Frankie Boyle cancels Southend gig (From Echo)

j-w wrote:
What about mocking the disabled lefty cyclist ? Is that ok or was that a misunderstanding too?

Shoebury_Cyclist wrote:

j-w wrote:
What about mocking the disabled lefty cyclist ? Is that ok or was that a misunderstanding too?

When? I saw him criticise unnecessary wars and brutal regimes that butcher people for minor crimes, but I didn't see him mock the disabled.

stonybrig wrote:
Gutted the guy says it like it is,a top comedian not a racist,,,,the people who moan about franks style have no sense humour.!!!!!!! keep up the insults!!!

Silencio wrote:
Ahhh, i love Frankie Boyle he's the guy that tells JOKES about everyone and everything and the people who don't find him funny have to get all offended. Don't like him? Don't go. Just don't spoil those who us who do's enjoyment over it.

asbo industries inc. wrote:
It's a shame. 'Lastlaugh', our resident Traveller (who posts on all things Traveller and a whole lot more) was probably looking forward to Sunday's performance. He may not even know of the postponement as he's most likely up at Eric Pickles offices making a CLINT of himself with the rest of the doasilikey scum.

Rather than making **** of themselves outside Pickles' offices the Traveller lobby might think about getting jobs, paying taxes and acting in a civilised manner .

What say you, lastlaugh?

Son of Stropmag wrote:
"Rather than making **** of themselves outside Pickles' offices the Traveller lobby might think about getting jobs, paying taxes and acting in a civilised manner ."

RACIST!!

asbo industries inc. wrote:
It's a shame. 'Lastlaugh', our resident Traveller (who posts on all things Traveller and a whole lot more) was probably looking forward to Sunday's performance. He may not even know of the postponement as he's most likely up at Eric Pickles offices making a CLINT of himself with the rest of the doasilikey scum.

Rather than making **** of themselves outside Pickles' offices the Traveller lobby might think about getting jobs, paying taxes and acting in a civilised manner .

What say you, lastlaugh?

asbo industries inc wrote:

asbo industries inc. wrote:
It's a shame. 'Lastlaugh', our resident Traveller (who posts on all things Traveller and a whole lot more) was probably looking forward to Sunday's performance. He may not even know of the postponement as he's most likely up at Eric Pickles offices making a CLINT of himself with the rest of the doasilikey scum.

Rather than making **** of themselves outside Pickles' offices the Traveller lobby might think about getting jobs, paying taxes and acting in a civilised manner .

What say you, lastlaugh?

asbo industries inc says...
8:54pm Mon 15 Oct 12
dregs of basildon setting up fake asbo account in 5,4,3,2...

shall we just say i'm psychic.

jantone wrote:
i wouldn't waste a penny to see him, he should be locked up, due to him slagging everyone off.

Est 84 wrote:
The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

Est 84 wrote:
The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

Est 84 wrote:
The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

If I was stand up comedian, my jokes would be similar to his. Taking the p!ss out of people and mainly politicians.

Get a life, and brighten up a bit. Even if a child has gone missing, theres no point of dwelling on it, because what has happened, has happened.

The best joke he cracked I think was about Jordans black baby. And when he said it cost 9 billion for the olympics, you could of wrote fu ck of Germany on the moon for cheaper!

Son of Stropmag wrote:
"Rather than making **** of themselves outside Pickles' offices the Traveller lobby might think about getting jobs, paying taxes and acting in a civilised manner ."

RACIST!!

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:
"Rather than making **** of themselves outside Pickles' offices the Traveller lobby might think about getting jobs, paying taxes and acting in a civilised manner ."

RACIST!!

I would like to make it clear that I did not post the comment quoted. It doesn't bother me too much though as I can see the funny side. It looks as though I have an imitator. I wonder who would do a thing like that?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:

Son of Stropmag wrote:
"Rather than making **** of themselves outside Pickles' offices the Traveller lobby might think about getting jobs, paying taxes and acting in a civilised manner ."

RACIST!!

I would like to make it clear that I did not post the comment quoted. It doesn't bother me too much though as I can see the funny side. It looks as though I have an imitator. I wonder who would do a thing like that?

Your 'father' ?

Perhaps the 'Daddy' is of the 'sugar' variety! Ha!

Est 84 wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

Est 84 wrote: The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

If I was stand up comedian, my jokes would be similar to his. Taking the p!ss out of people and mainly politicians. Get a life, and brighten up a bit. Even if a child has gone missing, theres no point of dwelling on it, because what has happened, has happened. The best joke he cracked I think was about Jordans black baby. And when he said it cost 9 billion for the olympics, you could of wrote fu ck of Germany on the moon for cheaper!

No point dwelling? Comments like that prive my point.... scum. Try telling that to the familes, would u feel the same if u were in their position?

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Est 84 wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

Est 84 wrote: The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

If I was stand up comedian, my jokes would be similar to his. Taking the p!ss out of people and mainly politicians. Get a life, and brighten up a bit. Even if a child has gone missing, theres no point of dwelling on it, because what has happened, has happened. The best joke he cracked I think was about Jordans black baby. And when he said it cost 9 billion for the olympics, you could of wrote fu ck of Germany on the moon for cheaper!

No point dwelling? Comments like that prive my point.... scum. Try telling that to the familes, would u feel the same if u were in their position?

How can anyone be offended by Frankie Boyle, he is just a comedian! If you don't like his jokes then don't watch him. Simples. What I find offensive is people like ET spreading his lies (you haven't yet responded to my point about human DNA on a previous post ET) and politicians telling us lies like "we want a fair society" and "the NHS will be safe in our hands" in order to gain personal power. Now that is really offensive.

The Soldier in White wrote:
Sir ! YES SIR !

jantone wrote:
anybody who goes to his gigs are very sick people with no sence of humour!!

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Est 84 wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

Est 84 wrote: The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

If I was stand up comedian, my jokes would be similar to his. Taking the p!ss out of people and mainly politicians. Get a life, and brighten up a bit. Even if a child has gone missing, theres no point of dwelling on it, because what has happened, has happened. The best joke he cracked I think was about Jordans black baby. And when he said it cost 9 billion for the olympics, you could of wrote fu ck of Germany on the moon for cheaper!

No point dwelling? Comments like that prive my point.... scum. Try telling that to the familes, would u feel the same if u were in their position?

How can anyone be offended by Frankie Boyle, he is just a comedian! If you don't like his jokes then don't watch him. Simples. What I find offensive is people like ET spreading his lies (you haven't yet responded to my point about human DNA on a previous post ET) and politicians telling us lies like "we want a fair society" and "the NHS will be safe in our hands" in order to gain personal power. Now that is really offensive.

Lies...you are a confused pathetic man...away and change your socks. Ill reply to your posts if and when i feel like it...or not if i so wish. You will wait for me to decide, if i do indeed decide.

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Est 84 wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

Est 84 wrote: The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

If I was stand up comedian, my jokes would be similar to his. Taking the p!ss out of people and mainly politicians. Get a life, and brighten up a bit. Even if a child has gone missing, theres no point of dwelling on it, because what has happened, has happened. The best joke he cracked I think was about Jordans black baby. And when he said it cost 9 billion for the olympics, you could of wrote fu ck of Germany on the moon for cheaper!

No point dwelling? Comments like that prive my point.... scum. Try telling that to the familes, would u feel the same if u were in their position?

How can anyone be offended by Frankie Boyle, he is just a comedian! If you don't like his jokes then don't watch him. Simples. What I find offensive is people like ET spreading his lies (you haven't yet responded to my point about human DNA on a previous post ET) and politicians telling us lies like "we want a fair society" and "the NHS will be safe in our hands" in order to gain personal power. Now that is really offensive.

Lies...you are a confused pathetic man...away and change your socks.

Ill reply to your posts if and when i feel like it...or not if i so wish. You will wait for me to decide, if i do indeed decide.

Aint it just the truth wrote:

jantone wrote:
anybody who goes to his gigs are very sick people with no sence of humour!!

And people who don't like him are obviously only semi literate judging by your post. Says it all.

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Est 84 wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

Est 84 wrote: The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

If I was stand up comedian, my jokes would be similar to his. Taking the p!ss out of people and mainly politicians. Get a life, and brighten up a bit. Even if a child has gone missing, theres no point of dwelling on it, because what has happened, has happened. The best joke he cracked I think was about Jordans black baby. And when he said it cost 9 billion for the olympics, you could of wrote fu ck of Germany on the moon for cheaper!

No point dwelling? Comments like that prive my point.... scum. Try telling that to the familes, would u feel the same if u were in their position?

How can anyone be offended by Frankie Boyle, he is just a comedian! If you don't like his jokes then don't watch him. Simples. What I find offensive is people like ET spreading his lies (you haven't yet responded to my point about human DNA on a previous post ET) and politicians telling us lies like "we want a fair society" and "the NHS will be safe in our hands" in order to gain personal power. Now that is really offensive.

Lies...you are a confused pathetic man...away and change your socks. Ill reply to your posts if and when i feel like it...or not if i so wish. You will wait for me to decide, if i do indeed decide.

I wasn't seriously expecting a sensible reply from you, I don't believe in miracles, especially after I have proven you WRONG once again, and you don't like being proven WRONG do you ET? Do you want to know why you keep getting banned ET? Just try reading your posts.

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Est 84 wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

Est 84 wrote: The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!

If I was stand up comedian, my jokes would be similar to his. Taking the p!ss out of people and mainly politicians. Get a life, and brighten up a bit. Even if a child has gone missing, theres no point of dwelling on it, because what has happened, has happened. The best joke he cracked I think was about Jordans black baby. And when he said it cost 9 billion for the olympics, you could of wrote fu ck of Germany on the moon for cheaper!

No point dwelling? Comments like that prive my point.... scum. Try telling that to the familes, would u feel the same if u were in their position?

How can anyone be offended by Frankie Boyle, he is just a comedian! If you don't like his jokes then don't watch him. Simples. What I find offensive is people like ET spreading his lies (you haven't yet responded to my point about human DNA on a previous post ET) and politicians telling us lies like "we want a fair society" and "the NHS will be safe in our hands" in order to gain personal power. Now that is really offensive.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Ha ha, words of wisdom from ET! But your assumptions are of a completely different magnitude to mine. That's another part of your problem, no sense of perspective.

Aint it just the truth wrote:
Have you been drinking ET?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything.

Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.)

So what is your view of success then?
Do you not admire it?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything.

Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.)

So what is your view of success then?
Do you not admire it?

The measure of success can only be quantified by ones own personal expectations/goals..

..surely!?

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything.

Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.)

So what is your view of success then?
Do you not admire it?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
Personally, I'm still not convinced that Stropmag &Son are anything other than someones fertile imagination!

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
Personally, I'm still not convinced that Stropmag &Son are anything other than someones fertile imagination!

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
Personally, I'm still not convinced that Stropmag &Son are anything other than someones fertile imagination!

You just keep telling yourself that. After all, there are no successful immigrants in this counrty all are there?

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
Personally, I'm still not convinced that Stropmag &Son are anything other than someones fertile imagination!

You just keep telling yourself that. After all, there are no successful immigrants in this counrty all are there?

Other than 'their' claim... do you have anything that suggests they are actually real people? Have you taken into consideration son of has been caught and admitted using more than one identity on here at the same time?

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
Personally, I'm still not convinced that Stropmag &Son are anything other than someones fertile imagination!

You just keep telling yourself that. After all, there are no successful immigrants in this counrty all are there?

Other than 'their' claim... do you have anything that suggests they are actually real people? Have you taken into consideration son of has been caught and admitted using more than one identity on here at the same time?

I can't see how having a double ID means that you will lie about everything. After all, you claim not to have one. Which reminds me, Asbo is still under the misapprehension that you are anti cannabis.

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
Personally, I'm still not convinced that Stropmag &Son are anything other than someones fertile imagination!

You just keep telling yourself that. After all, there are no successful immigrants in this counrty all are there?

Other than 'their' claim... do you have anything that suggests they are actually real people? Have you taken into consideration son of has been caught and admitted using more than one identity on here at the same time?

I can't see how having a double ID means that you will lie about everything. After all, you claim not to have one. Which reminds me, Asbo is still under the misapprehension that you are anti cannabis.

You can't see much...because of the dense weed smoke cloud?

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote: Have you been drinking ET?

Ah,, the truth hits home so dont deal with a reply to the smarting post but move to a old tactic "have you been drinking, have you missed taking your medication etc etc" All to distract from your stinging LOL..

asbo industries inc wrote:
you're in denial gay ray. i once worked with a guy at an induction who stood up and announced in front of the assembled new hires that he was gay. can't think how that was relevant to whether he could do the job or not. needless to say the others didn't stand up and announce they were straight.

Alekhine wrote:
infer/imply comment predicted from ET in the near future.

Alekhine wrote:
I think success is subjective dont you?

Especially without proof!

====

So now you want proof of the subjective.

Nice one Stanley...

Gay Ray wrote:

asbo industries inc wrote:
you're in denial gay ray. i once worked with a guy at an induction who stood up and announced in front of the assembled new hires that he was gay. can't think how that was relevant to whether he could do the job or not. needless to say the others didn't stand up and announce they were straight.

It probably says more about the calibre of people you were working with than anything else. I don't understand why you would say that I am in denial. Denial of what?

Aint it just the truth wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Aint it just the truth wrote: Have you been drinking ET?

Ah,, the truth hits home so dont deal with a reply to the smarting post but move to a old tactic "have you been drinking, have you missed taking your medication etc etc" All to distract from your stinging LOL..

No, I just can't be bothered conversing with muppets who are unable to learn, unable to reassess their views in the light of new and better information and who have a messianic level of self belief. And if you had a brain you'd know the only one getting a stinging is you sunshine.

asbo industries inc wrote:

Gay Ray wrote:

asbo industries inc wrote:
you're in denial gay ray. i once worked with a guy at an induction who stood up and announced in front of the assembled new hires that he was gay. can't think how that was relevant to whether he could do the job or not. needless to say the others didn't stand up and announce they were straight.

It probably says more about the calibre of people you were working with than anything else. I don't understand why you would say that I am in denial. Denial of what?

all of your posts are littered with innuendo...in fact the censor has removed the offending post in question (can't think who it might've offended). the point of my post was to question whether you're expecting special treatment from other posters because you are "gay"?

Gay Ray wrote:

asbo industries inc wrote:

Gay Ray wrote:

asbo industries inc wrote:
you're in denial gay ray. i once worked with a guy at an induction who stood up and announced in front of the assembled new hires that he was gay. can't think how that was relevant to whether he could do the job or not. needless to say the others didn't stand up and announce they were straight.

It probably says more about the calibre of people you were working with than anything else. I don't understand why you would say that I am in denial. Denial of what?

all of your posts are littered with innuendo...in fact the censor has removed the offending post in question (can't think who it might've offended). the point of my post was to question whether you're expecting special treatment from other posters because you are "gay"?

My penultimate post has indeed been removed together with about 10 unrelated posts. There was no innuendo whatsoever in that post. Straightforward statement of fact.

Of course I do not expect special treatment from other posters because I am gay. I find the very notion quite ridiculous. The reason I make it clear that I am gay is that it is sometimes relevant in so far as my experiences are those of a gay man in a largely straight society and I prefer that people should be in no doubt that I comment from that perspective. I usually make no reference to my sexuality but am aware that my user-name might give a clue.

Even the user-name may not reflect a poster's real character. For instance a regular poster, 'druggie scumbag' I doubt is either a druggie or a scumbag.

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
infer/imply comment predicted from ET in the near future.

I am absolutely amazed that you are still on the forum after your terrible post in reply to my post pointing out that not all 'success' is admirable!

there would be no point in mentioning infer/imply to you...you have shown in the past that you didn't understand the difference.

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
I think success is subjective dont you?

Especially without proof!

====

So now you want proof of the subjective.

Nice one Stanley...

It is clear that i will have to explain this to you as i did in regards to imply/infer

Subjective:

1.
existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).
2.
pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; personal; individual: a subjective evaluation.
3.
placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.; unduly egocentric.
4.
Philosophy . relating to or of the nature of an object as it is known in the mind as distinct from a thing in itself.
5.
relating to properties or specific conditions of the mind as distinguished from general or universal experience.

Dealing with the subject ( success)

If you have proof/evidence that something is successful then you are being aided in your subjection!

Without proof/evidence any subjection could be faulty or wrong in the true nature of the subject

So again i post

I think success ( the subject) is subjective dont you? Especially without proof! (no proof or evidence to aid the conclusion)

I hope i dont have to do this all the time with you.

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
infer/imply comment predicted from ET in the near future.

I am absolutely amazed that you are still on the forum after your terrible post in reply to my post pointing out that not all 'success' is admirable!

there would be no point in mentioning infer/imply to you...you have shown in the past that you didn't understand the difference.

I was talking about the personal success of Stropmags father and the methods used by him to achieve that success.

I do not consider Hitler successful in any way, shape or form.

It is your terrible post that is the shame here. I can hardly believe that you think your relatives died so that you can flout planning law. Are you saying planning law is racist? It is just a tick box exercise when done in a proper and timely manner.

Apparently you don't understand imply/infer yourself. How else do you expect to bring Hitler into a discussion about success without making an implication?

Or was it just a thread stopper as you had run out of argument?

Druggie Scumbag wrote:
@ Gay Ray who wrote:

"......... 'druggie scumbag' I doubt is either a druggie or a scumbag."

Sorry Ray, you got that one wrong. Any further comments of that sort and I may have to resort to legal action to protect my bad character. I have taken advice from lastlaugh's legal people and they reckon I have a good case (mind you, they had been on the shandies!).

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
I think success is subjective dont you?

Especially without proof!

====

So now you want proof of the subjective.

Nice one Stanley...

It is clear that i will have to explain this to you as i did in regards to imply/infer

Subjective:

1.
existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).
2.
pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; personal; individual: a subjective evaluation.
3.
placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.; unduly egocentric.
4.
Philosophy . relating to or of the nature of an object as it is known in the mind as distinct from a thing in itself.
5.
relating to properties or specific conditions of the mind as distinguished from general or universal experience.

Dealing with the subject ( success)

If you have proof/evidence that something is successful then you are being aided in your subjection!

Without proof/evidence any subjection could be faulty or wrong in the true nature of the subject

So again i post

I think success ( the subject) is subjective dont you? Especially without proof! (no proof or evidence to aid the conclusion)

I hope i dont have to do this all the time with you.

1. existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).

===

This is right. The subjective only exists in the mind whereas the objective can be empirically proven. So how do you expect anyone to prove something that exists only in your or anybody else's mind such as the concept of personal success?

A pity you never read or think about your own internet cuts and pastes. It is getting tiresome explaining them to you.

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
I think success is subjective dont you?

Especially without proof!

====

So now you want proof of the subjective.

Nice one Stanley...

It is clear that i will have to explain this to you as i did in regards to imply/infer

Subjective:

1.
existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).
2.
pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; personal; individual: a subjective evaluation.
3.
placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.; unduly egocentric.
4.
Philosophy . relating to or of the nature of an object as it is known in the mind as distinct from a thing in itself.
5.
relating to properties or specific conditions of the mind as distinguished from general or universal experience.

Dealing with the subject ( success)

If you have proof/evidence that something is successful then you are being aided in your subjection!

Without proof/evidence any subjection could be faulty or wrong in the true nature of the subject

So again i post

I think success ( the subject) is subjective dont you? Especially without proof! (no proof or evidence to aid the conclusion)

I hope i dont have to do this all the time with you.

1. existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).

===

This is right. The subjective only exists in the mind whereas the objective can be empirically proven. So how do you expect anyone to prove something that exists only in your or anybody else's mind such as the concept of personal success?

A pity you never read or think about your own internet cuts and pastes. It is getting tiresome explaining them to you.

Oh dear oh lor...does every obvious conclusion have to be explained to you?

The proof/evidence AIDS the subjective conclusion...the proof/evidence would come first if it is comes at all. if not the subjection comes without proof/evidence

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Druggie Scumbag wrote:
@ Gay Ray who wrote:

"......... 'druggie scumbag' I doubt is either a druggie or a scumbag."

Sorry Ray, you got that one wrong. Any further comments of that sort and I may have to resort to legal action to protect my bad character. I have taken advice from lastlaugh's legal people and they reckon I have a good case (mind you, they had been on the shandies!).

You are on your own mate, you dont know any legal people connected to me.
They and i dont consort with such as yourself.

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
I think success is subjective dont you?

Especially without proof!

====

So now you want proof of the subjective.

Nice one Stanley...

It is clear that i will have to explain this to you as i did in regards to imply/infer

Subjective:

1.
existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).
2.
pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; personal; individual: a subjective evaluation.
3.
placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.; unduly egocentric.
4.
Philosophy . relating to or of the nature of an object as it is known in the mind as distinct from a thing in itself.
5.
relating to properties or specific conditions of the mind as distinguished from general or universal experience.

Dealing with the subject ( success)

If you have proof/evidence that something is successful then you are being aided in your subjection!

Without proof/evidence any subjection could be faulty or wrong in the true nature of the subject

So again i post

I think success ( the subject) is subjective dont you? Especially without proof! (no proof or evidence to aid the conclusion)

I hope i dont have to do this all the time with you.

1. existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).

===

This is right. The subjective only exists in the mind whereas the objective can be empirically proven. So how do you expect anyone to prove something that exists only in your or anybody else's mind such as the concept of personal success?

A pity you never read or think about your own internet cuts and pastes. It is getting tiresome explaining them to you.

Oh dear oh lor...does every obvious conclusion have to be explained to you?

The proof/evidence AIDS the subjective conclusion...the proof/evidence would come first if it is comes at all. if not the subjection comes without proof/evidence

You cannot PROVE the subjective. That is why it IS subjective!

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
I think success is subjective dont you?

Especially without proof!

====

So now you want proof of the subjective.

Nice one Stanley...

It is clear that i will have to explain this to you as i did in regards to imply/infer

Subjective:

1.
existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).
2.
pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; personal; individual: a subjective evaluation.
3.
placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.; unduly egocentric.
4.
Philosophy . relating to or of the nature of an object as it is known in the mind as distinct from a thing in itself.
5.
relating to properties or specific conditions of the mind as distinguished from general or universal experience.

Dealing with the subject ( success)

If you have proof/evidence that something is successful then you are being aided in your subjection!

Without proof/evidence any subjection could be faulty or wrong in the true nature of the subject

So again i post

I think success ( the subject) is subjective dont you? Especially without proof! (no proof or evidence to aid the conclusion)

I hope i dont have to do this all the time with you.

1. existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).

===

This is right. The subjective only exists in the mind whereas the objective can be empirically proven. So how do you expect anyone to prove something that exists only in your or anybody else's mind such as the concept of personal success?

A pity you never read or think about your own internet cuts and pastes. It is getting tiresome explaining them to you.

Oh dear oh lor...does every obvious conclusion have to be explained to you?

The proof/evidence AIDS the subjective conclusion...the proof/evidence would come first if it is comes at all. if not the subjection comes without proof/evidence

You cannot PROVE the subjective. That is why it IS subjective!

Again you refuse to think logically or even intelligently... in fact you refuse to think...no one, other than you, has ever claimed the subjective can be proven!

Although saying that, if a persons personal opinion on something is then acted on, then in a way that might prove or point at a persons subjective evaluation in/on the matter

I suggested that proof or evidence of an issue in question can help in regards to the persons personal perpective of the issue ( subjection)...If you can't fathom that then thats you problem

Alekhine wrote:
"You did not specify who's success!

You merely stated 'wasn't success something to admire'... implying if someone didn't believe that then there was something wrong with them!

I gave an example of it not being admirable.

===

So you do consider Hitler a success then? Thats strange, i don't.!

===

The planning laws in the country are indeed operated in a discriminatory way as detailed by both the Government and the ECRC In its report.”

===

These being the same laws that everbody else is required to follow, irrespective of race/gender/ethnicit

y/sexuality.....

Nope, can't see how thats discriminatory.

====

My relatives did not die in the war so that you could flout planning law. That is a FACT not a digusting extreme. I find your assertion that they did and that i am somehow dishonoring their memory very offensive.

The rest of your message needs translation from unwinese.

Druggie Scumbag wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Druggie Scumbag wrote:
@ Gay Ray who wrote:

"......... 'druggie scumbag' I doubt is either a druggie or a scumbag."

Sorry Ray, you got that one wrong. Any further comments of that sort and I may have to resort to legal action to protect my bad character. I have taken advice from lastlaugh's legal people and they reckon I have a good case (mind you, they had been on the shandies!).

You are on your own mate, you dont know any legal people connected to me.
They and i dont consort with such as yourself.

Are you sure about that? Are you sure that your friends are really your friends?

Santa Claus wears a red coat (He's a communist?)
Has long hair and a beard (Must be a pacifist?)
What's in the pipe that he's smoking?

Santa Claus creeps down your roof at night (He must be a dope fiend?)
Don't it make you uptight?

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
"You did not specify who's success!

You merely stated 'wasn't success something to admire'... implying if someone didn't believe that then there was something wrong with them!

I gave an example of it not being admirable.

===

So you do consider Hitler a success then? Thats strange, i don't.!

===

The planning laws in the country are indeed operated in a discriminatory way as detailed by both the Government and the ECRC In its report.”

===

These being the same laws that everbody else is required to follow, irrespective of race/gender/ethnicit


y/sexuality.....

Nope, can't see how thats discriminatory.

====

My relatives did not die in the war so that you could flout planning law. That is a FACT not a digusting extreme. I find your assertion that they did and that i am somehow dishonoring their memory very offensive.

The rest of your message needs translation from unwinese.

It doesn't matter if the laws are 'supposed' to be the same for all...they are not enforced the same as the report clear says!

" So you do consider Hitler a success then?"

Here you go again, you can't deal with any post of mine without making such stupid crass comments! That are totally illogical and the opposite to what is being conferred!

You want to argue but dont have the tools to do so other than making such ridiculous comments!

You are ridiculous.

"My relatives did not die in the war so that you could flout planning law"

Again what an extreme comment, did anybody state they did, did anyone mention the war or victims of the war before you did?

Disgusting and wrong on so many levels! I wont comment on it any further as it clear you have problems.

You need someone to monitor you when your on the computer!

Alekhine wrote:
"Again what an extreme comment, did anybody state they did, did anyone mention the war or victims of the war before you did? "

==

You have done so previously on another string. Then, you chose to speak on behalf of the dead and said that not supporting the travellers cause was a dishonour to our relatives who had died. I took you up about it at the time. When you introduce Hitler into a string we all know where it is going.

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
"Again what an extreme comment, did anybody state they did, did anyone mention the war or victims of the war before you did? "

==

You have done so previously on another string. Then, you chose to speak on behalf of the dead and said that not supporting the travellers cause was a dishonour to our relatives who had died. I took you up about it at the time. When you introduce Hitler into a string we all know where it is going.

" You have done so previously on another string"


Oh i see on another thread you say! Have you got that other thread or is it conveniently (for you) locked?

It would seem you are admitting you made mention of the war and its victims first on this thread, because something about that was mentioned on another thread. Is that correct?

And then you run to the disgusting and offensive extreme with it making more and more disturbing assumptions as you go ( and still doing so)

*see next comment*

" Then, you chose to speak on behalf of the dead and said that not supporting the travellers cause was a dishonour to our relatives who had died. "

Now that is a disgusting lie isn't it? (more extreme and disturbing assumptions)

Offensive and disgusting to all!
Anyone who reads the posts would know that is a lie!

So i make mention of a murderous tyrant, to show there were those's who admired this inhuman beast and thought he was 'successful'.. this should of proven that not all 'success' is admirable as you were purporting..from that you came up with your truly wicked degenerate assumptions....

"we all know where it is going"

No we didn't, only you did and you purposely directed it that way.

Alekhine wrote:
"I pointed put that someone just saying someone in their family was successful doesn't make it so? You seemed to feel it did!"

==

So you do think the poster was lying. Why is that my problem? The discussion, which did not contain any heat before you brought in Hitler, was about the correct method for achieving personal success. Whether or not said poster was lying was academic to the discussion.

===

You decided to speak for someone who never, even as the post ran, agreed that he was being sarcastic...you thought he was, said he was and then couldn't prove he was, while he never stated he was!

===

You really don't get this subjective business do you? No he did not confirm or deny sarcasm, but then why should he. This means it can't be proved either way - sarcasm is subjective!

===

But of course what he thought didn't matter, it was what you thought he thought that was the priority consideration...

I was suggesting that you dont take things said on a public forum for granted and put all your eggs in the basket of it as truth and then present it to others as the ultimate truth without any proof of it being as you supposed!

===

i don't speak unwinese.

===
"catalog of lies"

Can you provide one lie out of that catalogue? Just one!

If you cant provide a proven lie doesn't this then prove what i have been saying about you.. that you are nieve and confused to the point of being plant like?”

===

Just the one? Too easy.

How about "I have no opinions on canabis" which you followed with about 20 abusive mesages? Or i could just quote from the previous sting viz war dead.. My relatives did not did so that you could flout planning law. It is a lie!!

Are you now going to deny saying that Hitler was a success or produce yet more obfuscation?

Alekhine wrote:
So i make mention of a murderous tyrant, to show there were those's who admired this inhuman beast and thought he was 'successful'.. this should of proven that not all 'success' is admirable as you were purporting..from that you came up with your truly wicked degenerate assumptions....

==

Where have i said that Hitler was a success? That is what you have said, i have quoted your message above and you are unable to explain.

Such offensive posting can only be politically motivated and should get you BANNED (again).

I myself have said no such thing. Hitler was NOT a success.

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything.

Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.)

So what is your view of success then?
Do you not admire it?

Not all success is admirable is it?

Do you admire...say...the success Hitler had?

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything.

Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.)

So what is your view of success then?
Do you not admire it?

Not all success is admirable is it?

Do you admire...say...the success Hitler had?

What does your above message say?

Your are a politically motivated pathalogical liar who not only cannot admit the contents of their messages on previous string but are also incapable of reading what is under their nose on this one.

Care to deny you said Hitler was a success again or do you want to run it past your legal team...

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything.

Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.)

So what is your view of success then?
Do you not admire it?

Not all success is admirable is it?

Do you admire...say...the success Hitler had?

What does your above message say?

Your are a politically motivated pathalogical liar who not only cannot admit the contents of their messages on previous string but are also incapable of reading what is under their nose on this one.

Care to deny you said Hitler was a success again or do you want to run it past your legal team...

asbo industries inc wrote:
you're in denial gay ray. i once worked with a guy at an induction who stood up and announced in front of the assembled new hires that he was gay. can't think how that was relevant to whether he could do the job or not. needless to say the others didn't stand up and announce they were straight.

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything.

Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.)

So what is your view of success then?
Do you not admire it?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you.

We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable.

Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you. We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable. Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

al coniston wrote:
well . . . . he has just won 50k in damages against the Mirror so the beers should be on him when he gets to town

The Soldier in White wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh.. wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
'Success can only be admired.'

I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything.

Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.)

So what is your view of success then?
Do you not admire it?

Not all success is admirable is it?

Do you admire...say...the success Hitler had?

What does your above message say?

Your are a politically motivated pathalogical liar who not only cannot admit the contents of their messages on previous string but are also incapable of reading what is under their nose on this one.

Care to deny you said Hitler was a success again or do you want to run it past your legal team...

Lastlaugh, you have been owned fair and square. Why not just admit it and move on ?

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you. We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable. Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

Thank you and my apologies. You are not ET.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you.

We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable.

Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

Druggie Scumbag wrote:
"............i will be taking no notice of it to any degree."

You have really excelled with that comment, Lastlaugh! Do you actually think before you post?

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Druggie Scumbag wrote:
"............i will be taking no notice of it to any degree."

You have really excelled with that comment, Lastlaugh! Do you actually think before you post?

Do you understand what "any degree" implies?

Shall i tell you?

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

The Soldier in White wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Congratulation ET ! You have just graduated. You may now wear the big red nose of the fully fledged clown !

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Congratulation ET ! You have just graduated. You may now wear the big red nose of the fully fledged clown !

Can i refer you back to the previous response i gave you?

muffindamule wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Congratulation ET ! You have just graduated. You may now wear the big red nose of the fully fledged clown !

Can i refer you back to the previous response i gave you?

I daresay you can if you put your mind to it.

Druggie Scumbag wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

You see, this is where you let yourself down so badly. The correct response would have been something to the effect of:

"I see what you mean. You are right, if I take no notice then there can be no degree to which I take no notice as it (taking no notice) is absolute. A grammatical mistake on my part. But I'm sure you knew what I meant".

But no! You cannot bring yourself to EVER admit that ANYTHING you post is wrong. Others on this site seem to manage to debate (not always in the best mannered fashion) and whilst not necessarily coming to a final meeting of minds, can (as evidenced on this thread a little earlier) accept a point made by another. That gains respect for both parties. You will never be respected as long as you are blindly dogmatic and seek to defend the indefensible in terms of some of the nonsense that you post.

Grow up Big Boy. We all make mistakes from time to time and men will admit to those mistakes. You never do.

The Soldier in White wrote:

muffindamule wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Congratulation ET ! You have just graduated. You may now wear the big red nose of the fully fledged clown !

Can i refer you back to the previous response i gave you?

I daresay you can if you put your mind to it.

LOL. I was going to say he can if he wants to make a clown of himself twice this evening.

muffindamule wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Congratulation ET ! You have just graduated. You may now wear the big red nose of the fully fledged clown !

Can i refer you back to the previous response i gave you?

I daresay you can if you put your mind to it.

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Druggie Scumbag wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

You see, this is where you let yourself down so badly. The correct response would have been something to the effect of:

"I see what you mean. You are right, if I take no notice then there can be no degree to which I take no notice as it (taking no notice) is absolute. A grammatical mistake on my part. But I'm sure you knew what I meant".

But no! You cannot bring yourself to EVER admit that ANYTHING you post is wrong. Others on this site seem to manage to debate (not always in the best mannered fashion) and whilst not necessarily coming to a final meeting of minds, can (as evidenced on this thread a little earlier) accept a point made by another. That gains respect for both parties. You will never be respected as long as you are blindly dogmatic and seek to defend the indefensible in terms of some of the nonsense that you post.

Grow up Big Boy. We all make mistakes from time to time and men will admit to those mistakes. You never do.

Why would i say i was wrong when i say

" Your opinion has the worth of your other posts...that being the case i will be taking no notice of it to any degree."

Even the most pathological pedantic word worrier would know what was meant.

It clearly means that, after my advising post, i will not be taking notice of his post!

Where is the mystery...

Are you suggesting i should of posted

"Your opinion has the worth of your other posts...that being the case, after i have posted this reply, i will be taking no notice of it to any degree."

It would seem because you cant work things out you want people to post in a way that you can understand...brain lazy?

The Soldier in White wrote:

muffindamule wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Congratulation ET ! You have just graduated. You may now wear the big red nose of the fully fledged clown !

Can i refer you back to the previous response i gave you?

I daresay you can if you put your mind to it.

LOL. I was going to say he can if he wants to make a clown of himself twice this evening.

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

muffindamule wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Congratulation ET ! You have just graduated. You may now wear the big red nose of the fully fledged clown !

Can i refer you back to the previous response i gave you?

I daresay you can if you put your mind to it.

LOL. I was going to say he can if he wants to make a clown of himself twice this evening.

Its clear its all above your head.

Sit tight and maybe someone will post something so low browed and trivial you will have half an inkling whats being said.

Till then do not take any notice of my posts to any degree...this might allow your frowning brow to relax...

I can well believe that when you post your forehead is furrowed like a corrugated slopping roof

Druggie Scumbag wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Druggie Scumbag wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

You see, this is where you let yourself down so badly. The correct response would have been something to the effect of:

"I see what you mean. You are right, if I take no notice then there can be no degree to which I take no notice as it (taking no notice) is absolute. A grammatical mistake on my part. But I'm sure you knew what I meant".

But no! You cannot bring yourself to EVER admit that ANYTHING you post is wrong. Others on this site seem to manage to debate (not always in the best mannered fashion) and whilst not necessarily coming to a final meeting of minds, can (as evidenced on this thread a little earlier) accept a point made by another. That gains respect for both parties. You will never be respected as long as you are blindly dogmatic and seek to defend the indefensible in terms of some of the nonsense that you post.

Grow up Big Boy. We all make mistakes from time to time and men will admit to those mistakes. You never do.

Why would i say i was wrong when i say

" Your opinion has the worth of your other posts...that being the case i will be taking no notice of it to any degree."

Even the most pathological pedantic word worrier would know what was meant.

It clearly means that, after my advising post, i will not be taking notice of his post!

Where is the mystery...

Are you suggesting i should of posted

"Your opinion has the worth of your other posts...that being the case, after i have posted this reply, i will be taking no notice of it to any degree."

It would seem because you cant work things out you want people to post in a way that you can understand...brain lazy?

I rest my case.

Druggie Scumbag wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

muffindamule wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

The Soldier in White wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:
"take no notice to any degree"

Yes thats it... you got it!

Congratulation ET ! You have just graduated. You may now wear the big red nose of the fully fledged clown !

Can i refer you back to the previous response i gave you?

I daresay you can if you put your mind to it.

LOL. I was going to say he can if he wants to make a clown of himself twice this evening.

Its clear its all above your head.

Sit tight and maybe someone will post something so low browed and trivial you will have half an inkling whats being said.

Till then do not take any notice of my posts to any degree...this might allow your frowning brow to relax...

I can well believe that when you post your forehead is furrowed like a corrugated slopping roof

Ah! The colourful palette of the urban wordsmith? No, the rantings of an egotistical simpleton.

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you. We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable. Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

Thank you and my apologies. You are not ET.

" You are not ET" LOL

Im sure he needed telling that!

You were advised before that the poster wasn't me (lastlaugh)

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you. We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable. Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

Thank you and my apologies. You are not ET.

" You are not ET" LOL

Im sure he needed telling that!

You were advised before that the poster wasn't me (lastlaugh)

So you were not lying, well thats is a first. What do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on?

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you. We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable. Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

Thank you and my apologies. You are not ET.

" You are not ET" LOL Im sure he needed telling that! You were advised before that the poster wasn't me (lastlaugh)

So you were not lying, well thats is a first. What do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on?

Oh what a devastatingly cutting post...so original, with the slicing razor wit of a top comedian bang at his best! Yet with the crafted punning of a word smith head hunted by the world of literature heros! Let me have the privilege of typing it... *Holds breath* "what do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on" "Exhales* in trembling admiration (opp's theres that word again) Please write more, in this exquisite style! 'chest to pin it on'....oh drollism at its highest height..

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you. We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable. Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

Thank you and my apologies. You are not ET.

" You are not ET" LOL Im sure he needed telling that! You were advised before that the poster wasn't me (lastlaugh)

So you were not lying, well thats is a first. What do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on?

Oh what a devastatingly cutting post...so original, with the slicing razor wit of a top comedian bang at his best! Yet with the crafted punning of a word smith head hunted by the world of literature heros! Let me have the privilege of typing it... *Holds breath* "what do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on" "Exhales* in trembling admiration (opp's theres that word again) Please write more, in this exquisite style! 'chest to pin it on'....oh drollism at its highest height..

I'll take that as a compliment. Drollism is a skill. You can write 2 pages of nothing. I can write 2 lines and the arrow hits its target.

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you. We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable. Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

Thank you and my apologies. You are not ET.

" You are not ET" LOL Im sure he needed telling that! You were advised before that the poster wasn't me (lastlaugh)

So you were not lying, well thats is a first. What do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on?

Oh what a devastatingly cutting post...so original, with the slicing razor wit of a top comedian bang at his best! Yet with the crafted punning of a word smith head hunted by the world of literature heros! Let me have the privilege of typing it... *Holds breath* "what do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on" "Exhales* in trembling admiration (opp's theres that word again) Please write more, in this exquisite style! 'chest to pin it on'....oh drollism at its highest height..

I'll take that as a compliment. Drollism is a skill.

You can write 2 pages of nothing. I can write 2 lines and the arrow hits its target.

Alekhine wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote: 'Success can only be admired.' I'm guessing that's *not* an old Chinese proverb!

It is not a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth or anything. Dr Lasker (one of Alekhine's friends)said it, along with "results are the only truth". (i.e if you are not getting results, there is something wrong with the method.) So what is your view of success then? Do you not admire it?

Success is simply relative to the individual, and can only be calculated by how achievements tally with expectations.

Yes, I agreed with you. We were talking about the personal success of a Somalian immigrant but the same concept could be applied to any immigrant who makes good by their own efforts (and there are many). It is admirable. Does whether or not Stropmag was lying in this instance make any difference?

Put like that, I guess the answer is, No.

Thank you and my apologies. You are not ET.

" You are not ET" LOL Im sure he needed telling that! You were advised before that the poster wasn't me (lastlaugh)

So you were not lying, well thats is a first. What do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on?

Oh what a devastatingly cutting post...so original, with the slicing razor wit of a top comedian bang at his best! Yet with the crafted punning of a word smith head hunted by the world of literature heros! Let me have the privilege of typing it... *Holds breath* "what do you want, a medal or a chest to pin it on" "Exhales* in trembling admiration (opp's theres that word again) Please write more, in this exquisite style! 'chest to pin it on'....oh drollism at its highest height..

I'll take that as a compliment. Drollism is a skill. You can write 2 pages of nothing. I can write 2 lines and the arrow hits its target.

Also grow up.... You are attaching your usual rubbish to an apology.

Alekhine wrote:
zzzzz, yawn, scratch,What do you look like? Since i'm awake i might as well finish the crossword.

Quizshow presented by avuncular northern host Jim Bowen - 8 letters?

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
zzzzz, yawn, scratch,What do you look like? Since i'm awake i might as well finish the crossword.

Quizshow presented by avuncular northern host Jim Bowen - 8 letters?

Bull****?

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Lastlaugh... wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
zzzzz, yawn, scratch,What do you look like? Since i'm awake i might as well finish the crossword.

Quizshow presented by avuncular northern host Jim Bowen - 8 letters?

Bull****?

Was that the sound of a 'target hitting arrow'....?

Est 84 wrote:
The guy is pure scum, he takes the pi** out of a child who is disabled & another child who got kidnapped and no1 knows where she is, oh but let's have a laugh about it. He & his fans are scum!