The split shocked Tinseltown where they were long regarded as having one of the strongest relationships in the entertainment industry.
Sarandon, 63, and Robbins, 51, worked together when he directed her in the 1995 film Dead Man Walking, for which she won an Oscar. Robbins later won an Academy Award for best supporting actor for his role in Mystic River, which was released in 2003.
They are also known as a “political power” couple, with both speaking out against the Iraq war in 2003 and publicly supporting the Democrats in last year’s election.
Sarandon’s publicist Teal Cannaday said: “Susan and her partner of 23 years, Tim Robbins, have announced that they separated over the summer.”
Sarandon, whose latest film The Lovely Bones is due out for release in the UK next month, met Robbins while making the 1988 film Bull Durham, in which Robbins played a baseball player and Sarandon the fan who simultaneously seduced him and prepared him for the big leagues.
They never married but went on to have two sons together. Sarandon also has a daughter from a previous relationship with the Italian filmmaker Franco Amurri.
In 2005 Sarandon flew to Scotland to introduce Bob Geldof at the Live 8 concert in Edinburgh. She described the choice of Sarah Palin as the Republicans’ vice-presidential candidate “divisive and cynical”.
In 2004, Sarandon said: “Tim is a guy guy, and he is also 12 years younger than me. I won’t marry because I am too afraid of taking him for granted or him taking me for granted – maybe it will be a good excuse for a party when I am 80.”
She later told The Herald: “I like it when somebody does something thoughtful, like framing a great picture – when somebody takes the time to listen to you, and maybe constructs something.
“Anything that’s not just going out and shopping – not that I’d turn down jewellery – but I think romance takes a little bit of creativity.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article