Letters RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Realities of the fur trade

It is shocking to see how many shops in Leigh are selling fur. This is Anti-Fur Week and demonstrations have been taking place across the country.

The fur industry trades in the suffering and torture of defenceless animals.

These animals live a life of misery. They are kept in terrible conditions, suffer agonising deaths and are often skinned alive.

If people were to witness this kind of treatment of an animal, they would be horrified.

So why do some people still buy fur? I think it is simply that they are unaware of the horrors.

Major retailers like Top Shop, Next, M&S, House of Fraser and many more have all pledged to be fur free. Please say no to fur and all that fur represents.

Debbie Zarb-Cousin
Southend Animal Aid
The Broadway
Thorpe Bay

Comments(10)

emcee says...
1:44pm Thu 1 Dec 11

Quote: "These animals live a life of misery. They are kept in terrible conditions, suffer agonising deaths and are often skinned alive."
-
And your proof that any of these shops deal in fur from animals who suffer all this is? Most fur is, these days, humanely retrieved. Fur has been used for thousand of years as clothing but the only difference is that most of it is now farmed and under controlled conditions. OK, so there will always be a few dodgy traders but there is an any industry.
Anti-fur is so 1980s and even though, I dare say, some cruelty may still exist in the trade you cannot tar every fur retailer with the same "cruel trade" brush.

nota says...
11:18am Fri 2 Dec 11

Fur farms are banned in Uk because of the cruelty involved I think the internet videos of the fur trade show how cruel it is.

PaulStig says...
3:09pm Fri 2 Dec 11

Quote: "Anti-fur is so 80s..." - that's like saying anti-war is so 60s. There is no reason in today's society and with modern fabrics, to kill an animal simply for it's skin and to throw the carcass away. It's barbaric and any trader that deals in fur should be ashamed of themselves!

Carrie.C says...
4:05pm Fri 2 Dec 11

If everyone spent a few minutes doing some research on the internet about the horrific realities of the fur trade, instead of wasting that same amount of time making ignorant statements about a subject they obviously know nothing about, then the fur trade would end overnight (assuming of course that there are aren't sickos out there who get a kick out of being responsible for animal torture)! Thanks to brainless bimbos like Jordan who young girls unfortunately see as a role model, fur has made a big comeback and this is very worrying because I thought that at last people had woken up and realised that draping dead animals all over them did not make them look beautiful inside or out! The fur trade is barbaric as the animals are very often skinned alive and at the moment there is an influx of fur from China which is being used to line boots as it is cheaper than fake fur. Anyone who has any compassion for the suffering of living creatures should be very careful about buying fake fur and if it's so convincing that it looks real, give it a wide berth as it will give the impression that you approve of fur and give out the wrong message to ignorant people who are perhaps in two minds. We should all take responsibility for the defenceless animals who cannot defend or speak for themslves and to those people who still think that they are in some way superior to animals and therefore animal suffering is somehow justified, I sincerely hope that one day someone skins you alive and see how you like it!

emcee says...
4:52am Sat 3 Dec 11

PaulStig wrote:
Quote: "Anti-fur is so 80s..." - that's like saying anti-war is so 60s. There is no reason in today's society and with modern fabrics, to kill an animal simply for it's skin and to throw the carcass away. It's barbaric and any trader that deals in fur should be ashamed of themselves!
Erm, the act of war cannot be improved upon in the same way that the fur trade can and, indeed, has.
However, I agree that throwing the carcass away is a waste. I believe some could be used as a by-product for certain industries, farming or as feed.
Actually, a lot of fur is also a by-product anyway, such as from rabbits, kangaroo and other animals that need to be culled. These animal can be and, indeed are eaten too. The fur is also often used from animals killed because of their pest status in certain countries, such as grey squirrel, fox or possum.
Gone are the days when you can buy a coat made from endangered species or those not taken from culled or pest species are from humane farms. I doubt you will find many shops in the UK that sell fur of dubious origin. There may be the odd one but they will be few and far between.

Nebs says...
9:38am Sat 3 Dec 11

When is anti leather week?

nota says...
5:14pm Sat 3 Dec 11

How do you explain dogs and cats being bred for fur. Unfortunately firm trim on many products is from dogs and cats and I can assure you this is not humane.

emcee says...
12:47am Sun 4 Dec 11

nota wrote:
How do you explain dogs and cats being bred for fur. Unfortunately firm trim on many products is from dogs and cats and I can assure you this is not humane.
Maybe cats and dogs are bred for the fur trade. However, what makes these animals any different from any other animal bred for fur. If they humanely cared for and dispatched then I see no problem. If, however, a UK trader (such as those in Leigh as referred to by the OP) are trading fur from dubious sources then there is a legitimate case to answer. However, the whole fur trade should not be condemned for the actions of the odd dodgy fur trader.

nota says...
5:53pm Tue 6 Dec 11

Please tell me who the humane traders are I have never heard of any or seen any evidence of any. You seem to have a great knowledge and I would like to inform PETA and many other groups working to stop this cruel trade that you have found humane fur farming and the details of such farms.

pinkpiggywigs says...
8:31pm Tue 6 Dec 11

emcee.. i am shocked by your comment.. only naive people would believe there is a 'humane' way of slaughtering an animal for it's fur coat.. yes your right fur has had to have been used in the past for clothing to survive such as cavemen.. they definitely didn't kill an animal for it's fur for vanity purposes..furthermor
e they killed the animal themselves and ate the remains.. but the only difference now is that we have alternative synthetic materials.. so why are shops in Leigh still selling real fur? last time i checked the owners weren't Inuits.. the only reason i can think of is because they want to make maximum profit by buying in cheap clothing from China.. but is it worth making a few more pounds when it's at the expense of an animals life? in addition the reason why these fur items are 'made in china' is because the animals are killed so brutally on a mass scale.. which is the main reason why England stopped the fur trade in the first place.. because it's so INHUMANE ..(United Kingdom—Under the Fur Farming (Prohibition) Act of 2000, England and Wales banned fur farming completely. All fur farms in England and Wales had to be shut down by January 1, 2003. Northern Ireland and Scotland both banned fur farming shortly afterwards. There are now no fur farms anywhere in the U.K.) .. i'm sorry to break it to you 'emcee' but More than 50 million animals are violently killed for use in fashion every year.. and i'm sure this amount of fur is not produced by the 'few dodgy traders' in the fur industry.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree