Axe South Essex Homes to save £1.1million a year

Southend's Queensway tower blocks Southend's Queensway tower blocks

AXING South Essex Homes could generate more than £1.1million a year to plough into major housing projects in Southend.

On the eve of a debate about the future of the management body, which is responsible for looking after Southend Council’s 6,000 homes across the borough, bosses have revealed a convincing case for bringing the service back in-house.

Officers holding the purse strings at the Civic Centre believe scrapping the organisation could free up millions of pounds to be spent on other schemes, such as building new council housing or revamping the town centre’s troubled tower blocks.

Members of Southend Council’s community services and culture scrutiny committee will sit down today to discuss the way forward, although a final decision will not be made until the authority’s Tory leadership meets later this year.

However, Jacqui Lansley, head of community strategy and development, said there was a strong case for axing the body. She said: “The council is now able to retain the rental income from homes they buy, build or bring back into use to invest in new and improved housing.

“Any savings in management costs can therefore be used to re-invest in the housing stock or bring forward new affordable housing.

“When looked at on its own, the financial case for bringing the function back in-house is compelling.”

South Essex Homes, which was set up in October 2005, is given more than £9million a year by the council as a management fee for running the properties.

Comments (4)

1:50pm Wed 17 Oct 12

perini says...

It should never have been subbed out in the first place!
It should never have been subbed out in the first place! perini

7:22pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rollocks says...

perini wrote:
It should never have been subbed out in the first place!
It's jobs for the boys their jolly is ending I think a tax audit might be timely
[quote][p][bold]perini[/bold] wrote: It should never have been subbed out in the first place![/p][/quote]It's jobs for the boys their jolly is ending I think a tax audit might be timely Rollocks

7:48pm Wed 17 Oct 12

jolllyboy says...

Bad that Mark Flewitt was questioning whether it is right to get rid of it without mentioning he is on the board of South Essex Homes. Transparency ? I think not. If South Essex Homes had been doing an exceptional job it would not even arise to question its existence. The council would save on the building straightaway as they have space at Civic Centre to take it all in house.
Bad that Mark Flewitt was questioning whether it is right to get rid of it without mentioning he is on the board of South Essex Homes. Transparency ? I think not. If South Essex Homes had been doing an exceptional job it would not even arise to question its existence. The council would save on the building straightaway as they have space at Civic Centre to take it all in house. jolllyboy

9:13pm Thu 18 Oct 12

the citizen says...

....because the Council ALWAYS do a better, cheaper and more efficient job.......yeah right. They never waste money on consultants, they wouldn't dream of spending this on themselves or other self-interest projects would they ? Does "troubled tower blocks" include refurbishing the Civic Centre. If it isn't broke - don't fix. Why hand the responsibilities to a council that will probably only have to employ all the staff of SE Homes anyway because they don't have the qualified staff at the Civic. Watch the cost soar as the Treasurer Department and the Town Clerks Department and everyone else in the ivory tower adds their on-costs.
Just how much would it cost to bring everything "in-house"? Probably more than we the rate payers can afford !
....because the Council ALWAYS do a better, cheaper and more efficient job.......yeah right. They never waste money on consultants, they wouldn't dream of spending this on themselves or other self-interest projects would they ? Does "troubled tower blocks" include refurbishing the Civic Centre. If it isn't broke - don't fix. Why hand the responsibilities to a council that will probably only have to employ all the staff of SE Homes anyway because they don't have the qualified staff at the Civic. Watch the cost soar as the Treasurer Department and the Town Clerks Department and everyone else in the ivory tower adds their on-costs. Just how much would it cost to bring everything "in-house"? Probably more than we the rate payers can afford ! the citizen

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree