MORE than 100 members of the public clapped and cheered as Rochford District Council unanimously rejected plans for 330 new homes in Hawkwell.

The scheme was put forward by developers David Wilson Homes for land in the green belt, between Main Road and Rectory Road.

It met massive opposition from the people of the village and Hawkwell Parish Council, who were worried about such a large number of new homes in the village.

Planning officer Mike Stranks said the total amount of housing proposed for Hawkwell up to 2021 by the council was 175. He added 300 would put too much of a strain on local doctors, schools and roads.

Officers were also concerned with the height of the properties which would be inappropriate for the area.

Martin Hull, speaking for the developers, said the council originally earmarked 400 homes to be built on the site, but this had now been cut back to 175. He added: “There can be no doubt this is the right location for new housing and it will also provide much needed affordable homes in the area.”

However, in an impassioned speech, councillor John Mason (Ind, Hawkwell) said he had received more than 300 letters objecting to the proposal, together with a large number of telephone calls.

He said: “In fact, I have only had two calls which are in favour of the proposals.”

Mr Mason said the site was totally unsuitable for the number of homes being proposed, for a large number of reasons.

He added: “There would also be an impact on the wildlife currently on the site and stress would be put on local services as a whole.

Heather Glynn (Con, Hawkwell) said part of the site was actually in Spencer Park which was leased to the parish council for 100 years and no account had been taken of this.

Councillor responsible for planning, Keith Hudson (Con, Hockley) praised Mr Mason for his speech and added: “I would willingly have been the seconder, if someone else hadn’t got in first.

“We have said the allocation for this part of Hawkwell is 175 homes and we intend to ensure it is no more than that. It is a maximum and not a minimum.”