JONATHAN WILLS, a specialist writer on the oil industry, recently
watched a BP executive apologise for spying on the company's most
outspoken American critic. Today he says that events in US Congress will
explain why the oil industry has much to feel sorry about.
BRITISH Petroleum and six other oil companies have been shut out of a
huge American oilfield following a ''dirty tricks'' campaign against the
man who passed environmental complaints to the US government.
The ''lock-out'' will reduce the USA's reserves of domestic oil,
increasing reliance on imports from the North Sea and the Middle East.
In the long term it could increase world oil prices and boost plans to
extract Atlantic oil from BP's huge Clair field west of the Shetland
Islands.
US senators have voted to ban exploration drilling in Alaska's Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge after learning of an alleged $1m ''sting''
against Charles ''Chuck'' Hamel, a retired oil broker turned Green
campaigner.
Details of the corporate spy scandal will be revealed to a
Congressional committee today. But Congress has already heard enough to
doubt industry promises about caring for the environment.
Congressman George Miller, chairman of the House Committee on Interior
Affairs which called the hearings, is incensed that a BP executive,
James Hermiller, ordered a private espionage operation against oil
company employees who wanted Congress to know about alleged
environmental outrages in Alaska's existing oilfields.
Obstructing communications with Congress is a criminal offence.
Hermiller, on loan from BP as president of the Alyeska Pipeline
Service Company, has admitted hiring the Wackenhut security firm last
year, to find out where Chuck Hamel got his ''whistleblower'' leaks.
Hermiller says nothing illegal was done, but six weeks ago he made a
public apology to Alaskans for the spying which, he said, was ''wrong''.
Over the past 10 years, Hamel has passed information to federal
agencies about oil spills on the tundra, corrosion in the 800 mile
Trans-Alaska Pipeline, and air and water pollution from Alyeska's Valdez
tanker terminal. He also funnelled insider information about the causes
of the Exxon Valdez tanker disaster near Valdez in March 1989.
Congressman Miller's committee will be told by former Wackenhut
employees that they bugged Hamel's house and portable telephones,
searched his refuse sacks and tailed him day and night in an elaborate
''gumshoe'' operation.
According to the witnesses, Wackenhut even set up a bogus
environmental organisation, complete with Save The Whale posters, and
conned Hamel into confiding details of his network of contacts.
The outfit paid Hamel $4000 in expenses, which he says he passed on to
ecology groups. On one occasion, Hamel says, they tried to set him up
with a prostitute in an attempt to wreck his marriage but he proved too
faithful to his wife.
BP owns 50.1% of Alyeska's shares, in a partnership with six other
companies, but say they do not formally control the pipeline company. A
former BP chairman of the partnership, Fred Garibaldi, says he knew of
the Wackenhut campaign but did not ask for details.
BP's Hermiller says he now regrets the seven-month operation by
Wackenhut, the third largest security firm in the US, but admits to
''unease and concern'' about the methods employed. He had earlier tried
court action to force the US Environmental Protection Agency to reveal
Hamel's sources, but without success.
Surveillance of Hamel was stopped last September, Hermiller says, when
BP's partners were told what was going on.
Hamel, no bleeding-heart environmentalist on his own admission, has
axes to grind. He has been involved in litigation against the oil
companies since 1980, claiming that they forced him out of the Alaska
trade by dumping excess water in his oil cargoes. Alyeska says the
charges have been fully investigated by the Alaskan authorities and
found to be groundless.
Hamel also claims he was swindled by Exxon and Gulf Oil over drilling
leases he once owned in the huge, undeveloped oilfield at Point McIntyre
on the western boundary of the Arctic wildlife refuge. The companies
charge him with attempted extortion for $12m.
Hamel said yesterday that he would not settle his claims out of court
unless the environmental misdeeds he had exposed were put right and his
sources compensated for damage to their careers.
A former millionaire, Hamel said he was now broke because of his 12
year fight against the oil industry.
What the American Press is calling the ''Hamelgate'' affair was the
last straw for Senators, after a well-organised campaign against
drilling in the wildlife refuge by the influential Sierra Club and other
environmental organisations.
They oppose further oil developments on the shores of the icy Beaufort
Sea because of possible disruption to migrating caribou herds, wolves,
polar bears and traditional Eskimo life.
Alaska's new governor, Walter Hickel, is pro-development. So are
Alaska's two US senators, both Republicans. Many Alaskans believe the
refuge should be developed to provide much-needed jobs and to secure
Arab-free fuel for the USA's strategic oil supplies -- if the oil
industry can give binding assurances on the environment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article