- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@Essex_Echo
Follow us
- Find us on Facebook
Echo
Like us on Facebook
Police boss calls on council to keep key domestic abuse job (From Echo)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us »
Police boss calls on council to keep key domestic abuse job
9:00am Monday 4th February 2013 in Local News
Police boss calls on council to keep key domestic abuse job
THE new Essex Police & Crime Commissioner has criticised plans to scrap a key figure in Southend’s fight against domestic abuse.
Southend Council wants to do away with its domestic abuse partnership manager in a bid to cut costs but Nick Alston voiced his concerns during his first ever “public engagement” meeting held at the town’s civic centre.
It comes after he revealed a four-year policing and crime plan which has tackling domestic abuse at its heart.
On hearing the role was in jeopardy, Mr Alston said: “I’m disappointed to hear it sounds as though we will be losing that in Southend. “I will certainly be arguing against that.”
He said he had been trying to find money specifically for more domestic violence advisors, as there are 44,000 victims of domestic abuse in Essex every year.
The role of domestic abuse partnership manager, held by Althea Cribb, is financed by Southend Council. They say scrapping it will save £105,000 from the budget.
However, Simon Ford, Southend Council’s community safety partnership manager, said the loss of the job was not a done deal. He said: “That’s just a proposal at the moment. There’s a whole consultation going through.”
Lib Dem councillor Graham Longley said they were in talks about whether there were other options.
To have your say on the police and crime plan go to http://www.essex.pcc.police.uk/2013/01/the-draft-police-and-crime-plan-for-essex/
Comments(8)
GrumpyofLeigh
says...
12:09pm Mon 4 Feb 13
emcee
says...
1:23pm Mon 4 Feb 13
If the EPCC thinks the council should keep the post and he thinks it's crucial as part of his crime plan then Essex Police should pay for that person. Why should it come out of council budgets?
GrumpyofLeigh
says...
2:22pm Mon 4 Feb 13
stopmoaning1
says...
4:54pm Mon 4 Feb 13
GrumpyofLeigh wrote:That’s a worthless argument. We pay for the post either through Council Tax or the Police Authority portion of our Council Tax bill. Have a look at your Council Tax bill and you’ll see how we pay either way
'Cos the post probably does a good slug of work you might think falls to the Police but without it appearing in their budgets: thats why they are so keen.
GrumpyofLeigh
says...
5:43pm Mon 4 Feb 13
At my end, I dont wish to pay for anything called "partnership manager" - its a wishy-washy bit of public sector nonsense brought about because a process clearly doesnt work and needs coordination. Thats regardless of whether that goes through the police element of local tax or council bit.
stopmoaning1
says...
8:06pm Mon 4 Feb 13
GrumpyofLeigh wrote:Yes, you've just said the same as me. i don't want to pay for it either through the SBC Council Tax or the Council Tax contribution to the Police Authority
re SM1 - the arguments for scrapping the job are separate from the Police's arguments here which are about which public sector body coughs up. Ask the police to pay for it if it is so important and the answer will doubtless be "no".
At my end, I dont wish to pay for anything called "partnership manager" - its a wishy-washy bit of public sector nonsense brought about because a process clearly doesnt work and needs coordination. Thats regardless of whether that goes through the police element of local tax or council bit.
GrumpyofLeigh
says...
10:17pm Mon 4 Feb 13
stopmoaning1 says...
10:51am Mon 4 Feb 13