Work underway at Southend Airport terminal

Building work for Southend Airport terminal extension Building work for Southend Airport terminal extension

WORK is underway on the £10million expansion of Southend Airport’s terminal to cater for the growing number of passengers.

The work is for a new arrivals facility and this is scheduled to be ready at the end of May 2013.

The terminal opened in February and already large numbers of passengers flying to and from Southend mean an extension is needed.

The building will become 90 metres longer with more check in desks / baggage drop off points.

Airport security and the Departure Lounge will also be made bigger to enhance the experience for passengers awaiting boarding after security.

Retail and catering facilities will be expanded throughout the terminal in order to provide a much wider range of shops and services available to passengers.

The final phase will be completed just before Christmas 2013.

The expansion will create an extra 300 jobs such as passenger service, security, retail, catering, baggage handling, engineering and maintenance, plus airline crew from London Southend based airline operations.

London Southend Airport Managing Director Alastair Welch said: “Our aim is to ensure that we deliver a very special level of customer service in Southend and this extension will allow us to ensure we can continue to deliver those high standards as the airport grows. This is also further evidence of the role the redeveloped airport is playing in supporting the regeneration of the wider Essex economy.”

Comments(115)

Olivia2847 says...
3:30pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Just waiting for the floodgates to open and all the whingers to start ...

Max Impact says...
3:42pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Jayman/jollyboy/1111
11/Torys4Southend or whatever log in he is going to use will not be happy about this.

But creating jobs during the build and after once it is open is important anyone who objects to creating jobs is living in a world where they are more intrested in themeslves.

Olivia2847 says...
3:50pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
Jayman/jollyboy/1111

11/Torys4Southend or whatever log in he is going to use will not be happy about this.

But creating jobs during the build and after once it is open is important anyone who objects to creating jobs is living in a world where they are more intrested in themeslves.
I think they are one of the same !

rjsizzler says...
3:58pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Whenever I go to the Echo website my laptop sounds like it's about to take off.

Maybe it's all these airport stories.

pipeman says...
4:02pm Fri 9 Nov 12

oh no.... the town will be devastated...! 12 flights a second/24 hours a day, 90 million pax a year, cars stacked 12 high at the Harp House roundabout, aircraft deliberately flying so far below the glideslope the pilots can see what folks are having for dinner, no one using the train station because they are carrying luggage, oh and the failed four members of 'we so hate the airport we want the kill it off whilst stating we don't'/S.A.E.N protesting at the airport gates, what ever shall we do...!!??

ps, great news, I very much look forward to using the extended terminal next year...lol

billericay boy says...
4:07pm Fri 9 Nov 12

I take it the uk border agency won't be needed there anymore. Turn the immigration control into a McDonalds and if you buy a happy meal you will get your asylum starter kit for free. ( no proof of identity needed).

Olivia2847 says...
4:10pm Fri 9 Nov 12

rjsizzler wrote:
Whenever I go to the Echo website my laptop sounds like it's about to take off.

Maybe it's all these airport stories.
You are letting your laptop runway with you ...

Olivia2847 says...
4:11pm Fri 9 Nov 12

billericay boy wrote:
I take it the uk border agency won't be needed there anymore. Turn the immigration control into a McDonalds and if you buy a happy meal you will get your asylum starter kit for free. ( no proof of identity needed).
Banal ......

notinwestcliffanymore says...
4:14pm Fri 9 Nov 12

They don't mess around do they, do they not need planning permisson to extend 90 meters?

jolllyboy says...
4:22pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Told its going to happen and plans just past one week. Work starts the next. Why does everything be a secret till the last minute.

paintlad3 says...
4:36pm Fri 9 Nov 12

good to see the extension taking place, will bring much needed jobs to the town
hopeful the airport might end up being the largest employer in the town,
which cannot be bad! better then a housing estate......

j-w says...
4:38pm Fri 9 Nov 12

notinwestcliffanymor
e
wrote:
They don't mess around do they, do they not need planning permisson to extend 90 meters?
last minute? secret?

http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/news/local_ne
ws/9474450.Plans_for
_Southend_Airport_ex
pansion/

Southend dave says...
4:39pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Notinwestcliffanymor
e: permission was granted ages ago.

jolllyboy: This has been known about for months, hardly been kept a secret until the last minute!

lawbreaker says...
4:43pm Fri 9 Nov 12

An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!

j-w says...
4:45pm Fri 9 Nov 12

http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/news/9663926.
Southend_Airport_can
_double_the_size_of_
its_terminal/

Southend dave says...
4:50pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Here's the "last minute" announcement of this extension from back in January!

http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/news/local_ne
ws/9474450.Plans_for
_Southend_Airport_ex
pansion/

Olivia2847 says...
4:55pm Fri 9 Nov 12

lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
Move .....

lawbreaker says...
5:05pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Olivia2847 wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
Move .....
I dont live in Southend! Im just saying how crap it is. over rated town.

Nebs says...
5:11pm Fri 9 Nov 12

lawbreaker wrote:
Olivia2847 wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
Move .....
I dont live in Southend! Im just saying how crap it is. over rated town.
Which borough has the privilege of your residence?

Max Impact says...
5:19pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Nebs wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
Olivia2847 wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
Move .....
I dont live in Southend! Im just saying how crap it is. over rated town.
Which borough has the privilege of your residence?
So why is it posting on a Southend story, just another troll, probably from Canvey or Basildon.

Mannersway says...
5:20pm Fri 9 Nov 12

lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
I love my Southend, might not be perfect but better than a lot of places in the UK so pleased with how the Airport is doing.
O.K. so where is the wonderful place you live then?

jayman says...
5:44pm Fri 9 Nov 12

in other news..

The second coming of Christ?... Jesus seen in westcliff

meteor impact in Leigh. residents react to better taste in the tap water since the impact..

cure for all illness and diseases found by Southend scientist.

Southend is one of the largest towns in the UK with hundreds of major employers contributing to the string of long established local bushinesses. local residents react to this discovery. Beth hummingbottom said to our reporter "i was stunned to discover that Southend had more then one business.. i thought it was just the airport and nothing else" read the full story in tomorrows echo.

Will_s1986 says...
6:00pm Fri 9 Nov 12

rjsizzler wrote:
Whenever I go to the Echo website my laptop sounds like it's about to take off.

Maybe it's all these airport stories.
Wondered what that noise was!

Max Impact says...
6:37pm Fri 9 Nov 12

A serious question:

Why did you make this statement without bothering to check any facts before posting?

It seems to me and probably many other on here it was just to stir things up between those for the airport, those against and those that are undecided.

It seems as if you are deliberately and wilfully attempting to deceive those that are sitting on the fence into believing that the practices of the airport operator and the council’s are less than honest in their dealings with the planning process.

Need you be reminded that despite a series of legal appeals and a failed application though the High Court for a judicial review Southend Council has been found to be innocent of any wrong doing.

Had you bothered to take a moment to look for the facts on the planning application and approval you would have seen it was granted permission in January as has been pointed out to you with the links provided by others but if you missed it:

http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/news/local_ne
ws/9474450.Plans_for
_Southend_Airport_ex
pansion/

If you take a moment to check for the facts relating to this issue before posting your comment, that clearly was an attempt (a very poor attempt) to cause distrust and confusion you would not have made yourself to look like an even bigger chump than you are ready are.

Max Impact says...
6:38pm Fri 9 Nov 12

jolllyboy wrote:
Told its going to happen and plans just past one week. Work starts the next. Why does everything be a secret till the last minute.
Sorry but forgot to add the comment from Jollyboy so...

A serious question:

Why did you make this statement without bothering to check any facts before posting?

It seems to me and probably many other on here it was just to stir things up between those for the airport, those against and those that are undecided.

It seems as if you are deliberately and wilfully attempting to deceive those that are sitting on the fence into believing that the practices of the airport operator and the council’s are less than honest in their dealings with the planning process.

Need you be reminded that despite a series of legal appeals and a failed application though the High Court for a judicial review Southend Council has been found to be innocent of any wrong doing.

Had you bothered to take a moment to look for the facts on the planning application and approval you would have seen it was granted permission in January as has been pointed out to you with the links provided by others but if you missed it:


http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/news/local_ne
ws/9474450.Plans_for
_Southend_Airport_ex
pansion/


If you take a moment to check for the facts relating to this issue before posting your comment, that clearly was an attempt (a very poor attempt) to cause distrust and confusion you would not have made yourself to look like an even bigger chump than you are ready are.

Max Impact says...
6:39pm Fri 9 Nov 12

jayman wrote:
in other news..

The second coming of Christ?... Jesus seen in westcliff

meteor impact in Leigh. residents react to better taste in the tap water since the impact..

cure for all illness and diseases found by Southend scientist.

Southend is one of the largest towns in the UK with hundreds of major employers contributing to the string of long established local bushinesses. local residents react to this discovery. Beth hummingbottom said to our reporter "i was stunned to discover that Southend had more then one business.. i thought it was just the airport and nothing else" read the full story in tomorrows echo.
So how many people do you employ?

jayman says...
7:12pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
jayman wrote:
in other news..

The second coming of Christ?... Jesus seen in westcliff

meteor impact in Leigh. residents react to better taste in the tap water since the impact..

cure for all illness and diseases found by Southend scientist.

Southend is one of the largest towns in the UK with hundreds of major employers contributing to the string of long established local bushinesses. local residents react to this discovery. Beth hummingbottom said to our reporter "i was stunned to discover that Southend had more then one business.. i thought it was just the airport and nothing else" read the full story in tomorrows echo.
So how many people do you employ?
well..

two footmen
five butlers
five chamber maids
a groundsman
a game keeper
and a driver

im not sure who i employ on the lower estate. Charles handles all those things.

oh and there has to be al least seven hundred hands at the asbestos factory, I'm a responsible employer. i only ask the under tens to sweep the dusty floor...

Max Impact says...
7:32pm Fri 9 Nov 12

jayman wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
jayman wrote:
in other news..

The second coming of Christ?... Jesus seen in westcliff

meteor impact in Leigh. residents react to better taste in the tap water since the impact..

cure for all illness and diseases found by Southend scientist.

Southend is one of the largest towns in the UK with hundreds of major employers contributing to the string of long established local bushinesses. local residents react to this discovery. Beth hummingbottom said to our reporter "i was stunned to discover that Southend had more then one business.. i thought it was just the airport and nothing else" read the full story in tomorrows echo.
So how many people do you employ?
well..

two footmen
five butlers
five chamber maids
a groundsman
a game keeper
and a driver

im not sure who i employ on the lower estate. Charles handles all those things.

oh and there has to be al least seven hundred hands at the asbestos factory, I'm a responsible employer. i only ask the under tens to sweep the dusty floor...
Your lack of wit, proves that you offer employment to nobody, so why moan when jobs are being created.

Are you one of these people that will moan about a compnay if you are turned down for a job because your skills are lacking in the area of compnay work in.

Would you agree that the airport is a major and important employment centre for Southend, that it has created a large number of jobs that would not have come to this area of Essex had the airport not expanded.

southendshrimper says...
7:45pm Fri 9 Nov 12

lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
so where do you live?

supershrimper says...
7:46pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Good news - there isn't enough seating at the moment, especially in the morning with the 6:30 to Faro, 6:45 to Dublin, 7:00 to Belfast and 7:25 to Barcelona. I just hope it doesn't do a City and lose its brilliant USP of a fly through terminal.

It's absolutely brilliant! When I came back from Belfast it took me 39 seconds to get through the terminal.

supershrimper says...
7:48pm Fri 9 Nov 12

lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
Then why are you on the Southend news website?

southendshrimper says...
7:51pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Great news, typical of the moaners.
Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!

southendshrimper says...
7:53pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
jayman wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
jayman wrote: in other news.. The second coming of Christ?... Jesus seen in westcliff meteor impact in Leigh. residents react to better taste in the tap water since the impact.. cure for all illness and diseases found by Southend scientist. Southend is one of the largest towns in the UK with hundreds of major employers contributing to the string of long established local bushinesses. local residents react to this discovery. Beth hummingbottom said to our reporter "i was stunned to discover that Southend had more then one business.. i thought it was just the airport and nothing else" read the full story in tomorrows echo.
So how many people do you employ?
well.. two footmen five butlers five chamber maids a groundsman a game keeper and a driver im not sure who i employ on the lower estate. Charles handles all those things. oh and there has to be al least seven hundred hands at the asbestos factory, I'm a responsible employer. i only ask the under tens to sweep the dusty floor...
Your lack of wit, proves that you offer employment to nobody, so why moan when jobs are being created. Are you one of these people that will moan about a compnay if you are turned down for a job because your skills are lacking in the area of compnay work in. Would you agree that the airport is a major and important employment centre for Southend, that it has created a large number of jobs that would not have come to this area of Essex had the airport not expanded.
The only people jayman employs are:-
jollyboy
111111
Torys4Southend

aka himself on his own in his small lonley life.

bongking says...
7:55pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
Jayman/jollyboy/1111

11/Torys4Southend or whatever log in he is going to use will not be happy about this.

But creating jobs during the build and after once it is open is important anyone who objects to creating jobs is living in a world where they are more intrested in themeslves.
yes jobs for the English!!

bongking says...
8:02pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Mannersway wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
I love my Southend, might not be perfect but better than a lot of places in the UK so pleased with how the Airport is doing.
O.K. so where is the wonderful place you live then?
it will be even better when all those mobile phone muggers get sent back home abroad somewhere!!

j-w says...
8:38pm Fri 9 Nov 12

I cant believe someone has gone to the bother of multiple logins or manipulating by nefarious means the post scoring system. This has been happening on a few stories lately, where as most comments get a 1 or two or minus 1 or two suddenly anti airport/ anti council or environmental type posts get double figure scores, whilst the opposite views are now getting high minus scores. (a 180 degree turnaround on past history). You wouldn't have to Walker too far, I bet, to find the culprit in his den.

Max Impact says...
11:09pm Fri 9 Nov 12

j-w wrote:
I cant believe someone has gone to the bother of multiple logins or manipulating by nefarious means the post scoring system. This has been happening on a few stories lately, where as most comments get a 1 or two or minus 1 or two suddenly anti airport/ anti council or environmental type posts get double figure scores, whilst the opposite views are now getting high minus scores. (a 180 degree turnaround on past history). You wouldn't have to Walker too far, I bet, to find the culprit in his den.
Why I always say they should only permit pop3 email addresses with IP tracking.

jayman says...
11:49pm Fri 9 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
j-w wrote:
I cant believe someone has gone to the bother of multiple logins or manipulating by nefarious means the post scoring system. This has been happening on a few stories lately, where as most comments get a 1 or two or minus 1 or two suddenly anti airport/ anti council or environmental type posts get double figure scores, whilst the opposite views are now getting high minus scores. (a 180 degree turnaround on past history). You wouldn't have to Walker too far, I bet, to find the culprit in his den.
Why I always say they should only permit pop3 email addresses with IP tracking.
I welcome this idea as perhaps it would stop you worrying so much about multiple login names for the same poster..

I cant say it doesn't happen, but it's not something i would do. i enjoy the freedom of having my own opinion and to be challenged on that opinion.

Brunning999 says...
7:50am Sat 10 Nov 12

What utter rubbish this airport has more right to be there than anyone or anything in the town it has squatters rights having been there before planning permission was even required.

Every single person alive today that lives in or near the airport knew unless they are stupid that the airport was there therefore they moved in knowing that it might turn into a real airport.

It has provided protection of the country during wars, it has provided employment for hundreds of local workers for donkeys years, it has survived bombings, crashes public hate, and last of all utterly useless Politicians for year after year, it is now reversing the trend of a worse recession for decades caused by governments of both elected Governments in the last decade.

And now thanks to a company with vision and determination has evolved to a well used growing airport providing jobs and wealth something excluding the minority loud mouthed greenies need the pleasure of flying to various locations often maintaining family connections, love and friendship.

We also hear the jets fly over most days but take the opinion that the jets are fulfilling a much needed purpose of providing employment, enjoyment and the growing wealth of the town.

Something Southend needs as a town is wealth creating schemes to provide for be ever increasing amount of social welfare claimants that has grown out of all proportions in recent years, the town now has its fair share of drunks, druggies, gangsters from Eastern Europe, Africa and China plus families that have excessive amounts of children all relying on wealth creators to provide welfare for their needs.

We need more areas that create wealth otherwise the town will land up like Margate a dump!

Well done Stobbarts and The Phiillip Millers and other wealth creators, I am proud to be called a Southender !

And as for those that hate the town my advice is simple have s-x and travel but don't be a hypocrite and fly from our airport.

Thames Gateway says...
8:40am Sat 10 Nov 12

Very well said Brunning999. The silent majority are right with you on that.

JeffMo says...
10:08am Sat 10 Nov 12

Money to burn by expanding the terminal as this generates profits but nothing is being spent to improve the compromised safety of aircraft and passengers at the airport.

It will all end in tears when the first easyjet aircraft ends up on the railway line at the end of Southend’s short narrow runway.

al coniston says...
10:40am Sat 10 Nov 12

JeffMo wrote:
Money to burn by expanding the terminal as this generates profits but nothing is being spent to improve the compromised safety of aircraft and passengers at the airport.

It will all end in tears when the first easyjet aircraft ends up on the railway line at the end of Southend’s short narrow runway.
Well that was a waste of your three minutes of typing that crap . . . . and my 30 seconds of reading it.

If you could find the time to pop down to the airport, you would witness for yourself that the incoming A319's are more than capable of stopping with 600 meters of the 'short' runway to spare

Oh, and i have heard (albeit unsubstantiated) rumours that a plan may be forthcoming into widening the runway

jayman says...
10:41am Sat 10 Nov 12

Thames Gateway wrote:
Very well said Brunning999. The silent majority are right with you on that.
more like loud ultra right wing minority.

it's market forces that will dictate the success of the airport. Nothing else..

disenfranchisedpast says...
10:57am Sat 10 Nov 12

JeffMo wrote:
Money to burn by expanding the terminal as this generates profits but nothing is being spent to improve the compromised safety of aircraft and passengers at the airport.

It will all end in tears when the first easyjet aircraft ends up on the railway line at the end of Southend’s short narrow runway.
I assume you have some evidence that they are compromising safety, surely you're not spouting garbage?

Fact of the matter is Southends runway is long enough and wide enough to accomodate the A319's operated by easyjet, The CAA approved the operations, if they didn't it wouldn't be happening.

So come on, lets have this evidence of compromised safety, I am sure the much smarter people at the CAA whose job it is to check these things will be gratified that you spotted it.

tophatdt says...
11:04am Sat 10 Nov 12

The comments on this forum get a bit boring and repetitive, don't you think? It ends up in the same old back stabbing, but I always scroll down and read in hope of reading something new. I have heard that before March we will all be told of new routes from Southend with a couple of new operators, plus I do think the runway MAY be widened in the future...but it's a difficult project (but not impossible).

lawbreaker says...
11:46am Sat 10 Nov 12

supershrimper wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
Then why are you on the Southend news website?
To take the p!ss out of seasiders.

maxell says...
11:47am Sat 10 Nov 12

pipeman wrote:
oh no.... the town will be devastated...! 12 flights a second/24 hours a day, 90 million pax a year, cars stacked 12 high at the Harp House roundabout, aircraft deliberately flying so far below the glideslope the pilots can see what folks are having for dinner, no one using the train station because they are carrying luggage, oh and the failed four members of 'we so hate the airport we want the kill it off whilst stating we don't'/S.A.E.N protesting at the airport gates, what ever shall we do...!!??

ps, great news, I very much look forward to using the extended terminal next year...lol
well predicted

lawbreaker says...
11:47am Sat 10 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
Nebs wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
Olivia2847 wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
Move .....
I dont live in Southend! Im just saying how crap it is. over rated town.
Which borough has the privilege of your residence?
So why is it posting on a Southend story, just another troll, probably from Canvey or Basildon.
I live right next to Lakeside.

Campbell's dad says...
11:57am Sat 10 Nov 12

Re the planning application being approved ages ago, only partial true, As the council & the airport forgot to tell Anglian Water, about the extension, when they found out, they put a blocking notice on it & the terminal cannot be signed off until the Sewage /Foul water issue is sorted to their satisfaction.
You can check out these facts on the Rochford Council web site, if you can find your way around it.
Of course once planning permission was granted, the airport can go ahead & build it, at their risk. the risk being that if the proposed sewage/foul water system does not meet the water boards criteria, they may have to pull it all down. But you don't expect the airport of the council to tell you this, they even managed to forget to tell the water board in the 1st place. Of course, if the proposed splitting of the extra sewage/foul water into 2 of the existing pipe runs does not work out. Rochford residents can look forward to not only having the stench of aviation fuel & exhaust, but we will also be treated to untreated sewage/foul water. Good job someone noticed & let the water board know, or they would have just overloaded the existing sewage/foul water system anyway.

Biker One says...
1:50pm Sat 10 Nov 12

On a sort of related topic, can anyone say why the Harp House roundabout is such a gridlocked mess at the weekend? Fortunately when I was visiting the area I was on my bike, the car drivers were not so happy!!

Max Impact says...
2:08pm Sat 10 Nov 12

lawbreaker wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
Nebs wrote:
lawbreaker wrote:
Olivia2847 wrote:
lawbreaker wrote: An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
Move .....
I dont live in Southend! Im just saying how crap it is. over rated town.
Which borough has the privilege of your residence?
So why is it posting on a Southend story, just another troll, probably from Canvey or Basildon.
I live right next to Lakeside.
The capital of Chav "culture" and I use the word culture as losely as possible as a Chav never has and never will be cultured.

JeffMo says...
2:26pm Sat 10 Nov 12

" So come on, lets have this evidence of compromised safety, I am sure the much smarter people at the CAA whose job it is to check these things will be gratified that you spotted it."

The church is so close to the side of the runway that special permission had to be given to allow operations. This special permission is under a yearly review.
A couple of weeks ago the airport shut down for two days due fog as no pilot wanted to take a chance with that church so close. Add to that a non-standard narrow runway and a short runway that is in kissing distance of the railway line plus a primitiveCAT1 ILS that can’t cope with fog and it is an accident waiting to happen. Google air crashes at Southend and see how many aircraft have overshot the runway and crashed into the railway line. Yes the runway is now longer but the aircraft are much faster than the old piston aircraft that used to fly from Southend.

j-w says...
2:41pm Sat 10 Nov 12

What complete BS! Pilots were not landing in the Fog had nothing to do with the church, its irrelevant. Where do these plonkers arrive from? Luton?

If the pilots cannot see the runway at a certain height they cannot land, simples. Other airports had problems and they are the best certified in the country.

j-w says...
2:43pm Sat 10 Nov 12

Biker One wrote:
On a sort of related topic, can anyone say why the Harp House roundabout is such a gridlocked mess at the weekend? Fortunately when I was visiting the area I was on my bike, the car drivers were not so happy!!
Because of the shoppers going into the retail park. The park has speed humps too near the entrance so everything slows down too much which then backs out onto the roundabout.

disenfranchisedpast says...
2:57pm Sat 10 Nov 12

JeffMo wrote:
" So come on, lets have this evidence of compromised safety, I am sure the much smarter people at the CAA whose job it is to check these things will be gratified that you spotted it."

The church is so close to the side of the runway that special permission had to be given to allow operations. This special permission is under a yearly review.
A couple of weeks ago the airport shut down for two days due fog as no pilot wanted to take a chance with that church so close. Add to that a non-standard narrow runway and a short runway that is in kissing distance of the railway line plus a primitiveCAT1 ILS that can’t cope with fog and it is an accident waiting to happen. Google air crashes at Southend and see how many aircraft have overshot the runway and crashed into the railway line. Yes the runway is now longer but the aircraft are much faster than the old piston aircraft that used to fly from Southend.
It's like you know a little bit about aircraft operations, just not quite enough.

Special permission means that people much smarter than you assesed the risks involved in operating to a runway of those dimensions with an obstruction (the church) that close to the runway and deemed it safe.

There's nothing "primitive" about a cat 1 ILS, it just has higher landing minima than cat 2 and 3. Pilots don't "take a chance" on landing, if the visibility or cloud is bellow their minima they don't land. If the pilots dont have visual contact with the runway by the time they have reached their decision height they go around and divert or hold for an improvement.

Operations in fog at airports aren't inherantly unsafe, it could be argued they become safer as a whole range of rules, procedures and limitations come into effect when fog rolls in.

Your argument that there have been accidents in the past is a fallacy, as you correctly point out the runway is longer now and if you knew anything about the performance charactaristics of A319's you would know that the landing distance available at southend is more than adequate for them to safely stop.

If you could get it into your head and realise that the CAA don't allow "accidents waiting to happen"

Nebs says...
3:14pm Sat 10 Nov 12

j-w wrote:
Biker One wrote:
On a sort of related topic, can anyone say why the Harp House roundabout is such a gridlocked mess at the weekend? Fortunately when I was visiting the area I was on my bike, the car drivers were not so happy!!
Because of the shoppers going into the retail park. The park has speed humps too near the entrance so everything slows down too much which then backs out onto the roundabout.
Coupled with people who wish to leave the roundabout at the retail park and airport exit remain in the outside lane, nearest the middle of the roundabout, until they are adjacent to the exit and then they try and cut across. Nobody lets them cut across, and so all the traffic that would normally use this lane to access the warners bridge exit gets backed up behind them.

tophatdt says...
3:59pm Sat 10 Nov 12

something that needs to get sorted out........i think Heathrow and Gatwick would not tolerate such a crazy situation!

lawbreaker says...
5:00pm Sat 10 Nov 12

tophatdt wrote:
something that needs to get sorted out........i think Heathrow and Gatwick would not tolerate such a crazy situation!
Well this is Southend we are talking about. Its a very strange place. Does not surprise me one bit. I cant stand the roads in Southend. Basildon and Thurrock area is good for driving. Boy racers and adrenaline seekers paradise!

Max Impact says...
6:46pm Sat 10 Nov 12

JeffMo wrote:
" So come on, lets have this evidence of compromised safety, I am sure the much smarter people at the CAA whose job it is to check these things will be gratified that you spotted it."

The church is so close to the side of the runway that special permission had to be given to allow operations. This special permission is under a yearly review.
A couple of weeks ago the airport shut down for two days due fog as no pilot wanted to take a chance with that church so close. Add to that a non-standard narrow runway and a short runway that is in kissing distance of the railway line plus a primitiveCAT1 ILS that can’t cope with fog and it is an accident waiting to happen. Google air crashes at Southend and see how many aircraft have overshot the runway and crashed into the railway line. Yes the runway is now longer but the aircraft are much faster than the old piston aircraft that used to fly from Southend.
There has not been as many you you want people to think there has, on to the railway lines I can find three or four thats it.

As you say the runway is longer, you say jets are faster than piston aircraft yes your right but why not mention that the breaking systems used are much better than they were, passenger jets and turboprop aircraft have reverse thrust aiding the process of slowing the aircraft down.

jayman says...
7:41pm Sat 10 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
JeffMo wrote:
" So come on, lets have this evidence of compromised safety, I am sure the much smarter people at the CAA whose job it is to check these things will be gratified that you spotted it."

The church is so close to the side of the runway that special permission had to be given to allow operations. This special permission is under a yearly review.
A couple of weeks ago the airport shut down for two days due fog as no pilot wanted to take a chance with that church so close. Add to that a non-standard narrow runway and a short runway that is in kissing distance of the railway line plus a primitiveCAT1 ILS that can’t cope with fog and it is an accident waiting to happen. Google air crashes at Southend and see how many aircraft have overshot the runway and crashed into the railway line. Yes the runway is now longer but the aircraft are much faster than the old piston aircraft that used to fly from Southend.
There has not been as many you you want people to think there has, on to the railway lines I can find three or four thats it.

As you say the runway is longer, you say jets are faster than piston aircraft yes your right but why not mention that the breaking systems used are much better than they were, passenger jets and turboprop aircraft have reverse thrust aiding the process of slowing the aircraft down.
yeah... the reverse thrust bit max talks about is the noise that wakes you up at night between take-offs..

god. some people.. tsk!

Max Impact says...
8:12pm Sat 10 Nov 12

jayman wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
JeffMo wrote:
" So come on, lets have this evidence of compromised safety, I am sure the much smarter people at the CAA whose job it is to check these things will be gratified that you spotted it."

The church is so close to the side of the runway that special permission had to be given to allow operations. This special permission is under a yearly review.
A couple of weeks ago the airport shut down for two days due fog as no pilot wanted to take a chance with that church so close. Add to that a non-standard narrow runway and a short runway that is in kissing distance of the railway line plus a primitiveCAT1 ILS that can’t cope with fog and it is an accident waiting to happen. Google air crashes at Southend and see how many aircraft have overshot the runway and crashed into the railway line. Yes the runway is now longer but the aircraft are much faster than the old piston aircraft that used to fly from Southend.
There has not been as many you you want people to think there has, on to the railway lines I can find three or four thats it.

As you say the runway is longer, you say jets are faster than piston aircraft yes your right but why not mention that the breaking systems used are much better than they were, passenger jets and turboprop aircraft have reverse thrust aiding the process of slowing the aircraft down.
yeah... the reverse thrust bit max talks about is the noise that wakes you up at night between take-offs..

god. some people.. tsk!
yeah some people really should check facts before posting.

When they post such bs they make right morons out of themselves.

Bit like those that resort to scaremoungering.

BASILBRUSH says...
9:11pm Sat 10 Nov 12

JeffMo wrote:
" So come on, lets have this evidence of compromised safety, I am sure the much smarter people at the CAA whose job it is to check these things will be gratified that you spotted it."

The church is so close to the side of the runway that special permission had to be given to allow operations. This special permission is under a yearly review.
A couple of weeks ago the airport shut down for two days due fog as no pilot wanted to take a chance with that church so close. Add to that a non-standard narrow runway and a short runway that is in kissing distance of the railway line plus a primitiveCAT1 ILS that can’t cope with fog and it is an accident waiting to happen. Google air crashes at Southend and see how many aircraft have overshot the runway and crashed into the railway line. Yes the runway is now longer but the aircraft are much faster than the old piston aircraft that used to fly from Southend.
I must've imagined the 62 flights cancelled and flights diverted at Heathrow during the same period reported in the national press.
Plus the flights cancelled or diverted at Luton, London City, Southampton, Gatwick etc etc...

http://www.bbc.co.uk
/news/uk-england-lon
don-20039145

As for the Terminal extension.. Good news!

Max Impact says...
10:05pm Sat 10 Nov 12

BASILBRUSH wrote:
JeffMo wrote:
" So come on, lets have this evidence of compromised safety, I am sure the much smarter people at the CAA whose job it is to check these things will be gratified that you spotted it."

The church is so close to the side of the runway that special permission had to be given to allow operations. This special permission is under a yearly review.
A couple of weeks ago the airport shut down for two days due fog as no pilot wanted to take a chance with that church so close. Add to that a non-standard narrow runway and a short runway that is in kissing distance of the railway line plus a primitiveCAT1 ILS that can’t cope with fog and it is an accident waiting to happen. Google air crashes at Southend and see how many aircraft have overshot the runway and crashed into the railway line. Yes the runway is now longer but the aircraft are much faster than the old piston aircraft that used to fly from Southend.
I must've imagined the 62 flights cancelled and flights diverted at Heathrow during the same period reported in the national press.
Plus the flights cancelled or diverted at Luton, London City, Southampton, Gatwick etc etc...

http://www.bbc.co.uk

/news/uk-england-lon

don-20039145

As for the Terminal extension.. Good news!
Now now Basilbrush you know you must NEVER let facts get in the way of the nimbys wanting is sow the seeds of sullbhit to scare people into believing the lie being planted.

JeffMo says...
5:05am Sun 11 Nov 12

"I must've imagined the 62 flights cancelled and flights diverted at Heathrow during the same period reported in the national press.
Plus the flights cancelled or diverted at Luton, London City, Southampton, Gatwick etc etc... "

There is a difference that some here like to forget.

At Southend I think the fog visibility has to be above 550m with a cloud base above 200ft. At proper airports aircraft can land blind because money has been invested in technology. Yes there are diversions at Heathrow when aircraft have to be more spaced out so not as many can land.

JeffMo says...
5:17am Sun 11 Nov 12

"As you say the runway is longer, you say jets are faster than piston aircraft yes your right but why not mention that the breaking systems used are much better than they were, passenger jets and turboprop aircraft have reverse thrust aiding the process of slowing the aircraft down"

Hope this link works http://www.dailyecho
.co.uk/news/1130667.
plane_overshoots_run
way/

Southampton is another airport with a runway around the same length as Southend. In 2007 a passenger jet much smaller than what easyjet use overshot its runway. Lucky for them they had a nice grass safety strip at the end of the runway. At Southend the aircraft would have broken its back on the embankment and no doubt caught fire. If a train was passing hundreds of people would have been killed. Southend should be closed now to passengers for their own safety as this is probably the most dangerous airport in the UK

disenfranchisedpast says...
8:05am Sun 11 Nov 12

JeffMo wrote:
"As you say the runway is longer, you say jets are faster than piston aircraft yes your right but why not mention that the breaking systems used are much better than they were, passenger jets and turboprop aircraft have reverse thrust aiding the process of slowing the aircraft down"

Hope this link works http://www.dailyecho

.co.uk/news/1130667.

plane_overshoots_run

way/

Southampton is another airport with a runway around the same length as Southend. In 2007 a passenger jet much smaller than what easyjet use overshot its runway. Lucky for them they had a nice grass safety strip at the end of the runway. At Southend the aircraft would have broken its back on the embankment and no doubt caught fire. If a train was passing hundreds of people would have been killed. Southend should be closed now to passengers for their own safety as this is probably the most dangerous airport in the UK
Again you are making assertions the have no evidence to back them up, southend also has a "nice safety strip" at either end if its runway, its called a runway end safety area.

Southend is no different from many many airports in the uk in that it has a road or a railway at the end of the runway.

You still haven't addressed the fact that much smarter people than you (the CAA) have deemed that it is safe to operate these flights at southend.

I'm sure your not just being a scare mongering pillock, right?

Max Impact says...
8:05am Sun 11 Nov 12

JeffMo wrote:
"As you say the runway is longer, you say jets are faster than piston aircraft yes your right but why not mention that the breaking systems used are much better than they were, passenger jets and turboprop aircraft have reverse thrust aiding the process of slowing the aircraft down"

Hope this link works http://www.dailyecho

.co.uk/news/1130667.

plane_overshoots_run

way/

Southampton is another airport with a runway around the same length as Southend. In 2007 a passenger jet much smaller than what easyjet use overshot its runway. Lucky for them they had a nice grass safety strip at the end of the runway. At Southend the aircraft would have broken its back on the embankment and no doubt caught fire. If a train was passing hundreds of people would have been killed. Southend should be closed now to passengers for their own safety as this is probably the most dangerous airport in the UK
JeffMo/Jayman/Jollyb
oy/111111 or what ever you want to call yourself. Why not do a little bit more research, all runways have a touch down zone, if the pilot can not land within it he must preform a go around (something you protesters hate).

If the CAA felt the airport was not safe it would not be granted an operating licence.

The runway was relaid recently greatly improving the breaking efficiency.

Brunning999 says...
8:11am Sun 11 Nov 12

What a load of dribble I love the Airport !

All the Luddite lefty s stay riding bikes!

j-w says...
10:04am Sun 11 Nov 12

I wonder what Stobarts and easyJets legal teams think about being accused of running an unsafe operation on a public website?

pipeman says...
12:07pm Sun 11 Nov 12

j-w wrote:
I wonder what Stobarts and easyJets legal teams think about being accused of running an unsafe operation on a public website?
That's an interesting thought....

Nebs says...
12:38pm Sun 11 Nov 12

pipeman wrote:
j-w wrote:
I wonder what Stobarts and easyJets legal teams think about being accused of running an unsafe operation on a public website?
That's an interesting thought....
On the subject of safety, in view of this application below, is it just an upgrade to make the lights better or is there a problem that needs to be put right, or is it because of the new terminal, or what? I'd have thought the approach lights would have been installed to the appropritate standard from the outset.
http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/announcements
/public_notices/lega
l_notices/public_not
ices/10037534.Civil_
Aviation_Act_1982__A
irports_Act_1986_and
_Acquisition_of_Land
_Act_1981/

openspace says...
1:07pm Sun 11 Nov 12

To those who have made ridiculous comments above, I can only say.
If an airport is safe, it is granted a licence. If it is not safe, no licence is granted.
Therefore, our airport is safe !!!!!!!.
But of course accidents can happen at any airport, regardless of all regulations.
PS Fog prevents landings at all airports on occasion, regardless of landing equipment, runway length, surroundings, etc, etc, etc. Not a difficult concept to understand for most of us that possess a fully functional brain!!!!

Max Impact says...
1:11pm Sun 11 Nov 12

The current lights were checked and passed by the CAA, prehaps they want to upgrade them to bump the CAT level up to 2,

If you read the whole thing it states:

"that it is to buy 1134 sqm of paddock land to the north side of Tinkers Lane, Rochford, Essex"

prehaps the airport do not own the land but rent it off the council, buying it would make it better for the airport to keep control of the land and the maintanace of the lights.


Going on:
"As may be necessary new approach lights and related structures and apparatus in, on, under and across the above-referenced land and to operate such lights and/or structures and/or apparatus including the right to survey, inspect, repair, maintain, alter, replace and/or remove such lights and/or structures and/or apparatus and any other associated equipment"

Where does it say they need to build new lights, it states may be not must.

As I said above before the passenger flights started the CAA would have gone over the airport with a fine toothed comb and flagged up any issues and not granted permission for the new operating licence to commence the flights until all the issues were sorted.

Nebs says...
2:31pm Sun 11 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
The current lights were checked and passed by the CAA, prehaps they want to upgrade them to bump the CAT level up to 2,

If you read the whole thing it states:

"that it is to buy 1134 sqm of paddock land to the north side of Tinkers Lane, Rochford, Essex"

prehaps the airport do not own the land but rent it off the council, buying it would make it better for the airport to keep control of the land and the maintanace of the lights.


Going on:
"As may be necessary new approach lights and related structures and apparatus in, on, under and across the above-referenced land and to operate such lights and/or structures and/or apparatus including the right to survey, inspect, repair, maintain, alter, replace and/or remove such lights and/or structures and/or apparatus and any other associated equipment"

Where does it say they need to build new lights, it states may be not must.

As I said above before the passenger flights started the CAA would have gone over the airport with a fine toothed comb and flagged up any issues and not granted permission for the new operating licence to commence the flights until all the issues were sorted.
I think the upgrade is possibly the most logical solution but, like you, I don't really know. Until someone from the airport tells us then it is all speculation. What would an upgrade to cat 2 allow the airport to do, that it cannot do with cat 1.?
Can't see the logic behind the rental argument with the council, as this is for a compulsory purchase. The council would surely have done a deal.
As for "Where does it say they need to build new lights", if they don't NEED to build new lights then why would a CPO be granted?

BASILBRUSH says...
2:42pm Sun 11 Nov 12

I must be bored, but:-

The cancellations at Heathrow were also due to operators unable to operate in those conditions. You did not mention the other Airports I listed?
And surely by the fact that there were cancellations and diversions at Southend, proves the safety was not compromised?

You wrote:-
Southampton is another airport with a runway around the same length as Southend {SOUTHAMPTON HAS ONLY ILS ON 1 RUNWAY AND PHYSICAL TARMAC LENGTH IS NOT THE SAME THING}. In 2007 {5 YEARS AND AROUND 228500 SAFE MOVEMENTS AGO } 'a' passenger jet much smaller than what easyjet use overshot its runway. Lucky for them they had a nice grass safety strip at the end of the runway {SOUTHEND HAS THE REQUIRED RUNWAY END SAFETY AREAS, HENCE PHYSICAL TARMAC COMMENT ABOVE}. At Southend the aircraft would have broken its back on the embankment and no doubt caught fire {ASSUMPTION BASED ON WHAT?}. If a train was passing hundreds of people would have been killed {AGAIN ASSUMPTION}. Southend should be closed now to passengers for their own safety as this is probably the most dangerous airport in the UK {ACTUALLY ONE OF THE SAFEST AS ALL EQUIPMENT NEW, AND IT HAS TO COMPLY WITH MODERN CAA REGULATIONS}

If you are going to try and scaremonger like SAEN, try to do some basic research. They failed partly because they didnt know what they were talking about either (based on their past and most recent press releases).

Good news about the terminal!!!!... again.

Max Impact says...
3:35pm Sun 11 Nov 12

Picture the scene:

Sitting having Sunday dinner... Well a KFC as the wife and kids are away and I could be bothered cooking for myself.

Phone rings it's the boss, he asked can you go to Dublin on Monday,

"yes" I say

"thats good" Boss responds with

"I can fly from Southend" I say

Boss responds with, "no you can't as we have already booked a flight"

"where from" I ask

"Manchester" He said...

What is more anoying is we have an office in Manchester.and they did not bother to ask anyone there before me, the job... Collect a bundle of paperwork that needs to be deliverd to the London office.

No I don't know why they booked a Manchester flight.

muffindamule says...
4:31pm Sun 11 Nov 12

LOL, you couldn't make it up, could you ?

Max Impact says...
6:47pm Sun 11 Nov 12

muffindamule wrote:
LOL, you couldn't make it up, could you ?
Wish I had, I could write a book about some of the stupid things the bosses have done.

A van was needed, myself and six workmates drew up what we needed and priced it all up, we submitted the proposal for a 7.5 ton truck, what did the bosses buy... A Renault Kangoo, then moaned that we had to hire vans to transport equipment.

They then brought TV's built for the US market for UK offices.

al coniston says...
10:36am Mon 12 Nov 12

more news out on Wednesday regarding a new service for the airport ;)

Nebs says...
10:41am Mon 12 Nov 12

al coniston wrote:
more news out on Wednesday regarding a new service for the airport ;)
A traffic policeman on Saturdays for the Harp House roundabout?

jayman says...
10:55am Mon 12 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
muffindamule wrote:
LOL, you couldn't make it up, could you ?
Wish I had, I could write a book about some of the stupid things the bosses have done.

A van was needed, myself and six workmates drew up what we needed and priced it all up, we submitted the proposal for a 7.5 ton truck, what did the bosses buy... A Renault Kangoo, then moaned that we had to hire vans to transport equipment.

They then brought TV's built for the US market for UK offices.
another pointless, anecdotal back-story brought to you by the spotter-in-chief of Southend airport.

you boss did you a favour mate.. wind your neck in and get back to work. lol

mrttev63 says...
11:25am Mon 12 Nov 12

I look forward to the discussion here on the Press Release which is due out on Wednesday - if it appears as plannned. Probably not too much for SEN in the shortrun, but lots of potential perhaps.

r6keith says...
11:51am Mon 12 Nov 12

lawbreaker wrote:
An expansion for the airport. So more people, more traffic, more problems. Cant be a bad thing, because I hate Southend!
With a bit of luck you live somewhere else far away. If not please feel free to move away ASAP.

fatgeezer says...
1:49pm Mon 12 Nov 12

southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either

j-w says...
2:19pm Mon 12 Nov 12

Bet you can't link to any of your "facts!"

go on, show us any tangible proof to any of the garbage you have written that is public record?

BASILBRUSH says...
2:26pm Mon 12 Nov 12

"2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for"

I love to know where they are going to fit this second runway let alone the application references?

"These are facts not moans."
Yet you havent given any information to back up these facts? So at the moment they are hearsay.

Good news about the terminal extension!

j-w says...
2:26pm Mon 12 Nov 12

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for


And where is it going to go? Through the golf course? The new housing on Hall Road?

Max Impact says...
3:14pm Mon 12 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
Jollyboy/jayman/1111
11/JeffMo/Torys4Sout
hend

Has yet another new login.

IP's never lie.

rjsizzler says...
4:34pm Mon 12 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
Local taxi firms for one have seen a huge increase in business since the airport began expanding.

Max Impact says...
6:12pm Mon 12 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
What companies have been forced out of business, please do tell us jayman/jollyboy/1111
11/torys4southend

Local companies from accross Exxex won contracts, local people work there.

This is just another new name poping up to comment on a story about the airport, before this story came up on here you had never posted undere this name before.

Everyone knows what you are, you are a troll and nothing more than that.

jayman says...
6:36pm Mon 12 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
Jollyboy/jayman/1111

11/JeffMo/Torys4Sout

hend

Has yet another new login.

IP's never lie.
max.

i will give you twenty quid if you can tell me my IP address!

ohhhh!! that's right.... you don't know, because you know about as much on computer internet protocol as you know about welding or getting important documents from Ireland..

Max Impact says...
7:09pm Mon 12 Nov 12

jayman wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
Jollyboy/jayman/1111


11/JeffMo/Torys4Sout


hend

Has yet another new login.

IP's never lie.
max.

i will give you twenty quid if you can tell me my IP address!

ohhhh!! that's right.... you don't know, because you know about as much on computer internet protocol as you know about welding or getting important documents from Ireland..
I'm a welder and will be until the end of the month, just welded to a desk, handed my notice in and will be moving to a new venture in December.

Manchester Airport hate the place, cold and bleak.

You can say what you want about me not being a welder, I could retaliate but your not worth the keystoke time.

disenfranchisedpast says...
8:16pm Mon 12 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "facts" there geezer.

Nebs says...
8:39pm Mon 12 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
jayman wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
Jollyboy/jayman/1111



11/JeffMo/Torys4Sout



hend

Has yet another new login.

IP's never lie.
max.

i will give you twenty quid if you can tell me my IP address!

ohhhh!! that's right.... you don't know, because you know about as much on computer internet protocol as you know about welding or getting important documents from Ireland..
I'm a welder and will be until the end of the month, just welded to a desk, handed my notice in and will be moving to a new venture in December.

Manchester Airport hate the place, cold and bleak.

You can say what you want about me not being a welder, I could retaliate but your not worth the keystoke time.
Before you go, are you ever going to tell us which internet bookie laid your election bet?

r6keith says...
1:56pm Tue 13 Nov 12

FHAT GEZZER stated: "Dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink."
Please tell us more who and where . What local bussinessess could suffer by the airports expansion ? I know some that have gained and some that it makes no difference too but adverse effects I do not think so !

fatgeezer says...
2:00pm Tue 13 Nov 12

disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote: Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal 2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport. Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much. And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink. Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary. These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "facts" there geezer.
disenfranchisedpast

No not fast and loose fella.

It is freely acknowledged that the majority of "new"jobs have "moved" to the airport from around the county. So that is not NEW jobs. The jobs and wiorkers that have moved to the airport, by and large do not support the local (Southend Borough) economy. They may support the economy of their home locality, but not Southend and area

The two businesses that have closed were recording studio's, one of long standing (20 years+). The cost of additional work to the studios to counter the additional noise and vibration of aircraft flying overhead was restrictive in both cases. The cost of moving to a new premises including the building work and fitting required was also restrictive, hence the closure of two businesses. I will not identify the third business, for the time being. It is not my business, and I do not wish to prejudice any ongoing discussions

As for the building workers, simply go and talk to a few. Most of them are billetted in a few B+B's near the seafront. They arrive in town on a Monday afternoon and go home Friday Lunchtime. The weekend shifts Arrive Thursday and go home Monday afternoon. They take their wages home.

The tourist industry in Maldon has been hit according to local business, as it is no longer a place for a quiet afternoon out, and I have witnessed the noise myself from Wallasey Island.


As for whoever MAX is. You make yourself look stupid with your uninformed libelous comments.

I am none of the people your sad little mind imagines sir/madam. I happen to have commented on several articles in the past, but I have a life which does not centre around making childish remarks and insulting people whilst hiding behind the mask of a newspaper forum. I can assure you that you do not know me. As for IP's never lying. I believe you need to take a course on how the internet work.

Now go play with the traffic you silly child

Max Impact says...
2:34pm Tue 13 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote: Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal 2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport. Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much. And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink. Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary. These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "facts" there geezer.
disenfranchisedpast

No not fast and loose fella.

It is freely acknowledged that the majority of "new"jobs have "moved" to the airport from around the county. So that is not NEW jobs. The jobs and wiorkers that have moved to the airport, by and large do not support the local (Southend Borough) economy. They may support the economy of their home locality, but not Southend and area

The two businesses that have closed were recording studio's, one of long standing (20 years+). The cost of additional work to the studios to counter the additional noise and vibration of aircraft flying overhead was restrictive in both cases. The cost of moving to a new premises including the building work and fitting required was also restrictive, hence the closure of two businesses. I will not identify the third business, for the time being. It is not my business, and I do not wish to prejudice any ongoing discussions

As for the building workers, simply go and talk to a few. Most of them are billetted in a few B+B's near the seafront. They arrive in town on a Monday afternoon and go home Friday Lunchtime. The weekend shifts Arrive Thursday and go home Monday afternoon. They take their wages home.

The tourist industry in Maldon has been hit according to local business, as it is no longer a place for a quiet afternoon out, and I have witnessed the noise myself from Wallasey Island.


As for whoever MAX is. You make yourself look stupid with your uninformed libelous comments.

I am none of the people your sad little mind imagines sir/madam. I happen to have commented on several articles in the past, but I have a life which does not centre around making childish remarks and insulting people whilst hiding behind the mask of a newspaper forum. I can assure you that you do not know me. As for IP's never lying. I believe you need to take a course on how the internet work.

Now go play with the traffic you silly child
"I have a life which does not centre around making childish remarks"

Really

"Now go play with the traffic you silly child"

Shall we agree to disagree, or shall we disagree to disagree which would mean we agree to disagree, which results in us agreeing to disagree about dissagreeing to agree to disagree,,,

Max Impact says...
2:40pm Tue 13 Nov 12

Nebs wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
jayman wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
Jollyboy/jayman/1111




11/JeffMo/Torys4Sout




hend

Has yet another new login.

IP's never lie.
max.

i will give you twenty quid if you can tell me my IP address!

ohhhh!! that's right.... you don't know, because you know about as much on computer internet protocol as you know about welding or getting important documents from Ireland..
I'm a welder and will be until the end of the month, just welded to a desk, handed my notice in and will be moving to a new venture in December.

Manchester Airport hate the place, cold and bleak.

You can say what you want about me not being a welder, I could retaliate but your not worth the keystoke time.
Before you go, are you ever going to tell us which internet bookie laid your election bet?
can't remeber the name it was three years ago!

As for leaving only leaving work not Southend.

Ricayboy says...
2:50pm Tue 13 Nov 12

I support the Aiport 100% and I am sure that the vast majority of Essex residents do. I only hope that it gets bigger and better as time goes on, bringing prosperity and a very valuable asset to Southend and Essex.

j-w says...
3:03pm Tue 13 Nov 12

so no facts about anything then, just more rubbish from factless geezer. Did the recording studios not need soundproofing for all the aircraft that have been landing at the airport for the last 70 years? Or are they only affected by A319's? What about the 2nd runway planning permission? Any meat on the bones of anything you have posted? Business names for those closed down?
So of the 500 currently working at the airport (not incl atc lasham and the other longstanding aviation related businesses) none of them contribute to the local economy? Not one single arriving passenger uses local taxis or buses or shops before fleeing to another part of the UK?

Joe Wildman says...
4:12pm Tue 13 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote:
Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal

2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for

BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals

Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport.

Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much.

And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink.

Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary.

These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
Please may you post a link for the application for the second runway, there is currently nothing on the Rochford Council website, nor is there anything on the Southend Council website.

If you can not substantiate what you are posting as fact than it is reckless for you to make a comment as fact that some people might beleve as true this could cause people great distress and worry about what is planned and happening.

Please either post links to all the everdence you have to substantiate your alligations of a submitted proposal for planning permission for a second runway or at least admit that you are wrong in your alligations for said proposal.

I await your response.

disenfranchisedpast says...
7:32pm Tue 13 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote: Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal 2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport. Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much. And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink. Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary. These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "facts" there geezer.
disenfranchisedpast

No not fast and loose fella.

It is freely acknowledged that the majority of "new"jobs have "moved" to the airport from around the county. So that is not NEW jobs. The jobs and wiorkers that have moved to the airport, by and large do not support the local (Southend Borough) economy. They may support the economy of their home locality, but not Southend and area

The two businesses that have closed were recording studio's, one of long standing (20 years+). The cost of additional work to the studios to counter the additional noise and vibration of aircraft flying overhead was restrictive in both cases. The cost of moving to a new premises including the building work and fitting required was also restrictive, hence the closure of two businesses. I will not identify the third business, for the time being. It is not my business, and I do not wish to prejudice any ongoing discussions

As for the building workers, simply go and talk to a few. Most of them are billetted in a few B+B's near the seafront. They arrive in town on a Monday afternoon and go home Friday Lunchtime. The weekend shifts Arrive Thursday and go home Monday afternoon. They take their wages home.

The tourist industry in Maldon has been hit according to local business, as it is no longer a place for a quiet afternoon out, and I have witnessed the noise myself from Wallasey Island.


As for whoever MAX is. You make yourself look stupid with your uninformed libelous comments.

I am none of the people your sad little mind imagines sir/madam. I happen to have commented on several articles in the past, but I have a life which does not centre around making childish remarks and insulting people whilst hiding behind the mask of a newspaper forum. I can assure you that you do not know me. As for IP's never lying. I believe you need to take a course on how the internet work.

Now go play with the traffic you silly child
Ok I'll be blunt, you're talking cr@p. There is no application for a second runway. It would be public if there was.

The theoretical recording studios would have needed soundproofing for the B757s, md80's, dc8's and airbuses that have been flying in and put of southend for maintenance for many many years prior to the expansion.

So lets see some proof of these workers fleeing the area with their pay, or the shattered tourist industry in malden. Something a bit more concrete than your fantasies

pipeman says...
8:24pm Tue 13 Nov 12

A second runway at Southend..!?..may I ask exactly where you think they are going to place it...?

Back in the late summer I went to Maldon, place was jammed packed with visitors.

pipeman says...
9:02pm Tue 13 Nov 12

Dennis Walker (second from the left) states 60,000 people's lives are ruined by the airport, how come there are not more folks protesting in this shot...? maybe I need to go to SpecSavers but I'm pretty sure I can only see FOUR.

Maybe the truth of the matter is that most folk in this town welcome the airport and many have no doubt used it since the improvements began.

http://www.flickr.co
m/photos/rosekb/4181
511016/lightbox/

disenfranchisedpast says...
10:34pm Tue 13 Nov 12

pipeman wrote:
Dennis Walker (second from the left) states 60,000 people's lives are ruined by the airport, how come there are not more folks protesting in this shot...? maybe I need to go to SpecSavers but I'm pretty sure I can only see FOUR.

Maybe the truth of the matter is that most folk in this town welcome the airport and many have no doubt used it since the improvements began.

http://www.flickr.co

m/photos/rosekb/4181

511016/lightbox/
I imagine that if 60000 peoples lives really were ruined by the airport then the SAEN facebook page would have a hell of a lot more members than the current 168

disenfranchisedpast says...
10:34pm Tue 13 Nov 12

pipeman wrote:
Dennis Walker (second from the left) states 60,000 people's lives are ruined by the airport, how come there are not more folks protesting in this shot...? maybe I need to go to SpecSavers but I'm pretty sure I can only see FOUR.

Maybe the truth of the matter is that most folk in this town welcome the airport and many have no doubt used it since the improvements began.

http://www.flickr.co

m/photos/rosekb/4181

511016/lightbox/
I imagine that if 60000 peoples lives really were ruined by the airport then the SAEN facebook page would have a hell of a lot more members than the current 168

fatgeezer says...
1:23pm Wed 14 Nov 12

disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote: Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal 2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport. Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much. And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink. Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary. These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "facts" there geezer.
disenfranchisedpast No not fast and loose fella. It is freely acknowledged that the majority of "new"jobs have "moved" to the airport from around the county. So that is not NEW jobs. The jobs and wiorkers that have moved to the airport, by and large do not support the local (Southend Borough) economy. They may support the economy of their home locality, but not Southend and area The two businesses that have closed were recording studio's, one of long standing (20 years+). The cost of additional work to the studios to counter the additional noise and vibration of aircraft flying overhead was restrictive in both cases. The cost of moving to a new premises including the building work and fitting required was also restrictive, hence the closure of two businesses. I will not identify the third business, for the time being. It is not my business, and I do not wish to prejudice any ongoing discussions As for the building workers, simply go and talk to a few. Most of them are billetted in a few B+B's near the seafront. They arrive in town on a Monday afternoon and go home Friday Lunchtime. The weekend shifts Arrive Thursday and go home Monday afternoon. They take their wages home. The tourist industry in Maldon has been hit according to local business, as it is no longer a place for a quiet afternoon out, and I have witnessed the noise myself from Wallasey Island. As for whoever MAX is. You make yourself look stupid with your uninformed libelous comments. I am none of the people your sad little mind imagines sir/madam. I happen to have commented on several articles in the past, but I have a life which does not centre around making childish remarks and insulting people whilst hiding behind the mask of a newspaper forum. I can assure you that you do not know me. As for IP's never lying. I believe you need to take a course on how the internet work. Now go play with the traffic you silly child
Ok I'll be blunt, you're talking cr@p. There is no application for a second runway. It would be public if there was. The theoretical recording studios would have needed soundproofing for the B757s, md80's, dc8's and airbuses that have been flying in and put of southend for maintenance for many many years prior to the expansion. So lets see some proof of these workers fleeing the area with their pay, or the shattered tourist industry in malden. Something a bit more concrete than your fantasies
To be honest Max, your attitude stinks, and debate with you is as pointless as debate with a child who stamps his feet.

I have lodged my point of view. I have certain knowledge of the facts, being the owner of one of the demised businesses.

You are welcome to accept what I say or deny it, that is your right. I, however will not degrade myself and come down to your level of argument, if that is what you call it, I certainly do not.

I therefore withdraw, safe in the knowledge that time will show where the truth lies. The game sir, for that is what you are playing here, is yours, and you are welcome to it

Joe Wildman says...
2:13pm Wed 14 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote: Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal 2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport. Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much. And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink. Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary. These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "facts" there geezer.
disenfranchisedpast No not fast and loose fella. It is freely acknowledged that the majority of "new"jobs have "moved" to the airport from around the county. So that is not NEW jobs. The jobs and wiorkers that have moved to the airport, by and large do not support the local (Southend Borough) economy. They may support the economy of their home locality, but not Southend and area The two businesses that have closed were recording studio's, one of long standing (20 years+). The cost of additional work to the studios to counter the additional noise and vibration of aircraft flying overhead was restrictive in both cases. The cost of moving to a new premises including the building work and fitting required was also restrictive, hence the closure of two businesses. I will not identify the third business, for the time being. It is not my business, and I do not wish to prejudice any ongoing discussions As for the building workers, simply go and talk to a few. Most of them are billetted in a few B+B's near the seafront. They arrive in town on a Monday afternoon and go home Friday Lunchtime. The weekend shifts Arrive Thursday and go home Monday afternoon. They take their wages home. The tourist industry in Maldon has been hit according to local business, as it is no longer a place for a quiet afternoon out, and I have witnessed the noise myself from Wallasey Island. As for whoever MAX is. You make yourself look stupid with your uninformed libelous comments. I am none of the people your sad little mind imagines sir/madam. I happen to have commented on several articles in the past, but I have a life which does not centre around making childish remarks and insulting people whilst hiding behind the mask of a newspaper forum. I can assure you that you do not know me. As for IP's never lying. I believe you need to take a course on how the internet work. Now go play with the traffic you silly child
Ok I'll be blunt, you're talking cr@p. There is no application for a second runway. It would be public if there was. The theoretical recording studios would have needed soundproofing for the B757s, md80's, dc8's and airbuses that have been flying in and put of southend for maintenance for many many years prior to the expansion. So lets see some proof of these workers fleeing the area with their pay, or the shattered tourist industry in malden. Something a bit more concrete than your fantasies
To be honest Max, your attitude stinks, and debate with you is as pointless as debate with a child who stamps his feet.

I have lodged my point of view. I have certain knowledge of the facts, being the owner of one of the demised businesses.

You are welcome to accept what I say or deny it, that is your right. I, however will not degrade myself and come down to your level of argument, if that is what you call it, I certainly do not.

I therefore withdraw, safe in the knowledge that time will show where the truth lies. The game sir, for that is what you are playing here, is yours, and you are welcome to it
fatgeezer:

I understand your stance on the view of Max Impact some people are firmly entrenched within one side of the argument or the other, max for you against the development.

However your comment above that you are “withdrawing” from the argument without providing any source of evidence for your statement that a planning application has been submitted for approval to a the construction of a second runway will only add emphasis to the fact that no such application has been submitted to date, furthermore those that know the area will be very doubtful of any future submission being made as there is no room for it and the local geology and nature of the land surrounding the airport virtually rules out any second runway.

I believe I have been polite and in no way have I been disrespectful towards yourself, I there for ask again please may you supply any and all evidence you have regarding this proposal for the second runway you speak of.

You say that you owned one of the companies that has been forced to close, this being fact why would you not name it, and where you were based, making statements that you do not substantiate with facts will only ever make people doubt what you or anybody has to say.

So please would you supply the information I have requested, if you fail to do so than I am sorry but I will only have to believe that you were creating a cloud of deception and only trying to trouble between people on this site and in the general populace of Southend.

I really would like to discuss this with you as it is an interesting debate when people actually talk and not just fight.

Joe

disenfranchisedpast says...
2:47pm Wed 14 Nov 12

fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote: Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal 2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport. Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much. And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink. Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary. These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "facts" there geezer.
disenfranchisedpast No not fast and loose fella. It is freely acknowledged that the majority of "new"jobs have "moved" to the airport from around the county. So that is not NEW jobs. The jobs and wiorkers that have moved to the airport, by and large do not support the local (Southend Borough) economy. They may support the economy of their home locality, but not Southend and area The two businesses that have closed were recording studio's, one of long standing (20 years+). The cost of additional work to the studios to counter the additional noise and vibration of aircraft flying overhead was restrictive in both cases. The cost of moving to a new premises including the building work and fitting required was also restrictive, hence the closure of two businesses. I will not identify the third business, for the time being. It is not my business, and I do not wish to prejudice any ongoing discussions As for the building workers, simply go and talk to a few. Most of them are billetted in a few B+B's near the seafront. They arrive in town on a Monday afternoon and go home Friday Lunchtime. The weekend shifts Arrive Thursday and go home Monday afternoon. They take their wages home. The tourist industry in Maldon has been hit according to local business, as it is no longer a place for a quiet afternoon out, and I have witnessed the noise myself from Wallasey Island. As for whoever MAX is. You make yourself look stupid with your uninformed libelous comments. I am none of the people your sad little mind imagines sir/madam. I happen to have commented on several articles in the past, but I have a life which does not centre around making childish remarks and insulting people whilst hiding behind the mask of a newspaper forum. I can assure you that you do not know me. As for IP's never lying. I believe you need to take a course on how the internet work. Now go play with the traffic you silly child
Ok I'll be blunt, you're talking cr@p. There is no application for a second runway. It would be public if there was. The theoretical recording studios would have needed soundproofing for the B757s, md80's, dc8's and airbuses that have been flying in and put of southend for maintenance for many many years prior to the expansion. So lets see some proof of these workers fleeing the area with their pay, or the shattered tourist industry in malden. Something a bit more concrete than your fantasies
To be honest Max, your attitude stinks, and debate with you is as pointless as debate with a child who stamps his feet.

I have lodged my point of view. I have certain knowledge of the facts, being the owner of one of the demised businesses.

You are welcome to accept what I say or deny it, that is your right. I, however will not degrade myself and come down to your level of argument, if that is what you call it, I certainly do not.

I therefore withdraw, safe in the knowledge that time will show where the truth lies. The game sir, for that is what you are playing here, is yours, and you are welcome to it
Are you implying that max and myself are the same person? Is this another statement you're making without evidence then?

I am sorry if you feel anyones attitude stinks, however you came onto a public forum and lied in an effort to stir up fear and resentment towards the airport, until you back up some of your statements with some proof they will remain lies.

Why not name your "business" what have you got to loose, how was your business able to survive the dc8's b757's and airbuses that operated into southend before easyjet arrived.

Flouncing off from an argument and saying your above it all is somewhat hamstrung by the fact you've been caught in a demonstrable lie regarding your earlier statements.

pipeman says...
4:59pm Wed 14 Nov 12

I think the poster from S.A.E.N has fled the scene of the crime ..lol

mrttev63 says...
5:42pm Wed 14 Nov 12

No press release today ?

Joe Wildman says...
5:57pm Wed 14 Nov 12

mrttev63 wrote:
No press release today ?
800 sign up for compensation for loss of property value apparently with more joining every day, or so the echo report.

What must also be pointed out is that an estate agent has said yes some homes have lost value because of the airport but other have gone up because of the airport.

I really would like Fatgeezer to respond to me but judging by his last post I will not get a reply, sadly comments boards like this are open to abuse and with no way of confirming who people are and no way of contacting them directly to continue discussions off board.

openspace says...
9:32am Thu 15 Nov 12

disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
disenfranchisedpast wrote:
fatgeezer wrote:
southendshrimper wrote: Great news, typical of the moaners. Don't tell anyone but a second runway will be built in secret. It will cross the current runway rochford golf course will be taken out. plans to be submitted next week, then the week after the runway will be built. shh don't tell anyone its a sercret!!!!!!!
Too late Pal 2nd runway to cater for a minimum 5 fold expansion in flights lready applied for BTW of the 100's of jobs created at the Airport, how many have gone to locals Over 90% of the construction staff were from other counties and shipped in for the build, with their wages going home, not into the Southend economy. Oh and what about the new firms at the Airport, who have brought staff in from previous premises to work at the airport. Most of those flying from Southend, commute to the Airport and spend no money in our local economy. There has been very little benefit to the town, when there could have been so much. And dont forget the local companies forced out of business by the expansion, I personally know of several affected businesses and one that is on the brink. Oh and the noise, like that caused by low flying aircraft over Maldon and along the Crouch estuary. These are facts not moans. I actually looked forward to the original expansion, until I looked deeper into what has been achieved. All a matter of public record. This is not a disaster for the town, but it is certainly NOT the benefit it has been made out to be either
I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "facts" there geezer.
disenfranchisedpast No not fast and loose fella. It is freely acknowledged that the majority of "new"jobs have "moved" to the airport from around the county. So that is not NEW jobs. The jobs and wiorkers that have moved to the airport, by and large do not support the local (Southend Borough) economy. They may support the economy of their home locality, but not Southend and area The two businesses that have closed were recording studio's, one of long standing (20 years+). The cost of additional work to the studios to counter the additional noise and vibration of aircraft flying overhead was restrictive in both cases. The cost of moving to a new premises including the building work and fitting required was also restrictive, hence the closure of two businesses. I will not identify the third business, for the time being. It is not my business, and I do not wish to prejudice any ongoing discussions As for the building workers, simply go and talk to a few. Most of them are billetted in a few B+B's near the seafront. They arrive in town on a Monday afternoon and go home Friday Lunchtime. The weekend shifts Arrive Thursday and go home Monday afternoon. They take their wages home. The tourist industry in Maldon has been hit according to local business, as it is no longer a place for a quiet afternoon out, and I have witnessed the noise myself from Wallasey Island. As for whoever MAX is. You make yourself look stupid with your uninformed libelous comments. I am none of the people your sad little mind imagines sir/madam. I happen to have commented on several articles in the past, but I have a life which does not centre around making childish remarks and insulting people whilst hiding behind the mask of a newspaper forum. I can assure you that you do not know me. As for IP's never lying. I believe you need to take a course on how the internet work. Now go play with the traffic you silly child
Ok I'll be blunt, you're talking cr@p. There is no application for a second runway. It would be public if there was. The theoretical recording studios would have needed soundproofing for the B757s, md80's, dc8's and airbuses that have been flying in and put of southend for maintenance for many many years prior to the expansion. So lets see some proof of these workers fleeing the area with their pay, or the shattered tourist industry in malden. Something a bit more concrete than your fantasies
To be honest Max, your attitude stinks, and debate with you is as pointless as debate with a child who stamps his feet.

I have lodged my point of view. I have certain knowledge of the facts, being the owner of one of the demised businesses.

You are welcome to accept what I say or deny it, that is your right. I, however will not degrade myself and come down to your level of argument, if that is what you call it, I certainly do not.

I therefore withdraw, safe in the knowledge that time will show where the truth lies. The game sir, for that is what you are playing here, is yours, and you are welcome to it
Are you implying that max and myself are the same person? Is this another statement you're making without evidence then?

I am sorry if you feel anyones attitude stinks, however you came onto a public forum and lied in an effort to stir up fear and resentment towards the airport, until you back up some of your statements with some proof they will remain lies.

Why not name your "business" what have you got to loose, how was your business able to survive the dc8's b757's and airbuses that operated into southend before easyjet arrived.

Flouncing off from an argument and saying your above it all is somewhat hamstrung by the fact you've been caught in a demonstrable lie regarding your earlier statements.
Agreed, the majority of anti-airport posters in these columns produce no facts or proof to back up their ludicrous claims, relying purely on heavily biased opinion. What is fact is that the airport has expanded is proving successful and
is providing jobs, whether for purely locals or from further afield is immaterial but I personally know of three people, who live in Southend and who have gained employment at the airport, doubtless many other locals are also working there.

tophatdt says...
11:48am Thu 15 Nov 12

There are no plans for a second runway at Southend. I have no evidence, but it's up to you to prove me wrong.

Sign of the times says...
1:40pm Thu 15 Nov 12

Max Impact wrote:
jayman wrote:
Max Impact wrote:
jayman wrote:
in other news..

The second coming of Christ?... Jesus seen in westcliff

meteor impact in Leigh. residents react to better taste in the tap water since the impact..

cure for all illness and diseases found by Southend scientist.

Southend is one of the largest towns in the UK with hundreds of major employers contributing to the string of long established local bushinesses. local residents react to this discovery. Beth hummingbottom said to our reporter "i was stunned to discover that Southend had more then one business.. i thought it was just the airport and nothing else" read the full story in tomorrows echo.
So how many people do you employ?
well..

two footmen
five butlers
five chamber maids
a groundsman
a game keeper
and a driver

im not sure who i employ on the lower estate. Charles handles all those things.

oh and there has to be al least seven hundred hands at the asbestos factory, I'm a responsible employer. i only ask the under tens to sweep the dusty floor...
Your lack of wit, proves that you offer employment to nobody, so why moan when jobs are being created.

Are you one of these people that will moan about a compnay if you are turned down for a job because your skills are lacking in the area of compnay work in.

Would you agree that the airport is a major and important employment centre for Southend, that it has created a large number of jobs that would not have come to this area of Essex had the airport not expanded.
"Are you one of these people that will moan about a compnay if you are turned down for a job because your skills are lacking in the area of compnay work in."

Dur?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree