- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@Essex_Echo
Follow us
- Find us on Facebook
Echo
Like us on Facebook
Fury as Thorney Bay homes are approved (From Echo)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us »
Fury as Thorney Bay homes are approved
12:00pm Friday 7th September 2012 in News By JACQUELINE McMILLAN
Angry warning – Canvey Island Independent councillor Neville Watson outside Thorney Bay Park
FURIOUS islanders and councillors stormed out of a heated meeting as plans to build as many as 600 homes on a Canvey caravan park were approved in principle.
Castle Point councillors approved businessman Jeff King’s outline application to build on Thorney Bay Caravan Park, off Thorney Bay Road, prompting protests and a walkout.
Council planners had recommended the planning committee to approve the application, with the fine details of the proposal still to be agreed.
However, when it came to the vote, councillors who opposed the plan joined residents who stormed out of the council chamber in anger.
They are worried the new homes will be too close to Canvey’s Calor Gas and Oikos terminals, both to the west of the site, and also think the development will clog up the island’s roads with extra traffic and put pressure on local schools and health facilities.
Canvey Island Independent councillors Neville and Grace Watson, Lee Barrett, Barry Campagna and Dave Blackwell, led the walkout.
During the meeting, Mr Watson said to fellow councillors: “Thanks for putting our residents at risk – you should be ashamed of yourselves. This is all on your heads if something goes wrong on those hazardous sites.”
Fellow islander and People Against Methane campaigner George Whatley had argued a decision on the homes should be delayed until the results of an Essex County Council’s review of safety near potentially hazardous sites were known.
However, Conservative councillors argued the development would be an improvement on the existing caravan site and give the council great control over who lived there.
Norman Smith, Tory councillor for Boyce ward in Benfleet , said: “The residents on that site are living in caravans which are in such poor condition they are certainly not suitable for children to be brought up in.
“I believe houses with walls and gardens are the correct place to house people, not inferior caravans.”
Ray Howard , Tory councillor for Canvey West ward, said: “If anyone asked me if I would like to go back to what it was like when I was young and it was a holiday park, I would say I would.
“However, I live in the real world and the previous council designated this as a future housing site in the local plan.
“The owner knows his rights and will fight his case. I would rather see homes here than the Dutch Village, and I would rather see 600 homes than 2,000 caravans.
“As a local authority, we have no way of knowing where the people in the caravans come from or who they are.”
Comments(30)
perini
says...
12:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12
AndyBSG
says...
1:22pm Fri 7 Sep 12
The objections are twofold, one that it will lead to more traffic and two that it's dangeours for people to live there.
Well, I would say that one house would take up the space of at least two caravans so i'd actually think the change in number of residents it allows for will actually stay pretty much the same unless they're planning on building flats.
Secondly, there are already people living there so the danger issue is a moot point!
Personally, I welcome the move because the unemployed desirables that currently occupy the caravan park have seen crime in that area go up quite a lot so replacing them with family homes will hopefully see these thieving bums located elsewhere!
Nebs
says...
1:22pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Great, can we assume you will be voting against any future applications for flats anwhere in your area.
smiffy1980
says...
1:34pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Then when houses are mentioned, people of a sudden use the schools as a weapon to dispute the plans.
Do the schools need more children or not ??
Curbishly
says...
1:42pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Keptquiettillnow
says...
3:57pm Fri 7 Sep 12
patternmaker
says...
4:53pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Big deal, Jeff King plans to build a Care Home, I would imagine this will be right next to the Gas Storage Terminal.
When the Methane terminal was in use which was stored underground there was a blanket restriction on all building within a 1.5 km radius of the terminal, now the Calor Gas plant which is stored above ground which poses a far greater risk to residents. Houses already border this plant.
Why will the council not reveal what is stored in the Oikos complex, probably because it would cause mass panic in the event of a accident or spillage, quite a few tanks contain aviation fuel, remember Buncefield.
Councilor Norman Smith who lives in Benfleet said it would be better for the occupants of caravans to live in houses with walls and gardens, not inferior caravans, would he care to explain to the occupants of these caravans how they can buy one of these new houses as the majority are on benefit and the reason they live in these caravans is because they cannot afford to rent houses let alone buy.
Now is the time for the residents of Canvey Island to stand up and be counted and have their say and demand another exit road is built and the infrastructure updated, until then NO MORE HOUSES .
Green777
says...
5:02pm Fri 7 Sep 12
marshman
says...
5:32pm Fri 7 Sep 12
As to endangering life by building there, what an utter load of codswallop. All that's been agreed is the principle to develop the site with the detail to be thrashed out later. The development exclusion zone (cordon sanitaire) hasn't gone away and is sure to be enforced by the HSE at the full planning application stage.
What has been removed is the obligation to provide affordable homes (by the government). This means the development is unlikely to ease the dire shortage of affordable homes for local people and will in fact probably create more homeless families in the borough. The people displaced from the vans will have to go somewhere won't they.
Rather than throwing another silly hissy-fit the independent councillors should have been addressing these issues.
Their childishness does them no credit and has let us all down.
John T Pharro
says...
6:11pm Fri 7 Sep 12
AndyBSG wrote:If you think you hare going to get houses with gardens think again. Housesh were in the Borough Plan (50) for the whole of the industrial area at the Point. On three fifths of the site Canvey Supply want to put 89 flats and 16 houses. That is the new plan as the residents objected to the number of flats. Result the new plans show a decrease of 4 houses and an increase of 3 flats.
The entire basis for their 'objections' has no basis on reality.
The objections are twofold, one that it will lead to more traffic and two that it's dangeours for people to live there.
Well, I would say that one house would take up the space of at least two caravans so i'd actually think the change in number of residents it allows for will actually stay pretty much the same unless they're planning on building flats.
Secondly, there are already people living there so the danger issue is a moot point!
Personally, I welcome the move because the unemployed desirables that currently occupy the caravan park have seen crime in that area go up quite a lot so replacing them with family homes will hopefully see these thieving bums located elsewhere!
So your are going to be dumped on Thorney Bay with 550 plus flats and a few houses.
And who says that better people than are alleged to live on Thorney Bay will fill them? Most probably they will just be rehoused from Thorney Bay .
All these developments voted by the Tory majority on the mainland.
Tell us Councillor Howard how do you control who gets these new properties because that is what you claim.
Curbishly
says...
6:41pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Read what Marshman has said and you will have some idea of the reality in these matters.
John T Pharro
says...
7:11pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Curbishly wrote:Not knee jerk at all. If you don't care what is built on Canvey, just say so. Most residents are concerned. Some of us try really hard despite a total lack of help from some officers at Castle Point Council. I suggest you attend some of the neighbourhood meetings and see how much effort and time some residents who really care put in. If you did you would know exactly what I am referring to.
Pharro Please stop jerking your knee at things you clearly know nothing about.
Read what Marshman has said and you will have some idea of the reality in these matters.
John T Pharro
says...
7:12pm Fri 7 Sep 12
patternmaker wrote:Spot on.
600 new houses to be built on Canvey, I am now totally convinced that this council is on a different planet, 600 new houses will mean a minimum of 600 plus cars but of course it will be suggested that Jeff King will pay £18.5 million to complete the link of Roscommon Way (The road to nowhere) which according to Ray Howard will be the answer to all Canvey’s traffic problems. Anyone with a atom of common sense knows that all traffic converges at Waterside Roundabout, the only exit from the Island.
Big deal, Jeff King plans to build a Care Home, I would imagine this will be right next to the Gas Storage Terminal.
When the Methane terminal was in use which was stored underground there was a blanket restriction on all building within a 1.5 km radius of the terminal, now the Calor Gas plant which is stored above ground which poses a far greater risk to residents. Houses already border this plant.
Why will the council not reveal what is stored in the Oikos complex, probably because it would cause mass panic in the event of a accident or spillage, quite a few tanks contain aviation fuel, remember Buncefield.
Councilor Norman Smith who lives in Benfleet said it would be better for the occupants of caravans to live in houses with walls and gardens, not inferior caravans, would he care to explain to the occupants of these caravans how they can buy one of these new houses as the majority are on benefit and the reason they live in these caravans is because they cannot afford to rent houses let alone buy.
Now is the time for the residents of Canvey Island to stand up and be counted and have their say and demand another exit road is built and the infrastructure updated, until then NO MORE HOUSES .
John T Pharro
says...
7:14pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Nebs wrote:Spot on see my comment re Canvey Supply proposed development.
Norman Smith, Tory councillor for Boyce ward in Benfleet , said: “.. houses with walls and gardens are the correct place to house people...”
Great, can we assume you will be voting against any future applications for flats anwhere in your area.
Brunning999
says...
9:58pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Green777 wrote:That okay then get someone else to pat for what you want, that sounds fair!
Im all for a few new homes going up as long as they are affordable for renting to stop the amounts we have to pay for private rfenting eg 1 bedroom around £550- £600 pcm and more for bigger properties, They should be made available for all ,not having to have loads of kids to get a home, every family on Canvey should have the option even if they have no kids or 2 or more. Orc is it another scam idea to make homes fpr 1st time buyers only? and lets face it not many will be helped by the banks etc.As far as safetly . Does it really matter where you live on the Island after all if the refineries went up they would take Canvey out anyay
We all pay for municipal housing through taxes.
We have nothing to do with private housing.
To be honest I don't want to pay for municipal housing that is then given to someone on full housing benefit which again we all pay for.
Enough is enough something for nothing has ruined this country.
Curbishly
says...
8:24am Sat 8 Sep 12
John T Pharro wrote:Pharro - You are all waffle and no substance, you are displaying your ignorance and it's making you look very stupid. You seem to think you are the fount of knowledge on these matters when the reality is you are pig ignorant.
Curbishly wrote:Not knee jerk at all. If you don't care what is built on Canvey, just say so. Most residents are concerned. Some of us try really hard despite a total lack of help from some officers at Castle Point Council. I suggest you attend some of the neighbourhood meetings and see how much effort and time some residents who really care put in. If you did you would know exactly what I am referring to.
Pharro Please stop jerking your knee at things you clearly know nothing about.
Read what Marshman has said and you will have some idea of the reality in these matters.
Attending a few council meetings does not make you an expert.
marshman
says...
12:31pm Sat 8 Sep 12
Is he just acting stupid or does he really fail to understand?
Ray mate, we're going to get the Dutch Village development coming forward as well. Plus the triangle of trapped land between Northwick Road, Rosscommon Way and Canvey Road, the Canvey Road Farm and I bet Brick House farm off Haven Road are dusting their plans off too.
The governments given a free hand to developers in the hope we can build our way out of recession. Suits your pals down the club a treat. Free booze for life outta this I reckon.
iknowbetter
says...
2:02pm Sat 8 Sep 12
marshman wrote:Now here is a post that makes sense, its a shame most people on Canvey just cannot see the wood through the trees because they still keep voting for these Tory crooks, The Tory Council has been pulling the wool over residents of Canvey for years and yet even now people still don't see it.
Just re-read Ray Howard's comment.
Is he just acting stupid or does he really fail to understand?
Ray mate, we're going to get the Dutch Village development coming forward as well. Plus the triangle of trapped land between Northwick Road, Rosscommon Way and Canvey Road, the Canvey Road Farm and I bet Brick House farm off Haven Road are dusting their plans off too.
The governments given a free hand to developers in the hope we can build our way out of recession. Suits your pals down the club a treat. Free booze for life outta this I reckon.
**
Strange how this road to nowhere is placed so conveniently for Jeffs new development don't you think.
Please Ray don't tell us all AGAIN that its to ease traffic and create jobs because so far none of it has come to fruition, unless of course you meant jobs as in builders. should make it easier for them to get to the new development. One would have thought you and Jeff could have come up with a better explanation for this new road while sipping sangria.
**
The Council knew exactly what they were doing when the Core strategy was scrapped. All those proposed sites that were rejected by the government inspector will most certainly get the planning passed. And all before end of Autumn, when the new core strategy is supposedly to be published.
stormynorman
says...
4:43pm Sat 8 Sep 12
upset
says...
6:00pm Sat 8 Sep 12
marshman wrote:Come on now who has been using Marshmans account?
Don't know why every one's getting a bee in the bonnet about this. The council had zero grounds for refusal - Cameron and Osborne have seen to that.
As to endangering life by building there, what an utter load of codswallop. All that's been agreed is the principle to develop the site with the detail to be thrashed out later. The development exclusion zone (cordon sanitaire) hasn't gone away and is sure to be enforced by the HSE at the full planning application stage.
What has been removed is the obligation to provide affordable homes (by the government). This means the development is unlikely to ease the dire shortage of affordable homes for local people and will in fact probably create more homeless families in the borough. The people displaced from the vans will have to go somewhere won't they.
Rather than throwing another silly hissy-fit the independent councillors should have been addressing these issues.
Their childishness does them no credit and has let us all down.
upset
says...
6:01pm Sat 8 Sep 12
marshman wrote:Marshmans back!!
Just re-read Ray Howard's comment.
Is he just acting stupid or does he really fail to understand?
Ray mate, we're going to get the Dutch Village development coming forward as well. Plus the triangle of trapped land between Northwick Road, Rosscommon Way and Canvey Road, the Canvey Road Farm and I bet Brick House farm off Haven Road are dusting their plans off too.
The governments given a free hand to developers in the hope we can build our way out of recession. Suits your pals down the club a treat. Free booze for life outta this I reckon.
patternmaker
says...
9:17pm Sat 8 Sep 12
I know because I was there, living on a Houseboat in Small Gains Creek
A lot of incidents at the Calor Gas plant are not reported and have already
been heavily fined for not reporting the serious incident when a valve failed, Butane or Propane expansion rate is approximately 233:1
Fortunately for Canvey the gas cloud was blown out to sea, the fire
brigade have stated it would be impossible to contain a major fire at the
Storage plant.
Everyone talks about a 3rd road off the Island, we only have one until
Get to Waterside Roundabout, it only needs one accident on that road and
The Island is gridlocked, Ray Howard once reported it took him
2 hours to get from Waterside to the Canvey High Street and the need to
complete the link to Roscommonway, I would like him to explain what
difference that would make, instead of wasting 18.4 million on this road to nowhere use it to build another exit road from Canvey.
At the end of Northwick Road you see Thurrock were it could link up
With the old A13, I understand Thurrock council have turned down this proposal so come on all you Tory councillors its not rocket science, get it sorted
soul man
says...
7:17am Sun 9 Sep 12
iknowbetter
says...
4:19pm Sun 9 Sep 12
whataday
says...
7:01pm Sun 9 Sep 12
It is getting quite ridiculous here - seems to be more and more blocks of flats and roads being built. I'm only surprised there hasn't been a planning application to build a block of flats on the Sadlers Farm roundabout yet.
Steve H
says...
8:35pm Sun 9 Sep 12
Mr Blackwell has alot to answer for as his baby, the Canvey Independant Party, is quite simply the worst thing ever to happen to Canvey.
Neville, join a bigger party and have a bigger voice.
John T Pharro
says...
9:16am Mon 10 Sep 12
Curbishly wrote:At least I use my name and don't hide behind a silly one dishing out insults.
John T Pharro wrote:Pharro - You are all waffle and no substance, you are displaying your ignorance and it's making you look very stupid. You seem to think you are the fount of knowledge on these matters when the reality is you are pig ignorant.
Curbishly wrote:Not knee jerk at all. If you don't care what is built on Canvey, just say so. Most residents are concerned. Some of us try really hard despite a total lack of help from some officers at Castle Point Council. I suggest you attend some of the neighbourhood meetings and see how much effort and time some residents who really care put in. If you did you would know exactly what I am referring to.
Pharro Please stop jerking your knee at things you clearly know nothing about.
Read what Marshman has said and you will have some idea of the reality in these matters.
Attending a few council meetings does not make you an expert.
If you could read properly you would see I was referring to other people who put a lot of time and effort in. Calling me pig ignorant is calling them pig ignorant. Most people will know just who is pig ignorant.
iknowbetter
says...
1:01pm Tue 11 Sep 12
Steve H wrote:You are probably right Steve but one thing is for sure, at least they are not tempted with rewards from greedy developers and they stick to what they believe in, unlike some we could mention.
Oh Neville, when will you learn, politics is all about majorities, your ragtag bunch of cronies will never have a majority and will always end up on the losing side.
Mr Blackwell has alot to answer for as his baby, the Canvey Independant Party, is quite simply the worst thing ever to happen to Canvey.
Neville, join a bigger party and have a bigger voice.
John T Pharro
says...
7:13pm Tue 11 Sep 12
iknowbetter wrote:Spot on, and had you noticed how Curbishly, the gutless one who hides behind a silly name, has not responded to my post?
Steve H wrote:You are probably right Steve but one thing is for sure, at least they are not tempted with rewards from greedy developers and they stick to what they believe in, unlike some we could mention.
Oh Neville, when will you learn, politics is all about majorities, your ragtag bunch of cronies will never have a majority and will always end up on the losing side.
Mr Blackwell has alot to answer for as his baby, the Canvey Independant Party, is quite simply the worst thing ever to happen to Canvey.
Neville, join a bigger party and have a bigger voice.
Now, my old Nan said people who cannot answer either have lost the argument or are ignorant. Being a lady would never put "pig" in front of ignorant. There again manners and respect for another's views are now lost.
E-Types.. says...
12:03pm Fri 7 Sep 12