MP Duddridge: Avoid return to Misery Line

COMMUTERS fear a return to the dark days when the London Fenchurch Street to Southend line was commonly known as the Misery Line.

Tory MP James Duddridge is worried the Government will fail to veto the use of old trains when it decides on the Essex Thameside rail franchise.

Mr Duddridge used PM’s Question time to call for reassurances that firms bidding for the London Fenchurch Street to Southend line, currently operated by c2c, will not be able to bring in old, dilapidated trains without air-conditioning to help cope with peak-time travellers.

The terms of the tender, drawn up by the Department for Transport, do not stipulate that rolling stock must be modern and comfortable. This could mean, in order to present the Government with financially attractive bids, companies may resort to using superannuated carriages at the busiest times.

This would enable them to keep up punctuality targets while keeping costs down – at the expense of commuters.

Calling for a debate on the future of the line, Mr Duddridge, the MP for Rochford and Southend East, said: “We could well see our new rolling stock replaced with non air-conditioned trains and that would be a bizarre and appalling situation. I want to put pressure on the Government early to make sure the people tendering for the line do not even consider using inferior rolling stock.

“I have been told that old, 315 trains are being considered. They are very much like those used on the Liverpool Street line, which are hot and dirty.”

The MP added: “This may be much better value for the Government, but Southend would suffer. We have a new airport, good c2c line and a new university. Everything is looking positive, but this would be a real blow for business and people looking to relocate here.

“I want to send a very clear message to all of the bidders, I and all of the local MPs will not tolerate old rolling stock going back on the line.”

Speaking in the Commons Mr Duddridge called for a full debate on the future of the line.

He said: “Specifically, can the Government give my commuter constituents reassurance that good rolling stock will not be replaced with old, dirty rolling stock without air conditioning?”

Secretary of State for Transport, Andrew Lansley, said: “The choice of rolling stock is a matter for the franchisee, but it must meet the franchise conditions. The competition to which my Honourable Friend refers is, of course, live, so I shall not make any further comment on the bids.”

The companies bidding for the line, c2c, First, MTL and Abelio, are due to submit their tenders by September 27. A spokesman for c2c said none of the companies are permitted to speak about the process.

Comments(10)

Blind Haze says...
7:51am Mon 17 Sep 12

How about they ask the commuters? Over the last 10 years or so, the only real trouble there's been is when c2c first introduced the new trains.

Nebs says...
8:05am Mon 17 Sep 12

How can he say this would be better value for the government. Every bid is by a company that wants to make a profit from running the line, and that profit comes from government subsidy and commuters fares. The best value for the government is to run it themselves, and cut out the middlemans profit.

Bosniavet says...
8:17am Mon 17 Sep 12

Well, at least he didn't claim to be a user of the line, we all know he has a family sized "2nd home" in London as it's too far to travel daily from Southend!
Oh, nice to see Mr Duddridge attended the Battle of Brtain service at St John's yesterday.

AndyBSG says...
8:44am Mon 17 Sep 12

This shouldn't even be up for debate IMO.

While there were terrible problems when the trains were first introduced, C2C have made a real turnaround and the line has gone from being on of the most unreliable in the country to one of the best.

Unless there is a VERY good reason not to C2C should be renewed.

Elephantman2 says...
9:00am Mon 17 Sep 12

So has Duddridge backed Virgin's objection to First Group winning the WCML farnchise? If not he is just another slimy politician pandering to his local eloctorate knowing that nothing wil be done.

152 says...
10:11am Mon 17 Sep 12

Even if they are introduced, it is unlikely the 315's will remain on the line for very long as they do not meet the current DDA standards.

wobblybob says...
11:30am Mon 17 Sep 12

c2c were intending to do this themselves before the financial crash, they were looking to introduce extra 'refurbished' rolling stock to cover peak overcrowding. However they decided that passenger numbers would not be increasing as much as predicted after the crash & cancelled the plans.
In 2007 published proposals were:
By 2012: More 12 car trains on the mainline & 12 car trains on the Tilbury loop and Ockendon branches (requiring platform extensions) to increase peak capacity. On the c2c route it is assumed that either additional 357 units will be ordered, or that class 317s will be cascaded from West Anglia. It is calculated that around 20 additional 4 car units will be required and calculations show that there is space for berthing these trains at East Ham and Shoeburyness depots.
Well the platform extensions got built but c2c cancelled the rolling stock.

live in westcliff says...
5:16pm Mon 17 Sep 12

The c2c has improved massively in terms of the quality of trains and punctuality, however, over the past ten years there has ceased to be any direct trains to Fenchurch Street (I remember all fast trains were last stop Benfleet and then straight through to Fenchurch Street and same returning home.

When the new trains were introduced we were promised that due to faster acceleration capabilities the journey times would be reduced by 10%. The opposite has happened. Whereas a fast train from Fenchurch Street used to be 39 minutes, now it is between 42 and 48 minutes.

For me, faster journey times must be part of the plan for the future of this line.

|Later trains also from London at night, difficult to go for a night out as last train too early.

wobblybob says...
7:58pm Mon 17 Sep 12

Totally agree, LTS Rail promised later (in fact all-night) trains once the new signal box was built & the new rolling stock in place. Then along came c2c who conveniently got amnesia & failed totally to address the promises of the operator they had just bought out!

heartbeat says...
10:05pm Mon 17 Sep 12

wobblybob wrote:
Totally agree, LTS Rail promised later (in fact all-night) trains once the new signal box was built & the new rolling stock in place. Then along came c2c who conveniently got amnesia & failed totally to address the promises of the operator they had just bought out!
I agree too, this area is ridiculous for the early-finishing of public transport!. No-one can even mention buses without laughing (unlike places like Oxford and Brighton and anywhere and everywhere on the fringes of London, with night-buses making it possible to leave the car at home).

Why on earth there isn't at least one later train each way I think is ridiculous. People going in the London direction always have to leave pubs and clubs early to catch the last train (how does that attract people to Southend I wonder!) and coming back from London is often fraught with worry about missing the last train if there are any problems on the tubes. All the political hot air about encouraging people to use public transport instead of cars means absolutely nothing when there's little option but to use the car.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree