Report this comment
  • "
    why not just build lads houses everywhere ad get it over and done with......



    should read, 'why not just build loads of houses everywhere and get it over and done with......'

    sorry, my bad typing/the terrible technical inadequacies of this site/total lack of proofreading before posting

    oh and for the record - Johnny Rotten (note correct spelling) said 'ever get the feeling you've been cheated?' if you are, in fact, referring to the end of their last ever live gig with the Jones,Cook,Rotten,Vi
    cious line up at the Winterland Ballroom in San Francicso prior to his leaving the band"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Homes coming to a field near you?

THE Echo can today reveal the swathes of green belt land which could be built on across Basildon. Council officers have drawn up a list of sites where homes could go to meet projected population rises by 2031. It comes after the council launched a public consultation over the number of new homes needed over the next 20 years. The council would prefer not to build on green belt, but has had to draw up where it would build if necessary. Sites vary from just one house on land between Lee Chapel Lane and High Banks, Langdon Hills, to up to 2,275 over 291 acres of green belt off Pound Lane, Bowers Gifford. The list includes the controversial 127 acres of green belt at Little Chalvedon Hall, off Pound Lane, Bowers Gifford, bought by Nottinghamshire County Council last January for £4.2million, where it wants to build 1,300 homes as a pension fund investment. A public backlash has led to a promise from council leader Tony Ball it would not be built on for at least 20 years. Mr Ball said: “The fact a site is in the list does not mean it will be developed. “This is not a policy document, but something all councils have to do. “Our preferred option is for no green belt development.” Officers whittled down from 480 to 78 possible development sites submitted by landowners and developers for consideration from 2007. Residents are being consulted over three house building targets, but the council has said its preferred option is 6,500 homes being built with none in the green belt. But residents are being asked to consider a second option of 10,100 homes with 3,300 in the green belt and a third, more radical plan, of 21,600 homes with 14,100 on green belt.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree