Castle Point RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Send us your news!


Future of Canvey's new seafront paddling pool uncertain


THE future of Canvey’s newest paddling pool is in doubt just a few days after the popular old one appeared to be saved from demolition.

Castle Point Council has said it is reviewing the future of the pool, known as the new pool, and located on the same stretch of the seafront, near the Concord Cafe.

The review is being carried out despite £250,000 being spent renovating it in the past two years.

Castle Point Council says it won’t be transferring ownership of the new pool to Canvey Town Council and will instead commission a review over what should be done with the new pool in future.

A spokesman said: “The borough council is to ask its community policy development group to re-examine the new sea water pool and come up with proposals.”

More than 1,000 residents teamed up with the Echo to pressure Castle Point Council into reversing its decision to demolish the much-loved old seaside pool because of fears it was dangerous. The borough council says it is now prepared to let the tourist attraction, which was built in the Thirties, stay open under the management of the town council.

The review of the new pool will please some campaigners who have warned for months it is the most dangerous of the two, but Lea Swann, who runs the Concord Cafe, said the £250,000 spent renovating the new one in 2008 would be wasted if it was closed.

She added: “Everyone knows they did a terrible job renovating the new pool, as they left it with a concrete base and dangerous rocky walls, which have become covered in slime and are really dangerous.

“I’m really pleased it looks like they’ve finally listened to residents and are going to leave the old pool alone.

“It has a safer, sandy base, was always far more popular with families, and I would much rather they kept that one if it was a choice between the two.

“However, it will be a massive waste of money if they remove the new pool after it had all that work done to it.”

Grandmother Mary Chalk, 63, from Enfield, North London broke her wrist in three places after slipping over on the seawall around the new pool.

Comments(10)

marshman says...
3:50pm Wed 25 Aug 10

Just a thought, but if they remove the tidal defence - which is in effect what this pool acts as - won't the sea rather quickly wash Concorde Cafe away?

Or is that the plan?

Remove Miss Swanns source of income as punishment for having taken on the might of the council and seemingly won (showing them to be rather uncaring, wasteful and stupid in the process).

So it's not just council tenants who're punished for biting their masters hand.

lifelongislander says...
10:03am Thu 26 Aug 10

I do not think the council will get away with removing the "new" pool, as you say it is a sea defence, and the PLA might have something to say if they tried. Also bear in mind that the council must in some way be answerable to the East of England Development Agency who provided the funding for the "new" pool. I dont think the council can just decide to pull it down. If they decommision it by opening the valve to let the water out they will still have a dangerous facility as the slime and drop will still be there. Perhaps they intend to put barbed wire round it and call it a WW2 museum!

lifelongislander says...
10:08am Thu 26 Aug 10

I dont think the council can remove the "new" pool, as you say Marshman it is a sea defence, the PLA would surely have something to say if they did. The East of England Development Agency would also have something to say as they provided funding for the work that was carried out on this "new" pool, the council must be answerable to them in some way with so much public funds being used. They could of course recommission the pool by leaving the valve open so the water drained out but that would still leave the slime and the drop. Perhaps they are goint surround it with barbed wire and call it a WW2 museum.

VocalVoice says...
12:47pm Thu 26 Aug 10

I dont think they will get rid because as you say it forms part of the defences. I would think if anything they would concrete over it and put some kind of covered seating area on there...

Could maybe convert it into a skate ramp ;O)

It is rather greedy having two as there are only a few in the country!

upset says...
9:33am Sun 29 Aug 10

From the photo it seems again considerable sums of our tax payers money is going to be spent to benefit a few (what ever councils pays), mostly the owners of the cafe.
Lets get real, there are many more things the island could benefit from at the costs being bandied about, to repair/make safe and then manage for years to come. It will be a mill stone around the Town Councils neck, which will either limit what they are able to do, or make it necessary to increase council tax in this time of supposed austerity.

tom.jea says...
11:42am Mon 30 Aug 10

To Upset-
It isn't just a few, it is the literally thousands of kids who use it during the summer. Plus all the people who travel here- did you know its the first bit of beach from London?
Without these pools, whenever the tide is out the beach is just sand and mud- with them it is useable all day long. They are a fantastic facility.

VocalVoice says...
9:27am Tue 31 Aug 10

Yeah but the majority of Londoners head the opposite way to the nice beaches in Brighton or past Canvey to Southend.

Upset you are right they should get rid of the second 'newer' pool and spend the money elsewhere on the island.

tom.jea says...
12:55pm Tue 31 Aug 10

So, you want to just let all the kids go out onto the mud and into the fastflowing river, eh?
Its not just money, its safety- and our Coastguards have said the pool is much safer for children.

VocalVoice says...
4:17pm Tue 31 Aug 10

Read my comment properly...

I said they should get rid of the second, newer pool! That means the old one will still be there!

Well thats as long as the CIIP take up the offer and can afford to keep it open...Doubt that very much, money down the pan and well done to CPBC for getting rid!

tom.jea says...
9:46am Wed 1 Sep 10

Apologies, Vocal Voice, I didn't read your comment properly.
Still, as the wall of the triangular pool would have to remain as it is a sea defence, it seems a shame not to keep it as something people can use.
Also, why does the Council think it can just trash things? The pools are OURS. I thought councils are supposed to manage public assets.


Campaigners meet on Canvey seafront to save their paddling pools Campaigners meet on Canvey seafront to save their paddling pools

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses