remain? Or do they have to go to?[/p][/quote]Only if they take you with them................ .we could pull the chain for one big flush.[/p][/quote]Do you often feel inclined to answer questions for others? Or is it only questions where you can show your moronic prejudice? It your sort of prejudice that belongs in the sewer..but them you already know that dont you. ThisYear
  • Score: -3

10:23pm Mon 7 Jul 14

ThisYear says...

DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
DAGASMAN wrote:
ThisYear wrote:
LinfordsLunchbox wrote:
Asian or romanian?
"who are both Asian"

Can you read?

No reply will answer that question.
Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians
What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry.

The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian!

PILLOCK!
Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.
You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak?

Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak?

Never mind via a picture

I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't.

Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian..

Who should be credited with the most reliable identification?

A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women

Or

B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women?

Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B.

Divvy!
Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.
Oh and just out of curiosity, before you flee the thread, where does it say the assistant described the women as 'indian" ?

Do you think, in your stupidity, that all Asians are Indian?
Its irrelevant as they are clearly romanian you wally.
You are a complete idiot aren't you?

You feel it is irrelevant that the 'on the spot witness' who spent time speaking to the criminals claims they were Asian?

Because you have seen a still photo of them and have decided, not withstanding the witness, that the criminals are not Asian but Romanian

Your identification would stand up even in an idiots court of law, you basic fool.
[quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DAGASMAN[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ThisYear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]LinfordsLunchbox[/bold] wrote: Asian or romanian?[/p][/quote]"who are both Asian" Can you read? No reply will answer that question.[/p][/quote]Can you not see? Theres a photo of them you idiot, they are clearly romanians[/p][/quote]What a sheer pillock you are...you shame all run-of-the-mill pillocks with your pillockry. The witnesses must of said they were Asian, The police seemingly accepts them as Asian, the newspaper reports them as Asian..Yet you in your pillock mode decide they are Romanian! PILLOCK![/p][/quote]Are you blind, stupid or both? There is a photo of 2 romanian women, its right there, you can see it, 2 women, both romanian, just because a shop worker assumed they were asian, does not magically mean the photo does not show 2 romanian women. I saw a photo in the paper of a dog in a field that somebody mistook for a big cat, that doesnt mean it was a big cat. It was a dog. And those 2 women are clearly romanians. You pillock.[/p][/quote]You can tell a persons nationality by sight...What a moronic claim...could you tell a white Australian from a White English man if they didn't speak? Could you tell a Black American from a Black Englishman if they didn't speak? Never mind via a picture I suggest even someone as thick as you would have to agree you couldn't. Now its clear the women spoke to the shop assistant who didn't have to view them via a photograph.. and she reported them as Asian.. Who should be credited with the most reliable identification? A) The shop assistant who engaged with the women Or B) A dope like you who can only make an identification via a picture of two women? Most people with even a teaspoon of brain matter would chose A...which means you would chose B. Divvy![/p][/quote]Of course i couldnt tell a white australian from a white englishman, what a moronic comparison to make. I can however tell a romanian from a indian. you pillock.[/p][/quote]Oh and just out of curiosity, before you flee the thread, where does it say the assistant described the women as 'indian" ? Do you think, in your stupidity, that all Asians are Indian?[/p][/quote]Its irrelevant as they are clearly romanian you wally.[/p][/quote]You are a complete idiot aren't you? You feel it is irrelevant that the 'on the spot witness' who spent time speaking to the criminals claims they were Asian? Because you have seen a still photo of them and have decided, not withstanding the witness, that the criminals are not Asian but Romanian Your identification would stand up even in an idiots court of law, you basic fool. ThisYear
  • Score: -3

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree