Neighbours set for third fight against Canvey flats

A SEVEN-YEAR battle to stop a block of flats being built down a narrow street in Canvey could be lost.

Neighbours living in Fenwick Way, Meppel Avenue and Leige Avenue have launched a petition against controversial plans to build a block of four flats in Leige Avenue.

The plans, submitted by Essex Way resident Colin Lane, are a revised version of two former applications to build 12 flats in two three-storey blocks – both of which residents successfully fought.

However, neighbours fear the development could be passed this time round as Castle Point Council seems primed to build on the island.

This comes as plans for 600 homes on Thorney Bay Caravan Park and 99 homes in Point Road have both been approved in the last month.

Concerns have also been raised it is just the tip of the ice berg, and that the developer will later submit proposals to build the remaining eight flats he wanted in the original document.

Susan Elliott, of Fenwick Way, said: “This is the third application for that site and still it is just not acceptable for the area. The road is so small pedestrians have to walk in the road as there’s no pavement. How do they think it can cope with a block of flats here?

“And once one block goes up, another application will soon follow for the other bit of land. Everyone in this area will be affected and we are all really concerned.”

Comments(20)

Curbishly says...
2:30pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Should have voted Tory not Canvey Independent.

marshman says...
2:35pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Oh for goodness sake!

I'm often the first to jump in and blast the council for the over-development of the Island, building on every little bit of green space like it's going out of fashion. But once the damage is done it's done. The proposal site is currently an eye-sore. Some flats will tidy it up, and, if sympathetically built, will blend in nicely. There's a shortage of smaller sized housing on Canvey and this application goes a little way to help fill that gap. Get on and build it Mr Lane, you're doing a public service.

marshman says...
2:42pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Curbishly wrote:
Should have voted Tory not Canvey Independent.
What???

Don't forget it was a tory council that eased through the compulsory purchase of the old 60 Acres plot-lands and allowed the developer Mr White (aka Fenwick) to over develop the site and build houses down streets that even then were below adoptable standard.

Want me to remind you how they even allowed part of the golf course to be 'accidentally' built on because nobody on the council noticed it wasn't the builders land.

Should have voted tory!

Don't make me laugh.

AndyBSG says...
3:13pm Wed 10 Oct 12

"Want me to remind you how they even allowed part of the golf course to be 'accidentally' built on because nobody on the council noticed it wasn't the builders land."

That wasn't 'accidentally' done though as the developer found out when his land theft was rumbled and he was taken to court.

John T Pharro says...
3:30pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..

It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.

So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?

This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.

John T Pharro says...
3:32pm Wed 10 Oct 12

John T Pharro wrote:
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..

It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.

So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?

This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Oh this should have gone as a response to Curbishly's stupid comment.

John T Pharro says...
3:35pm Wed 10 Oct 12

marshman wrote:
Oh for goodness sake!

I'm often the first to jump in and blast the council for the over-development of the Island, building on every little bit of green space like it's going out of fashion. But once the damage is done it's done. The proposal site is currently an eye-sore. Some flats will tidy it up, and, if sympathetically built, will blend in nicely. There's a shortage of smaller sized housing on Canvey and this application goes a little way to help fill that gap. Get on and build it Mr Lane, you're doing a public service.
Smaller size houses yes, flats no.

John T Pharro says...
3:38pm Wed 10 Oct 12

AndyBSG wrote:
"Want me to remind you how they even allowed part of the golf course to be 'accidentally' built on because nobody on the council noticed it wasn't the builders land."

That wasn't 'accidentally' done though as the developer found out when his land theft was rumbled and he was taken to court.
What was then outcome of the court case? The houses are still there.

iknowbetter says...
4:07pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Curbishly wrote:
Should have voted Tory not Canvey Independent.
hahaha excellent. Remind us all as well to thank the Tories for spending 250.000 pounds of tax payers money to have no core strategy which is allowing this over development of Canvey.
As well as the 18 million pound wasted on a road to no where that the Tories promised would create 1700 jobs. Lets not forget the demise of the full time fire crew that the Tories said would save money, ironic when they waste so much else where. Maybe they need to increase their expenses coffers for the Xmas knees up. There are more flats going up next to Nearbuys by the way, Good old Pam Challis must be well in with the big boys in London for managing to take a huge bite out of the building quota without even touching the mainland, Rebbecca you must be so proud!!!!

Whatthe* says...
4:11pm Wed 10 Oct 12

John T Pharro wrote:
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..

It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.

So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?

This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
What GREENBELT in Benfleet?

Whatthe* says...
4:13pm Wed 10 Oct 12

yet more political sabre rattling on this site .

iknowbetter says...
4:14pm Wed 10 Oct 12

I forgot to mention the new and improved additional £250.000 core strategy on top of whats already been wasted on the old Core strategy will be out very soon,on top of whats already been passed on Canvey there is a whole lot more to come.

Whatthe* says...
4:26pm Wed 10 Oct 12

iknowbetter wrote:
I forgot to mention the new and improved additional £250.000 core strategy on top of whats already been wasted on the old Core strategy will be out very soon,on top of whats already been passed on Canvey there is a whole lot more to come.
not all the £250,000 was wasted the data is still the same.
I hear the CIIP Cllrs have been whipped by Mr Blackwell not to attend any meetings about the local plan,why would he do that ?

Curbishly says...
4:38pm Wed 10 Oct 12

John T Pharro wrote:
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..

It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.

So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?

This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Yes. And the Canvey Independents, and their apologists, couldn't do a thing about it apart from whine and moan.

Now if they had voted Tory they would have a greater chance of influencing the party vote.

It's not exactly rocket science but it would appear to be too much for you.

naffeville says...
5:18pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Make it 9 storey then you can advertise sea view

John T Pharro says...
6:34pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Curbishly wrote:
John T Pharro wrote:
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..

It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.

So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?

This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Yes. And the Canvey Independents, and their apologists, couldn't do a thing about it apart from whine and moan.

Now if they had voted Tory they would have a greater chance of influencing the party vote.

It's not exactly rocket science but it would appear to be too much for you.
How on earth do you arrive at that conclusion as ALL THE TORIES VOTED IN FAVOUR?

You really are an ****.

John T Pharro says...
6:35pm Wed 10 Oct 12

John T Pharro wrote:
Curbishly wrote:
John T Pharro wrote:
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..

It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.

So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?

This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Yes. And the Canvey Independents, and their apologists, couldn't do a thing about it apart from whine and moan.

Now if they had voted Tory they would have a greater chance of influencing the party vote.

It's not exactly rocket science but it would appear to be too much for you.
How on earth do you arrive at that conclusion as ALL THE TORIES VOTED IN FAVOUR?

You really are an ****.
I said **** is that a swear word?

John T Pharro says...
6:37pm Wed 10 Oct 12

John T Pharro wrote:
John T Pharro wrote:
Curbishly wrote:
John T Pharro wrote:
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..

It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.

So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?

This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Yes. And the Canvey Independents, and their apologists, couldn't do a thing about it apart from whine and moan.

Now if they had voted Tory they would have a greater chance of influencing the party vote.

It's not exactly rocket science but it would appear to be too much for you.
How on earth do you arrive at that conclusion as ALL THE TORIES VOTED IN FAVOUR?

You really are an ****.
I said **** is that a swear word?
Clearly the Echo cannot tell it 's Mule from it's a--e.

iknowbetter says...
7:27pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Whatthe* wrote:
iknowbetter wrote:
I forgot to mention the new and improved additional £250.000 core strategy on top of whats already been wasted on the old Core strategy will be out very soon,on top of whats already been passed on Canvey there is a whole lot more to come.
not all the £250,000 was wasted the data is still the same.
I hear the CIIP Cllrs have been whipped by Mr Blackwell not to attend any meetings about the local plan,why would he do that ?
I'd already said that some time ago yes the data is still there and the new core strategy will be no different to the old one just reworded, which ever way you look at it Canvey will still get the brunt of the quota thrown at it.
As for CIIP, I wouldn't have a clue who Dave Blackwell whipped or didn't, his personal lifer is his personal life. :)

marshman says...
8:25pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Curbishly wrote:
Should have voted Tory not Canvey Independent.
I think I understand what you mean now.

The tories don't care about Canvey because residents there consistently reject them at the ballot box.

Or, put another way, tories only care about and look after their own. That's exactly what we're seeing from them nationally so I can't see how anybody can be surprised that we're seeing it locally too.

A bunch of out of touch snobs who only care about themselves.

Thanks Curbishly for reminding us all.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree