Local News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


‘Park legally to put us out of business’

At work – Mark Stone, director of LBS Enforcement, says the common view of clampers is unfair At work – Mark Stone, director of LBS Enforcement, says the common view of clampers is unfair

Car clampers face threats of violence and even wear anti-stab jackets to prevent them becoming victims of motorists, angry at being forced to pay hundreds of pounds for their vehicles to be released.

It is a tough job, but the boss of a Southend-based company says it could go out of business in an instant.

Mark Stone, director of LBS Enforcement, explained: “If every motorist read our signs, which we think are the clearest used by any clamping company, and stayed off private land, we wouldn’t make any money.

“But do you think that will happen?”

Perhaps many motorists across south Essex will have little sympathy and would like nothing more than to see clampers go out of business – but demand for such services is on the increase.

Set up less then two years ago by two former bailiffs, LBS now has contracts to clamp and remove cars from more 100 locations across Essex.

Mr Stone said the common view of clampers was unfair.

He added: “We’ve been in the Echo at least 20 times when private motorists complain, but what about the landowner, the person who owns where motorists have parked?

“They’re paying money for land they see as critical to the success of their business. It’s where they want customers to park, but they’re being obstructed by motorists using their private land for free.”

The source of the anger the company faces is the cost a car owner must pay to recover their vehicle, starting at nearly £300.

The price is high, Mr Stone says, due to the overheads of running the business.

He said: “To get just one of our patrol vans on the road costs around £3,000, a tow truck costs £15,000, maintenance is about £6,000, and vehicle insurance is £15,000.

“The rest of our insurance is around £12,000 and we’ve just been billed for £4,000 for the latest round of staff training.”

The company has recruited 12 clampers in its short existence and they work on commission, getting a cut of the fee a motorist pays to free their vehicle.

Staff are trained to get a BTEC in conflict management. They wear uniforms, carry ID and LBS insists they adopt a strict procedure when clamping a car.

At least three photographs must be taken, proving the offence, and LBS warns motorists anyone trying to remove a clamp can be prosecuted for criminal damage.

LBS says all the properties they are contracted to protect have warning signs.

Mr Stone said: “We operate exactly how a certificated bailiff would work and effectively we’re clearing what has been flytipped on private land.

“We only operate on private land and we’re removing something the landowner doesn’t want on their land.”

One of LBS’s customers in Southend is Mike Martin, the manager of National Cash Advances, in Southchurch Road.

He said: “We’ve got parking behind our premises and we just got more and more fed up finding no space when we arrived for work every morning.

“We had been late opening because of this and it even affects our customers.

“LBS does a good service and checks, when the shop is open, if cars are permitted on our space.”

Land owners tell LBS exactly which vehicles are allowed to park where, 24 hours a day.

More than 20 sites LBS is contracted to clamp and remove cars from are in Southend, but its clampers patrol areas in Romford, Billericay, Chelmsford, Colchester, Benfleet and Brentwood.

LBS says it also keeps a close eye on proposed legislation to control clampers and works closely with the Security Industry Authority.

Mr Stone admits there are “cowboy” clampers out there, but says his firm operates professionally.

LBS operates on a zero tolerance, 24-hour-a-day basis and cars it removes are taken to its compound in Camper Road, Southend, which has had to be reinforced after an angry victim tried to break in to get his vehicle back.

Comments(31)

thelonewhinger says...
10:38am Wed 17 Feb 10

I wonder what the rake-off is for businesses using these services? Whatever it is it will be greater than the amount it would cost to erect lockable barriers or gates to deter illegal parking.
These clamping firms are cash scams pure and simple and their days are numbered.

PJR says...
11:17am Wed 17 Feb 10

perhaps these clamping companies could publish a list of the car parks and other areas they cover - so the public has even more idea of where not to park?

For the record I agree - if you park legally you wouldn't have a problem. I parked on double yellows recently, and got a ticket. There was no where else I could park for work. Did I complain? Nope, I knew I'd done wrong, I took the chance and I've paid.

If you don't like the consequences, don't commit the action!

vangebasildon says...
1:27pm Wed 17 Feb 10

The company has recruited 12 clampers in its short existence and they work on commission, getting a cut of the fee a motorist pays to free their vehicle.

Thats says it all with regard to no leway given by the clampers.

'V' says...
1:57pm Wed 17 Feb 10

Aw diddums! Is da poor ickle clamper-wamper feelin hard done by?

My heart bleeds. If you don't like the abuse don't be a legalised mugger. These scum deserve no sympathy.

Nebs says...
2:35pm Wed 17 Feb 10

The clampers do a good job. If all the law enforcement agencies operated zero tolerance, like these firms do, then the world would be a better place.

firedog says...
4:35pm Wed 17 Feb 10

If you take a chance,dont winge when you get caught.what would be the point of having lockable barriers if the car park is for your customers?

Bonneville Bert says...
5:35pm Wed 17 Feb 10

Ex bailiffs, now clampers??
Nice people!!!!
Bullies in uniform.

BASILBRUSH says...
5:52pm Wed 17 Feb 10

If I park illegally (which I don't knowingly) then I expect a fine. But not extortion. I have no sympathy for him. The fees are way out of proportion.

Buffalo Bill says...
6:06pm Wed 17 Feb 10

I got clamped, signs weren't easy to see or read and I had to pay £250 to get car released...... BUT all I had to do was contact the legal service i get with my car insurance, they engaged a solicitor and I took land owner to court and won £250 back, plus costs of £130.

You see what I discovered is that there is NO law that covers parking on private property, it's all done under contract law and contract law does not allow for PENALTY CHARGES. It's case law.

Should you wish to know more, then a trip to http://forums.pepipo
o.com/index.php?show
forum=30 will let you know how to fight these parasites.

Buffalo Bill says...
6:12pm Wed 17 Feb 10

PS you have SIX years from the date you paid clampers to take them to court and get your money back including statutory 8% interest! Remember to include the land owner in your claim..

It's easy to wipe the smug little smile off of Mr Stone's face, only costs you £25 to do and lots of legal help is available on link above

westie says...
9:10pm Wed 17 Feb 10

Thank you Buffalo for the information. I have been on to the link that you give and it is very interesting. If this information is used by the many thousands of victims involved, the clamping industry could be brought to it's knees. Thanks again......

Beth the original one says...
9:40pm Wed 17 Feb 10

ok, so the clampers extort huge amounts of money, but as the man says, if you park legally, he cant clamp you. People that park on private land must be totally thick if they dont realise its private, especially in southend, Southend council have covered every spare bit of land they own with a carpark where you have to pay a fee, so it stands to reason if you find a plot of land that hasnt got a carpark space marked in it, and hasnt got a machine nearby, it must be private. All you whingers go on about the clampers extortionate rates, yet you think its perfectly acceptable to dump your car on someones private property for free. Mr stone said you lot can easily put him out of business and he is right. Park in a carpark and pay the relevent fee, if he hasnt got something to clamp he cant charge a fee can he, its not rocket science.

Buffalo Bill says...
12:31am Thu 18 Feb 10

Beth,

You ARE PARKED LEGALLY!, There IS NO LAW that covers private parking!!
Ergo you cannot be "parked illegally".

Just take 5 minutes to look at the price he charges.

In Scotland, Mr Price's activities are illegal.

Mr Price's firm have lost cases because their receipts do not meet the requirement's of the law/SIA requirements.

Beth the original one says...
7:20am Thu 18 Feb 10

Buffalo Bill wrote:
Beth, You ARE PARKED LEGALLY!, There IS NO LAW that covers private parking!! Ergo you cannot be "parked illegally". Just take 5 minutes to look at the price he charges. In Scotland, Mr Price's activities are illegal. Mr Price's firm have lost cases because their receipts do not meet the requirement's of the law/SIA requirements.
so obviously you are one of the people that think its perfectly ok to park for free on private land that belongs to someone else.

how selfish, you are typical of what is wrong with this country, we all think its perfectly ok to take what doesnt belong to us and when the owner kicks up a fuss, you complain.

radioman says...
2:48pm Thu 18 Feb 10

When any topic falls to the yah-boo stage, it is time to move on to something else.

Buffalo Bill says...
6:01pm Thu 18 Feb 10

Beth the original one wrote:
Buffalo Bill wrote:
Beth, You ARE PARKED LEGALLY!, There IS NO LAW that covers private parking!! Ergo you cannot be "parked illegally". Just take 5 minutes to look at the price he charges. In Scotland, Mr Price's activities are illegal. Mr Price's firm have lost cases because their receipts do not meet the requirement's of the law/SIA requirements.
so obviously you are one of the people that think its perfectly ok to park for free on private land that belongs to someone else.

how selfish, you are typical of what is wrong with this country, we all think its perfectly ok to take what doesnt belong to us and when the owner kicks up a fuss, you complain.
No Beth, I parked in a shop's car park, visited the shop and spent a fairly substantial sum of money, took items home, discovered that I needed a wall bracket, and other items and drove back to shop to buy them.

The clapers alleged that I had overstayed the allotted 2 hours maximum time I could park in this car park, (which has around 300 spaces). They had taken my cars index number when I arrived at 11, and when I returned at 1.15 they thought I had been parked all that time. (Despite the fact I was in a different parking space!).

You see if you knew what you were talking about you would find that:
Landowners get approached by these nefarious companies and are told that:

"We will manage your car park for you, and share any additional revenue.." Just google "Parking Control" and you will see how it works.

So, my vehicle was clamped while I was discussing options with a salesman, because the clamping company had said it had been parked for 3 hours.... (It was actually 1 hour in morning, then 30 mins later on in afternoon).

The Manager of the store even tried to get clamp removed, but guess what Clampers wouldn't do it until I paid.

Now you my little pixie cake, may think that is fair and equitable, but I don't. I think it is unfair as I didn't actually break any contract with them. Guess what the clampers work on commission.

You see, Beth, my little fairy cake, I happen to believe that clamping someone who has stuck to the rules, and has spent a fairly substantial sum of money in a shop that has a customer car park and then finding I have to pay £250 to get my own car back, when there is no law covering it is wrong.

The Judge agreed. (The Solicitor for clamping company just looked embarrassed, especially when one of the owners of company gave his "evidence". (Called an unreliable witness by Judge).

So Beth my little swiss roll, perhaps you think that I should have just paid the £250 and drove off? Is that what you would have done?

Beth, my little fudge sundae, it might be worth actually asking what happened before giving me your opinion of what I am like, because not only are you wrong, but you now look a little silly!

Beth the original one says...
6:40pm Thu 18 Feb 10

far from it, you have now chosen to elaborate, whereas earlier you was stating that its legal to park on other peoples property,

Have you had time to think up an excuse as to the whys and wherefores. AND i think you will find that even in most car parks, they state that a return within 2 hours is prohibited, probably because that is when the "wardens" do their rounds, and if they see a car that they have already recorded still there, they can assume that it has gone over the alloted time, unless of course a valid parking ticket has been purchased. You see there is nothing in your previous post to state that you had parked in a shop car park, you just stated thatyou took them to court and won, now you have chosen to elaborate. If you want to claim innocence, at least have the courtesy of putting the whole story, instead of letting everyone assume you had parked on private property without permission.

Buffalo Bill says...
8:21pm Thu 18 Feb 10

Beth.... Yawn, couldn't be bothered to read your post..... (BTW signs were so faded and placed too high to read.)

The Judge said it was illegal, Martyn Lewis said it was illegal, Scottish parliament said it was illegal.... Seems only you and the clamper (a relation perhaps?) seems to think it is legal.

As I said, if you can find ONE LAW that says it is illegal to park on private property then please enlighten us.

If you can't (here's a clue there isn't one), then it can't be illegal. (The Solicitor for clamping company couldn't find one either).

You silly little Belgian bun...... Run along and talk about something you actually know something about, or you will just make yourself look even sillier...... Did you go to special school???

Buffalo Bill says...
8:35pm Thu 18 Feb 10

This MP researched the matter and found that clampers are wrong:

http://www.poptel.or
g.uk/lynne.jones/par
kingenforcement.htm

A High Court judge said it's not illegal too http://news.bbc.co.u
k/1/hi/england/londo
n/8388077.stm Landowners only own the "Sub Soil"

Beth the original one says...
7:14am Fri 19 Feb 10

i didnt say i said they were legal, i just pointed out that if people parked in proper places and paid the correct fee, you cant be clamped. I also think that its grossly unfair of "some" people that think its ok to park on other peoples property without permission and then gripe when the owners make a noise.

I bet if some selfish lil toerag parked his car on your land, you would be less than happy too, but your attitude implies that you think its ok to do it to others.

Buffalo Bill says...
4:56pm Fri 19 Feb 10

Beth my little sausage roll, the article says:

"Park legally to put us out of business", which implies that they have some kind of legal right to clamp you.... They don't.

if you have ever received a parking ticket from one of these companies, you would discover that the ticket will look remarkably official. It will be called something that can be shortened to PCN (Legal tickets are called Parking Charge Notices), these scum bags will call them Parking Civil Notices or something else made up to try and fool you into thinking you should pay.

The truth is that you don't and whether I would like someone parking on my property or not is immaterial, I still would not have the right to steal £250 from them!

These companies are nothing more than con artists who rely on the gullibility of the public.

Haven't you noticed that they haven't posted on here? But you can bet they have checked the forum out.

As I said don't be fooled, they have no legal powers at all, if you get clamped, go to land registry then issue summons to land owner and parking company. They will ose and you will get your money back and best of all, (as in my case, they wouldn't pay), I therefore got court appointed Bailiffs to attend their premises, (ironically they tend to use mobiles and PO boxes), and state that certain items would be removed unless they paid up (including costs of Bailiffs). It was a delight to watch these "Big men", who like bullying the weak, acting all meek and mild...

Bet I am not on their Christmas card list! LOL

So that ends my post my little Cornish Pastie.

Be good people, pleasant dreams

Last Poster says...
2:38am Sat 20 Feb 10

Yeah but I pay our wondrous council £500 a year to park in one of their leaky lock ups and if, as happened just the other day, some thoughtless child of an unwed couple parks on my run up I wouldn't clamp his motor.

Burn it, maybe but I don't think clamping is right!

essexboi1989 says...
9:46am Sat 20 Feb 10

nothin like a nice b!tchy argument, keep it up buffalo bill and beth lol

Colleen G says...
10:53am Sat 20 Feb 10

Seems some dumbdumbs just don't get it, no doubt the same dumbdumbs who don't get the need for speed cameras or any other roolz!!

It doesn't matter if it cost you a £1 getting clamped or £1000, the point is DO NOT park there, the owner doesnt want YOU parking on their land so the penalties are almost academic. The implication here is that some dumbdumbs are prepared to break the rules if the price is right. To those I suggest they start using the brain they were gifted with and quit flapping. Do the crime you do the time, something we should applaud in these lawless times, someone getting punished for breaking roolz.

The private clampers do a job neither the Police or The Council will do to help out private landowners. Like most things these days we are left to fight our own battles. So don't blame the landowners, or indeed anyone else, for your own stupidity.

As the guy said if you behaved then he would be out of business instantly.

Now you understand that simple logic, not rocket science, lets try something a little harder:

One of the fusion reactions taking place in the core of less massive stars (as part of the so-called p-p-chain) is the fusion of two helium-3 nuclei (helium with 2 protons, 1 neutron) resulting in helium-4 (2 protons, 2 neutrons). For helium-3, the binding energy per nucleon is 2.6 MeV, for helium-4 a whopping great 7.1 MeV.

When two helium-3 nuclei merge, producing one helium-4 nucleus and two single protons, the binding energies before the fusion add up to twice the binding energy for helium-3, which is twice 7.8 MeV (t.8 MeV=3 times 2.6 MeV) or 15.6 MeV. After fusion has ocurred, the binding energy is that of the helium-4 nucleus, 4 times 7.1 or 28.5 MeV. The difference of 12.8 MeV is set free; it contributes to the kinetic energies of the resulting helium-4 nucleus and of the two single protons.

Answers on a postcard please. Winner gets a free lunch in the Railway Tavern Pitsea.

Beth the original one says...
4:19pm Sun 21 Feb 10

essexboi1989 wrote:
nothin like a nice b!tchy argument, keep it up buffalo bill and beth lol
cant be bothered essexboi, he is of the same calibre as the biatch i came across in tesco, it was raining i admit, but she rammed her car into the gaps between spaces that is designed for mums and toddlers and the disabled, and when i pointed out that it wasnt a parking space, she asked me if i knew her, i said "no thank god, all my friends respect other people and their needs"

Because she had parked her car their, the car with the blue badge displayed next to her wouldnt be able to be moved because the driver wouldnt be able to open the door, nor would that person be able to shimmy across the seats via passenger door, like an able bodied person could, but then all able bodied friends of mine would walk rather than take up such a space.

essexboi1989 says...
6:25pm Mon 22 Feb 10

Beth the original one wrote:
essexboi1989 wrote:
nothin like a nice b!tchy argument, keep it up buffalo bill and beth lol
cant be bothered essexboi, he is of the same calibre as the biatch i came across in tesco, it was raining i admit, but she rammed her car into the gaps between spaces that is designed for mums and toddlers and the disabled, and when i pointed out that it wasnt a parking space, she asked me if i knew her, i said "no thank god, all my friends respect other people and their needs"

Because she had parked her car their, the car with the blue badge displayed next to her wouldnt be able to be moved because the driver wouldnt be able to open the door, nor would that person be able to shimmy across the seats via passenger door, like an able bodied person could, but then all able bodied friends of mine would walk rather than take up such a space.
i can see your point now beth ;-)
sum people are just inconsiderate!

Mary Lou says...
8:28pm Mon 22 Feb 10

Buffalo Bill wrote:
Beth.... Yawn, couldn't be bothered to read your post..... (BTW signs were so faded and placed too high to read.) The Judge said it was illegal, Martyn Lewis said it was illegal, Scottish parliament said it was illegal.... Seems only you and the clamper (a relation perhaps?) seems to think it is legal. As I said, if you can find ONE LAW that says it is illegal to park on private property then please enlighten us. If you can't (here's a clue there isn't one), then it can't be illegal. (The Solicitor for clamping company couldn't find one either). You silly little Belgian bun...... Run along and talk about something you actually know something about, or you will just make yourself look even sillier...... Did you go to special school???
Do you have a driveway ?

If so please lets us have your address. Then we can park on your drive whenever we want to. After all it is legal !!

Sir LIFTolot says...
1:11pm Thu 25 Feb 10

Buffalo Bill wrote:
Beth.... Yawn, couldn't be bothered to read your post..... (BTW signs were so faded and placed too high to read.) The Judge said it was illegal, Martyn Lewis said it was illegal, Scottish parliament said it was illegal.... Seems only you and the clamper (a relation perhaps?) seems to think it is legal. As I said, if you can find ONE LAW that says it is illegal to park on private property then please enlighten us. If you can't (here's a clue there isn't one), then it can't be illegal. (The Solicitor for clamping company couldn't find one either). You silly little Belgian bun...... Run along and talk about something you actually know something about, or you will just make yourself look even sillier...... Did you go to special school???
well Buffalo Bill lets just hope that i Sir LIFTolot and my trusted steed iveco do not cross pathes as shall have no trouble in calling my second knight to which he is named as Sir CLAMPolot will gladly put ya car in shackels and to which remove said vehical and return to our castle with pleasure and then charge you a kings ransom for one to reclam your stead yours with honour....Sir LIFTolot

Sir CLAMPalot says...
1:51pm Thu 25 Feb 10

Buffalo Bill wrote:
Beth.... Yawn, couldn't be bothered to read your post..... (BTW signs were so faded and placed too high to read.) The Judge said it was illegal, Martyn Lewis said it was illegal, Scottish parliament said it was illegal.... Seems only you and the clamper (a relation perhaps?) seems to think it is legal. As I said, if you can find ONE LAW that says it is illegal to park on private property then please enlighten us. If you can't (here's a clue there isn't one), then it can't be illegal. (The Solicitor for clamping company couldn't find one either). You silly little Belgian bun...... Run along and talk about something you actually know something about, or you will just make yourself look even sillier...... Did you go to special school???
Was"nt that Buffallo Bill that sex case that was in Silence of the Lambs?
For his and all your information it is not illegal to clamp,remove and store any vehicle that is parked unauthorised on private property. If the clamper holds a current vehicle immoboliser lisence which is legal in England & Wales with clear signage erected showing all the terms of parking.
Also there are two very clear points of law that Mr B&B has not been informed off. Firstly tresspass and the other is flytipping!
Everybody has a moan off when it comes to flytippers when they drop a ton and half of crap in a road, what is the diffrence when some Ptaker drops his car in a loading bay or a fire exit? Or just some rate paying client of ours parking bay!
These inconciderate members of our our public are the Baldricks of society.(Quite loveable but dense).
Please go forth with your trusty steeds and leave them where you should not.
As you will come back and find your steed kidnapped and forced to confinement.
A ransome will be be paid so that once again said steed is aloud to roam the lands of Essex.
Untill our paths will cross once more, you will and said Baldricks of Essex, will pay many a score..
We hope that all ye Balricks have been put on the riotious path..
I wish you good morrow and fairwell
SirCLAMPalot.

bill123 says...
9:18pm Tue 2 Mar 10

Mr Stone you clearly do not understand the basic principles of business, when setting up a business one evaluates the potential market this includes considering the cost is of providing a service and what a customer will pay for the service. I guess its difficult for you to carry out such an excersise since you do not have a market prepared to pay for your services, you state that you provide your services free of charge, a normal business would charge its customers for providing a service. If you ran a legitimate business you would charge your clients a fee to enforce parking restrictions on their land but instead you seem to work on the principle of calculating your costs and then extorting a fee to meet those costs from unsuspecting victims irespective of whether the price is fair or legitimate. You try to justify your activities by convincing yourself that you are providing some sort of public service. Mr Stone your activities are nothing short of robbery, I am sure that it will not be long before LBS & companies operating in a similar manner will be put out of business by government legislation since such activities can not continue to exsit in a civilised society.

AspergerKidJoe says...
7:18pm Sat 13 Mar 10

Mr Stone is certainley risking it, by putting his face on the picture and also the car pound place address being mentioned onthis report. Certainely now a target for death threats, vandalism and arson attacks.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree