Southend RSS Feed Send your news


Send us your news!


Southend top of parking ticket league


MORE parking tickets have been handed out in Southend in the past year than in the rest of south Essex combined.

Figures, obtained by the Echo under the freedom of Information act, reveal 10,546 tickets were issued to motorists in the first four months of this year alone.

Over the financial year this equates to about 31,000 tickets being given out, compared to about 22,000 across Basildon, Castle Point, Rochford, Southend and Thurrock.

Southend Council says the reason is the town attracts more visitors than its neighbours and so has more parking to police.

But some feel the parking officials are still a little too strict and do not show enough sympathy or discretion when penalising local residents.

Raymond Bibby and his wife Doreen, both 64, were slapped with a £50 fine after he accidentally displayed a disabled badge upside down in his windscreen while parked in Clarence Road, Southend.

Mr Bibby said: “I had to get my wife’s wheelchair out in the road and I was getting flustered because of the traffic coming past and I just quickly slipped the disabled badge out. But I put it upside down without realising.

“When we came back we had a parking ticket, even though the tax disc states this is a disabled vehicle and has the car’s registration number on it.

“They ought to show more discretion.”

The couple of Cumberland Avenue, Southend, plan to appeal against the ticket.

Between January and April this year, 119 tickets were issued in the Southend borough for parking in a disabled bay without a badge.

As well as town centre streets and car parks, parking restrictions are also in place in residential streets.

Gaby Coello and her partner were issued with a £35 ticket for parking outside their own house in Osborne Road, Westcliff, in February.

The street is one of a number that is subject to a system where residents are permitted to park on one side during one month, then on the other side during the next month.

Gaby was expecting her first baby and thinking she was about to go into labour during the night, the couple parked their car outside their home, but on the wrong side of the road.

Gaby, 40, said: “There were no spaces anywhere near our house on the right side of the road and I didn’t want to have to walk miles if we had to get into the car to go to hospital.

“I didn’t go into labour that night, but obviously the car was the last thing our minds and when we came out the next day we had a ticket.

“I think it’s a ridiculous system.”

A council spokesman said the system had been in operation for about 20 years in streets that are too narrow to have parking on both sides.

He said: “The idea is to give everyone the equal chance of being able to park outside their own house.”

COUNCIL DEFENDS ITS RECORD

PARKING chiefs in Southend have defended the number of tickets handed out by their officers.

Council parking manager Derek Kenyon said the town was a tourist resort and large areas of restricted parking explained why they gave out tens of thousands more tickets than other local authorities.

He said: “Southend has a much bigger parking enforcement responsibility than any of its neighbouring authorities.

“The town attracts huge numbers of holidaymakers and daytrippers, and it has seven miles of seafront parking alone.”

Neil Hunwicks, contract manager at Apcoa, which runs parking enforcement for the council, denied there was a financial incentive for his employees to give out tickets.

He said: “We have been in Southend since 2001 and the number of tickets issued has rapidly declined, which means more people are parking properly.”

As well as issuing more tickets than other south Essex authorities, Southend also has a higher collection rate, raking in £281,456 in the first four months of the year. This is equivalent to 74 per cent of the tickets issued and compares to an average collection rate for council issued parking fines of about 65 per cent.

Basildon Council has collected £249,100 so far – about 66 per cent of the 10,272 fines issued in the 12 months to April.

Thurrock has collected £84,040, just 46 per cent of the total.

Rochford is owed more than £230,825, although collection rate figures were unavailable at the time of going to press.

Figures for Castle Point were also unavailable.

AN EASIER RIDE IN CASTLE POINT

MOTORISTS in Castle Point are the least likely to get a ticket with the borough’s two traffic wardens handing out just 1,140 in a year.

Taking into account weekends and bank holidays, when many restrictions do not apply, this works out at an average of three tickets a day.

Dave Blackwell, leader of the Canvey Island Independent Party, said: “I’m very surprised they issue so few tickets.

“Any time you drive around Canvey you see people parking on double yellow lines or in disabled bays.

“As councillors we constantly get people complaining about parking. A lot of residents have asked for yellow lines to be put down their streets at neighbourhood meetings but there is a worry they won’t be enforced.”

Problem parking spots on Canvey include residential streets in the town centre, outside shops at the top of Seaview Terrace and Station Road in the High Street and the disabled bays near the sea wall at Thorney Bay.

Residents living on the Saints estate, off Long Road, have complained about motorists ignoring double yellow lines at the entrance to the estate, in St Michael’s Road.

Jean Johnson, 75, of St Michael’s Road, was unsurprised to hear Castle Point has just two traffic wardens.

She said: “We get people parked on double yellow lines here quite a lot and it can get dangerous.

“I haven’t seen a traffic warden for years. When you think they’ve got Hadleigh to cover as well two doesn’t seem quite sufficient.”

In Southend, where the council pays private firm Apcoa to provide enforcement, 30 officers each issue on average 4.5 tickets a day.

Rochford’s five full time and one part-time warden issue about six a day as do Basildon’s seven full timers and one part timer.

Basildon’s Smart Car, a vehicle equipped with a camera to capture rogue motorists on film, issued 2,099 tickets while officers on foot handed out 8,173.

The figures also revealed Thurrock’s nine traffic wardens dish out an average of less than two fixed penalty notices a day – 3,839 in a year.

A Thurrock council spokesman said: “Thurrock Council officers do not have targets for the number of tickets they should issue.

“The only target they have is to ensure the streets are kept clear of illegal parking and safe for all our residents.”


Your Say YourEcho

Nebs, Westcliff-on-Sea says...
3:19pm Wed 28 Jul 10

I have never understood the need of some people to get parking tickets. It's not rocket science, just park where you are allowed to park and follow the rules.

anon anon, southend on sea says...
3:40pm Wed 28 Jul 10

Nebs wrote:
I have never understood the need of some people to get parking tickets. It's not rocket science, just park where you are allowed to park and follow the rules.
yep.....agree

keptquietillnow, Westcliff says...
3:41pm Wed 28 Jul 10

Probably more cars in Southend than anywhere else in SE Essex as well.
Non story really plus dont want a ticket, dont park where you should not.

PJR, Basildon says...
3:46pm Wed 28 Jul 10

Agree with all the above comments. While there are some which are unjust (such as ticketing a car with an upside down blue badge), there are many more that are fair, and deserved. I've had my fair share of parking tickets, but I've known I've been in the wrong, and have paid up. If you park within the rules, there's no problem

Peter Pantsless, Southend-on-Sea says...
4:14pm Wed 28 Jul 10

99 percent of all traffic wardens give the others a bad name.

westcliff willi, says...
4:26pm Wed 28 Jul 10

If all aspects of southend council were as efficient as the ever increasing scurge of the traffic warden the maybe it would be a better place to live. Does anyone clean the streets in westcliff any more.Does anyone ever get fined for letting their dog cr4p everywhere, are flytippers ever caught.NO NO AND NO

westcliff willi, says...
4:26pm Wed 28 Jul 10

If all aspects of southend council were as efficient as the ever increasing scurge of the traffic warden the maybe it would be a better place to live. Does anyone clean the streets in westcliff any more.Does anyone ever get fined for letting their dog cr4p everywhere, are flytippers ever caught.NO NO AND NO

Peter Pantsless, Southend-on-Sea says...
4:34pm Wed 28 Jul 10

Apart from the Great Wall Of China, Southends Double Yellow lines are the only other man made thing that can be seen from outer space!
.
Also before Anna Waite was demoted i'm sure her prime directive was to rid southend of as many car parks as possible (i hate to admit it, she did do a good job).
It seamed like everyone of Renaissance Southends fantasy pipe dreams was based upon developing a car park!
.
Dont even get me started on how some of the wardens pretend not to speak english when it suits then (particulary around the milton area of town).

LocalBoy, Hawkwell says...
4:42pm Wed 28 Jul 10

As a population we have allowed ourselves to be bullied in to accepting fines that are totally disproportionate to the offence committed.

I recently received a £25 for over staying 4 minutes in an on street parking bay. I totally accept this was my mistake (mistakes do happen) however having paid £3 for two hours £25 for 4 minutes is taking the p**s.

It seems those of us who attempt to be law abiding citizens get caned when we make relatively minor infractions of the law with totally disproportionate fines.

Those who revel in breaking the law as some sort of lifestyle choice don't get clobbered at all!

I'm getting to the stage in life where I realise Mr Cameron's "Big Society" is a load of old B*****ks. This country is all about everyone for themselves and that includes money grabbing local authorities.

sav25, Leigh-on-Sea says...
4:55pm Wed 28 Jul 10

Dont I know it - parked in the loading bay outside Pizza Express the other night (midweek). It was gone 8pm so a) assumed no loading would be done and b) other cars were parked all over the yellows etc and always have done past 7/8pm without getting tickets.

Came out after my meanl to find the little yellow gift waiting for me.

Yeah I was wrong on paper - but really - I was in noones way.

TB2, Leigh-on-Sea says...
6:00pm Wed 28 Jul 10

There haven't been Traffic Wardens in Southend for nearly 10 years. When parking became decriminalised SBC employed Parking Attendants through a contractor. Recent changes in the law means the people who issue parking tickets are now called Civil Enforcement Officers (CEO). Will the Echo please use the correct terminology.

radioman, westcliff-on-sea says...
6:38pm Wed 28 Jul 10

The published income from this legalised robbery equates to over three quarters of a million pounds in a year. Is there any hope of a reduction in council tax???

gitreal, Chalkwell says...
7:48pm Wed 28 Jul 10

Peter those double yellow lines were captured from the bloody moon!

That’s one small step for Anna, one big cash leap for Southend Council.

Glad her royal tree chopper was demoted or the remaining 2 trees in the county would be gone.

TB2, Leigh-on-Sea says...
8:40pm Wed 28 Jul 10

The Echo’s anti-parking enforcement article implies that readers should be sympathetic to a disabled driver who had a ticket issued (not slapped on her car) because her disable badge was displayed upside-down. Implying that for the mere reason it was difficult to read an overzealous CEO issued a ticket. Accusations of this nature are made against CEOs allover the country. Those familiar with disabled badges will know that on one side is the photo of the owner of the badge and on the other is the expiry date. The correct way to display the badge is expiry date side UP and photo side DOWN. In instances when the badge is described as ‘upside-down’ (ie photo side up) this should in fact be described as ‘wrong way round’ so that the expiry date is not visible. If the expiry date is not visible the badge is not displayed correctly; how does the CEO know if the badge is in date and not one of the thousands in circulation that are out of date and being used by people who are not entitled to them. On this occasion the CEO acted correctly, the driver has good grounds to appeal and hopefully will be more careful in the future. And hopefully the Echo will be more careful in their choice of words.

Nebs, Westcliff-on-Sea says...
9:21pm Wed 28 Jul 10

LocalBoy wrote:
As a population we have allowed ourselves to be bullied in to accepting fines that are totally disproportionate to the offence committed. I recently received a £25 for over staying 4 minutes in an on street parking bay. I totally accept this was my mistake (mistakes do happen) however having paid £3 for two hours £25 for 4 minutes is taking the p**s. It seems those of us who attempt to be law abiding citizens get caned when we make relatively minor infractions of the law with totally disproportionate fines. Those who revel in breaking the law as some sort of lifestyle choice don't get clobbered at all! I'm getting to the stage in life where I realise Mr Cameron's "Big Society" is a load of old B*****ks. This country is all about everyone for themselves and that includes money grabbing local authorities.
Well done to you for admitting that you were wrong. It makes a change in this day and age, most people try and come up with some excuse as to why they should be exempt from fines. £25 is a small price to pay, but it's not £25 for 4 minutes, it's £25 because you didn't pay. Many places would charge more than that.

Mr Common Sense, Westcliff says...
10:40pm Wed 28 Jul 10

Whilst I don't know the whole facts, I just wonder why if your wife is disabled and has a wheelchair why you need to park on double yellow lines when you would be fully capable of parking in a normal metered parking space and pay the appropriate fee? I do believe that some badge holders do take advantage of the privilege.

LocalBoy, Hawkwell says...
7:55am Thu 29 Jul 10

Nebs wrote:
LocalBoy wrote:
As a population we have allowed ourselves to be bullied in to accepting fines that are totally disproportionate to the offence committed. I recently received a £25 for over staying 4 minutes in an on street parking bay. I totally accept this was my mistake (mistakes do happen) however having paid £3 for two hours £25 for 4 minutes is taking the p**s. It seems those of us who attempt to be law abiding citizens get caned when we make relatively minor infractions of the law with totally disproportionate fines. Those who revel in breaking the law as some sort of lifestyle choice don't get clobbered at all! I'm getting to the stage in life where I realise Mr Cameron's "Big Society" is a load of old B*****ks. This country is all about everyone for themselves and that includes money grabbing local authorities.
Well done to you for admitting that you were wrong. It makes a change in this day and age, most people try and come up with some excuse as to why they should be exempt from fines. £25 is a small price to pay, but it's not £25 for 4 minutes, it's £25 because you didn't pay. Many places would charge more than that.
You miss my point. First of all I did pay with absolutely no intent to avoid the parking fees.

Second, I was not parked illegally I had overstayed by 4 minutes, inconveniencing no one!

For this privilege I am fined £25, this is an excessive amount in relation to the offence committed.

There should be a process that allows people who have made genuine errors to pay a more appropriate fee for their overstay.

The rate per minute to park was 2.5 pence; the rate for the overstay was £6.25 pence per minute. This is an unreasonable penalty/uplift for the offence committed.

If I had been an hour late; £25 no problem. However 4 minutes?

On their return to the car the motorist should be forced to buy another ticket to prove the time of return and then a fine on a sliding scale would be a fair way to deal with this type of error.

My overriding point is that people like me who do our best to lead a blameless life are hit by a totally unfair and inflexible punishment on the odd time we make a mistake and breach a civil law.

Many people who have broken criminal laws are fined less than this amount.

The fine should be proportionate to the offence; this is not.

Nebs, Westcliff-on-Sea says...
11:39am Thu 29 Jul 10

Localboy
No, I get your point. You think you should be exempt from what is a paltry fine because you were unable to get back to your car in time. I appreciate that you may not have intended to overstay. But you did. Somewhere along the line you either made the conscious decision that whatever you were doing was more important than getting back to your car in time, or you did not pay attention to how long you had left on your ticket and were late. Even with no intention, and either way, it is your fault. Nobody elses.

The fact that you inconvenienced nobody is not relevant at all. You paid for a period of time, and exceeded that time.

You say £25 is excessive for the offence. £25 is a minor sum, and will teach you to look at your watch more often in future.

You say there should be a process that allows people who have made genuine errors to pay a more appropriate fee for their overstay. There is, for pay-in-advance bays. It is called a small fine, which is what you have got. Why don't you just park somewhere that issues pay-on-exit tickets if you are that worried about it.

The rate per minute to park was 2.5 pence; the rate for the overstay was not £6.25 pence per minute. It was a flat fee of £25. How much do you think it costs to pay wages to traffic wardens , and collect the fines. Why should I, as a taxpayer, subsidise someone like you who is unable to manage their time properly.

On their return to the car the motorist should be forced to buy another ticket to prove the time of return, or get one from someone else who already has an earlier ticket so as they can lie about what time they returned, and then a fine on a sliding scale, starting at £25 to cover admin costs, would be a fair way to deal with this type of error.

My overriding point is that people like you who do their best to lead a blameless life somehow think they are being victimised when they breach a civil law. The law is for everyone, you are not exempt.

Many people who have broken criminal laws are fined less than this amount. The fine should be proportionate to the offence; this is, but those who are fined less for criminal activity are the ones getting off lightly.

LocalBoy, Hawkwell says...
11:45am Thu 29 Jul 10

Dear NEBS,
You miss my point.
Perhaps the e should be an O and the S deleted.

Baker_Boy, Gt Wakering says...
1:09pm Thu 29 Jul 10

we are top the league. say we are top the league.

well well well what can i say do better and you wont get a ticket.

always park where i am allowed always pay if im paying to park so no problems for me some people must like giving money away

Joe Hune, Southend says...
1:41pm Thu 29 Jul 10

Baker_Boy wrote:
we are top the league. say we are top the league. well well well what can i say do better and you wont get a ticket. always park where i am allowed always pay if im paying to park so no problems for me some people must like giving money away
It just shows what a great job our Civil Enforcement Officers in Southend are doing! The poor people of Canvey never see an Officer and Castle Point admit they have TWO!! They have to look after Hadleigh, parts of Rayleigh, Thundersley and Canvey. They obviously don't care about parking!

I always think the ECHO only write about parking when they don't have anything else to write about! Why don't they say well done to the Southend team of Civil Enforcement Officers for doing such a great job?

As I always say, if you don't break to law, you wont get fined.

If the ECHO wont say it, I will as I am happy that this private company seems to care about the parking in Southend, so WELL DONE for being Top, Top, Top of the league!

maywood, Langdon Hills says...
5:11pm Thu 29 Jul 10

LocalBoy wrote:
As a population we have allowed ourselves to be bullied in to accepting fines that are totally disproportionate to the offence committed. I recently received a £25 for over staying 4 minutes in an on street parking bay. I totally accept this was my mistake (mistakes do happen) however having paid £3 for two hours £25 for 4 minutes is taking the p**s. It seems those of us who attempt to be law abiding citizens get caned when we make relatively minor infractions of the law with totally disproportionate fines. Those who revel in breaking the law as some sort of lifestyle choice don't get clobbered at all! I'm getting to the stage in life where I realise Mr Cameron's "Big Society" is a load of old B*****ks. This country is all about everyone for themselves and that includes money grabbing local authorities.
I believe you should have appealed,you have deprived the Council of that space and so as you paid parking at the rate of £1-50 per hour,that is the fine approbate to the offense.Also parking in a Loading bay there again you should have looked into this,I also have a disabled blue badge,i parked on a so called service rd in Basildon double yellow lines,Euro Car Park gave me a ticket,first they stated i was not parked in a correct manner in the car park,i appealed,they then stated i was parked in a service rd,there are no signs stating that this is a service rd,the law states that there must be signs stating this and these have to be of a correct size and written in black writing,parking laws are a minefield,they are now threatening me with a £120 fine and if i do not pay they will pass it to debt collectors

PJR, Basildon says...
11:32am Fri 30 Jul 10

Pay and display parking is a nightmare, always is. I never know how long I'm realistically going to be. I may be half an hour away from my car, or I may be a couple of hours. I could go over, but then you're not supposed to feed the metre.
...
My solution? Well obviously pay-on-exit parking won't work on the seafront. So how about this. You park your car and go to a machine. Here you enter your reg number and get a ticket. This is displayed in the car. When you get back, you take the ticket to the machine, insert it, and pay the appropriate fee. If you park with no intention to pay, you won't be displaying a ticket and will be fined. If you drive off without paying, the machine will have your reg number and time of parking stored, so you will be fined...
...
But I have to support the parking rules and regs. If I park in pay and display without paying (yes I've done it), I know I'm running a risk. I've been ticketed and I didn't complain. Also, when I park in pay and display, I make sure I keep an eye on the time to get back before the ticket runs out. You can't complain that officers should let you off if you're five minutes late back. Everyone will then take advantage of that, soon it'll be 10 mins, then 15...
...
If you don't want the fine, don't park illegally. If you do, and you get a ticket, accept it.

See-the-real, Southend says...
12:08am Sat 31 Jul 10

I refuse to pay for parking.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Especially as I take the bus everywhere.

Last Poster, Basildon says...
2:37pm Sat 31 Jul 10

"Over the financial year this equates to about 31,000 tickets being given out, compared to about 22,000 across Basildon, Castle Point, Rochford, Southend and Thurrock."

Is it just me or is this a paradoxical staircase?

PJR, Basildon says...
10:41am Mon 2 Aug 10

How can Southend be included in the 22,000 tickets when the story reports that 31,000 have been handed out in the town, more than anywhere else? How can Southend be included in the anywhere else category, when it's here that we're talking about?

Comments are closed on this article.

Raymond and Doreen Bibby displayed their disabled badge upside down Raymond and Doreen Bibby displayed their disabled badge upside down

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »