Lorry load of rubbish dumped at football ground (From Echo)

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
good question you ask, i wonder what community these people are from? if only there was a social group who did this kind of thing regularly we could assume it was them again...

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
good question you ask, i wonder what community these people are from? if only there was a social group who did this kind of thing regularly we could assume it was them again...

I_hate_scum! wrote:
What, you mean **** scum?

Rollocks wrote:
Do you get told off if we say the word that you are all alluding to?

Camp Incontinent wrote:
Whoever was responsible should be thoroghly ashamed of themselves. Apart from anything else it makes the place look like a traveller's encampment !

Camp Incontinent wrote:
Just throw in a few caravans, a couple of lurchers and a pile of burning tyres and the scene would be complete.

Trainman wrote:
WHY are people SO fast in accusing any race, colour, or creed, WITHOUT proof?

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Camp Incontinent wrote:
Just throw in a few caravans, a couple of lurchers and a pile of burning tyres and the scene would be complete.

Sure, for the stereotypical mind...but better to get the people who dumped it there and dump it in their house...have you had a rummage in it yet?

Quick! Might save you a few quid at the 99p shop.

stropmag. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Camp Incontinent wrote:
Just throw in a few caravans, a couple of lurchers and a pile of burning tyres and the scene would be complete.

Sure, for the stereotypical mind...but better to get the people who dumped it there and dump it in their house...have you had a rummage in it yet?

Quick! Might save you a few quid at the 99p shop.

Some people have quicker ways to save money at the 99p shop. They simply send their kids in well briefed to 'liberate' what they desire.

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
I have no idea who could have done this, would never want to point fingers, but whoever it was should think about how they would feel if somebody dumped a load of rubble on the open space they use for bare knuckle boxing

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
I have no idea who could have done this, would never want to point fingers, but whoever it was should think about how they would feel if somebody dumped a load of rubble on the open space they use for bare knuckle boxing

Or perhaps where they sit drinking their cheap cider, bantering about who might be the father of their mates child, remarking on the colour grey of their track suits whilst smoking the herb of their choice.

stropmag. wrote:
What sort of thoughtless, greedy, lazy, people with a contempt for the law would do this sort of thing?

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

eddicaine wrote:

stropmag. wrote:
What sort of thoughtless, greedy, lazy, people with a contempt for the law would do this sort of thing?

Rumour has it that a load of rubbish is dumped on the pitch at Roots Hall every week

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

I have already been in contact with the people who should control this site and they told me you were to be denyed acsess.

I repeat my demand to have you removed as the inposter that you are. My civil libertys are being infringed. I demand the imediate removal of this inposter who uses my name.

doasilikey. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
I have no idea who could have done this, would never want to point fingers, but whoever it was should think about how they would feel if somebody dumped a load of rubble on the open space they use for bare knuckle boxing

Or perhaps where they sit drinking their cheap cider, bantering about who might be the father of their mates child, remarking on the colour grey of their track suits whilst smoking the herb of their choice.

At least you wouldn't have the same difficulty pinpointing the father- it would just boil down to which of the uncles/cousins was the more likely candidate.

doasilikey. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

I have already been in contact with the people who should control this site and they told me you were to be denyed acsess.

I repeat my demand to have you removed as the inposter that you are. My civil libertys are being infringed. I demand the imediate removal of this inposter who uses my name.

Stop shaking hands with yourself you clown!

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

I have already been in contact with the people who should control this site and they told me you were to be denyed acsess.

I repeat my demand to have you removed as the inposter that you are. My civil libertys are being infringed. I demand the imediate removal of this inposter who uses my name.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

I have already been in contact with the people who should control this site and they told me you were to be denyed acsess.

I repeat my demand to have you removed as the inposter that you are. My civil libertys are being infringed. I demand the imediate removal of this inposter who uses my name.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

I have already been in contact with the people who should control this site and they told me you were to be denyed acsess.

I repeat my demand to have you removed as the inposter that you are. My civil libertys are being infringed. I demand the imediate removal of this inposter who uses my name.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

Minceir. wrote:
Back to the subject in hand now- well, on field to be more accurate.
Myself and my very civil, polite, clean and responsible band of merry men (always smiling and joking) will be pleased to clean the spoil from the hallowed turf.
In the run-up to Xmas we will be offering special rates but obviously we will have to pay for a proper dump as as would never tip anywhere else. I'll have to take a proper look to assess the amount of work involved as someone might have added to the pile (there are some people who would actually do that you know) but from what I remember there was nothing nasty in the load. I reckon that with a fair wind we could do the football boys a favour at £650 cash-in-hand.
I'll be in touch.

stropmag. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

I have already been in contact with the people who should control this site and they told me you were to be denyed acsess.

I repeat my demand to have you removed as the inposter that you are. My civil libertys are being infringed. I demand the imediate removal of this inposter who uses my name.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

If you're going to make a FOI application I would suggest that you ask your friend Stewart Hardprick Carruthers to do it as he has an account with the office. Mind you, I'll warn you, he doesn't have a lot of success.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

stropmag. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

I have already been in contact with the people who should control this site and they told me you were to be denyed acsess.

I repeat my demand to have you removed as the inposter that you are. My civil libertys are being infringed. I demand the imediate removal of this inposter who uses my name.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

If you're going to make a FOI application I would suggest that you ask your friend Stewart Hardprick Carruthers to do it as he has an account with the office. Mind you, I'll warn you, he doesn't have a lot of success.

I asked if that was needed to get the info not what i was going to do!

Im sure the log-on details and IP if traced would lead back to very confused, hypocritical people suffering self-shame.

Why would you suggest A, the person mentioned and B, if you know he isn't very successful?

Are you struggling again? Another bad day?

Be assured it will get better.

stropmag. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

stropmag. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
@ EEK A HOUSE
You can't keep a good man down.

I have already been in contact with the people who should control this site and they told me you were to be denyed acsess.

I repeat my demand to have you removed as the inposter that you are. My civil libertys are being infringed. I demand the imediate removal of this inposter who uses my name.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

To Administration and legal department.

(complaint put into public domain in part so it cant be denied)

I have already complained about this poster copying my user name. How he has been able to do it must be a worry to all. This is cyberstalking, (same poster has aped user names on 5 different occasions) you might or might not be aware of that.

The poster has already libelled me, which is being looked at by a legal team, I ask that you pay close attention to what this impostor email address' and posts in case he commits criminal offenses on this forum and tries to lay them at my door. You need to be aware of who is posting what!

I have asked for his log details to be made available to me so legal action can be taken against him, I again ask for those details, if i need to ask for them under FOI then please state this is the case. I have also reported my concerns to the police in case criminal offenses are committed and you are now aware who is responsible for any crime.

I believe this cyberstalking is taken because of my racial identity and i would ask you to consider it as that which would make it a criminal matter. I will be forwarding this post onto the PA of the CEO of the company as i have with all the complaints made on this forum.

If you're going to make a FOI application I would suggest that you ask your friend Stewart Hardprick Carruthers to do it as he has an account with the office. Mind you, I'll warn you, he doesn't have a lot of success.

I asked if that was needed to get the info not what i was going to do!

Im sure the log-on details and IP if traced would lead back to very confused, hypocritical people suffering self-shame.

Why would you suggest A, the person mentioned and B, if you know he isn't very successful?

Are you struggling again? Another bad day?

Be assured it will get better.

It's all a matter of public record Old Boy.

stropmag. wrote:
A boy is a young male human, usually child or adolescent.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

stropmag. wrote:
A boy is a young male human, usually child or adolescent.

I see so an old boy is an old " young male human, usually child or adolescent" Is that correct?

Now the public record comment like to explain that rather stunted post

stropmag. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

stropmag. wrote:
A boy is a young male human, usually child or adolescent.

I see so an old boy is an old " young male human, usually child or adolescent" Is that correct?

Now the public record comment like to explain that rather stunted post

Certainly. All applications under the FOI legislation are available to view on-line and are therefore a matter of public record. If you care to take the trouble you will see that Stewart Hardprick Carruthers has not been very successful in his applications. That is all I was saying.
I trust you can understand that?

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
That rubble is the broken-up driveways of vulnerable pensioners from all over the county

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
wow, witty comeback, must have taken you ages to come up with that one!

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
jeez even a dog could have detected the sarcasm

stropmag. wrote:
What sort of thoughtless, greedy, lazy, people with a contempt for the law would do this sort of thing?

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
How can you have an attempt as sarcasm? It either is or it isn't, not exactly a difficult concept to grasp is it, well unless you're an un-educated product of in-breeding i guess

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
How can you have an attempt as sarcasm? It either is or it isn't, not exactly a difficult concept to grasp is it, well unless you're an un-educated product of in-breeding i guess

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
What racist slur? I see no mention of race. "brought to the attention of the authorities" HAHA! yes i'm sure the swat team are waiting for the go-ahead as we speak. Do you realise how pathetic you sound? "the full weight of the law will be bought to bare" LMFAO!!

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
What racist slur? I see no mention of race. "brought to the attention of the authorities" HAHA! yes i'm sure the swat team are waiting for the go-ahead as we speak. Do you realise how pathetic you sound? "the full weight of the law will be bought to bare" LMFAO!!

Ignore the idiot...its an impostor. He has ruined one thread by pretending to me and then pretending to be me replying to me! The guy is seriously disturbed. Report him

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
What racist slur? I see no mention of race. "brought to the attention of the authorities" HAHA! yes i'm sure the swat team are waiting for the go-ahead as we speak. Do you realise how pathetic you sound? "the full weight of the law will be bought to bare" LMFAO!!

Ignore the idiot...its an impostor. He has ruined one thread by pretending to me and then pretending to be me replying to me! The guy is seriously disturbed. Report him

Impostor!

You can tell from the syntax, the way the idiot tries to ape me with misspelt words and grammar that he is not me.
It is my advise to you and all innocent partys on this site that you should complain to the Echo about this idiot. I have done so many times but some how he can carry on posting and imitating me.

I have made it clear to the Echo that I am aware of my rights and that this amounts to a serious case of cereal cyber stalking. I expect legal action will follow very soon.

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
What racist slur? I see no mention of race. "brought to the attention of the authorities" HAHA! yes i'm sure the swat team are waiting for the go-ahead as we speak. Do you realise how pathetic you sound? "the full weight of the law will be bought to bare" LMFAO!!

Ignore the idiot...its an impostor. He has ruined one thread by pretending to me and then pretending to be me replying to me! The guy is seriously disturbed. Report him

Impostor!

You can tell from the syntax, the way the idiot tries to ape me with misspelt words and grammar that he is not me.
It is my advise to you and all innocent partys on this site that you should complain to the Echo about this idiot. I have done so many times but some how he can carry on posting and imitating me.

I have made it clear to the Echo that I am aware of my rights and that this amounts to a serious case of cereal cyber stalking. I expect legal action will follow very soon.

Unless you are a Crunchy Nut Cornflake it is hardly likely to amount to a case of "cereal cyber stalking".

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
What racist slur? I see no mention of race. "brought to the attention of the authorities" HAHA! yes i'm sure the swat team are waiting for the go-ahead as we speak. Do you realise how pathetic you sound? "the full weight of the law will be bought to bare" LMFAO!!

Ignore the idiot...its an impostor. He has ruined one thread by pretending to me and then pretending to be me replying to me! The guy is seriously disturbed. Report him

Impostor!

You can tell from the syntax, the way the idiot tries to ape me with misspelt words and grammar that he is not me.
It is my advise to you and all innocent partys on this site that you should complain to the Echo about this idiot. I have done so many times but some how he can carry on posting and imitating me.

I have made it clear to the Echo that I am aware of my rights and that this amounts to a serious case of cereal cyber stalking. I expect legal action will follow very soon.

Unless you are a Crunchy Nut Cornflake it is hardly likely to amount to a case of "cereal cyber stalking".

This is the idiot impostor, he thinks he is oh so clever. He has had one thread closed down and will have every thread he goes on closed down. No one will be able to debate anything while he is allowed to troll like he is.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
It seems this type of stalking might come under the Protection From Harassment Act...this is being investigated

Meanwhile an expert on Internet stakers has come up with this appraisal of who is a cyberstalker


" Internet stalker profile

If you've been stalked by a cyberstalker, this profile will give you an insight into who you are dealing with. One or all of these will apply to your cyberstalker

The cyber stalker lives in a 1-room flat which hasn't been cleaned for months - if ever

has stacks of pornographic magazines in his bedroom area

has poor personal hygiene

has poor table manners

has poor social etiquette

hasn't changed the sheets on his bed for months, which are now best described as crusty

has a bathroom, the state of which doesn't bear thinking about

lives on pizza and beer/coke, the remnants of which litter his apartment

may have an unusual pet (eg ferret) which has free run of the apartment

is either significantly over- or under-weight

has a small moustache or other facial hair

has not held down any job for more than a couple of years, probably less

has no friends

has no life outside the Internet

fear of men

fear of physical pain

Hidden effeminate ways

The Internet stalker probably has other unpleasant characteristics that sexual harassers possess, and the usual sexual inadequacy including lack of intimacy, controlling behaviour, no concept of the partner's needs, premature ****, and an abnormal belief bordering on obsession in his smallness."

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
What racist slur? I see no mention of race. "brought to the attention of the authorities" HAHA! yes i'm sure the swat team are waiting for the go-ahead as we speak. Do you realise how pathetic you sound? "the full weight of the law will be bought to bare" LMFAO!!

Ignore the idiot...its an impostor. He has ruined one thread by pretending to me and then pretending to be me replying to me! The guy is seriously disturbed. Report him

Impostor!

You can tell from the syntax, the way the idiot tries to ape me with misspelt words and grammar that he is not me.
It is my advise to you and all innocent partys on this site that you should complain to the Echo about this idiot. I have done so many times but some how he can carry on posting and imitating me.

I have made it clear to the Echo that I am aware of my rights and that this amounts to a serious case of cereal cyber stalking. I expect legal action will follow very soon.

Unless you are a Crunchy Nut Cornflake it is hardly likely to amount to a case of "cereal cyber stalking".

This is the idiot impostor, he thinks he is oh so clever. He has had one thread closed down and will have every thread he goes on closed down. No one will be able to debate anything while he is allowed to troll like he is.

So you say but how can I know. At the end of the day you may or not be the 'original' user of the name. It scarcely matters. The reality is that there is great animosity between you and another poster or posters. I would suggest that you change your user name (regardless of whether you were first to use it or not) and post in moderate terms without resorting to name calling and incivility. That way what you fear, the disintegration of the facility, may be avoided.

doasilikey. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
It seems this type of stalking might come under the Protection From Harassment Act...this is being investigated

Meanwhile an expert on Internet stakers has come up with this appraisal of who is a cyberstalker


" Internet stalker profile

If you've been stalked by a cyberstalker, this profile will give you an insight into who you are dealing with. One or all of these will apply to your cyberstalker

The cyber stalker lives in a 1-room flat which hasn't been cleaned for months - if ever

has stacks of pornographic magazines in his bedroom area

has poor personal hygiene

has poor table manners

has poor social etiquette

hasn't changed the sheets on his bed for months, which are now best described as crusty

has a bathroom, the state of which doesn't bear thinking about

lives on pizza and beer/coke, the remnants of which litter his apartment

may have an unusual pet (eg ferret) which has free run of the apartment

is either significantly over- or under-weight

has a small moustache or other facial hair

has not held down any job for more than a couple of years, probably less

has no friends

has no life outside the Internet

fear of men

fear of physical pain

Hidden effeminate ways

The Internet stalker probably has other unpleasant characteristics that sexual harassers possess, and the usual sexual inadequacy including lack of intimacy, controlling behaviour, no concept of the partner's needs, premature ****, and an abnormal belief bordering on obsession in his smallness."

Proof then that it is possible to stalk oneself. Much as many on here had suspected.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
What racist slur? I see no mention of race. "brought to the attention of the authorities" HAHA! yes i'm sure the swat team are waiting for the go-ahead as we speak. Do you realise how pathetic you sound? "the full weight of the law will be bought to bare" LMFAO!!

Ignore the idiot...its an impostor. He has ruined one thread by pretending to me and then pretending to be me replying to me! The guy is seriously disturbed. Report him

Impostor!

You can tell from the syntax, the way the idiot tries to ape me with misspelt words and grammar that he is not me.
It is my advise to you and all innocent partys on this site that you should complain to the Echo about this idiot. I have done so many times but some how he can carry on posting and imitating me.

I have made it clear to the Echo that I am aware of my rights and that this amounts to a serious case of cereal cyber stalking. I expect legal action will follow very soon.

Unless you are a Crunchy Nut Cornflake it is hardly likely to amount to a case of "cereal cyber stalking".

This is the idiot impostor, he thinks he is oh so clever. He has had one thread closed down and will have every thread he goes on closed down. No one will be able to debate anything while he is allowed to troll like he is.

So you say but how can I know. At the end of the day you may or not be the 'original' user of the name. It scarcely matters. The reality is that there is great animosity between you and another poster or posters. I would suggest that you change your user name (regardless of whether you were first to use it or not) and post in moderate terms without resorting to name calling and incivility. That way what you fear, the disintegration of the facility, may be avoided.

I do not fear the disintegration of the facility in fact i would be quite happy if it didn't exist!

That way i wouldn't have to 'mix' with some of the low life's who use the site to racially abuse people.

I respond in the manner i am addressed in and make no apology for that.

Im not the 'turn the other cheek' type

The impostor has in the past copied other names and would just copy again. Its stalking and there is a law against it, whether that law covers the internet is now being looked at.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
Just had this sent to me via an internet law firm...


Malicious Communications Act (1998) classified cyberstalking as a criminal offense.


Well Well Well!

doasilikey. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
What racist slur? I see no mention of race. "brought to the attention of the authorities" HAHA! yes i'm sure the swat team are waiting for the go-ahead as we speak. Do you realise how pathetic you sound? "the full weight of the law will be bought to bare" LMFAO!!

Ignore the idiot...its an impostor. He has ruined one thread by pretending to me and then pretending to be me replying to me! The guy is seriously disturbed. Report him

Impostor!

You can tell from the syntax, the way the idiot tries to ape me with misspelt words and grammar that he is not me.
It is my advise to you and all innocent partys on this site that you should complain to the Echo about this idiot. I have done so many times but some how he can carry on posting and imitating me.

I have made it clear to the Echo that I am aware of my rights and that this amounts to a serious case of cereal cyber stalking. I expect legal action will follow very soon.

Unless you are a Crunchy Nut Cornflake it is hardly likely to amount to a case of "cereal cyber stalking".

This is the idiot impostor, he thinks he is oh so clever. He has had one thread closed down and will have every thread he goes on closed down. No one will be able to debate anything while he is allowed to troll like he is.

So you say but how can I know. At the end of the day you may or not be the 'original' user of the name. It scarcely matters. The reality is that there is great animosity between you and another poster or posters. I would suggest that you change your user name (regardless of whether you were first to use it or not) and post in moderate terms without resorting to name calling and incivility. That way what you fear, the disintegration of the facility, may be avoided.

I do not fear the disintegration of the facility in fact i would be quite happy if it didn't exist!

That way i wouldn't have to 'mix' with some of the low life's who use the site to racially abuse people.

I respond in the manner i am addressed in and make no apology for that.

Im not the 'turn the other cheek' type

The impostor has in the past copied other names and would just copy again. Its stalking and there is a law against it, whether that law covers the internet is now being looked at.

"I do not fear the disintegration of the facility in fact i would be quite happy if it didn't exist!"

This is very revealing. Perhaps there is something in the suggestions that have been made that there is no impostor and that you are setting yourself up? You spend an awful lot of time posting to a site you say you would be happy if it were not to exist.

"That way i wouldn't have to 'mix' with some of the low life's who use the site to racially abuse people."

I don't recall seeing any racial abuse on this thread yet you have posted to it a good deal.

"I respond in the manner i am addressed in and make no apology for that"

Nobody has asked you to apologise for anything- surprisingly in my opinion.

"Im not the 'turn the other cheek' type"

Most regular readers will have noticed. Is that something you feel proud of?

"The impostor has in the past copied other names and would just copy again. Its stalking and there is a law against it, whether that law covers the internet is now being looked at."

How do you know that the impostor has in the past copied other names when you don't know who the impostor (if there is one) is? You have given the impression in previous posts (or was that the impostor?) that you had the legal situation sorted. Now you say that it is "being looked at".

You, sir, are a clown of the first order.

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
Just had this sent to me via an internet law firm...


Malicious Communications Act (1998) classified cyberstalking as a criminal offense.


Well Well Well!

I really don't wish to take the wind out of your sails but I think you need to read and understand the legislation before simply throwing a reference to an Act out as if it were proof of some assertion you have made. I think that when (if) you come to read the Act you will find that it hardly applies to the situation you are seemingly so keen to have addressed through the law.

The old adage"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" is as true in these days of computers as it always was.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing"

I think the imposter strikes again!

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Trainman wrote:
WHY are people SO fast in accusing any race, colour, or creed, WITHOUT proof?

To pun your name, its because they have a one track mind...they are not intelligent enough to give themselves many options to consider before they conclude what they think. The poster who claims not to be in control of his body functions ( including thinking?) is an example of that

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
Just had this sent to me via an internet law firm...


Malicious Communications Act (1998) classified cyberstalking as a criminal offense.


Well Well Well!

I really don't wish to take the wind out of your sails but I think you need to read and understand the legislation before simply throwing a reference to an Act out as if it were proof of some assertion you have made. I think that when (if) you come to read the Act you will find that it hardly applies to the situation you are seemingly so keen to have addressed through the law.

The old adage"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" is as true in these days of computers as it always was.

I have simply posted what is reported which was

" In the United Kingdom, the Malicious Communications Act (1998) classified cyberstalking as a criminal offense."

Are you stating thats not the case?

If so please state that rather than all the other padding in the post.

Is it needed?

EEK A BAILIFF wrote:
Interesting to read the latest on the Dale Farm saga. The Echo are running a story headlined "EXCLUSIVE: Council leader received hate mail during eviction" in which the Council leader describes a communication he received: “They had cut out letters from pages and spelt out "Sewer rat" "this should be you". "I have not spoken about that individual letter until now."” Interesting choice of language. Ring any bells anyone?

EEK A BAILIFF wrote:
Interesting to read the latest on the Dale Farm saga.

The Echo are running a story headlined "EXCLUSIVE: Council leader received hate mail during eviction" in which the Council leader describes a communication he received: “They had cut out letters from pages and spelt out "Sewer rat" "this should be you". "I have not spoken about that individual letter until now."”

Interesting choice of language. Ring any bells anyone?

EEK A BAILIFF wrote:
In fact my conscience forces me to communicate with Essex Police to draw their attention to the poster allegedly from the Traveller Community who routinely describes those he disagrees with in the terms described by Cllr. Ball. What a turn-up, eh?

Your 'special' DNA may yet be the undoing of you E-Types!

Perhaps you have nothing to worry about? We shall hopefully read all about it in due course.

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:
Just had this sent to me via an internet law firm...


Malicious Communications Act (1998) classified cyberstalking as a criminal offense.


Well Well Well!

I really don't wish to take the wind out of your sails but I think you need to read and understand the legislation before simply throwing a reference to an Act out as if it were proof of some assertion you have made. I think that when (if) you come to read the Act you will find that it hardly applies to the situation you are seemingly so keen to have addressed through the law.

The old adage"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" is as true in these days of computers as it always was.

I have simply posted what is reported which was

" In the United Kingdom, the Malicious Communications Act (1998) classified cyberstalking as a criminal offense."

Are you stating thats not the case?

If so please state that rather than all the other padding in the post.

Is it needed?

Well, I hope your better understanding of The Act will prove beneficial in one way or another.

Aint it just the truth wrote:

EEK A BAILIFF wrote:
Interesting to read the latest on the Dale Farm saga. The Echo are running a story headlined "EXCLUSIVE: Council leader received hate mail during eviction" in which the Council leader describes a communication he received: “They had cut out letters from pages and spelt out "Sewer rat" "this should be you". "I have not spoken about that individual letter until now."” Interesting choice of language. Ring any bells anyone?

Funny you should mention it but that unusual choice of insult does sound rather familiar...

stropmag.. wrote:
If you wake at midnight, and hear a horse's feet,
Don't go drawing back the blind, or looking in the street,
Them that ask no questions isn't told a lie.
Watch the wall my darling while the didicoy goes by.

Caught out by the rozzers, sure to take a fall,
Sending stalking letters, to a man called Tony Ball,
Should have kept his trap shut but could not resist a fight,
Creeping like a creeping thing under cover of the night.

(Apologies to Mr. Kipling)

stropmag.. wrote:
If you wake at midnight, and hear a horse's feet,
Don't go drawing back the blind, or looking in the street,
Them that ask no questions isn't told a lie.
Watch the wall my darling while the didicoy goes by.

Caught out by the rozzers, sure to take a fall,
Sending stalking letters, to a man called Tony Ball,
Should have kept his trap shut but could not resist a fight,
Creeping like a creeping thing under cover of the night.

(Apologies to Mr. Kipling)

The Soldier in White wrote:

stropmag.. wrote:
If you wake at midnight, and hear a horse's feet,
Don't go drawing back the blind, or looking in the street,
Them that ask no questions isn't told a lie.
Watch the wall my darling while the didicoy goes by.

Caught out by the rozzers, sure to take a fall,
Sending stalking letters, to a man called Tony Ball,
Should have kept his trap shut but could not resist a fight,
Creeping like a creeping thing under cover of the night.

(Apologies to Mr. Kipling)

Mr. Kipling makes exceedingly good cakes.

stropmag.. wrote:
If you wake at midnight, and hear a horse's feet,
Don't go drawing back the blind, or looking in the street,
Them that ask no questions isn't told a lie.
Watch the wall my darling while the didicoy goes by.

Caught out by the rozzers, sure to take a fall,
Sending stalking letters, to a man called Tony Ball,
Should have kept his trap shut but could not resist a fight,
Creeping like a creeping thing under cover of the night.

(Apologies to Mr. Kipling)

Laughlast wrote:

EEK A BAILIFF wrote:
Interesting to read the latest on the Dale Farm saga.

The Echo are running a story headlined "EXCLUSIVE: Council leader received hate mail during eviction" in which the Council leader describes a communication he received: “They had cut out letters from pages and spelt out "Sewer rat" "this should be you". "I have not spoken about that individual letter until now."”

Interesting choice of language. Ring any bells anyone?

I see you were banned! I agreed to give up the name you copied and brought into disrepute, and made a formal complaint to those who have an interest in those sort of things.

The paper are rather angry that you are copying names and then disrupting the threads.

I did point out how this was deemed a criminal offense under the malicious communications act and how it might effect their business not to mention their reputation...they were livid. Im sure any cooperation need by them will now be forth coming.

As for Ball, im sure he got lots of hate mail and in a country made up of mostly decent people im sure he got as much as he warranted.

But he never got any of me for i wouldn't waste a penny nor time or effort on the man.

His reward for the eviction was to lose any chance achieving the ambition he might of had to become an MP...his own colleagues made that clear when he was ignored in the councillor of the year award. Did you see his face on youtube when he knew he wasn't even in the 'never made it' list!...LOL

Laughlast wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

EEK A BAILIFF wrote: Interesting to read the latest on the Dale Farm saga. The Echo are running a story headlined "EXCLUSIVE: Council leader received hate mail during eviction" in which the Council leader describes a communication he received: “They had cut out letters from pages and spelt out "Sewer rat" "this should be you". "I have not spoken about that individual letter until now."” Interesting choice of language. Ring any bells anyone?

Funny you should mention it but that unusual choice of insult does sound rather familiar...

Im sure it not an unusual form of insult, im sure i wouldn't be wrong if i was to say you get called it all the time..LOL

Laughlast wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

stropmag.. wrote:
If you wake at midnight, and hear a horse's feet,
Don't go drawing back the blind, or looking in the street,
Them that ask no questions isn't told a lie.
Watch the wall my darling while the didicoy goes by.

Caught out by the rozzers, sure to take a fall,
Sending stalking letters, to a man called Tony Ball,
Should have kept his trap shut but could not resist a fight,
Creeping like a creeping thing under cover of the night.

(Apologies to Mr. Kipling)

Mr. Kipling makes exceedingly good cakes.

Ah, now you start with your multiple accounts supporting your own posts...sicko!

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Laughlast wrote:

EEK A BAILIFF wrote:
Interesting to read the latest on the Dale Farm saga.

The Echo are running a story headlined "EXCLUSIVE: Council leader received hate mail during eviction" in which the Council leader describes a communication he received: “They had cut out letters from pages and spelt out "Sewer rat" "this should be you". "I have not spoken about that individual letter until now."”

Interesting choice of language. Ring any bells anyone?

I see you were banned! I agreed to give up the name you copied and brought into disrepute, and made a formal complaint to those who have an interest in those sort of things.

The paper are rather angry that you are copying names and then disrupting the threads.

I did point out how this was deemed a criminal offense under the malicious communications act and how it might effect their business not to mention their reputation...they were livid. Im sure any cooperation need by them will now be forth coming.

As for Ball, im sure he got lots of hate mail and in a country made up of mostly decent people im sure he got as much as he warranted.

But he never got any of me for i wouldn't waste a penny nor time or effort on the man.

His reward for the eviction was to lose any chance achieving the ambition he might of had to become an MP...his own colleagues made that clear when he was ignored in the councillor of the year award. Did you see his face on youtube when he knew he wasn't even in the 'never made it' list!...LOL

I take it you were addressing this comment to me. Are you some sort of clown?

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Laughlast wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

EEK A BAILIFF wrote: Interesting to read the latest on the Dale Farm saga. The Echo are running a story headlined "EXCLUSIVE: Council leader received hate mail during eviction" in which the Council leader describes a communication he received: “They had cut out letters from pages and spelt out "Sewer rat" "this should be you". "I have not spoken about that individual letter until now."” Interesting choice of language. Ring any bells anyone?

Funny you should mention it but that unusual choice of insult does sound rather familiar...

Im sure it not an unusual form of insult, im sure i wouldn't be wrong if i was to say you get called it all the time..LOL

Hello hello another muppet who can't even write proper English (probably the same one with a dfferent Echo account?), and sewer rat might be a common insult where you come from (DF?) but I haven't heard anyone use that since the 1950s, except for a certain poster on this website. I reckon that nice Mr Balls ought to get the Police to investigate...

The Soldier in White wrote:

Laughlast wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

stropmag.. wrote:
If you wake at midnight, and hear a horse's feet,
Don't go drawing back the blind, or looking in the street,
Them that ask no questions isn't told a lie.
Watch the wall my darling while the didicoy goes by.

Caught out by the rozzers, sure to take a fall,
Sending stalking letters, to a man called Tony Ball,
Should have kept his trap shut but could not resist a fight,
Creeping like a creeping thing under cover of the night.

(Apologies to Mr. Kipling)

Mr. Kipling makes exceedingly good cakes.

Ah, now you start with your multiple accounts supporting your own posts...sicko!

Wrong again. I am not stropmag. Wishful thinking on your part ?

You have already been responsible for ruining at least one thread with your multiple account nonsense. It's time to call it a day.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

Good.. im glad you contacted the police, they will now have contact details for you which will save time in the future.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
There is nothing technically wrong with saying you "don't write proper English", whereas your line "is that there then proper writing?" is the sort of grammatical nonsense we'd expect from Junior school chilfdren. I have just talked to Mr Ball and he informs me that he is already aware of the similarity between your misuse of English and the insults he received so they're on your case already ET/EaH/Laughlast. The truth always prevails. Ha ha ha ho ho ho!

Aint it just the truth wrote:
There is nothing technically wrong with saying you "don't write proper English", whereas your line "is that there then proper writing?" is the sort of grammatical nonsense we'd expect from Junior school chilfdren. I have just talked to Mr Ball and he informs me that he is already aware of the similarity between your misuse of English and the insults he received so they're on your case already ET/EaH/Laughlast. The truth always prevails. Ha ha ha ho ho ho!

Aint it just the truth wrote:
There is nothing technically wrong with saying you "don't write proper English", whereas your line "is that there then proper writing?" is the sort of grammatical nonsense we'd expect from Junior school chilfdren. I have just talked to Mr Ball and he informs me that he is already aware of the similarity between your misuse of English and the insults he received so they're on your case already ET/EaH/Laughlast. The truth always prevails. Ha ha ha ho ho ho!

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Unlike you, the Echo has let me use my old names, you have just been banned outright, repeatedly, for your bad attitude and constant insults which is why you have to keep making up new names. Isn't it? And "argued myself to a standstill"? Ha ha ha! Only in your dreams matey, you have lost every inch of the way, you just aren't smart enough to realise it.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EAH/LL, I think it's your identity Mr Ball and the Police really want. Ho ho ho! The truth always gets out in the end. Btw if you had bothered to write a nice letter to Dr Wilson I'm sure he would tell you all about his findings, as he did me. Ha ha ha!

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

Good.. im glad you contacted the police, they will now have contact details for you which will save time in the future.

Yes, I was happy to leave my full name, address and contact telephone number. I doubt they will need to speak to me again as the Echo will be their logical next port of call should they wish to investigate further.

I was able to inform them that I have a large number of screen grabs available dating back to September 3 2011. Apparently they feel that they will not need them (there is some issue regarding admissibility). They are confident that all the data they require will be provided by the Echo.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Yeah yeah yeah. Worm, worm, worm. Take whatever action you want matey, as I will.

J Arthur Rank wrote:
@ Lastlaugh who wrote:

" Leaving a space in between the letters and then registering is fooling nobody."

Be fair, it fooled you for several days!

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Ooo-er we'd better watch out, old ET has told us he has 'post grad uni students' on his side, ha ha ha! I think the word you are looking for is 'graduates' ET, unless you are confusing people like me who have taken extra post grad qualifications and degrees. You have no idea sunshine.
.
High five Stropmag!

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Ooo-er we'd better watch out, old ET has told us he has 'post grad uni students' on his side, ha ha ha! I think the word you are looking for is 'graduates' ET, unless you are confusing people like me who have taken extra post grad qualifications and degrees. You have no idea sunshine.
.
High five Stropmag!

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Still getting everything wrong ET? You really should seek help for your verbal diarrhoea.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Yeah yeah yeah. Worm, worm, worm. Take whatever action you want matey, as I will.

LOL, i show how you are guilty of what castigate and then how you cant even remember what it was you were posting about...LOL

You then imply im trying to squirm out of something or other....ironically its you who is squirming by posting "Worm worm worm" to avoid your FAIL LOL

You action?...there is no law against showing a fool that he is a fool..is there?

Aint it just the truth wrote:
"Mr Ball can have my identify anytime he wants to, i would welcome speaking to him and asking him the questions he has yet, to date, not replied to or answered".
.
Then call him now, I'm sure he'd be very pleased to establish your identity. You can get his phone number and email address from the Basildon Council website. Go on, I dare you.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Yeah yeah yeah. Worm, worm, worm. Take whatever action you want matey, as I will.

LOL, i show how you are guilty of what castigate and then how you cant even remember what it was you were posting about...LOL

You then imply im trying to squirm out of something or other....ironically its you who is squirming by posting "Worm worm worm" to avoid your FAIL LOL

You action?...there is no law against showing a fool that he is a fool..is there?

I might as well say it before someone else does................

.Hey Hey! Stanley's back.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
"Mr Ball can have my identify anytime he wants to, i would welcome speaking to him and asking him the questions he has yet, to date, not replied to or answered".
.
Then call him now, I'm sure he'd be very pleased to establish your identity. You can get his phone number and email address from the Basildon Council website. Go on, I dare you.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Yeah yeah yeah. Worm, worm, worm. Take whatever action you want matey, as I will.

LOL, i show how you are guilty of what castigate and then how you cant even remember what it was you were posting about...LOL

You then imply im trying to squirm out of something or other....ironically its you who is squirming by posting "Worm worm worm" to avoid your FAIL LOL

You action?...there is no law against showing a fool that he is a fool..is there?

I might as well say it before someone else does................


.Hey Hey! Stanley's back.

And so is "dada" and son of a.....

Did you email the police or ring them? Im sure they provided you with a ref number? Do you have that.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Yeah yeah yeah. Worm, worm, worm. Take whatever action you want matey, as I will.

LOL, i show how you are guilty of what castigate and then how you cant even remember what it was you were posting about...LOL

You then imply im trying to squirm out of something or other....ironically its you who is squirming by posting "Worm worm worm" to avoid your FAIL LOL

You action?...there is no law against showing a fool that he is a fool..is there?

I might as well say it before someone else does................



.Hey Hey! Stanley's back.

And so is "dada" and son of a.....

Did you email the police or ring them? Im sure they provided you with a ref number? Do you have that.

I emailed them using their website's proforma. There was no reference number- why would there be for passing on information? I should have thought you of all people would have known that.

There was no reference number from the council site either- why would there be?

Eric Whim wrote:
has anyone cleared up all this rubbish yet?

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Eric Whim wrote:
has anyone cleared up all this rubbish yet?

Minceir. said at 3:38pm Saturday:

"Myself and my very civil, polite, clean and responsible band of merry men (always smiling and joking) will be pleased to clean the spoil from the hallowed turf."

Perhaps he was true to his word. ???

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Yeah yeah yeah. Worm, worm, worm. Take whatever action you want matey, as I will.

LOL, i show how you are guilty of what castigate and then how you cant even remember what it was you were posting about...LOL

You then imply im trying to squirm out of something or other....ironically its you who is squirming by posting "Worm worm worm" to avoid your FAIL LOL

You action?...there is no law against showing a fool that he is a fool..is there?

I might as well say it before someone else does................




.Hey Hey! Stanley's back.

And so is "dada" and son of a.....

Did you email the police or ring them? Im sure they provided you with a ref number? Do you have that.

I emailed them using their website's proforma. There was no reference number- why would there be for passing on information? I should have thought you of all people would have known that.

There was no reference number from the council site either- why would there be?

Must be a bit strenuous for you to keep having to log on and off to use your names... remember when you were caught out? LOL...caught like a kipper!

Oh good you emailed them...they will then be able to get your IP address without having to bother the Echo with court orders (if thats the procedure)

I havent passed on information 'we' have made complaints.. a vastly different thing, although within that we have provided the information needed to prove criminal offenses.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Yeah yeah yeah. Worm, worm, worm. Take whatever action you want matey, as I will.

LOL, i show how you are guilty of what castigate and then how you cant even remember what it was you were posting about...LOL

You then imply im trying to squirm out of something or other....ironically its you who is squirming by posting "Worm worm worm" to avoid your FAIL LOL

You action?...there is no law against showing a fool that he is a fool..is there?

I might as well say it before someone else does................





.Hey Hey! Stanley's back.

And so is "dada" and son of a.....

Did you email the police or ring them? Im sure they provided you with a ref number? Do you have that.

I emailed them using their website's proforma. There was no reference number- why would there be for passing on information? I should have thought you of all people would have known that.

There was no reference number from the council site either- why would there be?

Must be a bit strenuous for you to keep having to log on and off to use your names... remember when you were caught out? LOL...caught like a kipper!

Oh good you emailed them...they will then be able to get your IP address without having to bother the Echo with court orders (if thats the procedure)

I havent passed on information 'we' have made complaints.. a vastly different thing, although within that we have provided the information needed to prove criminal offenses.

I have no need to log in and out. I only have the one name. "Caught like a kipper"? I think you not only have the wrong metaphor but you must also be mistaking me for somebody else.

I have no problem whatsoever with anyone I directly communicate with having my IP a/d.

The "We" that you refer to? Is that the Royal "We" or is it the Wee that is trickling down your left trouser leg?

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

I think most readers will have NOTICED.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

Its a legal procedure thang, probably all beyond you.

Ask "dada" maybe he will see the significance of the post and the clear NOTICE within it.

The fact you replied to it is proof it was served!

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

Son of Stropmag wrote:
@ Lastlaugh who wrote:

"That fee schedule will be £250 per hour."

You're not laying dodgy tarmac on pensioners' driveways now.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

Your 'father' claimed to be Somalian and you agreed that was the case...Are there white Somalian's? i know there are white Jamaicans...are you not your 'fathers' son?

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

I think most readers will have NOTICED.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

The Soldier in White wrote:

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

I think most readers will have NOTICED.

I noticed. It only took me a few minutes so I'll let you have my time for a tenner. Cah in hand please !

Eric Whim wrote:
that's a bit hard on that poor box of frogs

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

'I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!'

...*or* Somalian.

P.S. Neither do I take kindly to being ordered about!

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

Its a legal procedure thang, probably all beyond you.

Ask "dada" maybe he will see the significance of the post and the clear NOTICE within it.

The fact you replied to it is proof it was served!

Why don't you add a few "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in for good measure. I can now see why so many people see you as a total idiot.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

Your 'father' claimed to be Somalian and you agreed that was the case...Are there white Somalian's? i know there are white Jamaicans...are you not your 'fathers' son?

My father is indeed a black Somalian. I, however am white. Now, which camp would you place yourself in?

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

'I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!'

...*or* Somalian.

P.S. Neither do I take kindly to being ordered about!

Well, I think most people will see that you desire to avoid at all costs putting yourself in one camp or the other. I wonder, why?

If you don't like being ordered about I would suggest that you don't fall out with ET (now Lastlaugh).

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote: "Mr Ball can have my identify anytime he wants to, i would welcome speaking to him and asking him the questions he has yet, to date, not replied to or answered". . Then call him now, I'm sure he'd be very pleased to establish your identity. You can get his phone number and email address from the Basildon Council website. Go on, I dare you.

Why dont you provide his number and get him to agree to answer the questions asked of him? Im sure you can arrange that cant you? You having easy access to him. So live up to your boast and arrange it or forever be a recognised as one with delusions of contacts...Psst, have you got Mandonna's details...iv err...mislaid them.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

Its a legal procedure thang, probably all beyond you.

Ask "dada" maybe he will see the significance of the post and the clear NOTICE within it.

The fact you replied to it is proof it was served!

Why don't you add a few "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in for good measure. I can now see why so many people see you as a total idiot.

You make mention of "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in connection to what i have posted and then you talk about idiots! LOL...do you even know what i posted? Do you know what it means in legal terms?

Do you even know what "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" means and covers?

I bet you dont and you have posted in your sheer ignorance! DUH DUH

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote: "Mr Ball can have my identify anytime he wants to, i would welcome speaking to him and asking him the questions he has yet, to date, not replied to or answered". . Then call him now, I'm sure he'd be very pleased to establish your identity. You can get his phone number and email address from the Basildon Council website. Go on, I dare you.

Why dont you provide his number and get him to agree to answer the questions asked of him? Im sure you can arrange that cant you? You having easy access to him. So live up to your boast and arrange it or forever be a recognised as one with delusions of contacts...Psst, have you got Mandonna's details...iv err...mislaid them.

Councdillor Tony Ball: 52 Laburnum Avenue, Wickford, SS12 0DA. Phone: 01268 454564. email: tony.ball@members.ba

sildon.gov.uk. Glad to be of assistance.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

'I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!'

...*or* Somalian.

P.S. Neither do I take kindly to being ordered about!

Well, I think most people will see that you desire to avoid at all costs putting yourself in one camp or the other. I wonder, why?

If you don't like being ordered about I would suggest that you don't fall out with ET (now Lastlaugh).

Why should people put themselves in camps? Because you have? Most people just live and let live, why is it you and your 'father' can't?

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

'I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!'

...*or* Somalian.

P.S. Neither do I take kindly to being ordered about!

Well, I think most people will see that you desire to avoid at all costs putting yourself in one camp or the other. I wonder, why?

If you don't like being ordered about I would suggest that you don't fall out with ET (now Lastlaugh).

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

'I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!'

...*or* Somalian.

P.S. Neither do I take kindly to being ordered about!

Well, I think most people will see that you desire to avoid at all costs putting yourself in one camp or the other. I wonder, why?

If you don't like being ordered about I would suggest that you don't fall out with ET (now Lastlaugh).

'one camp or the other'

My usual default position would be to side with the underdog....but on this occasion I'll make an exception!

Hope that helps...

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

'I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!'

...*or* Somalian.

P.S. Neither do I take kindly to being ordered about!

Well, I think most people will see that you desire to avoid at all costs putting yourself in one camp or the other. I wonder, why?

If you don't like being ordered about I would suggest that you don't fall out with ET (now Lastlaugh).

Why should people put themselves in camps? Because you have? Most people just live and let live, why is it you and your 'father' can't?

I think you need to address that question to Southchurch59 who said:

".... the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools"

This creates two camps. I don't think I need expand (even for you).

Son of Stropmag wrote:
Re. my last. My comments were actually posted to the organ grinder. I didn't expect the monkey to reply.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

'I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!'

...*or* Somalian.

P.S. Neither do I take kindly to being ordered about!

Well, I think most people will see that you desire to avoid at all costs putting yourself in one camp or the other. I wonder, why?

If you don't like being ordered about I would suggest that you don't fall out with ET (now Lastlaugh).

'one camp or the other'

My usual default position would be to side with the underdog....but on this occasion I'll make an exception!

Hope that helps...

Lastlaugh. wrote:

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

Its a legal procedure thang, probably all beyond you.

Ask "dada" maybe he will see the significance of the post and the clear NOTICE within it.

The fact you replied to it is proof it was served!

Why don't you add a few "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in for good measure. I can now see why so many people see you as a total idiot.

You make mention of "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in connection to what i have posted and then you talk about idiots! LOL...do you even know what i posted? Do you know what it means in legal terms?

Do you even know what "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" means and covers?

I bet you dont and you have posted in your sheer ignorance! DUH DUH

Although it has been many years since I had any interest in legal affairs, I do have a degree in law. Of course, if you know better....

(I don't know why I'm taking the time to say this to a clear ignoramus)

So with your degree in law you will know what i posted means...right?

And likewise you will know what you posted has absolutely nothing to do with what i posted...right?

Which begs the question why did you, taking your 'degree' into consideration, post what you did?

It would seem you have forgotten or never learnt the law or the part in question...which might make it seem its you who's the ignoramus.

Are you really stating that taking your degree you never came across the NOTICE matter?

Was it one of those American ones

" Hey you bub, yes you! Want to be rich, famous, have a life?

Then sign up for our 72 hour law degree, be handsome, be popular with our all in one 72 hour law degree.

Available also in 48 hours format for the discounted price of $8.75..yes my lawyer friend just $8.75. sign up now and we will throw in a genuine piece of moon rock to help you win those difficult cases." (Free wig and cape for the one off price of $600)

Please send cash


Was that the one?

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

J Arthur Rank wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
ET/EaH/Laughlast has spoilt LOTS of threads, all he ever does is insult people and rants on about how intelligent he is which is pure nonsense. You'd think he'd get the message but he doesn't seem to does he? I'm going to let that nice Mr Balls know about ET/EaH/Laughlast and his antiquated insults, I'd bet money they're the same insults that Mr Ball received. I;m emailing Mr Balls now.

You probably already know that there is a facility on the council's web site. I have passed the information on in this way. Also I have sent a copy of my report to Essex Police who also have such a facility.

You have, imo, now stated in public that you have reported me to the police on suspicion of sending offensive mail to Mr Ball (this can be deduced from your other posts) This being the case

The NOTICE to the principle is NOTICE to the agent.

NOTICE to the agent is NOTICE to the principle.

I give you NOTICE that there will be a fee schedule in place for every minute i may spend officially dealing with this malicious complaint.

That fee schedule will be £250 per hour.

As mad as a box of frogs!

Its a legal procedure thang, probably all beyond you.

Ask "dada" maybe he will see the significance of the post and the clear NOTICE within it.

The fact you replied to it is proof it was served!

Why don't you add a few "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in for good measure. I can now see why so many people see you as a total idiot.

You make mention of "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in connection to what i have posted and then you talk about idiots! LOL...do you even know what i posted? Do you know what it means in legal terms?

Do you even know what "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" means and covers?

I bet you dont and you have posted in your sheer ignorance! DUH DUH

Although it has been many years since I had any interest in legal affairs, I do have a degree in law. Of course, if you know better....

(I don't know why I'm taking the time to say this to a clear ignoramus)

So with your degree in law you will know what i posted means...right?

And likewise you will know what you posted has absolutely nothing to do with what i posted...right?

Which begs the question why did you, taking your 'degree' into consideration, post what you did?

It would seem you have forgotten or never learnt the law or the part in question...which might make it seem its you who's the ignoramus.

Are you really stating that taking your degree you never came across the NOTICE matter?

Was it one of those American ones

" Hey you bub, yes you! Want to be rich, famous, have a life?

Then sign up for our 72 hour law degree, be handsome, be popular with our all in one 72 hour law degree.

Available also in 48 hours format for the discounted price of $8.75..yes my lawyer friend just $8.75. sign up now and we will throw in a genuine piece of moon rock to help you win those difficult cases." (Free wig and cape for the one off price of $600)

Please send cash


Was that the one?

Ah, I see you've been reading the brochure from the lawyers that represent the illegal occupants living beside Dale Farm.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

And which camp would you place yourself in?

I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!

I have never claimed to be black. Do you have any evidence to show or is that claim simply a diversion? Try answering the question.

'I don't (normally) communicate with people who pretend to be black!'

...*or* Somalian.

P.S. Neither do I take kindly to being ordered about!

Well, I think most people will see that you desire to avoid at all costs putting yourself in one camp or the other. I wonder, why?

If you don't like being ordered about I would suggest that you don't fall out with ET (now Lastlaugh).

'one camp or the other'

My usual default position would be to side with the underdog....but on this occasion I'll make an exception!

Hope that helps...

It does. Why did it take you so long?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

"...like paint on a palette."

Er, yes. Jackson Pollock's springs to mind.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

"...like paint on a palette."

Er, yes. Jackson Pollock's springs to mind.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

"...like paint on a palette."

Er, yes. Jackson Pollock's springs to mind.

It ain't the paint on Pollock's palette that’s the the problem - it's the 'drippy' paintings the painter produced.

Brunning999 wrote:

stropmag. wrote:
What sort of thoughtless, greedy, lazy, people with a contempt for the law would do this sort of thing?

We have an abundance of thug type people in this country that have no respect for anyone or anything other than themselves, they have no fear of The Police or The Legal System the deterrent of punishment has gone, and it will continue to get worse BECAUSE the trendy lefty Liberal Elite have manipulated their ideas and the current Government are useless to act.

We should either give in or reintroduce deterrents.

It works in Jersey with realistic penalties.

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Eric Whim wrote:
that's a bit hard on that poor box of frogs

Which poor box of frogs? Do you think they exist?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
@Aint it just the truth

'Like you'd have the brains to understand Jackson Pollock, Southchurch59, not.'

Why would I need to ‘understand’ something I don't find aesthetically pleasing? I don't doubt that his work has an appeal to some, but frankly, I have a suitcase in the loft, filled with 'paintings' done by my own children (aged 3,4,5yrs) that are of a similar bent.

Do *you* like (and ‘understand’ him) then?

Personally, I'm more impressed when I see the results of the Old Masters efforts!

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
@Aint it just the truth 'Like you'd have the brains to understand Jackson Pollock, Southchurch59, not.' Why would I need to ‘understand’ something I don't find aesthetically pleasing? I don't doubt that his work has an appeal to some, but frankly, I have a suitcase in the loft, filled with 'paintings' done by my own children (aged 3,4,5yrs) that are of a similar bent. Do *you* like (and ‘understand’ him) then? Personally, I'm more impressed when I see the results of the Old Masters efforts!

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
@Aint it just the truth 'Like you'd have the brains to understand Jackson Pollock, Southchurch59, not.' Why would I need to ‘understand’ something I don't find aesthetically pleasing? I don't doubt that his work has an appeal to some, but frankly, I have a suitcase in the loft, filled with 'paintings' done by my own children (aged 3,4,5yrs) that are of a similar bent. Do *you* like (and ‘understand’ him) then? Personally, I'm more impressed when I see the results of the Old Masters efforts!

Can't say I'm surprised you prefer the 'old Masters' as you don't have to think about them very much to understand them on a superficial level. Personally I prefer the earlier modernists, the Bauhaus school, Kandinsky, Mondrian, Van Der Rohe etc. You may not like them and you clearly don't understand them but these are the people who shaped the world you live in, which is part of the reason why people pay £millions for their works.

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
What I've 'noticed', is that the so called 'educated' are regularly trounced by those they accuse of being fools!

I've also noticed that 'Lastlaugh' likes (on occasion) embrace our rich lexicon and mix words like paint on a palette; whereas others use theirs like a hammer and bolster, banging away at a sculpture of dust and dreams....

"...like paint on a palette."

Er, yes. Jackson Pollock's springs to mind.

Eric Whim wrote:

Lastlaugh. wrote:

Eric Whim wrote:
that's a bit hard on that poor box of frogs

Which poor box of frogs? Do you think they exist?

they exist as much as your fantasist threats of legal action.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Like you'd have the brains to understand Jackson Pollock, Southchurch59, not.
.
'Fantasist threats' is about right EW, dealing with old ET is like being back in the school playground isn't it?
.
ET/EaH/LL I had to speak to a senior planning officer today (something you'd know nothing about). Fortunately he was in his office so I managed to get put straight through. Does this prove he's one of my best friends ET? No of course it doesn't. I know ten year olds who have a better grasp of the pitfalls of assumption than you do. As the CIA says, 'assumption is the mother of all **** ups', something you would be wise to learn if you want to get anywhere the real truth.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
"Early modernism is nothing like Pollocks work. You are trying to twist my words...." Pollock is an abstract expressionist, still a modernist.
.
"People pay millions because 'art' at that level only goes up in price. It's called investment!" It only goes up in price because it has meaning, as I said before these are the people who shaped the world you live in.
.
People like Pollock and Picasso were perfectly capable, and did, produce high quality works of traditional art. So why do you think they stopped doing that and developed their own style? And the correct answer is NOT to make more money.

asbo industries inc wrote:
he has a point. if you intend to take legal action why would you shout it from the rooftops? it looks like bluster, walks like bluster and quacks like bluster.

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

asbo industries inc wrote:
he has a point. if you intend to take legal action why would you shout it from the rooftops? it looks like bluster, walks like bluster and quacks like bluster.

I didn't really want go through this again but...

There has never been any "threats"!

There were warnings given, that a poster was using racial offensive language which was illegal and could they disist. A Polite warning.

Now those who received those warnings are complaining they were warned...some ignored the warning and some noted it and stopped the racial abuse.

And thats it in a nutshell, It and they have been reported, the authorities are aware of the matter and evidence collated on these threads is available to them.

Why posters continually bring it up is beyond me...if they dont believe it then fine...if they do then fine also.

Whether they do or not does not change the reality of it all.

There are posters who stated the term wasn't a racial one and even tried to circumvent the ban on the forum to use it. One serial abuser wrote the term and after the asterisks wrote "traveller' making it quite clear what he had written. What can you say or do with people like that other than hope the laws of the land deal with them appropriately as they would expect and welcome they being law-abiding people.

Look, walk and talk dosent have to be constantly proven...just the once, in time, will suffice

asbo industries inc wrote:
surely better to grow a thicker skin, try to enjoy this forum (where would you be without it??) and close down the wikipedia tab on internet law

asbo industries inc wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

asbo industries inc wrote:
he has a point. if you intend to take legal action why would you shout it from the rooftops? it looks like bluster, walks like bluster and quacks like bluster.

I didn't really want go through this again but...

There has never been any "threats"!

There were warnings given, that a poster was using racial offensive language which was illegal and could they disist. A Polite warning.

Now those who received those warnings are complaining they were warned...some ignored the warning and some noted it and stopped the racial abuse.

And thats it in a nutshell, It and they have been reported, the authorities are aware of the matter and evidence collated on these threads is available to them.

Why posters continually bring it up is beyond me...if they dont believe it then fine...if they do then fine also.

Whether they do or not does not change the reality of it all.

There are posters who stated the term wasn't a racial one and even tried to circumvent the ban on the forum to use it. One serial abuser wrote the term and after the asterisks wrote "traveller' making it quite clear what he had written. What can you say or do with people like that other than hope the laws of the land deal with them appropriately as they would expect and welcome they being law-abiding people.

Look, walk and talk dosent have to be constantly proven...just the once, in time, will suffice

agree but do it quietly or draw a line under it. you have the victory with the "word". time to move on....

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote: "Early modernism is nothing like Pollocks work. You are trying to twist my words...." Pollock is an abstract expressionist, still a modernist. . "People pay millions because 'art' at that level only goes up in price. It's called investment!" It only goes up in price because it has meaning, as I said before these are the people who shaped the world you live in. . People like Pollock and Picasso were perfectly capable, and did, produce high quality works of traditional art. So why do you think they stopped doing that and developed their own style? And the correct answer is NOT to make more money.

People want to follow their own inclination and instinct but also leave behind their own legacy..to paint any artist as someone who gives his all for his art is nonsense... they give their all for a number of things, money, fame, immortality, legacy and in some cases because of mental trauma and illness! Art is seldom for art sake most times its for anything but!

Ha ha ha, so you are an art expert now are you? You are such a clown ET and believe me you know absolutely NOTHING about the creative mind, you just judge everyone and everything by your own lowly blinkered standards. Ho ho ho!.
.
Racist? But you have already admitted that THIS ISN'T ABOUT RACISM! Do you want a link to where you said that, several times?
.
And you get banned because ... oh why bother, no point telling you anything cos you know it all already. Not.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
A master what?...!

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EthanEdwards wrote: I see there is another username for the oft banned essex version of Stanley Unwin. Welcome back for the fifteenth time isn't it Mincy?

....and those are only the ones we know about. But i can see that the master of nonsense is fitting in well and rubbing along with the banter as efficiently as normal.

Leave poor old ET/EaH/LL alone, he's busy contemplating the painting of the oriental lady on his caravan wall, ho ho ho!

Posturing, noise and bluster! You're not an 'art critic' are you?

He seems to feel he's is the last word on everything.

Well I've certainly led a more varied life than you and know a lot more about the world than you do matey.

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EthanEdwards wrote: I see there is another username for the oft banned essex version of Stanley Unwin. Welcome back for the fifteenth time isn't it Mincy?

....and those are only the ones we know about. But i can see that the master of nonsense is fitting in well and rubbing along with the banter as efficiently as normal.

Leave poor old ET/EaH/LL alone, he's busy contemplating the painting of the oriental lady on his caravan wall, ho ho ho!

All very boring i must say..you are seemingly allowed to bait people like this but any reply in kind is punished by banning...lets see how long the Echo will allow this to go on.

It's the way you do it that gets you banned ET, and the fact that you don't seem to know much about anything except tarmac.

Alekhine wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote: A master what?...!

Not sure i spelled it correctly.

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EthanEdwards wrote: I see there is another username for the oft banned essex version of Stanley Unwin. Welcome back for the fifteenth time isn't it Mincy?

....and those are only the ones we know about. But i can see that the master of nonsense is fitting in well and rubbing along with the banter as efficiently as normal.

Leave poor old ET/EaH/LL alone, he's busy contemplating the painting of the oriental lady on his caravan wall, ho ho ho!

All very boring i must say..you are seemingly allowed to bait people like this but any reply in kind is punished by banning...lets see how long the Echo will allow this to go on.

It's the way you do it that gets you banned ET, and the fact that you don't seem to know much about anything except tarmac.

Your post is a racial slur.. one of the many that you have posted and to which the Echo admin and its editor have been made aware of..what they do about it and the others is something that they can answer to in the future.

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EthanEdwards wrote: I see there is another username for the oft banned essex version of Stanley Unwin. Welcome back for the fifteenth time isn't it Mincy?

....and those are only the ones we know about. But i can see that the master of nonsense is fitting in well and rubbing along with the banter as efficiently as normal.

Leave poor old ET/EaH/LL alone, he's busy contemplating the painting of the oriental lady on his caravan wall, ho ho ho!

Posturing, noise and bluster! You're not an 'art critic' are you?

He seems to feel he's is the last word on everything.

Well I've certainly led a more varied life than you and know a lot more about the world than you do matey.

Have you indeed and all on the computer. What was it you said about assuming?

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote: A master what?...!

Not sure i spelled it correctly.

Don't think you did ;0)

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EthanEdwards wrote: I see there is another username for the oft banned essex version of Stanley Unwin. Welcome back for the fifteenth time isn't it Mincy?

....and those are only the ones we know about. But i can see that the master of nonsense is fitting in well and rubbing along with the banter as efficiently as normal.

Leave poor old ET/EaH/LL alone, he's busy contemplating the painting of the oriental lady on his caravan wall, ho ho ho!

All very boring i must say..you are seemingly allowed to bait people like this but any reply in kind is punished by banning...lets see how long the Echo will allow this to go on.

It's the way you do it that gets you banned ET, and the fact that you don't seem to know much about anything except tarmac.

Your post is a racial slur.. one of the many that you have posted and to which the Echo admin and its editor have been made aware of..what they do about it and the others is something that they can answer to in the future.

What's racist about telling you "it's the way you do it" that gets your accounts closed down Night'n'Day/ET/EaH/L

L? Other people may slip in the odd insult when provoked but almost every paragraph you write is full of offensive insults. Come to think of it you're being unusually restrained today, any reason for that?

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EthanEdwards wrote: I see there is another username for the oft banned essex version of Stanley Unwin. Welcome back for the fifteenth time isn't it Mincy?

....and those are only the ones we know about. But i can see that the master of nonsense is fitting in well and rubbing along with the banter as efficiently as normal.

Leave poor old ET/EaH/LL alone, he's busy contemplating the painting of the oriental lady on his caravan wall, ho ho ho!

Posturing, noise and bluster! You're not an 'art critic' are you?

He seems to feel he's is the last word on everything.

Well I've certainly led a more varied life than you and know a lot more about the world than you do matey.

Have you indeed and all on the computer. What was it you said about assuming?

No assumption, you have proved your lack of knowledge on here all by yourself.

Son of Stropmag wrote:
I see Mincer's back with the old "Tick Tock" nonsense. It must have a very large spring if that clock is still running down after a year.

Alekhine wrote:
"I believe the Echo editor and his staff have ignored your behaviour and posts for their own reasons. "

What reasons? Its not like you to mince your words. Lets have it straight. It sounds as if you are calling Echo admin racist for banning you.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
"You seem to have forgotten that you too have had other user names...although you advise you are still able to use them. Is this likely?"
.
Silly Billy, just look, I have got my original nom de plume back, no fantasy just fact.
.
"If you cant see the racial slur in your post then you are not as clever as you think you are".
.
What racial slur? You have already admitted "this is not about racism" (do you want a link to that?). Neither the Irish Govt nor Drs Wilson and Cavallerri etc say you are a seperate race, in fact most Scottish islanders have more genetic differences from the main population than you have from the main Irish population so how can you claim to be a different race? Absolute nonsense.
.
"Your posts over the last 12 months are full of your boasts of superiority and insult.I hope you do have the membership of the elite society organisation you claim to belong to".
.
What has my membership of a Royal Institute got to do with anything? This is a professional organisation that everyone in my profession has to belong to by law. Don't suppose you belong to any professional organisations do you?
.
"I have responded to those insults but while you remain on the forum while continuing your insults, I on the other hand have been banned".
.
Already told you why that is but true to form you only believe your own theories cooked up in your own head. Typical of you and more proof that you're not half as smart as you think you are (as if we needed proof of that).
.
"I believe the Echo editor and his staff have ignored your behaviour and posts for their own reasons".
.
As Alekhine says it sounds like you are accusing the Echo of acting unfairly which in your terms usually means racist. Get a grip man, it's your attitude that gets you banned.

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote: "You seem to have forgotten that you too have had other user names...although you advise you are still able to use them. Is this likely?" . Silly Billy, just look, I have got my original nom de plume back, no fantasy just fact. . "If you cant see the racial slur in your post then you are not as clever as you think you are". . What racial slur? You have already admitted "this is not about racism" (do you want a link to that?). Neither the Irish Govt nor Drs Wilson and Cavallerri etc say you are a seperate race, in fact most Scottish islanders have more genetic differences from the main population than you have from the main Irish population so how can you claim to be a different race? Absolute nonsense. . "Your posts over the last 12 months are full of your boasts of superiority and insult.I hope you do have the membership of the elite society organisation you claim to belong to". . What has my membership of a Royal Institute got to do with anything? This is a professional organisation that everyone in my profession has to belong to by law. Don't suppose you belong to any professional organisations do you? . "I have responded to those insults but while you remain on the forum while continuing your insults, I on the other hand have been banned". . Already told you why that is but true to form you only believe your own theories cooked up in your own head. Typical of you and more proof that you're not half as smart as you think you are (as if we needed proof of that). . "I believe the Echo editor and his staff have ignored your behaviour and posts for their own reasons". . As Alekhine says it sounds like you are accusing the Echo of acting unfairly which in your terms usually means racist. Get a grip man, it's your attitude that gets you banned.

Err, No thats not your original, you have spaced it, unless you are saying admin deleted it and then gave it back to you? Is that what you are implying? Again i reiterate if you cant see the racial slur in your post then your not as clever as you demand we accept you to be. Yes link the comment you are talking about and it will show clearly how you have taken it out of context. You seem to have an issue with the terms racial/racism/racial ly...they are the terms dictated by society not by me or others. You are again mentioning a report you state that was not made public but you read, you have implied the Dr in question wrote you a letter stating what conclusions he came to? He did this while not releasing any report he may of had? Nonsense and again clearly untrue! I claim no such thing about race in fact i state the opposite! There are no separate 'races' on the earth.. just one race.. the human race, everything else is cultural! Thats where you seem to have the problem understanding the issue. The Dr stated clearly that the Pavee and the Irish Celt are two different cultures...if they are not the same then they are different..and he states this. BINGO! Why dont you post up the Dr's letter? Im sure you wont because you cant. Im sure when this all gets revealed you might find yourself being asked questions in regards to your membership...i mean who would want to be a member of a institute that has a fellow member on here posting racial abuse and slur? You would be surprised what i belong to! Very surprised! The banning of me for much milder posts than yours says it all. The Echo can explain that when asked. Attitude gets no one banned or you wouldn't be on here posting. Go through this thread, look at my comments as compared to yours...yet i was banned off this thread while you have remained. There lies the moon rock (in the form of questions) waiting to be picked up...but picked up it will be.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Probably wasted my time with the above posting, not just because you aren't capable of understanding it but because I have no doubt you will be getting beaten up by the Police outside Pickles office today in your pathetic little demonstration.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Shows what you know, check my old posts, yes of course I have most of my old name tags back. Posts are removed semi-automatically after a complaint, they don't actually read the offending posts unless the decision is appealed and in my case they found I was removed unfairly by people whose complaint was based on their opinion not on offensive content so I got most of my old names back. Fact. Some people don't like the truth do they ET?
.
As for us all being the same, get your facts right ET, over 80% of our DNA is dormant and much of the rest is shared with everything from worms and snails to blue whales so your claims of tiny percentage differences is a gross exaggeration of the real facts (still seeing the world in black and white ET?). The fact that there is only 2% difference between us and the higher primates which should have given you a clue that your 0.2% differences are much more signifcant than your simplistic analysis would suggest.
.
Our racial differences are partly based on our genetic roots which in our case includes a percentage of Neandertal genes which neither Africans nor eastern Asians possess and these differences have been amplified by tens of thousands of years of physical seperation. Likewise we have only recently discovered that all Africans have DNA from another African hominid ancestor (not Neandertal) that non Africans do not possess and the evidence is growing that eastern Asians similarly have genes from their own local pre homo sapien ancestors so yes we are all different.
.
It is true that the idea of race is not as simple as it seems but it's certainly not as simple as you would have us believe. Learn a bit more about the subject before you try and present your simplistic biased ideas as factual evidence. Sadly you probably don't even understand any of this so there is little chance of you doing more research. Btw Palaeoanthropology has been a hobby of mine for decades, helped by the fact that two of my closest friends are a microbiologist and his son who has a Doctorate in Genetics.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Btw before you quote different percentages back at me gleaned from Wicki or wherever just remember the figures all depend on how the question is defined, some genes seem to be completely redundant, some are only switched on ocassionally, some more so some less so etc.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Hello, hello, I see that old ET HAS been back - a posting with his favoiurite word has been deleted - but he hasn't responded to my critique of his erroneous claims that there is only one human race on earth. Wonder why not?

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Probably wasted my time with the above posting, not just because you aren't capable of understanding it but because I have no doubt you will be getting beaten up by the Police outside Pickles office today in your pathetic little demonstration.

The Soldier in White wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Probably wasted my time with the above posting, not just because you aren't capable of understanding it but because I have no doubt you will be getting beaten up by the Police outside Pickles office today in your pathetic little demonstration.

I doubt the police would be so foolish as to 'beat up' the Press Officer
;-)

Aint it just the truth wrote:
"In my opinion you are the biggest self-righteous bore i have ever seen or heard of"... You most certainly are ET. Your self belief is breathtaking.
.
You once said that you left school early and that you would be even more intelligent if you had stayed on. What absolute total nonsense. Intelligence is the ability to see the truth but even when we spell out your mistakes in words a child could understand you still don't get it do you? No hope for you at all.
.
"Im sure some peoples DNA might be more than 80% with slugs and the like". NO, YOU share 80% of your DNA with everything from daffodils to blue whales, that is a fact. If you had more than one brain cell you would have cottoned on that if we are only 2% different from Chimpanzees that your tiny percentage differences between the races is a lot more significant than you claim in your cloud cuckoo land.
.
No point talking to a plonker like you who understands absolutely nothing but actually believes he knows it all. Ha ha ha! There is a name for your condition, it's called the Messianic complex.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Btw I see you believe some scientists but not others, you just cherry pick the bits you like and reject the bits you don't. That is not being intelligent, that is being plain stupid. Just for the record I don't only have scientist friends, I AM a scientist you muppet, my FIRST degree was a science degree. And I have tried to explain to you that you should check exactly how your percentages are defined before you quote them but same as everything else, it goes straight through the space between your ears. Sad.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
"I have never stated i would be " even more intelligent" if i had more education or stayed on at school!"
.
Liar! Yes you have, do you want a link?
.
No response to my explanation as to why your figures are WRONG? I'm susprised you don't just claim you are right and everyone else is wrong, as you usually do, wrongly. If you don't want to be proven wrong then keep your mouth shut.
.
Do you want to know why you keep getting banned - then just read your own posts. End of.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
I'll end it when I want ET, people like you generally call me Sir, not the other way around. And you're right Eric, no point conversing with someone who is unable or unwilling to learn and has an egotistical self belief as big as the Titanic. END OF.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
You are right, people like you wouldn't call me Sir, but the normal working people I saw in the course of my career had a bit more respect than scum like you. Can't be bothered to find your link, you're not worth the trouble and you'll only try and twist it round with your idiotic pedanticism which you confuse with intelligence when it's actually a sign of a very childish mind, but beware, push me and I will go find it then you will owe me yet another apology matey.
ps Not still trying to argue there is only one human race? Do tell why not?

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Your tactic of getting people banned so they cant challenge you or show you for what you are is wasted on me.
.
Everything is wasted on you. As previously stated I have never complained about anyone except Asbo once when he used the most foul language.
.
A racist megalomanic with delusions of grandeur and elite intelligence.
.
Absolutely perfect description of you sir.
.
Lets not try distraction ie you childish attempt at going back to the 'human race' matter to get away from the issue at hand!
.
You are the one trying to distract so you don't have to admit you are WRONG as usual.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
I have never said I complained about you, I may have said that I've a good mind to but I'm not that petty that I'd actually do that (unlike you). I have told you twice before that the only person I have ever complained about is Asbo when he used the most vile disgusting language on here, a public site that schoolchildren can see. This is absolutely typical of you to get your facts wrong, exaggerate, assume, bluster and make up your own "facts". Twonk.
.
"People see me make a fool of you". Ha ha! If you really beleive that you are one seriously deluded individual. Just because you scream that you are right doesn't make it so, truth is you consistently get things wrong but crow that you have got them right. You don't half talk a load of old nonsense.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
If this was more public I would sue you as I have never told lies, muppet.
.
"i rarely post if i dont know what im talking about" Ha ha ha, true comedy gold, you waffle on about all sorts of things that you know NOTHING whatsoever about, laughable.
.
Why do I post? BECAUSE I ABHOR IGNORANCE and you are truly ignorance personified.
.
"I hate this forum and can't wait till i can leave it far behind". Then don't let me or any of the other people who have expressed contempt for you stop you, just GO!
.

Eric Whim wrote:
this comments section has a hundred more comments than the one which is top of the 'most commented on' section on the front page, but this page seems mysteriously to be omitted.

What is this then? Is it a cynical plot to keep E Types (or what ever he is called today) and the usual combatants away fromt he rest of the sites comments thread?

Maybe Minty's Gimp can call up his contacts in the admin section of The Echo and ask them

Eric Whim wrote:
this comments section has a hundred more comments than the one which is top of the 'most commented on' section on the front page, but this page seems mysteriously to be omitted. What is this then? Is it a cynical plot to keep E Types (or what ever he is called today) and the usual combatants away fromt he rest of the sites comments thread? Maybe Minty's Gimp can call up his contacts in the admin section of The Echo and ask them

Eric Whim wrote:
this comments section has a hundred more comments than the one which is top of the 'most commented on' section on the front page, but this page seems mysteriously to be omitted.

What is this then? Is it a cynical plot to keep E Types (or what ever he is called today) and the usual combatants away fromt he rest of the sites comments thread?

Maybe Minty's Gimp can call up his contacts in the admin section of The Echo and ask them

The Soldier in White wrote:
Oops, please disregard my last comment. It should have read;

That might not be easy, Eric. They've probably blocked his number.