Rayleigh / Rochford RSS Feed


Send us your news!


Stambridge Mill owners put in plan for new homes


PLANS have gone in for a huge housing development at a derelict mill site on the banks of the River Roach.

The proposals for 163 homes at Stambridge Mills, Mill Lane, near Rochford, have been put together by developers the Inner London Group.

The multi-million-pound development to build 28 houses and 135 flats involves demolishing some of the existing mill buildings and refurbishing others.

Inner London Group partner Larry Fentiman said: “This is a really well thought-out scheme.

“I think it will be well-liked when we present it.

“Two and a half years of design work has gone into it so it sits nicely in the setting there.

“It’s already been endorsed by Inspire East, a Government quango.

“We are also doing some flood defence work which all the local community in Stambridge will benefit from.

“This will be in keeping with what’s already there.

“A couple of millions of pounds will be spent on the flood defences alone.”

Mr Fentiman said issues of cost, the number of affordable homes and when work would begin were issues still being worked out.

He said the site had a lot of contamination, which would need to be cleared.

The plans were submitted to Rochford District Council last week but details are still to be validated by the planning department, which means they are not yet publically available.

The council’s planning committee will decide on whether to approve the plans.

This would involve changing the use of the land, which the council has currently earmarked for employment, to residential.

According to the council website, the three- and four-bedroom houses would be three to four storeys high while the flats would be a mix of one- and two-bedroom apartments.

The flats would be partly in the refurbished mills, with a new three-storey block and three five- and six-storey blocks built using the existing foundations.

The developer also wants to build private gardens, a communal open area, a children's play space and a sports pitch plus parking for 313 cars.


Comments(16)

emcee says...
12:33pm Wed 1 Sep 10

“It’s already been endorsed by Inspire East, a Government quango.
-
Says it all really.
-
Also "..the number of affordable homes ....still being worked out."
Affordable to whom? It really annoys me when they say this because most homes are affordable to somebody.
Most of these "affordable homes" still seem to come in the catagory where the only people who can afford them are those with income over £60,000 and young couples who are in the fortunate position to have parents who will pay the deposits.
In my book "affordable homes" should be affordable to the average, hard working, people who are not lucky enough to have high paid jobs and maybe work in retail or in a basic admin job. That is what affordable homes should mean. I mean, a basic one bed flat can cost over £100,000 these days and you need at least £30,000 a year income, and be able to save the deposit/costs on top, to secure even that.

Thames Gateway says...
2:43pm Wed 1 Sep 10

Why build a load of homes virtually directly on the flight paths from the airport, only about a mile away.

SafetySam says...
2:49pm Wed 1 Sep 10

Would it not be a good idea to demand that the 'Developers' have to
inform the council, at the time of application, the selling prices for each property?
That way the council could take the application for approval on that basis and if the developer then increases the cost of any of the properties the council could impose a huge 'Fine'.
This may prevent developers obtaining permission to build 'affordable' properties which actually are not!

BASILBRUSH says...
2:55pm Wed 1 Sep 10

Don't worry Thames Gateway. No one buys a house near an airport and then complains about it afterwards...... Do they ? ;)

SafetySam says...
2:58pm Wed 1 Sep 10

Inner London Group partner Larry Fentiman says 'This is a really well thought out scheme'.
He would wouln't he if he is a partner in the group.
Buildings up to Four Floors, On the flight path for the airport, a flood risk area - what a brilliant idea - NOT!

j-w says...
2:58pm Wed 1 Sep 10

Not unless they are the head/director of Saen!

Sensible Man says...
8:16pm Wed 1 Sep 10

Dear Mister "Inner London Group" Fentinan - have you npt noticed that Stambridge is not "Inner London". Stick with what you are - allegedly???? familiar with and stay in "Inner London".We do not want your crazy ideas here. Please just go away. The train to Stratford leaves soon. Plenty of room there after the Olympic Arena falls into disrepair and decay in 2012. Leave Essex alone!!!! Bye Bye!!!!

gangsta len says...
11:00pm Wed 1 Sep 10

what amazes me is how many places that should be preserved mysteriously catch fire 12 months before a lucrative planning deal is proposed. Very odd. The people of southend and rochford need to realise that money talks in this town and more and more of our history and green areas will be sold and built on and there really is very little anyone can do about it. If the council had any sense they would knock down all the derelict buildings in the town (vic ave!)and build on that before destroying the surrounding farms and green areas that are the only escape from this chav ridden hell hole! Look at what happened to the kursaal in the 80s built on, the historic buildings that stood where the royals now stands, york road market's suprise closure and flattening, many of the towns old cinemas and theatres, historic pubs, the priory park scheme that wasnt going to happen then suddenly is, vic circus trees disappearing. The lack of any effort to restore the pier. The concrete monstrosity that replaced the victorian gardens by the pier entrance etc etc etc. There is no interest in preserving any form of history in the town, that is clearly evident.

gangsta len says...
11:07pm Wed 1 Sep 10

Quote:

“This will be in keeping with what’s already there.

28 three- and four-bedroom houses would be three to four storeys high 135 flats
private gardens, a communal open area, a children's play space and a sports pitch plus parking for 313 cars strangely does not sound like it will be in keeping unless they are building it all underground. What a load of PR crap the fact that they have 200 new properties and the extra traffic that will create will destroy the whole feel of the area. Then there will be the usual moans that the traffics bad cause the roads cant cope, then more money spent on road widening and bypasses... etc etc.

SARFENDMAN says...
6:45am Thu 2 Sep 10

Access to this development is Stambridge Road. Now that will be a slight challenge for all the construction traffic and future home owners through the Medieval narrow streets of Rochford and then onto the over subscribed Ashingdon Road. Rochford's infrastucture will really be creaking when you add on the proposed 600 houses with the RDC backed development in Hall Road.

radioman says...
7:58am Thu 2 Sep 10

If I remember correctly, Stambridge is accessed by way of a narrow, stone-built bridge. If this is still the only route from South to North, the first heavy-goods vehicle will cut off Stambridge forever, thus solving the problem.

village of the damned says...
8:37am Thu 2 Sep 10

on the banks of the river roach :O won't they be at risk from flooding!

Thames Gateway says...
8:43am Thu 2 Sep 10

Risk of flooding? Of course not, they will have flooded Wallasea Island by then, and in so doing this, it is is going to protect us all from sea flooding! (well that's the theory anyway - I don't buy it myself).

j-w says...
9:03am Thu 2 Sep 10

If I remember correctly, Stambridge is accessed by way of a narrow, stone-built bridge.

you remember incorrectly!

what amazes me is how many places that should be preserved mysteriously catch fire
Why on earth should this monstrosity be preserved, it is not a quaint watermill or windmill, that said I dont agree that houses should be built there either.

reptile says...
11:07am Thu 2 Sep 10

The extra traffic though Rochford should just about finish the town off.

Jose El Mezclador says...
2:47pm Fri 3 Sep 10

Firstly forget victoria avenue - that is Southend Council and this development is planned for Rochford

Secondly, big risk of flooding

Thirdly, the view over to the industrial estate will put off many potential buyers

Fourthly, who wants the big jets that will surely arrive flying 100ft over their heads

Fifthly, the roads won't take the extra traffic (or will the next thing be to blast a new A road through to Rettenden?)


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses