News RSS Feed


Send us your news!


200 homes plan thrown out...for now

5:22pm Thursday 14th February 2008

comment Comments (4)   Have your say »


PLANS for more than 200 homes on a beauty spot have been thrown out by Basildon Council.

Campaigners claimed a victory after councillors said "no" to building on ten of the 100 acres of Barn Hall fields, off Station Avenue, Wickford.

Yet the fight is not over.

Residents are now shaping up for round two as developer Gleeson Homes is appealing to the Government to overturn the decision.

Peter Boyns, founder of Wickford North Green action group, spoke passionately at a council meeting which was held in Bromfords School hall, Wickford, to accommodate the 200-strong audience.

He said: "Building on Barn Hall will destroy a lovely area of countryside forever.

"It is an area of tranquil, peaceful retreat in a relatively crowded area of Essex. Generations of children have grown up here playing safely in meadows, hedges and copses."

Sylvia Buckley, chairman of Basildon Council development control committee, vowed the council would make every effort to beat the appeal.

She said: "I have every confidence in our officers.

"They will put forward a good case and councillors will also attend. I wish to retain the green fields we still have around Wickford."

Council leader Malcolm Buckley fears if the 200 homes were approved it would open the flood gates for the mass development of Barn Hall.

However, some residents blame the council for Gleeson's appeal as it failed to vote over the original application within the 13-week deadline. The legal blunder, in 2006, meant the site could not be designated green belt.

So it is currently earmarked for homes and pressure is mounting as the council is behind in its bid to meet a Government housing target of 10,700 new homes by 2011.

More than 320 residents wrote objection letters to Barn Hall plans - there were also complaints from neighbouring Chelmsford Council, the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England, Natural England and Network Rail.

Councillor jeered for comments

A CONTROVERSIAL councillor caused outrage when he voiced his support for the development of Barn Hall.

Labour's Danny Nandanwar said Gleeson Homes' proposals were just a small development with a good mix of homes and a "breath of fresh air" to flats being built in town centres.

In contrast, fellow Labour councillor Lynda Gordon branded them outrageous and Mr Nandanwar's comments led to jeers from the 200-strong crowd.

Mr Nandanwar is no stranger to controversy.

At the previous development control meeting he argued the green belt was not sacrosanct and the council should seek to build on fields as well as in town centres.

He is also an ardent supporter of travellers remaining at Crays Hill and believes more sites should be created in the district.

However, he does oppose the application for a site at Terminus Drive, Pitsea, in his ward.

Residents shouted "rubbish" after his Barn Hall speech.

Returning to the debate, Tory councillor Kevin Blake said: "Mr Nandanwar's comments are ludicrous.

"We all know this is a trojan horse for further development."


Your Say YourEcho

shallotman, Basildon says...
10:42am Fri 15 Feb 08

So Councilor Nandanwar is for the gypsy site at Crays Hill, but is against a proposed site at Terminus Drive in his own constituency, the term "not in my back yard" comes to mind

Slapshot, Essex says...
12:02pm Fri 15 Feb 08

I just wonder why do Basildon council want to stop this deve;opement? They back a lot more that are going to be built on "beauty spots" so why this one?
The council have allow for more developement, just look at Basildon town centre as one block is finished another is about to start on the old Essex Ford site and then the George Hurd centre.
Wickford is going to get more flats and appartments than they can deal with, is it because blocks of flats have a greater collection of Council Tax per floor space than houses?
Lets face it this council cant grab money off people fast enough.

Colin Clarke, Basildon says...
8:30pm Fri 15 Feb 08

NIMBY?
Once again the Buckleys show their two faces! They boldly stamp all over the Ghyllgrove protesters as the last play area sinks under the concrete of the George Hurd centre, with the "Master Model" showing even more buildings on this narrow strip of green space, then spout about carving up Gloucester Park for private development. We lost an area designated as green space when the Barclay's con job happened.All these patches of green space are under the glare of their Baronial offices, yet they appear not to care about OUR last green space. Yet they are improving Wickords parkland and defending every divot in that town with such force it would frighten Attila the Hun!
Er, THEY wouldn't by chance happen to live somewhere near Wickford, would they?

One of the bunch, ABOUT TOWN says...
5:15am Mon 18 Feb 08

Colin Clarke wrote:
NIMBY? Once again the Buckleys show their two faces! They boldly stamp all over the Ghyllgrove protesters as the last play area sinks under the concrete of the George Hurd centre, with the "Master Model" showing even more buildings on this narrow strip of green space, then spout about carving up Gloucester Park for private development. We lost an area designated as green space when the Barclay's con job happened.All these patches of green space are under the glare of their Baronial offices, yet they appear not to care about OUR last green space. Yet they are improving Wickords parkland and defending every divot in that town with such force it would frighten Attila the Hun! Er, THEY wouldn't by chance happen to live somewhere near Wickford, would they?
Dam right they do !Look on the Council website for his address and "E mail" address

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »