Washington.
IN A SERIOUS blow to the defence, the Los Angeles Judge hearing the O.
J. Simpson case ruled today that evidence found at his house the night
his ex-wife was murdered was admissible.
His lawyers had argued that police had entered the property without a
warrant.
The evidence includes a number of bloodstains, a pair of sneakers, and
other items. Perhaps the most damning is a glove, pair to one found next
to Mrs Simpson's body.
The hearing is a presentation of evidence against Mr Simpson, who is
charged with murdering his ex-wife, Nicole, and a friend, Ronald
Goldman, on June 13.
The Judge will decide whether the retired football star should be sent
to trial. No doubt his lawyers will continue to argue that evidence
taken at his house is inadmissible, and the matter may end up in the
California court of appeals.
The police arrived at Mr Simpson's house at 4.45am. They rang the
bell, without response, and eventually climbed the fence. Then they
found a guest staying in a guest house at the back, and Mr Simpson's
daughter, who let them into the house. The Judge found that they had
behaved reasonably.
The case continues to fascinate America. Newsweek Magazine, for
instance, has had O. J. Simpson on its front cover for three weeks in a
row, and earlier this week the Los Angeles hearing was being broadcast
live on seven television channels in New York.
The legal arguments were less dramatic than witnesses offered in
earlier sessions, but as soon as the Judge had ruled on the evidence at
Mr Simpson's house, the court reverted to high drama.
A detective took the stand to describe the scene of the crime and the
items collected there -- a knitted cap, a keyring, and the left-hand
glove. He said blood was running down the steps of the house from Mrs
Simpson's body, and there were the pawmarks of an animal in the blood,
leading down to the street.
The bodies were found at midnight after a man walking his dog noticed
Mrs Simpson's Akita barking frenziedly at the path leading to the house.
The first person to look in saw the bodies and a ''river of blood''
running down the steps.
Today's witness said there were also bloody footprints leading away
from the bodies and round to the back of the house.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article