Havens to appeal over Leigh green belt hospice plan

CAMPAIGNERS are urging Havens Hospices to think carefully before appealing a decision to refuse permission for a new hospice in the green belt.

Southend Council’s development control committee unanimously rejected the plans for a 16 bed adult hospice with office and training facilities on land off Belton Way West, Leigh.

Save Our Green Belt group say they are pleased with the council’s decision but want bosses at the charity to start again rather than submiiting an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate at a further cost of the charity and local authority.

Founder Mike King, of Marine Parade, Leigh said; “We are exceptionally disappointed with Havens for indicating they want to go to appeal. It’s complete nonsense.

“They need to start from the beginning, as the council said there are plenty of empty offices in Victoria Avenue for administration. Look just for a site for a 16 bed hospice and we’d be delighted to assist that. The two just don’t need to be together, Little Havens operates from an office in Chalkwell fine.

“They have upset their supporters twice already, to appeal will damage their reputation a third time, its lunatic.”

The group hope Havens can be persuaded to avoid an appeal. Mr King also believes as Southend and Leigh both unanimously rejected it, it will also fail at appeal.

However Havens are clear they will definitely appeal and expect to do so shortly with a result in the New Year. It is not known how much the process may cost but the charity believes it is worth it.

Chief Executive Andy Smith said: “We have not taken the decision to go to appeal lightly, but we are in a critical position. We will of course abide by the decision made by the independent planning inspectors.

“We would not risk the future of patient care if there was a viable alternative.

“The kind donations from our supporters will continue to help us care for those who need us right now. We are only doing what is best for our patients, and we trust that our supporters have faith in the decisions we make. We only have one chance to get this right.”

The charity has said that Fair Havens in Second Avenue, Westcliff is outdated and unsuitable as six of its ten rooms are upstairs with no lift, only stairlift access. A new hospice would provide 16 beds and be suitable for years to come.

Comments (7)

4:45pm Mon 22 Oct 12

firedog says...

The protest group should hang their heads in shame.Will they be protesting about the new stadium to be built on green belt land or is that OK by them.
The protest group should hang their heads in shame.Will they be protesting about the new stadium to be built on green belt land or is that OK by them. firedog

9:30pm Mon 22 Oct 12

BMNO6 says...

The genral public donated money to be used for CARE not lawyers! shame on you LH administrators.
The genral public donated money to be used for CARE not lawyers! shame on you LH administrators. BMNO6

10:08pm Mon 22 Oct 12

DogsMessInLeigh says...

surely there are other bits of land around to build on, or a very large plot with dilapidated buildings on that can be pulled down and rebuilt
surely there are other bits of land around to build on, or a very large plot with dilapidated buildings on that can be pulled down and rebuilt DogsMessInLeigh

8:43am Tue 23 Oct 12

Eric Whim says...

BMNO6 wrote:
The genral public donated money to be used for CARE not lawyers! shame on you LH administrators.
I agree
[quote][p][bold]BMNO6[/bold] wrote: The genral public donated money to be used for CARE not lawyers! shame on you LH administrators.[/p][/quote]I agree Eric Whim

9:32am Wed 24 Oct 12

MickyLeigh says...

firedog wrote:
The protest group should hang their heads in shame.Will they be protesting about the new stadium to be built on green belt land or is that OK by them.
Hang my head in shame? Because I do not agree with a huge development on green belt land that is, lets's face it, mostly an admin center with a small hospice attached. This is a genuinely held view by many, indeed, most people. To say it is shameful is, frankly, insulting. I am sure the supporters are genuine but let's have debate about the facts, not this emotive language.
[quote][p][bold]firedog[/bold] wrote: The protest group should hang their heads in shame.Will they be protesting about the new stadium to be built on green belt land or is that OK by them.[/p][/quote]Hang my head in shame? Because I do not agree with a huge development on green belt land that is, lets's face it, mostly an admin center with a small hospice attached. This is a genuinely held view by many, indeed, most people. To say it is shameful is, frankly, insulting. I am sure the supporters are genuine but let's have debate about the facts, not this emotive language. MickyLeigh

5:25pm Thu 25 Oct 12

Eric Whim says...

think about how much the green spaces in the area are dwindling - once you build on one it disappears for ever.
think about how much the green spaces in the area are dwindling - once you build on one it disappears for ever. Eric Whim

8:23pm Sun 28 Oct 12

jolllyboy says...

Please do not waste my donation on an appeal.
This is green belt. When it's gone it's gone. We cannot spare it. there are plenty of other places. there is insufficeint transport as well and the roads would be congested.
Please do not waste my donation on an appeal. This is green belt. When it's gone it's gone. We cannot spare it. there are plenty of other places. there is insufficeint transport as well and the roads would be congested. jolllyboy

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree