Attack outside Southend nightspot

A MAN was attacked outside a Southend nightspot where he was sat on the kerb waiting for a friend.

The victim was outside Churchills bar, in Tylers Avenue, when he was approached by a man and a woman who began shouting abuse at him.

The woman then punched him on the nose and the man punched him in the head.

It happened at about 3am on Saturday July 7.

The suspect couple are described as white, aged 18 to 25 and of a slim build.

Anyone with any information is asked to contact PC Kevin Oxlade at Southend police station on 101, or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Comments (8)

3:34pm Tue 10 Jul 12

meldrew84 says...

Narrowed the description down nicely as usual i see......
Narrowed the description down nicely as usual i see...... meldrew84

3:51pm Tue 10 Jul 12

huedash says...

stupid place to sit....
stupid place to sit.... huedash

4:16pm Tue 10 Jul 12

richcarol says...

Why did he not fight back ? Ive got no time for cowards.
Why did he not fight back ? Ive got no time for cowards. richcarol

6:36pm Tue 10 Jul 12

Last Poster says...

richcarol wrote:
Why did he not fight back ? Ive got no time for cowards.
Well good for you mate! Some people are pacifists. Some people are stupid, thick and always on the lookout for trouble. Sometimes discretion is the right move. Which would you have floored first, the lady or the man?
[quote][p][bold]richcarol[/bold] wrote: Why did he not fight back ? Ive got no time for cowards.[/p][/quote]Well good for you mate! Some people are pacifists. Some people are stupid, thick and always on the lookout for trouble. Sometimes discretion is the right move. Which would you have floored first, the lady or the man? Last Poster

6:46pm Tue 10 Jul 12

All 9 of me says...

Isn't carol another usernames' alterego ? I mean security manageress ? I mean terrysays2/3/ad infinitum
Isn't carol another usernames' alterego ? I mean security manageress ? I mean terrysays2/3/ad infinitum All 9 of me

10:08pm Tue 10 Jul 12

Bosniavet says...

richcarol - I was always told only "cowards" hit women.If you read the story, the victim was firstly attacked by the woman, then then man. I would imagine that the man hit the victim whilst he was reeling from the first onslaught. Just because someone fails to retaliate, it does not mean that they are a coward as you put it. Let's hope the victim recovers. It seems that there is a lot of "trouble" around this particular establishment.
richcarol - I was always told only "cowards" hit women.If you read the story, the victim was firstly attacked by the woman, then then man. I would imagine that the man hit the victim whilst he was reeling from the first onslaught. Just because someone fails to retaliate, it does not mean that they are a coward as you put it. Let's hope the victim recovers. It seems that there is a lot of "trouble" around this particular establishment. Bosniavet

11:40am Wed 11 Jul 12

sav25 says...

You hit them back and YOU go to jail...well...that seems to be the current legal system anyway.
You hit them back and YOU go to jail...well...that seems to be the current legal system anyway. sav25

9:09am Thu 12 Jul 12

R85 says...

Bosniavet wrote:
richcarol - I was always told only "cowards" hit women.If you read the story, the victim was firstly attacked by the woman, then then man. I would imagine that the man hit the victim whilst he was reeling from the first onslaught. Just because someone fails to retaliate, it does not mean that they are a coward as you put it. Let's hope the victim recovers. It seems that there is a lot of "trouble" around this particular establishment.
If you are saying that in THIS situation he shouldn’t have hit her than that’s sickening! Fk that wtf! She attacked an innocent guy minding his own business knowing that she had her man to back her if this poor guy defended himself! She needed to be floored – in that situation she is not a woman/Lady whatever you want to call it. If a woman is seriously and savagely attacking you, you need to put her down! Can you please tell me why, if a woman savagely attacks you, you shouldn’t hit her back? WTF is should be no different to a man – she put herself in that situation and absolutely, completely, unequivocally, 110 percent needs to be floored! She deserves it too!

To sav25s last comment though – you’re bang on and that’s why the justice system is raping the Great out of Britain!
[quote][p][bold]Bosniavet[/bold] wrote: richcarol - I was always told only "cowards" hit women.If you read the story, the victim was firstly attacked by the woman, then then man. I would imagine that the man hit the victim whilst he was reeling from the first onslaught. Just because someone fails to retaliate, it does not mean that they are a coward as you put it. Let's hope the victim recovers. It seems that there is a lot of "trouble" around this particular establishment.[/p][/quote]If you are saying that in THIS situation he shouldn’t have hit her than that’s sickening! Fk that wtf! She attacked an innocent guy minding his own business knowing that she had her man to back her if this poor guy defended himself! She needed to be floored – in that situation she is not a woman/Lady whatever you want to call it. If a woman is seriously and savagely attacking you, you need to put her down! Can you please tell me why, if a woman savagely attacks you, you shouldn’t hit her back? WTF is should be no different to a man – she put herself in that situation and absolutely, completely, unequivocally, 110 percent needs to be floored! She deserves it too! To sav25s last comment though – you’re bang on and that’s why the justice system is raping the Great out of Britain! R85

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree