- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@Essex_Echo
Follow us
- Find us on Facebook
Echo
Like us on Facebook
Property firm's bill for overcharging residents to top £100K (From Echo)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us »
Property firm's bill for overcharging Southend residents to top £100K
1:00pm Tuesday 11th December 2012 in Local News By David Trayner
Kerry Staab, who has been repaid £15,000 she paid for permission to extend her home
A PROPERTY firm’s final bill for overcharging householders for allowing improvements to their homes is expected to top £100,000.
The Echo can reveal Thorpe Estated Ltd has already repaid more than £71,000 charged to people living on the Burges Estate, which spans Thorpe Bay and parts of Shoebury.
Ron Woodley, chairman of the Burges Estate Residents’ Association (BERA), said: “It’s going to be well in excess of £100,000.
“When you consider the situation over the last 12 years, £71,000 is a nice sum – but it’s not all of it yet.
“As people realise these charges were inappropriate, more people will come forward; and we hope we address those as well.”
Mr Woodley and fellow independent Thorpe Ward councillor Mike Stafford met with a representative from Thorpe Estates last Tuesday to present more cases where residents have been overcharged for permission for adjustments like extensions, disabled access ramps or changes to windows.
The campaigners are still in talks with Nicky Gould, joint owner of the Regis Group, an international property giant that owns a 51 per cent stake of Thorpe Estates, over lifting a restrictive covenant that allows it to levy a “reasonable administration charge” from residents who want to change their homes.
He had expected to call a meeting of the association to announce a deal by now, but Mr Gould is rarely available in the UK to meet.
BERA also wants to keep an absolute covenant that prevents people from building a second home on their plot, install caravans or run certain businesses from their homes.
Mr Woodley said: “The integrity of the estate is important to all residents. That’s without question.
“People want to love here because it’s well kept and well maintained.
“There are covenants that we need to protect that.”
BBC show Inside Out picked up on the Echo’s coverage of the residents’ plight over the past few months and ran a report last week.
Mr Woodley said: “With the Echo picking up on the cases in the last few months, it enabled other channels of media to get involved and highlight this issue.”
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (6)
1:57pm Tue 11 Dec 12
geriatric says...
2:01pm Tue 11 Dec 12
andy:) says...
Whats puzzled me is why individuals didnt take action at Court/LVT ?. I beat my freeholder and his silly demands quite easily, I know thyere was mention of the residents building up a legal fighting fund, but anyone with a reasonable brain can challange their freeholder/managing agent.
Andy
3:23pm Tue 11 Dec 12
halojump says...
This was a big issue Andy for home owners who included several lawyers.If anyone had lost a case in court to regis then it would have stopped future claims in their tracks for anyone else with the same contract.
3:37pm Tue 11 Dec 12
echoforum says...
Congradulations to Ron.
These bandits are hard-core and it took a real campaigner to break them down.
Now lets get rid of this crappy, vague covenant that resides on our deeds that serves no purpose other than to fill the pockets of these blackmailers.
3:48pm Tue 11 Dec 12
echoforum says...
Mistake,I was clearly over excited with the gradual demise of Thorpe/Pier/Regis etc....
The programme is:
INSIDE OUT EAST...worth watching to see the bill that these thieves are charging one resident (£500,000)
2:31pm Thu 13 Dec 12
Ivanna Goodhump says...
The company that holds similar covenants in Chalkwell (Chalkwell Estates Ltd - I believe) has recently begun trying to levy increased charges in a similar fashion.
Apparently this change of stance has co-incided with control of the company moving to the Chidren of the original Directors.
If true they obviously have a lower moral threshold.