Ofsted rap for Leigh Road Baptist Church Pre-School after child hurt

Echo: Ofsted rap for pre-school after child hurt Ofsted rap for pre-school after child hurt

INSPECTORS have described the care at a Leigh pre-school as being inadequate after it failed to notify Ofsted of an unexplained injury to a child within two weeks.

A report into Leigh Road Baptist Church Pre-School in Marguerite Drive published last week has rated it as inadequate.

Inspector Claire Parnell said in the report that the centre was not following all required procedures to protect children from harm.

A complaint was made against the pre-school in October for failing to notify the inspectorate about an unexplained injury to a child within 14 days.

Investigations led to the pre-school being cleared of having anything to do with the injury. But Ms Parnell’s report this week criticised them over the administrative procedure.

She said: “Agencies that have statutory duty to protect children from harm are not kept informed of concerns relating to children in the setting’s care. Therefore children are not protected from harm.”

The report does say that staff do have the right training and knowledge to keep children out of danger. But it added: “The setting has failed to inform Ofsted of a significant event within the given timescale, therefore, children’s safety is not appropriately promoted. This is an offence and a breach of requirement.”

The pre-school was also criticised over its teaching strategies not offering enough for more able children to do, and for not monitoring their development enough. But it was praised for children’s understanding of numbers, communication and physical skills being enhanced through effective teaching, both indoors and outdoors.

A spokesman for the pre-school said: “We at Leigh Road Baptist Church Pre School have always taken the safety and development of all the children in our care extremely seriously.

“We are grateful for the Ofsted inspection report as we welcome any feedback that highlights areas of our provision that can be improved.

“We want to assure everyone, particularly parents, that we have already taken steps to ensure our policies and practices are robust and comprehensive.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:27pm Mon 23 Dec 13

the citizen says...

Was\anyone else confused by the headline and then the content of the article? Important to note that the Ofsted "rap" as the Echo puts it in the headline was for an administrative issue rather than for the incident, for which the pre-school was totally cleared of all responsibility. If this has highlighted a weakness in the pre-school administrative system then that is a good thing, and I am sure it wont happen again and other pre-schools will learnt too - but can we be more careful with the sensationalist headlines so as not to mislead the reader.
Was\anyone else confused by the headline and then the content of the article? Important to note that the Ofsted "rap" as the Echo puts it in the headline was for an administrative issue rather than for the incident, for which the pre-school was totally cleared of all responsibility. If this has highlighted a weakness in the pre-school administrative system then that is a good thing, and I am sure it wont happen again and other pre-schools will learnt too - but can we be more careful with the sensationalist headlines so as not to mislead the reader. the citizen

8:45pm Mon 23 Dec 13

DogsMessInLeigh says...

the citizen wrote:
Was\anyone else confused by the headline and then the content of the article? Important to note that the Ofsted "rap" as the Echo puts it in the headline was for an administrative issue rather than for the incident, for which the pre-school was totally cleared of all responsibility. If this has highlighted a weakness in the pre-school administrative system then that is a good thing, and I am sure it wont happen again and other pre-schools will learnt too - but can we be more careful with the sensationalist headlines so as not to mislead the reader.
agreed....i think the headline was meant to grab attention, thats what headlines are for...even if the actual story reads a bit differant., nothing to see here....move along.
[quote][p][bold]the citizen[/bold] wrote: Was\anyone else confused by the headline and then the content of the article? Important to note that the Ofsted "rap" as the Echo puts it in the headline was for an administrative issue rather than for the incident, for which the pre-school was totally cleared of all responsibility. If this has highlighted a weakness in the pre-school administrative system then that is a good thing, and I am sure it wont happen again and other pre-schools will learnt too - but can we be more careful with the sensationalist headlines so as not to mislead the reader.[/p][/quote]agreed....i think the headline was meant to grab attention, thats what headlines are for...even if the actual story reads a bit differant., nothing to see here....move along. DogsMessInLeigh

10:47pm Mon 23 Dec 13

woolstone says...

OFSTED's favourite word is inadequate and their other favourite saying is needs improvement.
OFSTED's favourite word is inadequate and their other favourite saying is needs improvement. woolstone

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree