SOUTHEND United fans are concerned the latest uncertainties over the club’s finances have hit the performance of the team and could affect plans for a new stadium.

The club were in the High Court again this week, facing another winding up order over a disputed £200,000 unpaid tax bill.

The case was adjourned for 28 days and Blues chairman Ron Martin has accused Revenue and Customs of “making mischief”.

But fans say they are concerned and want the problem cleared up quickly.

Rob Craven, spokesman for supporters’ group the Shrimpers Trust, said: “It’s frustrating to have another four weeks with this situation hanging over the club. We thought it had been sorted out a few months ago, but it’s been dragging on.

“There have been performances on the pitch over the past month where you can see the situation is taking its toll on the players.

“We are monitoring events closely, as much as we can, to keep abreast of the situation, and we are hopeful the club can sort it out.

“Work on the new stadium was scheduled to have started some time ago, but it hasn’t, and it’s imperative to the club progressing.”

Lee Boyce, 22, of Oast Way, Rochford, said: “I want the club to just move into the new stadium and get on with it.

“This is hanging over the club like a bad smell which won’t go away. If we are struggling now, what will it be like with a massive stadium at Fossetts Farm to pay for?”

Mr Boyce also felt the club’s financial issues were having an effect on the team’s performances.

Blues are currently just above the relegation zone in League One, having only won one of their last eight matches. Mr Boyce said: “So far, the club haven’t been very consistent. It’s affecting the players and I’m worried we will get relegated.”

In a statement, chairman Mr Martin attacked Revenue and Customs, saying: “Customs is flaunting the rules to its own ends.”

“The players are professional and remain focused on winning games. They know what this club’s future holds, of which I have reassured them. After all, if there was a fundamental problem, I wouldn’t have paid the £2.15million.

“These issues are a matter of process. We have appealed against HMRC’s claims and it may be a matter for the Tribunals Service, which is an independent body.

“The term ‘habitual defaulter’ is a dramatic, inflammatory term used by HMRC barristers in an attempt to persuade the judge. I recognise HMRC has a job to do, which has been made harder by the recession.

“I just wish there could be a little more understanding – we do an enormous amount of good work which equally needs to be protected.”