News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Send Us News


Numberplate stolen from Canvey carpark


A NUMBERPLATE was stolen from a vehicle which had been left in a Canvey carpark.

Thieves took the plate from a silver Ford Fiesta in the carpark opposite the Haystack pub in Long Road.

They also took the front bumper some time between 8pm and 11.30pm on Thursday March 11.

Anyone with information should call Canvey police on 0300 333 4444.

Comments(7)

anon anon says...
1:25pm Tue 16 Mar 10

is this really news? sorry for the person who had it stolen but....

PJR says...
1:46pm Tue 16 Mar 10

surely the bigger news would be that the bumper was stolen

Also, aren't numberplates on Fiestas often attached to the bumper? So the bumper was stolen, and the numberplate was just on it.

Honestly doubt the thief thought to take the numberplate off and leave it!

Ageing Commuter says...
1:54pm Tue 16 Mar 10

This is just the Police trying to 'bump' up the crime figures, they can then 'register' the 'plate' as a crime........grooooa
aaaannnnnn.

Often_amused says...
4:14pm Tue 16 Mar 10

I'd assume from the way the article was written that the number plate that was stolen was the rear number plate. Also the entire front number plate was taken.

If you put 2+2 together its reasonable to assume that the clever theives already have a similar model Fiesta, which now wont trigger any of the police ANPR cameras!

PJR says...
9:47am Wed 17 Mar 10

As a journalist myself, to say 'the way the article is written suggests the rear numberplate' is wide of the mark.

For a start, the bigger news is the removal of a front bumper, which is more difficult to take off, requires more time, costs more to replace and is therefore a higher criminal offence. Secondly, the article should report that it was the rear numberplate, rather than just assume that we will all guess.

Plus, that would also mean that the public are aware of a car driving around with a complete set of false numberplates, front and rear.

Maya Pinnion says...
10:25am Wed 17 Mar 10

PJR wrote:
As a journalist myself, to say 'the way the article is written suggests the rear numberplate' is wide of the mark.

For a start, the bigger news is the removal of a front bumper, which is more difficult to take off, requires more time, costs more to replace and is therefore a higher criminal offence. Secondly, the article should report that it was the rear numberplate, rather than just assume that we will all guess.

Plus, that would also mean that the public are aware of a car driving around with a complete set of false numberplates, front and rear.
says it all really, Echo take note!

Ian P says...
12:50pm Wed 17 Mar 10

If the article stated what the registration number was then members of the public might be able to assist in locating both the number plate(s) and possibly the bumper if it is still attached to the number plate.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses