News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


School’s out of the question

Story time – Michelle teaches her children, Kate and Jonathon, at home Story time – Michelle teaches her children, Kate and Jonathon, at home

CONCERNS about bullying, poor care for children with special needs and a limited and irrelevant curriculum are just some of the reasons why an increasing number of families are choosing to educate their children at home.

However, new Government rules to toughen-up regulation around home schooling could make it difficult for children to opt out of school in the future.

Home educators in Essex are furious about the plans, currently going through Parliament. They want to explain why home schooling is so important, and shatter the misconceptions which surround parents teaching their children.

Michelle Cook, 32, is a teach-at-home mum to her six-year-old daughter Kate. No two days are the same for the pair, who combine learning with regular visits to the library, walks in parks and nature reserves, as well as meeting other home-educated youngsters for play time.

For Michelle, who lives in Church Road, Basildon, keeping Kate at home seemed like the most natural thing in the world.

She said: “I had been teaching Kate since she was a baby, so it just seemed natural to keep going. This way, Kate can learn at her own pace and what she wants.

“We tend to look at things she gets interested in. Last year she was fascinated by space.

“We wrote stories about it, and learnt some maths as well.

“We even got some geography involved, by looking at the locations of space stations like Nasa.

“I teach her reading and writing, but I don't think there’s anything else she categorically has to know. If she’s interested, then we’ll explore it together.”

The mum, who also has a two-year-old son, Jonathon, said one of the main misconceptions about home educating was that youngsters who don’t go to school have no social life.

She said: “Kate has ballet once a week, she goes to Rainbows as well, and is part of a wildlife explorers’ club.

“She’s also got lots of friends, and we’ve got a good network of other home-educating families who we meet regularly.

“She is always interacting with adults and other children. She’s a very happy, sociable child.”

However, if new Government proposals are brought in, home education would have to change.

Under the new rules, parents will have to register their child once a year with their local council, and provide a statement of what and how they intend to teach their children over the coming year.

Inspectors would then visit once a year to make sure this plan is being followed, as well as have one-to-one interviews with the children.

This comes after an independent report, produced earlier this year by child protection expert Graham Badman, claimed home education could be being used as a cover for child abuse.

Home educators have dismissed the report as a rush-job, and said the new rules would go against everything home education stands for. Petitions have been sent to MPs, including David Amess, Conservative MP for Southend West.

Michelle added: “These proposals are so extreme. Wanting to interview the child on their own is ridiculous. What will it achieve? If they are being abused, they’re not going to tell a complete stranger.

“If they’re so worried about children being abused out of school, then they’d have to start interviewing school children in the holidays as well.”

Ann Newstead, 39, spokeswoman for Education Otherwise, a charity set up to support home educators, said: “Obviously child abuse can happen, but that is in disturbed families and in most cases they are already known to agencies in the system.

“Home educating is on the increase, partly because more people are beginning to realise it is a legal option. Most people think you have to send your children to school, but you don’t.”

Ann, from Bromley in Kent, said many parents opt for home schooling because their children have special educational needs. She started home schooling after one of her four sons was so badly bullied at school he started self-harming.

Headteacher Terry Flitman, from Wickford Junior School, in Market Road, Wickford, said none of his pupils had been taken out of school to be home educated.

He said: “Some children find the school environment very difficult to deal with, some children don’t come in for medical reasons, or it can be something has gone wrong in a school.

“Most parents can teach their child to read and write, but part of school is also about developing social skills, negotiating, play, and taking part in all the things that happen as part of a school day. I worry about some children educated at home not getting that, and becoming isolated.”

He also said the Government’s proposed changes were a good thing.

He said: “At the moment, a person can say they are going to educate their child at home and there is no way of checking.

“One hopes these new rules will actually make sure every child is getting an education.”

Comments(5)

perini says...
12:23am Wed 20 Jan 10

Trouble is that there are too many (f*ckwit) parents which will see this as an easy option and then the circle continues. Make school attendance compulsory unless the would be parents/home tutor have been deemed competant. At the end of the day school teaches children how to integrate and mix with other people - that can't be replicated at home!

KNorman says...
9:54am Wed 20 Jan 10

I as a home educating parent worry far more about the social aspect of being in school. One of our reasons for home educating is so that my daughters can have a more balanced group of friends - a range of different adults and children of different ages, rather than the limited number of adults and a group of children all of the same age. In this way, and with guidance from an interested adult when needed home educated children generally have few problems learning to negotiate. Home educated children also have a far greater opportunity to play - and until they are much older than in school.
I was home educated for a couple of years and the thing it taught me most was that enabled me to have a much greater proportion of time spent playing often outside, than was ever possible in a classroom.
I also worry that schooled children miss out on the opportunity to spend time learning and living with their families.
Some home educatd children may feel isolated - but then onthe other hand how many children fel isolated in a classroom full of other children? A great many I think, especially those who may seem a little different and for whom home education is often invaluable to help them develop confidence.

kizzy831 says...
10:56am Wed 20 Jan 10

As a mother of 3 socially adept children, who are home educated, I find the idea that school being the only place to learn to mix and integrate to be unfounded.
Home education has been the default for the human race since time began. Mass schooling is a very recent invention in the scheme of things. Are you saying that anyone who was born pre-1880's was unable to mix or integrate? I guess they weren't able to read or write either!

Clover_Grl says...
12:23pm Wed 20 Jan 10

perini wrote:
Trouble is that there are too many (f*ckwit) parents which will see this as an easy option and then the circle continues. Make school attendance compulsory unless the would be parents/home tutor have been deemed competant. At the end of the day school teaches children how to integrate and mix with other people - that can't be replicated at home!
The thing is, nobody seems to agree on what makes a competant teacher. There's even a lot of debate about what a 'teacher' should be, or if they help the learning process.

The research done on home education shows that even un-qualified parents from a low socio-economic background will educate their children to a higher standard than school children whose parents are better off. Home education has been shown to be at least as effective as school even in the case of child-led education, where the parent merely facliltates the child's interests, and actively 'teaches' nothing.

Also, I'm confused at the misconception - why would learning by living in the real world produce less functional adults than removing the kids from real life and sticking them together in brick boxes, in groups of 30, against their will? School has little to no resemblence to the real world, and it can hardly be considered a good preperation - that's why people have to 'adjust' to adult life. Home ed kids don't experience this, because they live in the real world from the start.

On the point of socialising. School is not a natural social situation; in fact it's about as artificial as it gets. School kids don't learn to socialise with adults naturally, or indeed with children of any age other than their own. In their peer group, there is HUGE pressure to 'fit in' propagated by teacher and child alike; from knowing about the latest fad to wearing an imposed uniform, and bullying is endemic. There have been suggestions from some educationalists that school is actually a form of systemic psychological abuse.

Home education, on the other hand, equips children with experience of natural social situations - a varied peer group, respect but not fear for ones elders, solitude, and the ability to walk away from a situation that they know is not good for them. Because of the range of friends home ed children have, there is little peer pressure, and much support from adults and friends in the rare cases where bullying is encountered.

I realise this comes across a tad strong, as I've responded to some things you didn't even say, but I'm afraid I've lost my patience. As a home educated child, I've been subjected to a lot of pejudice from those who don't know what home ed is actually like. I hold no ill-will to you, just a fervant desire to set the record straight and correct peoples' mistaken assumptions.

Thanks for inspiring my rant,

Clover

P.S. I speak as a home ed teen starting an Open University course this term (2 years early), and one who has a friendship network extending the length and breadth of the country. I've also been to both state and private schools previously.

glitterola says...
2:28pm Thu 28 Jan 10

It's spelt "competent".
I have had lots of school leavers as work mates, and many (not all) have very bad social skills, seemingly no team working skills, low working morale and an arrogance out of this world. Children don't learn social skills at school. The only thing they seem to learn is to adapt to a school environment. Since I'm not putting my son in a school, we haven't got a problem. He would be far too understimulated in a general class, anyway. Hands off our freedom to take responsibility for our own kids!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree