We were given false promises over fields

Angry - Grahame Rudkins Angry - Grahame Rudkins

hundreds of homes could be built on farmland in Billericay , neighbours are warning.

Residents living near Great Cowbridge Grange Farm, off London Road, say Basildon Council has gone back on a promise not to let green belt land be used for the 6,500 homes the borough was told it had to accommodate over the next 20 years.

The council has now admitted many more homes than this will have to be built, with some greenfield sites among those being considered.

Cowbridge Grange Farm is one of several large green belt sites on the edge of urban areas in planners’ sights.

They have already declared it suitable to take as many as 650 homes, as well as industrial units.

Grahame Rudkins, 79, whose home in Courtlands overlooks the fields in question, said: “I attended the consultations and was assured the council was going for Option 1 – 6,500 homes and no green belt release. “I asked about the other two options and why this land was ringed for employment, I was assured, ‘Oh don’t worry about those. We are going for option 1’.”

Before the May council elections Mr Rudkins was assured by fellow Courtlands resident, Tory councillor Paul Arnold, the land was safe.

He also spoke to Basildon and Billericay MP John Baron , who said he would resist attempts to built there.

Mr Rudkins, a retired chartered civil engineer, said: “I feel we have been led up the garden path and given false promises before the election, which now can’t be kept. They should have been realistic with people about the number of homes needed.”

The Echo has discovered developer Redrow Homes has an option to buy the site, but has so far not responded to our requests for further information.

Malcolm Buckley , councillor responsible for regeneration, denied residents had been hoodwinked before the election. He explained: “We have seen other authorities put forward similar housing levels and have been rejected by the inspector, even before they got to a public inquiry. “”We also now have to take new census information into account.”

The council also claims the fact only 300 people across the borough responded to public consultations on the original document backing Option 1 would make it hard to argue that option had widespread public support.

However, Mr Buckley added: “It is too early to identify sites.”

Comments(8)

SpaffSpiff84 says...
8:22pm Sat 4 Aug 12

why should the entire area have to change because the government cant control our borders?

benfleet101 says...
1:10am Sun 5 Aug 12

The developers are suddenly crawling out of the woodwork all over the place.
http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/news/local_ne
ws/castlepoint/98042
21.Residents____alar
m_at_plans_for_200_g
reen_belt_homes_in_B
enfleet/

perini says...
3:06am Sun 5 Aug 12

When will Britain wake up to the fact that ALL politicians, local or national, are lying, thieving bastewards that only have their own agenda at heart and f*ck the tax payer mentality. These shytes need to be made accountable to their paymasters - ie US the taxpayer! Write to your MP and complain loud and often - that way they WILL start taking notice.

perini says...
3:06am Sun 5 Aug 12

When will Britain wake up to the fact that ALL politicians, local or national, are lying, thieving bastewards that only have their own agenda at heart and f*ck the tax payer mentality. These shytes need to be made accountable to their paymasters - ie US the taxpayer! Write to your MP and complain loud and often - that way they WILL start taking notice.

shallotman says...
7:56am Sun 5 Aug 12

Are you suggesting that councillors tell porkies.

The Cater Wood Creeper says...
5:19pm Sun 5 Aug 12

The council also claims the fact only 300 people across the borough responded to public consultations on the original document backing Option 1 would make it hard to argue that option had widespread public support.


perhaps if it was made easier to give one's opinion rather than having it seem like one was sitting a degree level examination more people may have actually made their opinion known. But then again that may have been the plan of the Council from the outset so they could use the 'well not enough people seemd to be against any proposal....' approach.

Regardless of that though it seems that since then, the amount of housing units 'required' by someone somewhere along the line has been massively expanded so even the sacred cow of Billericay must bear the brunt of future housing development.

Poor old Fat Burstead Counciller Blake must be cacking his not inconseridably sized trousers in case this impairs his normally safe seat.....

E-Types. says...
2:18am Mon 6 Aug 12

Oh dear who would of thought it...the leader of the council and the local MP misleading people....shock... horror....wake up, the enemy isn't those who live along side you but those who are paid to serve you!

John T Pharro says...
7:35pm Mon 6 Aug 12

benfleet101 wrote:
The developers are suddenly crawling out of the woodwork all over the place.
http://www.echo-news

.co.uk/news/local_ne

ws/castlepoint/98042

21.Residents____alar

m_at_plans_for_200_g

reen_belt_homes_in_B

enfleet/
Well said, I know exactly where you are coming from. Doesn't matter does it where you live money (developers) rule and democracy, if there really is such a thing in GB, is steam rollered.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree