15,000 homes could be built in Basildon despite Tory pledge (From Echo)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us »
15,000 homes could be built in Basildon despite Tory pledge
9:00am Wednesday 27th February 2013 in Local News
15,000 homes could be built in Basildon despite Tory pledge
RULING Tories have been accused of “playing politics” over house building targets after it emerged more than 15,000 homes could be built across Basildon in the next 20 years.
The Tories won last year’s local election promising to build just 6,400 homes over the next 20 years and releasing no green belt for housing.
But now its emerged Basildon Council was given Govenment guidance to build 21,000 homes and may have to raise its housing estimate in its local development framework.
A council source told the Echo: “There were three options, 6,400, 10,800 and 21,000. The Government guidance said 21,000, which is way too many, but they had to be realistic and come somewhere closer to that. They opted for the lowest level which was never going to get through a planning inspector.
“Now while preparing the final drafts of the local development framework it is going to have to be higher than 15,000 to get through.”
The housing bombshell comes as residents continue to fight plans for nearly 1,500 homes at either end of the borough, with 750 homes planned for Little Chalvedon Hall in Bowers Gifford and 725 set top be built at Dry Street in Basildon.
Phil Rackley, leader of the Basildon independent Labour group, said: “I pointed out at the time the 6,400 was completely unrealistic and they were just playing politics. I am worried about where these additional houses will be built already a great deal of pressure on Basildon at Bowers Gifford and the Ford Dunton site. Basildon is overcrowded and if 16,000 is the number it will have to be spread across the borough.”
The Echo also understands the Conservatives won’t reveal new housing until after the Essex County Council elections in May.
Council leader Tony Ball said: “I cannot go into what the figure will be as it is still being worked on, and the figures are now not likely to be published until the summer, but this is due to ongoing surveys and nothing to do with any elections.
“If you use the government’s house building calculations then you meet the over 21,000 figure, but you have to take into account other factors, and that is what the surveys are about, so it will not be anything like as high as that figure.”
Comments(26)
TheWizzard
says...
9:49am Wed 27 Feb 13
hothead wrote:Fighting the huge growth? what about the uturn on dry street? and as for bowers gifford i doubt that will be safe neither. There is a councillor from Nottingham who was on the thames gateway project. As is Tony Ball
The Labour councillor is the one playing politics here.
All Councils are being forced to provide more homes to meet demand. Do you expect Basildon Council to just agree to 21,000 homes, of course not, so they have done the right thing by fighting the hige growth and instead trying to fight developments such as that at Bowers Gifford.
Nebs
says...
10:11am Wed 27 Feb 13
DrSpiffSpaffington
says...
10:11am Wed 27 Feb 13
5759
says...
10:31am Wed 27 Feb 13
Well done Basildon Council on this one, spot on.
Cosmo Spring
says...
10:58am Wed 27 Feb 13
People still fall for the Tory line.
Woodenspoon
says...
11:04am Wed 27 Feb 13
Get over it, accept it. There is a huge waiting list for houses in every area, not just Basildon or Essex. Unless you are willing to chain yourselves to drums of concrete etc and protest then you will get no where. But just remember that by doing so, you will put up everyone's Council Tax to pay for your 5 mins of disruption. If you don't like it, you are free to move to another area.
Maybe the occupy groups should start taking over the gardens/grounds of MP's and such like rather than buildings to get their point across.
Having houses on green belt land stops the Travelers from buying them and putting their "Homes" on them.
Start to see the bigger picture and longer than till the end of the year and see what's good for the area/country and ALL the people rather than just your short-sighted self for a change.
Cosmo Spring
says...
11:21am Wed 27 Feb 13
Cosmo Spring
says...
11:23am Wed 27 Feb 13
Cosmo Spring
says...
11:25am Wed 27 Feb 13
People aren't necessarily against the building of houses it's the systematic raping and pillaging of open, green space that people object to.
Woodenspoon
says...
11:43am Wed 27 Feb 13
Cosmo Spring wrote:I am sure that if there was some article in the paper about using that site for houses someone would protest against it, either stating that there is now some new form of tarmac louse or newt and that the ground would be unsafe for the kids play on due to the amount of old engine oil etc that had leaked out of the cars while being parked there etc etc not to mention the noise from the train line and the fumes from the BP garage.
then there's the ex-car park opposite the BP on Roundacre that's a good brownfield site.
People aren't necessarily against the building of houses it's the systematic raping and pillaging of open, green space that people object to.
5759
says...
11:54am Wed 27 Feb 13
We won't have this chance again!!!!!
Those that don't like it can always move to Tilbury.
Cosmo Spring
says...
12:01pm Wed 27 Feb 13
This is a fantastic opportunity to take this place by the scruff of the neck and sort it out for THE FUTURE. Lets get some nice quality housing in
Well said.
Lets try and preserve as much open, green space as we can at the same time though.
The older estates should be redeveloped to increase housing stocks by more efficient and intelligent design.
DrSpiffSpaffington
says...
12:09pm Wed 27 Feb 13
Cosmo Spring
says...
12:35pm Wed 27 Feb 13
DrSpiffSpaffington wrote:voters will continue to vote the in a tory led council regardless of this.
So are areas like barking & dagenham, romford, canning town desireable places to live? No they are not, they have been concreted over to house the 3rd world just like what is happening in basildon. If basildon is over-crowded, then people who dont own their own home should stop having babies, people should stop applying for council housing from outside the area. When you look how close we are to london, and you look at the state of southend now, basildon is f**king lucky not to be over-run with slimebags and all the council seem to be doing is trying to change that for their own financial gain
Nebs
says...
4:32pm Wed 27 Feb 13
Woodenspoon wrote:I doubt that local people will be given the new houses.
We need more houses, yet everyone complains when its near them.
Get over it, accept it. There is a huge waiting list for houses in every area, not just Basildon or Essex. Unless you are willing to chain yourselves to drums of concrete etc and protest then you will get no where. But just remember that by doing so, you will put up everyone's Council Tax to pay for your 5 mins of disruption. If you don't like it, you are free to move to another area.
Maybe the occupy groups should start taking over the gardens/grounds of MP's and such like rather than buildings to get their point across.
Having houses on green belt land stops the Travelers from buying them and putting their "Homes" on them.
Start to see the bigger picture and longer than till the end of the year and see what's good for the area/country and ALL the people rather than just your short-sighted self for a change.
TheWizzard
says...
4:55pm Wed 27 Feb 13
5759 wrote:Wouldn't call any of the builds quality housing, one of the new houses has already got scaffolding up in gloucester park, and if you do a bit of research new home owners of these so called quality homes are regretting buying them now
This is a fantastic opportunity to take this place by the scruff of the neck and sort it out for THE FUTURE. Lets get some nice quality housing in and make Basildon (which has become a laughing stock) a desirable place to live.
We won't have this chance again!!!!!
Those that don't like it can always move to Tilbury.
TheWizzard
says...
4:57pm Wed 27 Feb 13
Woodenspoon wrote:None of these houses will reduce the council waiting list,
We need more houses, yet everyone complains when its near them.
Get over it, accept it. There is a huge waiting list for houses in every area, not just Basildon or Essex. Unless you are willing to chain yourselves to drums of concrete etc and protest then you will get no where. But just remember that by doing so, you will put up everyone's Council Tax to pay for your 5 mins of disruption. If you don't like it, you are free to move to another area.
Maybe the occupy groups should start taking over the gardens/grounds of MP's and such like rather than buildings to get their point across.
Having houses on green belt land stops the Travelers from buying them and putting their "Homes" on them.
Start to see the bigger picture and longer than till the end of the year and see what's good for the area/country and ALL the people rather than just your short-sighted self for a change.
Lastlaugh...
says...
1:22am Thu 28 Feb 13
Cosmo Spring wrote:Is there anyone left in Essex that actually believes a word, the leader of the Basildon council, Tony Balls says?
politicians not telling the truth to get elected, what a shocker.....
People still fall for the Tory line.
These people did and looked what happened to them
http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=MIIptoRzQ
aw
Lastlaugh...
says...
1:24am Thu 28 Feb 13
Woodenspoon wrote:So to preserve green belt from Travellers it should be built on...wacko!
We need more houses, yet everyone complains when its near them.
Get over it, accept it. There is a huge waiting list for houses in every area, not just Basildon or Essex. Unless you are willing to chain yourselves to drums of concrete etc and protest then you will get no where. But just remember that by doing so, you will put up everyone's Council Tax to pay for your 5 mins of disruption. If you don't like it, you are free to move to another area.
Maybe the occupy groups should start taking over the gardens/grounds of MP's and such like rather than buildings to get their point across.
Having houses on green belt land stops the Travelers from buying them and putting their "Homes" on them.
Start to see the bigger picture and longer than till the end of the year and see what's good for the area/country and ALL the people rather than just your short-sighted self for a change.
DrSpiffSpaffington
says...
2:18pm Thu 28 Feb 13
beverman
says...
9:27pm Thu 28 Feb 13
DrSpiffSpaffington wrote:Why wouldn't you even know that you were in Europe if you took a train to Canning Town DrSpiffSpaffington?
I beg anybody who thinks this is a good idea to take a train to canning town, its frightening the state of it now you wouldnt even know you were in europe if it wasnt for the extortionate price of a train fare
DrSpiffSpaffington
says...
12:06pm Fri 1 Mar 13
beverman wrote:Gee, i wonder...
DrSpiffSpaffington wrote:Why wouldn't you even know that you were in Europe if you took a train to Canning Town DrSpiffSpaffington?
I beg anybody who thinks this is a good idea to take a train to canning town, its frightening the state of it now you wouldnt even know you were in europe if it wasnt for the extortionate price of a train fare
beverman
says...
12:52pm Fri 1 Mar 13
DrSpiffSpaffington wrote:Same here, why won't you say?
beverman wrote:Gee, i wonder...
DrSpiffSpaffington wrote:Why wouldn't you even know that you were in Europe if you took a train to Canning Town DrSpiffSpaffington?
I beg anybody who thinks this is a good idea to take a train to canning town, its frightening the state of it now you wouldnt even know you were in europe if it wasnt for the extortionate price of a train fare
DrSpiffSpaffington
says...
2:14pm Fri 1 Mar 13
cathyw
says...
5:01pm Fri 1 Mar 13
the only option now is for families to have a home is to privatly rent. and the rents are so high they cant afford to save the deposit for 1 of these places. ive had fliers comethrough the door advertizing the houses on markhams chase area, knocking the price down. so if they cant sell those places what gives them the idea they will see the 600 odd places they have earmarked for the top of ballards walk. where will they go to the doctors as our surgey wont be taking them. what about the schools?? the hspital cant cope now. big mistake all these new builds. and if they want to build how about the outskirts of Billericay lots of lovely feilds there they can use.!!!
hothead says...
9:22am Wed 27 Feb 13
All Councils are being forced to provide more homes to meet demand. Do you expect Basildon Council to just agree to 21,000 homes, of course not, so they have done the right thing by fighting the hige growth and instead trying to fight developments such as that at Bowers Gifford.