Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us »
8:00am Wednesday 24th June 2009 in
IT WAS a four-year lifestyle of tree-top homes and nature on the doorstep, but now Camp Bling is moving on.
Campaigners had been living on the site to prevent Southend Council from pushing ahead with plans to widen Priory Crescent, but when the council backed down earlier this year, Camp Bling began to come down.
Protesters have been dismantling the camp, which consists of 17 makeshift wooden huts and tree houses. But they are far from sad the camp – which for many has been their home – is being taken down.
Nadine Bourne, 26, lived at the site for a year and now lives in Bristol.
She said: “Life at the camp could be tough – there were ups and downs. There was abuse from passers-by. But it didn’t last long, and we had lots of support from the community.
“I don’t feel sad the camp is coming down, it is actually really positive. It has been a success and achieved what it set out to do.”
People on the camp tried to make life as harmonious as possible, with Blingers living a “low impact” lifestyle using recycled material, and solar and wind energy. The site even has its own cat, Ginger.
The base started out as just one platform in a tree covered with tarpaulin, but it soon grew into a mini-village – which should be completely gone by the end of July.
And these green campaigners are taking the meaning of recycling to the next level, as some of the material used to create Camp Bling is being taken to another protest site at Titnore woods, Worthing, West Sussex, where people are campaigning against Tesco.
Shaun Qureshi, 37, one of the founding members of Bling, said soon no one would know they were ever there.
He said: “We are doing it as sympathetically as possible to minimise the impact.
“All that can be seen from the huts we have taken down is a patch of soil, which we dig over. Grass is already growing back.”
The campaign to stop the road began eight years ago, before Camp Bling, but for many of the Blingers the camp has shaped their lives.
Shaun added: “We are not necessarily expecting people to agree with us, but it is good to see something like this in the local community. It shows things don’t have to be the way they are – we all have choices and we have to be prepared to face up to the consequences of those choices.
“A lot of material is being reused and recycled. Ideally we are avoiding landfill. A lot of the stuff here was second-hand when we got it.
“There is a lot of nature here, but I have a feeling the council will come and strim it within an inch of its life.
Shaun has not made up his mind about what to do next. He added: “We need to look at the way we live. We need to be aware of peak oil and climate change.”
The determined protesters first set up the camp in 2005, following the discovery of a Saxon king’s burial ground on the site.
The name of the camp took its inspiration from the Sun newspaper, which dubbed the Saxon king buried in the tomb the King of Bling, because gold crosses were found during the archaeological dig.
Comments(63)
Rick Jones
says...
10:20am Wed 24 Jun 09
DannyK86 wrote:So true most were from outside Southend so it had jack all to do with them.
So it seems the vast majority are moving elsewhere to other protests or back where they came from, despite their claims that most of them were 'locals'.
Jaq
says...
10:38am Wed 24 Jun 09
jq
says...
10:55am Wed 24 Jun 09
farnishk
says...
10:55am Wed 24 Jun 09
farnishk
says...
11:00am Wed 24 Jun 09
Quercus
says...
11:07am Wed 24 Jun 09
Soozie
says...
11:20am Wed 24 Jun 09
farnishk wrote:I will miss the friendly waves from you 'Blingers' now you are going.
Rick, does *your* job have a net positive or negative effect on society as a whole? The whole "get a job" thing is meaningless. I experienced this when I was picking berries at Bling. I had enough to make two pies, with loads left over on the bushes: then someone drove past in a white van screaming "GET A JOB!" I guess that would be in order to earn money to buy food. How bizarre.
evilc
says...
11:22am Wed 24 Jun 09
Soozie
says...
11:28am Wed 24 Jun 09
evilc wrote:who you talking to evilc?
P155 off!you do not speak for me.
Soozie
says...
11:29am Wed 24 Jun 09
evilc wrote:who you talking to evilc?
P155 off!you do not speak for me.
GavtheSpav
says...
11:46am Wed 24 Jun 09
Don South
says...
12:17pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Soozie
says...
12:26pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Don South wrote:I sincerely doubt that Don. If you want real proof of stinky unwashed filthy people - half the commuters into London can't be bothered to wash on a daily if not weekly basis. Ugh
There are some protesters who vowed not to wash until they achieved victory. A walking 'biological' weapon to overpower by body odour any construction workers that ventured near. At long last they can remove four years of built up grime from thie bodies and join normal society. Many residents had complained of smells coming from the nearby waste treatment works - not realising it was the stench of the protesters.
streaky
says...
12:35pm Wed 24 Jun 09
spudgun2007
says...
12:35pm Wed 24 Jun 09
evilc
says...
12:38pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Soozie wrote:Soozie my dear it certainly aint meant for you.
evilc wrote:who you talking to evilc?
P155 off!you do not speak for me.
Rick Jones
says...
12:56pm Wed 24 Jun 09
DannyK86
says...
1:15pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Partyboy2
says...
1:16pm Wed 24 Jun 09
streaky wrote:Gonna have to be quick or it will have pikey's on it before long!
Now these wasters have left the site (back to their homes all over the place), can we widen the road?
GavtheSpav
says...
1:19pm Wed 24 Jun 09
atwork
says...
1:23pm Wed 24 Jun 09
southendmechanic
says...
1:35pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Rick Jones
says...
1:41pm Wed 24 Jun 09
atwork wrote:So the labour govenment have not bust the country and there is not a recession and the contry is not going to hell in a hand cart...
i would like to say a MASSIVE thank you to the people of camp bling! You won :), there is no real use for the road and if it was up to certain people the whole country would end up as one big motorway. So im very proud that there are people who care about what happens to the area. They certainly wasnt on the dol or all the other nasty comments people decided to put, you shouldnt be so sterotypical! Least these people are doing a good cause!!! :). And also...it doesnt make you a tree hugger just because you dont want a dirty great road through a park!!
Partyboy2
says...
1:59pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Rick Jones wrote:I will laugh my a** off if pikies move in on the land. Then the supportive locals will be crying out for it to be tarmac'd. Probably get it done on the cheap too!
atwork wrote: i would like to say a MASSIVE thank you to the people of camp bling! You won :), there is no real use for the road and if it was up to certain people the whole country would end up as one big motorway. So im very proud that there are people who care about what happens to the area. They certainly wasnt on the dol or all the other nasty comments people decided to put, you shouldnt be so sterotypical! Least these people are doing a good cause!!! :). And also...it doesnt make you a tree hugger just because you dont want a dirty great road through a park!!So the labour govenment have not bust the country and there is not a recession and the contry is not going to hell in a hand cart... The project was scrapped because the govenment did not have the money to fund it end of.
Soozie
says...
2:03pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Rick Jones wrote:Wrongo Rick. The money was there at that time, now the money is not there.
atwork wrote: i would like to say a MASSIVE thank you to the people of camp bling! You won :), there is no real use for the road and if it was up to certain people the whole country would end up as one big motorway. So im very proud that there are people who care about what happens to the area. They certainly wasnt on the dol or all the other nasty comments people decided to put, you shouldnt be so sterotypical! Least these people are doing a good cause!!! :). And also...it doesnt make you a tree hugger just because you dont want a dirty great road through a park!!So the labour govenment have not bust the country and there is not a recession and the contry is not going to hell in a hand cart... The project was scrapped because the govenment did not have the money to fund it end of.
GavtheSpav
says...
3:40pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Jaq
says...
4:10pm Wed 24 Jun 09
fletch12107
says...
4:45pm Wed 24 Jun 09
bumper
says...
4:54pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Mildlyconservative
says...
4:55pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Jaq
says...
4:57pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Mildlyconservative
says...
5:08pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Partyboy2
says...
5:09pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Jaq wrote:Did the number of people driving past shouting abuse at you not tell you that the majority of people didnt want you there stinking the place out? The only reason there were more letters of objection was because of all the non working, non driving folk who actually have the time to write letters and camp in trees. I think you would find 'average Joe' would prefer a faster route into and out of Southend meaning they could get to work and back quicker and maybe improve their quality of life slightly.
fletch do you really believe that, given the state of our current democracy? I really wish we were a minority group like those you mention, we would then get plenty of Govt hand outs and anti discrimination protection from the kind of abuse we have to take! The numer of petitions, letters and other objections to this road , not to mention Echo polls etc proved beyond doubt that the majority of local people did not want the road, so seeing it cancelled is democracy and the will of the people in force!
TaoMark
says...
5:49pm Wed 24 Jun 09
firedog
says...
7:30pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Grey hair of leigh
says...
7:44pm Wed 24 Jun 09
fletch12107
says...
7:50pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Jaq wrote:You people who squatted on the land known as camp bling were a minority in every sense of the word. You cant quote figures about polls and letters of objections because there are no figures so do not use that as a reason for being on that land illegally. You were a few people who didn't think that widening a road was in YOUR best interest and had the time to sit around spouting YOUR take on things. Perhaps the reason the state of our democracy is not all it should be is down to your minority group and others like taking matters into your own hands.
fletch do you really believe that, given the state of our current democracy? I really wish we were a minority group like those you mention, we would then get plenty of Govt hand outs and anti discrimination protection from the kind of abuse we have to take! The numer of petitions, letters and other objections to this road , not to mention Echo polls etc proved beyond doubt that the majority of local people did not want the road, so seeing it cancelled is democracy and the will of the people in force!
TaoMark
says...
8:32pm Wed 24 Jun 09
TaoMark
says...
8:54pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Francis Grubb
says...
9:54pm Wed 24 Jun 09
tommyp
says...
10:21pm Wed 24 Jun 09
fletch12107
says...
5:54am Thu 25 Jun 09
southendmechanic
says...
6:49am Thu 25 Jun 09
GavtheSpav
says...
10:30am Thu 25 Jun 09
TaoMark
says...
10:36am Thu 25 Jun 09
DannyK86
says...
10:54am Thu 25 Jun 09
TaoMark wrote:It's well known that people who actually respond to newspaper polls are those more likely to have negative views (e.g. if the Daily Mail has a poll saying 'what do you think about immigrants?', it's not exactly going to be balanced is it?).
Fletch, for someone who posts on an Echo site, you seem to have missed the polls conducted by this paper. If you want figures, the ones that have been published and you seem to have overlooked, just ask. I'm sure they have archives or something. Similarly, the council and department for transport will have a record of all objections and it's your democratic right to find out the figures. So don't use the lame and incorrect excuse that there are no figures, because there are. Just involves getting off your bum and asking.
GavtheSpav
says...
10:58am Thu 25 Jun 09
TaoMark
says...
11:10am Thu 25 Jun 09
DannyK86 wrote:As opposed to people who live in the area, you mean? In that case, why don't we just let the council buy up all the land that isn't theirs and build what they like on it? Second homes for all the politicians perhaps? In this current climate of sponging, nest-feathering MPs, are you really suggesting that they are the only people who can be trusted to make a decision that isn't self-serving?
TaoMark wrote:It's well known that people who actually respond to newspaper polls are those more likely to have negative views (e.g. if the Daily Mail has a poll saying 'what do you think about immigrants?', it's not exactly going to be balanced is it?).
Fletch, for someone who posts on an Echo site, you seem to have missed the polls conducted by this paper. If you want figures, the ones that have been published and you seem to have overlooked, just ask. I'm sure they have archives or something. Similarly, the council and department for transport will have a record of all objections and it's your democratic right to find out the figures. So don't use the lame and incorrect excuse that there are no figures, because there are. Just involves getting off your bum and asking.
Leave decisions on roads to professionals from planning and highways services.
farnishk
says...
11:47am Thu 25 Jun 09
farnishk
says...
11:48am Thu 25 Jun 09
DannyK86
says...
11:56am Thu 25 Jun 09
farnishk
says...
2:46pm Thu 25 Jun 09
Soozie
says...
4:07pm Thu 25 Jun 09
farnishk wrote:I can't see you leaving the place in bad shape...after all it would defeat part of why you were there.
Well, it was always meant to be temporary, Danny, and has left a minimal impact on the ground. Nature always found its way under and in the structures. There was also a strict "no tents" rule, which really helped keep things in order. Also, don't forget that these were *very* small living spaces by civilised standards; the inside was worn out, as it were. No back gardens, lofts or garages to stow stuff away in. I think, all things considered, it was a pretty tidy place.
Mildlyconservative
says...
5:26pm Thu 25 Jun 09
Quercus
says...
6:22pm Thu 25 Jun 09
DannyK86
says...
12:04pm Fri 26 Jun 09
Quercus wrote:Regardless of the decline of oil as a fuel and commodity, we will still need cars in future. Already we're seeing a huge shift towards more fuel-efficient cars and petrol/electric hybrids. Over the next 2 decades hybrids, electric cars and )hopefully) hydrogen fuel cell cars are going to become more and more common and should replace petrol vehicles. People are still going to need to get about and it's evident that public transport infrastructure is going to be woefully ill-equipped for a long time yet. Hence building more roads is not necessarily a dead end in terms of sustainable transport - think abotu the future rather than the now!
> Here come the dozers Do you mean all those people in denial who are sleepwalking into the post-peak oil age?
farnishk
says...
1:08pm Fri 26 Jun 09
DannyK86
says...
1:33pm Fri 26 Jun 09
Tone-Fu
says...
2:45pm Fri 26 Jun 09
Annyetta
says...
7:46am Sat 27 Jun 09
southendmechanic
says...
4:59pm Sat 27 Jun 09
farnishk
says...
2:34pm Tue 30 Jun 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for hundreds of jobs in Essex and beyond
Search Now »
Bring love into your life! Find a date in Essex
Search Now »
Homes for sale, and to let, in Essex
Search Now »
New and used cars in Essex and across the UK
Search Now »
DannyK86 says...
9:14am Wed 24 Jun 09