Tenants want more of a say in housing shake-up

COUNCIL tenants have demanded more of a say in the future of South Essex Homes.

Residents living in some of Southend Council’s 6,000 homes want it to come clean about its intention for the management organisation.

South Essex Homes has held responsibility for the everyday running of council properties in the borough for the past seven years, but council chiefs are considering axing it to cut costs.

Although bosses insisted no decision has been made, residents claimed they were being left out of the process.

Speaking at a council meeting, a tenant named only as Mr Ali said: “For residents to have a say in the housing review, they need to be well informed.

“Southend Council should give full disclosure of its discontent with South Essex Homes.”

Another resident, who did not want to be named, added: “I can’t understand what is going on. Why aren’t we, as the tenants, being involved in this decision? It seems crazy.”

South Essex Homes, which was set up in October 2005, is given more than £9million a year by the council as a management fee for running the properties.

The body deals with tenants’ day-to-day problems, as well as routine maintenance.

Council chiefs set up a review of the organisation earlier this year, as part of its bid to save more than £30million over the next three years.

If South Essex Homes was merged back into the council, savings could potentially be made through redundancies or management restructuring.

Lesley Salter, the Tory councillor responsible for social housing, said the review was not about the council’s discontent with South Essex Homes.

She added: “As part of the review, the council is required to consult with tenants on any significant change in management arrangements and councillors will be debating the best way to achieve this at a special meeting on October 17.”

Comments(3)

emcee says...
3:26pm Sun 30 Sep 12

What makes me annoyed with situations like this is if the council can make savings by running things themselves, and still be as efficient, why did they decided to pay someone else to carry out the service in the first place.

jolllyboy says...
6:04pm Sun 30 Sep 12

The Govt encouraged long arm management to save money (probably on the pension side). It was obvious to all that to keep management in house is more efficient with more control. When not in house there is less accountability too.
The tenants had to vote for South Essex Homes in the first place, therefore they would surely have to vote them out. However it appears that whoever they then appointed to maintain the houses be it Connaught, Lovell or Kier it usually meant the same people doing the actual work. Whether the reason for considering returning to in house is for savings or not little will change there. Grants were given by govt for the 'decent homes' drive.
9m seems an amazing amount of money - £1,500 per house ! just to instruct others to get the work done, often this would not be at the first visit either, a source of difficulty for working tenants. They have been based in several building since 2004 when they started which costs. No doubt the decision is already made- the discussions are probably whether or not they can afford the redundancy packages for their 'friends' and who to keep, also where they would be based bearing in mind that the Customer Service at Civic Centre is only an enquiry counter now .

sosad 1 says...
6:32pm Sun 30 Sep 12

lets get one thing straigt we are not council tenants we are under a housing acs ive had alot of personal promblems and without seh i would not be here

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree