Neighbours set for third fight against flats (From Echo)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us »
Neighbours set for third fight against Canvey flats
1:00pm Wednesday 10th October 2012 in News
A SEVEN-YEAR battle to stop a block of flats being built down a narrow street in Canvey could be lost.
Neighbours living in Fenwick Way, Meppel Avenue and Leige Avenue have launched a petition against controversial plans to build a block of four flats in Leige Avenue.
The plans, submitted by Essex Way resident Colin Lane, are a revised version of two former applications to build 12 flats in two three-storey blocks – both of which residents successfully fought.
However, neighbours fear the development could be passed this time round as Castle Point Council seems primed to build on the island.
This comes as plans for 600 homes on Thorney Bay Caravan Park and 99 homes in Point Road have both been approved in the last month.
Concerns have also been raised it is just the tip of the ice berg, and that the developer will later submit proposals to build the remaining eight flats he wanted in the original document.
Susan Elliott, of Fenwick Way, said: “This is the third application for that site and still it is just not acceptable for the area. The road is so small pedestrians have to walk in the road as there’s no pavement. How do they think it can cope with a block of flats here?
“And once one block goes up, another application will soon follow for the other bit of land. Everyone in this area will be affected and we are all really concerned.”
Comments(20)
marshman
says...
2:35pm Wed 10 Oct 12
I'm often the first to jump in and blast the council for the over-development of the Island, building on every little bit of green space like it's going out of fashion. But once the damage is done it's done. The proposal site is currently an eye-sore. Some flats will tidy it up, and, if sympathetically built, will blend in nicely. There's a shortage of smaller sized housing on Canvey and this application goes a little way to help fill that gap. Get on and build it Mr Lane, you're doing a public service.
marshman
says...
2:42pm Wed 10 Oct 12
Curbishly wrote:What???
Should have voted Tory not Canvey Independent.
Don't forget it was a tory council that eased through the compulsory purchase of the old 60 Acres plot-lands and allowed the developer Mr White (aka Fenwick) to over develop the site and build houses down streets that even then were below adoptable standard.
Want me to remind you how they even allowed part of the golf course to be 'accidentally' built on because nobody on the council noticed it wasn't the builders land.
Should have voted tory!
Don't make me laugh.
AndyBSG
says...
3:13pm Wed 10 Oct 12
That wasn't 'accidentally' done though as the developer found out when his land theft was rumbled and he was taken to court.
John T Pharro
says...
3:30pm Wed 10 Oct 12
It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.
So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?
This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
John T Pharro
says...
3:32pm Wed 10 Oct 12
John T Pharro wrote:Oh this should have gone as a response to Curbishly's stupid comment.
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..
It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.
So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?
This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
John T Pharro
says...
3:35pm Wed 10 Oct 12
marshman wrote:Smaller size houses yes, flats no.
Oh for goodness sake!
I'm often the first to jump in and blast the council for the over-development of the Island, building on every little bit of green space like it's going out of fashion. But once the damage is done it's done. The proposal site is currently an eye-sore. Some flats will tidy it up, and, if sympathetically built, will blend in nicely. There's a shortage of smaller sized housing on Canvey and this application goes a little way to help fill that gap. Get on and build it Mr Lane, you're doing a public service.
John T Pharro
says...
3:38pm Wed 10 Oct 12
AndyBSG wrote:What was then outcome of the court case? The houses are still there.
"Want me to remind you how they even allowed part of the golf course to be 'accidentally' built on because nobody on the council noticed it wasn't the builders land."
That wasn't 'accidentally' done though as the developer found out when his land theft was rumbled and he was taken to court.
iknowbetter
says...
4:07pm Wed 10 Oct 12
Curbishly wrote:hahaha excellent. Remind us all as well to thank the Tories for spending 250.000 pounds of tax payers money to have no core strategy which is allowing this over development of Canvey.
Should have voted Tory not Canvey Independent.
As well as the 18 million pound wasted on a road to no where that the Tories promised would create 1700 jobs. Lets not forget the demise of the full time fire crew that the Tories said would save money, ironic when they waste so much else where. Maybe they need to increase their expenses coffers for the Xmas knees up. There are more flats going up next to Nearbuys by the way, Good old Pam Challis must be well in with the big boys in London for managing to take a huge bite out of the building quota without even touching the mainland, Rebbecca you must be so proud!!!!
Whatthe*
says...
4:11pm Wed 10 Oct 12
John T Pharro wrote:What GREENBELT in Benfleet?
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..
It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.
So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?
This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Whatthe*
says...
4:13pm Wed 10 Oct 12
iknowbetter
says...
4:14pm Wed 10 Oct 12
Whatthe*
says...
4:26pm Wed 10 Oct 12
iknowbetter wrote:not all the £250,000 was wasted the data is still the same.
I forgot to mention the new and improved additional £250.000 core strategy on top of whats already been wasted on the old Core strategy will be out very soon,on top of whats already been passed on Canvey there is a whole lot more to come.
I hear the CIIP Cllrs have been whipped by Mr Blackwell not to attend any meetings about the local plan,why would he do that ?
Curbishly
says...
4:38pm Wed 10 Oct 12
John T Pharro wrote:Yes. And the Canvey Independents, and their apologists, couldn't do a thing about it apart from whine and moan.
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..
It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.
So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?
This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Now if they had voted Tory they would have a greater chance of influencing the party vote.
It's not exactly rocket science but it would appear to be too much for you.
naffeville
says...
5:18pm Wed 10 Oct 12
John T Pharro
says...
6:34pm Wed 10 Oct 12
Curbishly wrote:How on earth do you arrive at that conclusion as ALL THE TORIES VOTED IN FAVOUR?
John T Pharro wrote:Yes. And the Canvey Independents, and their apologists, couldn't do a thing about it apart from whine and moan.
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..
It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.
So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?
This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Now if they had voted Tory they would have a greater chance of influencing the party vote.
It's not exactly rocket science but it would appear to be too much for you.
You really are an ****.
John T Pharro
says...
6:35pm Wed 10 Oct 12
John T Pharro wrote:I said **** is that a swear word?
Curbishly wrote:How on earth do you arrive at that conclusion as ALL THE TORIES VOTED IN FAVOUR?
John T Pharro wrote:Yes. And the Canvey Independents, and their apologists, couldn't do a thing about it apart from whine and moan.
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..
It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.
So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?
This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Now if they had voted Tory they would have a greater chance of influencing the party vote.
It's not exactly rocket science but it would appear to be too much for you.
You really are an ****.
John T Pharro
says...
6:37pm Wed 10 Oct 12
John T Pharro wrote:Clearly the Echo cannot tell it 's Mule from it's a--e.
John T Pharro wrote:I said **** is that a swear word?
Curbishly wrote:How on earth do you arrive at that conclusion as ALL THE TORIES VOTED IN FAVOUR?
John T Pharro wrote:Yes. And the Canvey Independents, and their apologists, couldn't do a thing about it apart from whine and moan.
Don't talk stupid. The Canvey Independents voted against the building on green belt in Benfleet and the over development at Canvey Supply..
It was the Tory majority on that voted both through.
So how do you make voting Tory would stop passing inappropriate building?
This is the sort of stupid comment Councillor Sharp would make.
Now if they had voted Tory they would have a greater chance of influencing the party vote.
It's not exactly rocket science but it would appear to be too much for you.
You really are an ****.
iknowbetter
says...
7:27pm Wed 10 Oct 12
Whatthe* wrote:I'd already said that some time ago yes the data is still there and the new core strategy will be no different to the old one just reworded, which ever way you look at it Canvey will still get the brunt of the quota thrown at it.
iknowbetter wrote:not all the £250,000 was wasted the data is still the same.
I forgot to mention the new and improved additional £250.000 core strategy on top of whats already been wasted on the old Core strategy will be out very soon,on top of whats already been passed on Canvey there is a whole lot more to come.
I hear the CIIP Cllrs have been whipped by Mr Blackwell not to attend any meetings about the local plan,why would he do that ?
As for CIIP, I wouldn't have a clue who Dave Blackwell whipped or didn't, his personal lifer is his personal life. :)
marshman
says...
8:25pm Wed 10 Oct 12
Curbishly wrote:I think I understand what you mean now.
Should have voted Tory not Canvey Independent.
The tories don't care about Canvey because residents there consistently reject them at the ballot box.
Or, put another way, tories only care about and look after their own. That's exactly what we're seeing from them nationally so I can't see how anybody can be surprised that we're seeing it locally too.
A bunch of out of touch snobs who only care about themselves.
Thanks Curbishly for reminding us all.
Curbishly says...
2:30pm Wed 10 Oct 12