News RSS Feed


Send us your news!


£10m per mile - the cost of making the A12 safer

9:26am Wednesday 16th April 2008

comment Comments (12)   Have your say »


Widening the A12 could cost at least £10 million-a-mile, a top civil engineer warned today.

This would equate to a bill of more than £1,400 for every home in Essex.

Francis Connolly, a recently-retired senior partner at global firm Peter Brett Associates, claimed other services could suffer if Essex County Council decides to use council tax cash to fund improvements.

He said the need to keep the major trunk route open while works were carried out could double the size of the eventual bill.

Council leader Lord Hanningfield has said he will consider borrowing money to sort out congestion woes on the road, even though it is the responsibility of the Highways Agency, as he is fed up of waiting for funds to be released by the treasury.

He believes widening from a dual to a three-lane carriageway for the whole length of the A12 in Essex will prove to be the long-term solution.

Mr Connolly, who oversaw major road schemes across the country over 33 years, claimed it could "easily" cost £10 million a mile - or £1,900 a foot - to expand all the two-lane sections.

That tallies with an estimate worked out by the council several years ago of £800 million, equating to £1,468 for every home in Essex.

It calls into question whether the Essex stretch will ever be completely widened to three lanes for nearly 50 miles from the M25 to the Suffolk border, as the annual Government budget for road schemes across the East of England is just £75 million.

"Widening existing roads can be frighteningly expensive," said Mr Connolly.

The council has appointed Sir David Rowlands to hold a public inquiry into the state of the A12.

The first of three hearings will take place from 10am to 5pm at County Hall tomorrow.

  • More in today's Gazette

Your Say YourEcho

The Vicar, Basildon says...
11:12am Wed 16 Apr 08

£10 million a mile?

You'd need a very large brown envelope to move that kind of money around. :)

piano hinges, says...
12:48pm Wed 16 Apr 08

It's still cheaper than Renaissance Southend. They've cost a fortune, and got us precisely nowhere.

Red Tape, Colchester says...
12:59pm Wed 16 Apr 08

Why should the bill fall on Essex taxpayers to foot? Surely the road is used by lots of people from outside Essex on their way to the East Anglian coast. Why should these benefit from any improvements for free?

£10m, Essex says...
1:58pm Wed 16 Apr 08

Anyone that uses the A12 will know that it is a very busy road and justifiably needs upgrading to motorway standard, realistically will 3lanes be enough?

How do they justify £10m per mile, I'd like to see a break down of the costs that they think will cost that much. Essex provides access to 3major ports (Tilbury, Harwich & Felixstowe), there are also 2 airports, (not directly on the A12, but to access them, alot of people would use A12 at some point, plus you have a major oli terminal on Canvey, the Army in Colchester, but only 1 major trunk route which runs North/South thru the middle of the county. What other counties have so much transport requirements per mile than Essex.
Essex needs a major road upgrade scheme more than most other parts of the country, its time for the Government to stop funding Scottish University entrance fees, prescription fees etc from the English peoples money and spend it alot nearer to home.

Denis Walker, PPPS says...
2:58pm Wed 16 Apr 08

£10m a mile is considerably better value than the £11.5m for 400 metres that Southend Borough Council wants to spend on Priory Crescent.

Nevertheless, the long-term solution is to reduce the number of cars using the road and at the rate oil is going up in price (it's very nearly doubled in the last twelve months), that might start happening with no outside intervention soon.

The Vicar, Basildon says...
3:39pm Wed 16 Apr 08

Denis Walker wrote:
£10m a mile is considerably better value than the £11.5m for 400 metres that Southend Borough Council wants to spend on Priory Crescent. Nevertheless, the long-term solution is to reduce the number of cars using the road and at the rate oil is going up in price (it's very nearly doubled in the last twelve months), that might start happening with no outside intervention soon.
Seeing as a third of all automobiles on the road are uninsured perhaps we could start there.

jimmo, colly says...
4:38pm Wed 16 Apr 08

And I always thought part of the road tax was used to build roads nationwide?

piano hinges, says...
5:00pm Wed 16 Apr 08

How exactly did they manage to spin "widening a road" into making it "safer"?

Welcome to Essexworld, where nothing is as it seems, and your money disappears before your very eyes... only to magically reappear in the pockets of big business.

MerylThePeril, Colchester says...
5:29pm Wed 16 Apr 08

I cannot believe that widening the A12 is a good idea. That will just generate even more traffic, so the road will remain just as congested. More important is to improve safety, e.g. by lowering speeds, installing cameras and resurfacing.

chris, Costa Blanca says...
7:21pm Wed 16 Apr 08

I have said before, here in Spain we have had millions spent of roads which far less busy than the A12, ask the EU for money, the Spanish obviously have !!

DCI Hunt, Colchester says...
9:49pm Wed 16 Apr 08

Make it a toll road for the first 3 years, that should pay for it in its own right.Easy to do everything automated. Not popular but tough days mean tough choices. Reasonable fees and zoned. Not exactly rocket science

Trainman, says...
11:02pm Wed 16 Apr 08

£10m per mile? Is that just for the bosses HIGH salaries?

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »